SB550: Bill Text

Hearings and procedures

Health care records in electronic format

Under current law, a physician, chiropractor, psychologist, podiatrist, dentist, physician assistant, advance practice nurse prescriber, hospital, or health service provider, upon request by an injured employee, employer, insurer, or DWD, must provide that person with any written material that is reasonably related to an injury for which the employee claims worker's compensation, upon payment of the actual cost of providing those materials, not to exceed the greater of 45 cents per page or $7.50 per request, plus the actual costs of postage.

This bill permits that material to be provided in electronic format upon payment of $26 per request.

Final practitioner's report

Under current law, if an injured employee has a period of temporary disability of more than three weeks or a permanent disability, has undergone surgery to treat an injury, other than surgery to correct a hernia, or sustains an eye injury requiring medical treatment on three or more occasions off the employer's premises, the employer or insurer must submit to DWD a final treating practitioner's report. Current law, however, prohibits DWD from requiring submission of that report when the employer or insurer denies the employee's claim for compensation and the employee does not contest that denial. This bill limits that prohibition to cases in which the employer or insurer denies the employee's claim for compensation in its entirety.

Prospective vocational rehabilitation training orders

Under current law, any party in interest may submit to DWD any controversy concerning worker's compensation and DWD, after hearing, must issue an order determining the rights of the parties regarding the controversy. Current law also permits DWD to issue interlocutory, i.e., nonfinal, findings, orders, and awards, which may be enforced in the same manner as final awards. Current law specifically permits DWD to include in an interlocutory or final award or order an order directing the employer or insurer to pay for any future treatment that may be necessary to cure and relieve an injured employee from the effects of the employee's injury.

This bill permits DWD to include in an interlocutory or final award or order an order directing the employer or insurer to pay for a future course of instruction or other rehabilitation training services provided under a rehabilitation training program.

Administrative review of a worker's compensation decision

Under current law, a party to a worker's compensation proceeding may petition the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) for review of a DWD hearing examiner's decision awarding or denying worker's compensation (petition for review) if DWD or LIRC receives the petition for review within 21 days after DWD mailed a copy of the examiner's findings and order to the petitioner's last-known address. Currently, LIRC must dismiss a petition for review that is not timely filed unless the petitioner shows probable good cause that the reason for failure to timely file the petition was beyond the petitioner's control. This bill requires a party to file a petition for review with LIRC, not DWD. The bill also requires LIRC to dismiss a petition for review that is not filed within those 21 days unless the petitioner shows that the petition was filed late for a reason that was beyond the petitioner's control.

Under current law, within 28 days after a decision of LIRC is mailed to the last-known address of each party to a worker's compensation proceeding, LIRC may, on its own motion, set aside the decision for further consideration. This bill permits LIRC to set aside a decision within 28 days after the date of the decision, not the date of its mailing.

Judicial review of a worker's compensation decision

Under current law, a party that is aggrieved by an order or award made by LIRC may commence an action against LIRC in circuit court for judicial review of the order or award (action for judicial review). Current law requires the adverse party to also be made a defendant in an action for judicial review. Recently, a concurring opinion in Xcel Energy Services, Inc. v. LIRC, 2013 WI 64, "unequivocally and firmly" recommended that the Council on Worker's Compensation propose legislative revisions to clarify who must be included as a party in an action for judicial review. Id. at p. 71. That concurring opinion further proposed that LIRC consider adopting the practice of providing information with its order or award instructing the parties as to who is to be named as an adverse party in an action for judicial review. Id. at p. 73.

This bill requires LIRC to identify in an order or award the persons that must be made parties to an action for judicial review. The bill also requires the summons and complaint in the action to name those persons as defendants. In addition, the bill permits the circuit court to join as a party to the action any other person determined necessary for the proper resolution of the action, unless joinder of the person would unduly delay the resolution of the action.

Program administration

Health service fee disputes

Under current law, if a health service provider, injured employee, insurer, or employer submits to DWD a dispute over the reasonableness of a health service fee charged by the health service provider for services provided to the injured employee, DWD must determine the reasonableness of the disputed fee by comparing the disputed fee to the mean fee for the procedure for which the disputed fee was charged, as shown by data from a database certified by DWD. If the disputed fee is at or below the mean fee, plus 1.2 standard deviations from that mean, DWD must determine that the disputed fee is reasonable and order the fee to be paid. If the disputed fee is above the mean fee, plus 1.2 standard deviations from that mean, DWD must determine that the disputed fee is unreasonable and order that a reasonable fee be paid, unless the health service provider proves that a higher fee is justified. This bill lowers the standard deviations used to determine the reasonableness of a disputed health service fee to 0.7 standard deviations from the mean.

