SB319: Bill Text

1. Information on the effect of a proposed rule on public utility ratepayers.

2. An analysis of alternatives to the proposed rule, including the alternative of not promulgating the rule.

3. A determination made in consultation with the businesses and individuals who may be affected by the proposed rule as to whether the proposed rule would adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, jobs, or the overall economic competitiveness of this state.

4. Comparisons with the approaches used by the federal government and by Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, and Minnesota to address the policy problem that the proposed rule is intending to address and, if the approach chosen by the agency to address that policy problem is different from those approaches, a statement as to why the agency chose a different approach.

5. An assessment of how effective the proposed rule will be in addressing the policy problem that the rule is intended to address.

Under prior law, an economic impact analysis was required to contain information on the effect of the proposed rule on specific businesses, business sectors, and the state's economy and to include all of the following: 1) an analysis and quantification of the problem, including any risks to public health or the environment, that the rule is intending to address; 2) an analysis and quantification of the economic impact of the rule, including costs reasonably expected to be incurred by the state, governmental units, associations, businesses, and affected individuals; and 3) an analysis of benefits of the rule, including how the rule reduces the risks and addresses the problems that the rule is intended to address.

This bill eliminates the changes made by 2011 Wisconsin Act 21 and restores prior law with respect to the information that must be included in an economic impact analysis for a proposed rule that was considered at the joint annual spring fish and wildlife rule hearing of the Department of Natural Resources and county meeting of the Wisconsin Conservation Congress.

For further information see the state fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.

The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:

SB319, s. 1 Section 1. 227.135 (2) of the statutes, as affected by 2011 Wisconsin Act 21, is amended to read:

SB319,5,3 227.135 (2) An Except as provided in sub. (2m), an agency that has prepared a statement of the scope of the proposed rule shall present the statement to the governor and to the individual or body with policy-making powers over the subject matter of the proposed rule for approval. The agency may not send the statement to the legislative reference bureau for publication under sub. (3) until the governor issues a written notice of approval of the statement. The individual or body with policy-making powers may not approve the statement until at least 10 days after publication of the statement under sub. (3). No state employee or official may perform any activity in connection with the drafting of a proposed rule to which this subsection applies except for an activity necessary to prepare the statement of the scope of the proposed rule until the governor and the individual or body with policy-making powers over the subject matter of the proposed rule approves the statement.

SB319, s. 2 Section 2. 227.135 (2m) of the statutes is created to read:

SB319,5,17 227.135 (2m) If the department of natural resources prepares a statement of the scope of a proposed rule that was considered at the joint annual spring fish and wildlife rule hearing of the department of natural resources and county meeting of the Wisconsin conservation congress, that department shall present the statement to the natural resources board for approval. The natural resources board may not approve the statement until at least 10 days after publication of the statement under sub. (3). If the natural resources board does not disapprove the statement within 30 days after the statement is presented to that board or by the 11th day after publication of the statement in the register, whichever is later, the statement is considered to be approved. No state employee or official may perform any activity in connection with the drafting of a proposed rule to which this subsection applies except for an activity necessary to prepare the statement of the scope of the proposed rule until the natural resources board approves the statement.

SB319, s. 3 Section 3. 227.135 (3) of the statutes, as affected by 2011 Wisconsin Act 21, is amended to read:

SB319,6,2 227.135 (3) If the governor approves a statement of the scope of a proposed rule under sub. (2), the agency shall send the statement to the legislative reference bureau for publication in the register. If the natural resources board approves a statement of the scope of a proposed rule under sub. (2m), the department of natural resources shall send the statement to the legislative reference bureau for publication in the register. On the same day that the agency sends the statement to the legislative reference bureau, the agency shall send a copy of the statement to the secretary of administration.

SB319, s. 4 Section 4. 227.135 (5) of the statutes is created to read:

SB319,6,6 227.135 (5) This section does not apply to emergency rules that were considered at the joint annual spring fish and wildlife rule hearing of the department of natural resources and county meeting of the Wisconsin conservation congress.

