Senate Bill
417
Senate Bill
429
Senate Bill
431
Senate Bill
472
Senate Bill
473
Senate Bill
480
Senate Bill
507
Senate Bill
513
Senate Bill
514
Senate Bill
517
Senate Bill
520
Senate Bill
523
Senate Bill
524
Senate Bill
527
Senate Bill
533
Senate Bill
541
Senate Bill
552
Senate Bill
572
Senate Bill
578
Senate Bill
581
Senate Bill
583
Senate Bill
585
Senate Bill
586
Senate Bill
587
Senate Bill
591
Senate Bill
598
Senate Bill
604
Senate Bill
605
Senate Bill
608
Senate Bill
618
Senate Bill
619
Senate Bill
622
Senate Bill
625
Senate Bill
630
Senate Bill
670
Senate Bill
672
Senate Bill
681
Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010.
__________________
The Chief Clerk records:
Senate Joint Resolution
61
Deposited in the office of the Secretary of State on 5-11-2010.
__________________
State of Wisconsin
Office of the Governor
May
11
, 2010
To the Honorable, the Senate:
The following bill(s), originating in the Senate, have been approved, signed and deposited in the office of the Secretary of State:
Bill Number Act Number
Date Approved
Senate Bill 96
Act 277
May 11
, 2010
Senate Bill 127
Act 278
May 11
, 2010
Senate Bill 323
Act 279
May 11
, 2010
Senate Bill 460
Act 280
May 11
, 2010
Senate Bill 609
Act 281
May 11
, 2010
Senate Bill 667
Act 282
May 11
, 2010
Senate Bill 684
Act 283
May 11
, 2010
Respectfully Submitted,
JIM DOYLE
Governor
State of Wisconsin
Office of the Secretary of State
May
11
, 2010
The Honorable, the Legislature:
Bill Number Act Number
Publication Date
Senate Bill 409Act
265
May 24
, 2010
Senate Bill 121Act
271
May 24
, 2010
Senate Bill 624Act
272
May 24
, 2010
Sincerely,
DOUGLAS LA FOLLETTE
Secretary of State
__________________
State of Wisconsin
Government Accountability Board
May 11, 2010
The Honorable, The Senate:
The following lobbyists have been authorized to act on behalf of the organizations set opposite their names.
For more detailed information about these lobbyists and organizations and a complete list of organizations and people authorized to lobby the 2009-2010 session of the legislature, visit the Government Accountability Board's web site at:
Brozek, Michael Appriss, Inc.
Schimming, Brian Appriss, Inc.
Also available from the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board are reports identifying the amount and value of time state agencies have spent to affect legislative action and reports of expenditures for lobbying activities filed by organizations that employ lobbyists.
Sincerely,
kevin kennedy
Director and General Counsel
__________________
State of Wisconsin
Legislative Audit Bureau
May 12, 2010
The Honorable, The Legislature:
We have completed an evaluation of public health programs and medical education and research initiatives established by the Medical College of Wisconsin and the University of Wisconsin (UW) School of Medicine and Public Health. The schools established these programs and initiatives with funding they received in trust when Blue Cross Blue Shield United of Wisconsin became a for-profit, publicly held stock insurance corporation. They requested our evaluation to fulfill requirements in a March 2000 order by the Commissioner of Insurance.
The Commissioner's order divided the funds equally and restricted their use to medical education and research and public health initiatives. From December 2003 through December 2007, a total of $630.4 million was transferred to permanent endowments managed separately by each school. Through December 31, 2008, the Medical College expended $32.1 million and the UW School of Medicine and Public Health expended $44.1 million on grants and administration.
Both schools have generally complied with the requirements they established for awarding and monitoring their funding, and we found that most grantees met the objectives described in their proposals. However, there were some exceptions, and we include recommendations for the schools to improve grant management and oversight. We also identified policy issues for their consideration, including possible changes to the conflict-of-interest policies for the committees that award some funds at each school and the need to continue careful monitoring of endowment balances. We also suggest the Commissioner of Insurance consider clarifying the definition of supplanting, the degree to which medical education and research funds may be allocated by the schools' Deans on a noncompetitive basis, and the extent to which the schools should directly expend public health funding rather than award it to community-based programs administered by other entities.
We appreciate the courtesy and cooperation extended to us by the schools and grantees as we conducted this evaluation. Results of our in-depth review of 40 individual projects funded by each school are summarized in a separate document (report 10-7). The schools' responses to our evaluation follow the appendices.