Health service fee schedule

This bill requires DWD to establish a schedule of the maximum fees that a health care provider may charge an employer or insurer for health services provided to an injured employee who claims worker's compensation benefits. Under the bill, DWD must, when that schedule is established, notify the Legislative Reference Bureau (LRB), and the LRB must publish that notice in the Wisconsin Administrative Register. On publication of that notice, the health service fee dispute resolution process under current law no longer applies and instead the liability of an employer or insurer for a health service included in the fee schedule is limited to the maximum fee allowed under the schedule for that health service as of the date on which the health service was provided, any fee agreed to by the contract between the employer or insurer and health care provider for the health service as of that date, or the health care provider's actual fee for the health service as of that date, whichever is less.

The bill requires DWD, in determining those maximum fees, to divide the state into five regions based on geographical and economical similarity, including similarity in the cost of health services, and, for each region, to: 1) determine the average payment made by insured and self-insured group health plans, and the average copayment, coinsurance, and deductible payment made by persons covered under those plans, for each health service included in the schedule; and 2) set the maximum fee for each health service included in the schedule at 110 percent of the sum of that average payment and that average copayment, coinsurance, and deductible payment.

The bill also requires DWD to adjust those maximum fees annually by the change in the consumer price index for medical care services and, no less often than every two years, to redetermine the average payment made by group health plans for the services included in the schedule and revise those maximum fees based on that redetermined average.

Investigation and prosecution of fraudulent activity

Under current law, if an insurer or self-insured employer has evidence that a worker's compensation claim is false or fraudulent and if the insurer or self-insurer is satisfied that reporting the claim will not impede its ability to defend the claim, the insurer or self-insured employer must report the claim to DWD. DWD may then require the insurer or self-insured employer to investigate the claim and report the results of the investigation to DWD. If, based on the investigation, DWD has a reasonable basis to believe that criminal insurance fraud has occurred, DWD must refer the matter to the district attorney for prosecution.

This bill permits DWD to request the Department of Justice (DOJ) to assist DWD in an investigation of a false or fraudulent worker's compensation claim of any other suspected fraudulent activity on the part of an employer, employee, insurer, health care provider, or other person related to worker's compensation. If, based on the investigation, DWD has a reasonable basis to believe that theft, forgery, fraud, or any other criminal violation has occurred, DWD must refer the matter to the district attorney or DOJ for prosecution.

Uninsured employers fund

Under current law, if an employee of an uninsured employer suffers an injury for which the uninsured employer is liable, DWD, from the uninsured employers fund, or, if DWD obtains excess or stop-loss reinsurance from a reinsurer, the reinsurer pays benefits to the injured employee that are equal to the worker's compensation owed by the uninsured employer.

This bill requires DWD to pay a claim of an employee of an uninsured employer in excess of $1,000,000 from the uninsured employers fund in the first instance, but provides that if the claim is not covered by excess or stop-loss reinsurance, the secretary of administration annually must transfer from the worker's compensation operations fund to the uninsured employers fund an amount equal to the amount by which payments from the uninsured employers fund on all such claims in the prior year are in excess of $1,000,000 per claim, subject to a $500,000 annual limit on the amount that the secretary of administration may transfer. If the amount to be transferred exceeds that $500,000 annual limit, the secretary of administration must transfer the amount in excess of $500,000 in the next calendar year or in subsequent calendar years until the amount in excess of $500,000 is transferred in full.

Self-insured employers

Election by governmental employer to self-insure. Under current law, every employer that is subject to the worker's compensation law must carry worker's compensation insurance from an insurer that is authorized to do business in this state (duty to insure), except that DWD may exempt an employer from the duty to insure if the employer shows that it can self-insure its worker's compensation liability and if the employer agrees to report all compensable injuries and to comply with the worker's compensation law and the rules of DWD. DWD rules, however, permit the state or a local governmental unit to self-insure without further order of DWD.

This bill codifies those DWD rules into the statutes. Specifically, the bill permits the state or a local governmental unit that has independent taxing authority (governmental employer) to elect to self-insure its worker's compensation liability without further order of DWD if the governmental employer agrees to report all compensable injuries and to comply with the worker's compensation law and the rules of DWD. Under the bill, a local governmental unit that elects to self-insure its liability for the payment of worker's compensation must notify DWD of that election in writing before commencing to self-insure that liability, must notify DWD of its intent to continue to self-insure that liability every three years after that initial notice, and must notify DWD of its intent to withdraw that election not less than 30 days before the effective date of that withdrawal.