SB319, s. 5 Section 5. 227.137 (2) of the statutes, as affected by 2011 Wisconsin Act 21, is amended to read:

SB319,6,11 227.137 (2) An Except as provided in sub. (2m), an agency shall prepare an economic impact analysis for a proposed rule before submitting the proposed rule to the legislative council staff under s. 227.15.

SB319, s. 6 Section 6. 227.137 (2m) of the statutes is created to read:

SB319,7,4 227.137 (2m) After the department of natural resources publishes under s. 227.135 (3) a statement of the scope of a proposed rule that was considered at the joint annual spring fish and wildlife rule hearing of the department of natural resources and county meeting of the Wisconsin conservation congress, and before that department submits the proposed rule to the legislature for review under s. 227.19 (2), a municipality, an association that represents a farm, labor, business, or professional group, or 5 or more persons who would be directly and uniquely affected by the proposed rule may submit a petition to the department of administration asking the secretary of administration to direct the department of natural resources to prepare an economic impact analysis for the proposed rule. If the secretary of administration directs the department of natural resources to prepare the economic impact analysis, that department shall prepare the economic impact analysis before submitting the proposed rule to the legislature for review under s. 227.19 (2). The secretary of administration shall direct the department of natural resources to prepare an economic impact analysis for the proposed rule before submitting the proposed rule to the legislature for review under s. 227.19 (2) if the secretary determines that all of the following apply:

SB319,7,8 (a) The petition was submitted to the department of administration no later than 90 days after publication of the statement of the scope of the proposed rule under s. 227.135 (3) or no later than 10 days after publication of the notice for a public hearing under s. 227.17, whichever is later.

SB319,7,13 (b) The proposed rule would cost affected persons $20,000,000 or more during each of the first 5 years after the rule's implementation to comply with the rule or the proposed rule would adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or state, local, or tribal governments or communities.

SB319, s. 7 Section 7. 227.137 (3) (intro.) of the statutes, as affected by 2011 Wisconsin Act 21, is amended to read:

SB319,8,2 227.137 (3) (intro.) An economic impact analysis of a proposed rule prepared under sub. (2) shall contain information on the economic effect of the proposed rule on specific businesses, business sectors, public utility ratepayers, local governmental units, and the state's economy as a whole. When preparing the analysis, the agency shall solicit information and advice from businesses, associations representing businesses, local governmental units, and individuals that may be affected by the proposed rule. The agency shall prepare the economic impact analysis in coordination with local governmental units that may be affected by the proposed rule. The agency may request information that is reasonably necessary for the preparation of an economic impact analysis from other businesses, associations, local governmental units, and individuals and from other agencies. The economic impact analysis shall include all of the following:

SB319, s. 8 Section 8. 227.137 (3m) of the statutes is created to read:

SB319,8,13 227.137 (3m) An economic impact analysis of a proposed rule prepared under sub. (2m) shall contain information on the effect of the proposed rule on specific businesses, business sectors, and the state's economy. When preparing the analysis, the department of natural resources shall solicit information and advice from the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation and from businesses, associations, governmental units, and individuals that may be affected by the proposed rule. The department of natural resources may request information that is reasonably necessary for the preparation of the economic impact analysis from other state agencies and from businesses, associations, governmental units, and individuals. The economic impact analysis shall include all of the following:

SB319,8,15 (a) An analysis and quantification of the problem, including any risks to public health or the environment, that the proposed rule is intending to address.

SB319,8,18 (b) An analysis and quantification of the economic impact of the proposed rule, including the costs that are reasonably expected to be incurred by the state, businesses, governmental units, and affected individuals.

SB319,8,20 (c) An analysis of the benefits of the proposed rule, including how the rule reduces the risks and addresses the problems that the rule is intended to address.

SB319, s. 9 Section 9. 227.137 (4) of the statutes, as affected by 2011 Wisconsin Act 21, is amended to read:

SB319,9,10 227.137 (4) On the same day that the agency submits the an economic impact analysis prepared under sub. (2) to the legislative council staff under s. 227.15 (1), the agency shall also submit that analysis to the department of administration, to the governor, and to the chief clerks of each house of the legislature, who shall distribute the analysis to the presiding officers of their respective houses, to the chairpersons of the appropriate standing committees of their respective houses, as designated by those presiding officers, and to the cochairpersons of the joint committee for review of administrative rules. If a proposed rule is modified after the economic impact analysis is submitted under this subsection so that the economic impact of the proposed rule is significantly changed, the agency shall prepare a revised economic impact analysis for the proposed rule as modified. A revised economic impact analysis shall be prepared and submitted in the same manner as an original economic impact analysis is prepared and submitted.

