The question was: Shall Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 447 be adopted? YES
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 447 be adopted? YES
The question was: Assembly Bill 447 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? YES
The question was: Shall Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 448 be adopted? YES
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 448 be adopted? YES
The question was: Assembly Bill 448 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? YES
The question was: Shall Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 171 be adopted? YES
The question was: Assembly Bill 171 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? YES
The question was: Shall Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 494 be adopted? YES
The question was: Assembly Bill 494 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? YES
The question was: Assembly Bill 558 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? YES
The question was: Assembly Bill 559 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? YES
The question was: Assembly Bill 560 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? YES
The question was: Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 561 be adopted? YES
The question was: Assembly Bill 561 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? YES
The question was: Assembly Bill 562 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? YES
The question was: Assembly Bill 563 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? YES
The question was: Senate Bill 463 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in? YES
The question was: Senate Bill 464 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in? YES
The question was: Senate Bill 465 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in? YES
The question was: Senate Bill 466 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in? YES
The question was: Senate Bill 467 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in? YES
The question was: Senate Bill 251 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in? YES
The question was: Senate bill 262 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in? YES
The question was: Senate Bill 475 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in? YES
Thank you in advance for your assistance with this request.
Sincerely,
Gary Hebl
State Representative
46th Assembly District
_____________
January 21, 2014
Patrick E. Fuller
Assembly Chief Clerk
17 West Main Street, Suite 401
Madison, WI 53703
Dear Chief Clerk Fuller:
hist17118Please add my name as a co-author of Assembly Bill 164, relating to local ordinances regarding possession of marijuana or a synthetic cannabinoid. hist17119Please add my name as a co-sponsor of Senate Bill 150, relating to local ordinances regarding possession of marijuana or a synthetic cannabinoid. Sincerely,
CORY MASON
State Representative
66th Assembly District
_____________
Calendar of Tuesday,
January 21
Relating to: purchases or transfers of rifles or shotguns in other states.
hist17185The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 368 be ordered engrossed and read a third time? Motion carried.
hist17186Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 368 be given a third reading. Granted. hist17187The question was: Assembly Bill 368 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives August, Ballweg, Barca, Barnes, Bernard Schaber, Bernier, Bewley, Bies, Billings, Born, Brooks, Clark, Craig, Czaja, Danou, Doyle, Endsley, Genrich, Goyke, Hebl, Hesselbein, Hintz, Hulsey, Hutton, Jacque, Jagler, Johnson, Jorgensen, Kahl, Kapenga, Kaufert, Kerkman, Kessler, Kestell, Kleefisch, Klenke, Knodl, Knudson, Kolste, Kooyenga, Kramer, Krug, Kuglitsch, Kulp, T. Larson, LeMahieu, Loudenbeck, Marklein, Mason, Murphy, Mursau, Murtha, Nass, Nerison, Neylon, Nygren, Ohnstad, A. Ott, J. Ott, Petersen, Petryk, Pope, Pridemore, Richards, Riemer, Ringhand, Ripp, Rodriguez, Sanfelippo, Sargent, Schraa, Severson, Shankland, Sinicki, Skowronski, Smith, Spiros, Steineke, Strachota, Stroebel, Swearingen, Tauchen, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Vruwink, Wachs, Weatherston, Weininger, Williams, Wright, Young, Zamarripa, Zepnick and Speaker Vos - 94.
Noes - Representatives Berceau, Pasch and C. Taylor - 3.
Absent or not voting - Representatives Milroy and Tranel - 2.
Motion carried.
hist17188Representative Vruwink asked unanimous consent to be added as a coauthor of Assembly Bill 368. Granted. hist17189Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 368 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted. Relating to: rule-making procedures and repealing various rules promulgated by the Department of Workforce Development.
hist17192The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 515 be ordered engrossed and read a third time? Motion carried.
hist17193Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 515 be given a third reading. Granted. hist17194The question was: Assembly Bill 515 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? Motion carried.
hist17195Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 515 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted. Relating to: rule-making procedures and modifying certain rules promulgated by the Department of Workforce Development for the administration of the laws governing traveling sales crews.
hist17197The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 516 be ordered engrossed and read a third time? Motion carried.
hist17198Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 516 be given a third reading. Granted. hist17199The question was: Assembly Bill 516 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? Motion carried.
hist17200Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 516 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted. Relating to: the definition and practice of dentistry for professional licensing purposes.
hist17202The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 552 be ordered engrossed and read a third time? Motion carried.
hist17203Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 552 be given a third reading. Granted. hist17204The question was: Assembly Bill 552 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? Motion carried.
hist17205Representatives Pope, Jorgensen, Hebl, Smith, Berceau, Sinicki, Clark, Pasch, Zamarripa, Ohnstad, Wright, Goyke, Kolste, Barnes, Hesselbein, Johnson and Shankland asked unanimous consent to be added as coauthors of Assembly Bill 552. Granted. hist17206Representative Kramer asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 552 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted. Representative Milroy asked unanimous consent that his leave of absence be lifted. Granted.
Representative Milroy asked unanimous consent to be recorded as voting “Aye” on Assembly Bill 368. Granted.
Relating to: standards for admission into a course offered by a school district of a pupil enrolled in a home-based private educational program.