Revocation of governmental employer election to self-insure. Current law permits DWD, after seeking the advice of the Self-Insurer's Council, to revoke an exemption from the duty to insure if DWD finds that the employer's financial condition is inadequate to pay its employees' claims for compensation, that the employer has received an excessive number of claims for compensation, or that the employer has failed to discharge faithfully its obligations according to the agreement contained in the application for exemption.

This bill permits DWD to revoke an election by a governmental employer to self-insure its liability for worker's compensation, without seeking the advice of the Self-Insurer's Council, if DWD finds that the governmental employer's financial condition is inadequate to pay its employees' claims for compensation, that the governmental employer has received an excessive number of claims for compensation, or that the governmental employer has failed to discharge faithfully its obligations under the worker's compensation law and the rules of DWD. Under the bill, once such an election is revoked, the governmental employer whose election is revoked may not elect to self-insure its liability for the payment of worker's compensation unless at least three calendar years have elapsed since the revocation and DWD finds that the governmental employer's financial condition is adequate to pay its employees' claims for compensation, that the governmental employer has not received an excessive number of claims for compensation, and that the governmental employer has faithfully discharged its obligations under the worker's compensation law and the rules of DWD.

Self-insured employer assessments. Current law establishes a self-insured employers liability fund, consisting of assessments paid into the fund by self-insured employers, that is used to pay the worker's compensation liability of current or former self-insured employers that cannot pay that liability. Under current law, on issuance of an order exempting an employer from the duty to insure, the exempt employer must pay into the fund an amount that is equal to the amount assessed upon each other exempt employer (initial assessment). Subsequent assessments, however, are prorated on the basis of the gross payroll for this state of the exempt employer, as reported to DWD for the previous calendar year for purposes of unemployment insurance.

This bill requires an initial assessment, as well as subsequent assessments, for the self-insurer's fund to be prorated on the basis of the gross payroll for this state of the exempt employer, as reported to DWD for the previous calendar year for purposes of unemployment insurance.

The bill also removes governmental employers from the coverage of the self-insurer's fund. Specifically, the bill prohibits DWD from: 1) requiring a governmental employer that elects to self-insure its liability for the payment of worker's compensation to pay into the self-insurer's fund; and 2) making payments from that fund for the liability under the worker's compensation law of such an employer, whether currently or formerly exempt from the duty to insure.

Study of treatment outcomes

Finally, the bill requires the secretary of workforce development to create a committee to review and evaluate the outcomes of treatment provided to injured employees by health care providers under the worker's compensation program. The committee must include representatives of employers, employees, health care providers, worker's compensation insurers authorized to do business in this state, and DWD. Upon completion of the study, the committee must report its findings, conclusions, and recommendations to DWD and the Council on Worker's Compensation, after which the committee ceases to exist.

For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.

The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:

SB550,1 Section 1. 20.445 (1) (ra) of the statutes, as affected by 2013 Wisconsin Act 20, is amended to read:

SB550,12,6 20.445 (1) (ra) Worker's compensation operations fund; administration. From the worker's compensation operations fund, the amounts in the schedule for the administration of the worker's compensation program by the department , for assistance to the department of justice in investigating and prosecuting fraudulent activity related to worker's compensation, for transfer to the uninsured employers fund under s. 102.81 (1) (c), and for transfer to the appropriation accounts under par. (rp) and sub. (2) (ra). All moneys received under ss. 102.28 (2) (b) and 102.75 shall be credited to this appropriation account. From this appropriation, an amount not to exceed $5,000 may be expended each fiscal year for payment of expenses for travel and research by the council on worker's compensation, an amount not to exceed $500,000 may be transferred in each fiscal year to the uninsured employers fund under s. 102.81 (1) (c), the amount in the schedule under par. (rp) shall be transferred to the appropriation account under par. (rp), and the amount in the schedule under sub. (2) (ra) shall be transferred to the appropriation account under sub. (2) (ra).

SB550,2 Section 2. 101.654 (2) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB550,12,12 101.654 (2) (b) If the applicant is required under s. 102.28 (2) (a) to have in force a policy of worker's compensation insurance or if the applicant is self-insured in accordance with s. 102.28 (2) (b) or (bm), that the applicant has in force a policy of worker's compensation insurance issued by an insurer authorized to do business in this state or is self-insured in accordance with s. 102.28 (2) (b) or (bm).