SB319, s. 10 Section 10. 227.137 (4m) of the statutes is created to read:

SB319,9,14 227.137 (4m) The department of natural resources shall submit an economic impact analysis prepared under sub. (2m) to the legislative council staff, to the department of administration, and to the petitioner.

SB319, s. 11 Section 11. 227.137 (5) of the statutes is renumbered 227.137 (8).

SB319, s. 12 Section 12. 227.137 (6) (intro.) of the statutes, as affected by 2011 Wisconsin Act 21, is renumbered 227.137 (6) (a) (intro.) and amended to read:

SB319,9,25 227.137 (6) (a) (intro.) If an economic impact analysis regarding a proposed rule prepared under sub. (2) indicates that a total of $20,000,000 or more in implementation and compliance costs are reasonably expected to be incurred by or passed along to businesses, local governmental units, and individuals as a result of the proposed rule or if an economic impact analysis is prepared under sub. (2m) for a proposed rule that was considered at the joint annual spring fish and wildlife rule hearing of the department of natural resources and county meeting of the Wisconsin conservation congress, the department of administration shall review the proposed rule and issue a report. The agency may not submit a proposed rule to the legislature for review under s. 227.19 (2) until the agency receives a copy of the department's report and the approval of the secretary of administration. The report shall include all of the following findings:

SB319, s. 13 Section 13. 227.137 (6) (a) of the statutes, as affected by 2011 Wisconsin Act 21, is renumbered 227.137 (6) (a) 1.

SB319, s. 14 Section 14. 227.137 (6) (b) of the statutes, as affected by 2011 Wisconsin Act 21, is renumbered 227.137 (6) (a) 2.

SB319, s. 15 Section 15. 227.137 (6) (c) of the statutes, as affected by 2011 Wisconsin Act 21, is renumbered 227.137 (6) (a) 3.

SB319, s. 16 Section 16. 227.137 (6) (cm) of the statutes is created to read:

SB319,10,16 227.137 (6) (cm) No person is entitled to judicial review of any action taken by the department of administration under this subsection with respect to an economic impact analysis prepared under sub. (2m) for a proposed rule that was considered at the joint annual spring fish and wildlife rule hearing of the department of natural resources and county meeting of the Wisconsin conservation congress.

SB319, s. 17 Section 17. 227.137 (6) (d) of the statutes, as affected by 2011 Wisconsin Act 21, is renumbered 227.137 (6) (a) 4.

SB319, s. 18 Section 18. 227.137 (7) of the statutes, as affected by 2011 Wisconsin Act 21, is renumbered 227.137 (6) (bm) and amended to read:

SB319,11,2 227.137 (6) (bm) Before issuing a report under sub. (6) par. (a), the department of administration may return a proposed rule to the agency for further consideration and revision with a written explanation of why the proposed rule is being returned. If the agency head disagrees with the department's reasons for returning the proposed rule, the agency head shall so notify the department in writing. The secretary of administration shall approve the proposed rule when the agency has adequately addressed the issues raised during the department's review of the rule.

SB319, s. 19 Section 19. 227.14 (2) (a) 6. of the statutes, as affected by 2011 Wisconsin Act 21, is amended to read:

SB319,11,8 227.14 (2) (a) 6. Any analysis and supporting documentation that the agency used in support of the agency's determination of the rule's effect on small businesses under s. 227.114 or that was used when the agency prepared an economic impact analysis under s. 227.137 (3) (2) or (2m).

SB319, s. 20 Section 20. 227.17 (3) (em) of the statutes, as created by 2011 Wisconsin Act 21, is amended to read:

SB319,11,15 227.17 (3) (em) The economic impact analysis required under s. 227.137 (2), any revised economic impact analysis required under s. 227.137 (4), and any report prepared by the department of administration under s. 227.137 (6) for that analysis, or a summary of that analysis and report and a description of how a copy of the full analysis and report may be obtained from the agency at no charge.

SB319, s. 21 Section 21. 227.185 of the statutes, as created by 2011 Wisconsin Act 21, is amended to read:

SB319,12,2 227.185 Approval by governor. After Except as provided in this section, after a proposed rule is in final draft form, the agency shall submit the proposed rule to the governor for approval. The governor, in his or her discretion, may approve or reject the proposed rule. If the governor approves a proposed rule, the governor shall provide the agency with a written notice of that approval. No proposed rule may be submitted to the legislature for review under s. 227.19 (2) unless the governor has approved the proposed rule in writing. This section does not apply to a proposed rule that was considered at the joint annual spring fish and wildlife rule hearing of the department of natural resources and county meeting of the Wisconsin conservation congress.

SB319, s. 22 Section 22. 227.19 (3) (intro.) of the statutes, as affected by 2011 Wisconsin Act 21, is amended to read:

SB319,12,13 227.19 (3) Form of report. (intro.) The report required under sub. (2) shall be in writing and shall include the proposed rule in the form specified in s. 227.14 (1), the material specified in s. 227.14 (2), (3), and (4), a copy of any economic impact analysis prepared by the agency under s. 227.137 (2) or (2m), a copy of any revised economic impact analysis prepared by the agency under s. 227.137 (4), a copy of any report prepared by the department of administration under s. 227.137 (6), a copy of any energy impact report received from the public service commission under s. 227.117 (2), and a copy of any recommendations of the legislative council staff. The report shall also include all of the following:

SB319, s. 23 Section 23. 227.24 (1) (e) 1d. of the statutes, as affected by 2011 Wisconsin Act 32, is amended to read:

SB319,13,2 227.24 (1) (e) 1d. Prepare a statement of the scope of the proposed emergency rule as provided in s. 227.135 (1), obtain approval of the statement as provided in s. 227.135 (2) or (2m), and send the statement to the legislative reference bureau for publication in the register as provided in s. 227.135 (3). If the agency changes the scope of a proposed emergency rule as described in s. 227.135 (4), the agency shall prepare and obtain approval of a revised statement of the scope of the proposed emergency rule as provided in s. 227.135 (4). No state employee or official may perform any activity in connection with the drafting of a proposed emergency rule except for an activity necessary to prepare the statement of the scope of the proposed emergency rule until the governor and the individual or body with policy-making powers over the subject matter of the proposed emergency rule approves the statement.

SB319, s. 24 Section 24. 227.24 (1) (e) 1g. of the statutes, as affected by 2011 Wisconsin Act 32, is amended to read:

SB319,13,14 227.24 (1) (e) 1g. Submit Except as provided in this subdivision, submit the proposed emergency rule in final draft form to the governor for approval. The governor, in his or her discretion, may approve or reject the proposed emergency rule. If the governor approves a proposed emergency rule, the governor shall provide the agency with a written notice of that approval. An agency may not file an emergency rule with the legislative reference bureau as provided in s. 227.20 and an emergency rule may not be published until the governor approves the emergency rule in writing. This subdivision does not apply to a proposed emergency rule that was considered at the joint annual spring fish and wildlife rule hearing of the department of natural resources and county meeting of the Wisconsin conservation congress.

SB319, s. 25 Section 25. Initial applicability.

SB319,13,19 (1) Gubernatorial approval of rules. The treatment of sections 227.135 (2), (2m), (3), and (5), 227.185, and 227.24 (1) (e) 1d. and 1g. of the statutes first applies to a proposed rule whose statement of scope is published in the Wisconsin Administrative Register on the effective date of this subsection.

SB319,13,24 (2) Economic impact reports. The treatment of sections 227.137 (2), (2m), (3) (intro.), (3m), (4), (4m), (5), and (6) (intro.), (a), (b), (c), (cm), (d), and (7), 227.14 (2) (a) 6., 227.17 (3) (em), and 227.19 (3) (intro.) of the statutes first applies to a proposed administrative rule submitted to the legislature under section 227.19 (2) of the statutes on the effective date of this subsection.

SB319,13,25 (End)