SB550,3 Section 3. 102.01 (2) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB550,12,19 102.01 (2) (d) "Municipality" includes a county, city, town, village, school district, sewer district, drainage district and long-term care district and "Local governmental unit" means a political subdivision of this state; a special purpose district or taxing jurisdiction, as defined in s. 70.114 (1) (f), in this state; an instrumentality, corporation, combination, or subunit of any of the foregoing; or any other public or quasi-public corporations corporation.

SB550,4 Section 4. 102.03 (4) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB550,13,2 102.03 (4) The right to compensation and the amount of the compensation shall in all cases be determined in accordance with the provisions of law in effect as of the date of the injury except as to employees whose rate of compensation is changed as provided in ss. 102.43 (7) or 102.44 (1), (1m), (4m), or (5) or, before May 1, 2014 2016, as provided in s. 102.43 (5) (c) and employees who are eligible to receive private rehabilitative counseling and rehabilitative training under s. 102.61 (1m) and except as provided in s. 102.555 (12) (b).

SB550,5 Section 5. 102.04 (1) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB550,13,6 102.04 (1) (a) The state, and each county, city, town, village, school district, sewer district, drainage district, long-term care district and other public or quasi-public corporations therein local governmental unit in this state.

SB550,6 Section 6. 102.04 (2m) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB550,13,16 102.04 (2m) A temporary help agency is the employer of an employee whom the temporary help agency has placed with or leased to another employer that compensates the temporary help agency for the employee's services. A temporary help agency is liable under s. 102.03 for all compensation and other payments payable under this chapter to or with respect to that employee, including any payments required under s. 102.16 (3), 102.18 (1) (b) 3. or (bp), 102.22 (1), 102.35 (3), 102.57, or 102.60. Except as permitted under s. 102.29, a temporary help agency may not seek or receive reimbursement from another employer for any payments made as a result of that liability.

SB550,7 Section 7. 102.07 (1) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB550,14,4 102.07 (1) (a) Every person, including all officials, in the service of the state, or of any municipality therein local governmental unit in this state, whether elected or under any appointment, or contract of hire, express or implied, and whether a resident of the state or employed or injured within or without the state. The state and or any municipality local governmental unit may require a bond from a contractor to protect the state or municipality local governmental unit against compensation to employees of such the contractor or to employees of a subcontractor under the contractor. This paragraph does not apply beginning on the first day of the first July beginning after the day that the secretary files the certificate under s. 102.80 (3) (a), except that if the secretary files the certificate under s. 102.80 (3) (ag) this paragraph does apply to claims for compensation filed on or after the date specified in that certificate.

SB550,8 Section 8. 102.07 (1) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB550,14,13 102.07 (1) (b) Every person, including all officials, in the service of the state, or of any municipality therein local governmental unit in this state, whether elected or under any appointment, or contract of hire, express or implied, and whether a resident of the state or employed or injured within or without the state. This paragraph first applies on the first day of the first July beginning after the day that the secretary files the certificate under s. 102.80 (3) (a), except that if the secretary files the certificate under s. 102.80 (3) (ag) this paragraph does apply to claims for compensation filed on or after the date specified in that certificate.

SB550,9 Section 9. 102.07 (3) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB550,14,21 102.07 (3) Nothing herein contained shall prevent municipalities in this chapter prevents a local governmental unit from paying teachers, police officers, fire fighters and other employees a teacher, police officer, fire fighter, or any other employee his or her full salaries salary during a period of disability, nor interfere interferes with any pension funds fund, nor prevent prevents payment to teachers, police officers or fire fighters therefrom a teacher, police officer, fire fighter, or any other employee from a pension fund.

SB550,10 Section 10. 102.07 (7) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB550,15,7 102.07 (7) (a) Every member of a volunteer fire company or fire department organized under ch. 213, a legally organized rescue squad, or a legally organized diving team is considered to be an employee of that company, department, squad, or team. Every member of a company, department, squad, or team described in this paragraph, while serving as an auxiliary police officer at an emergency, is also considered to be an employee of that company, department, squad, or team. If a company, department, squad, or team described in this paragraph has not insured its liability for compensation to its employees, the municipality or county political subdivision within which that company, department, squad, or team was organized shall be liable for that compensation.

SB550,11 Section 11. 102.07 (10) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB550,15,19 102.07 (10) Further to effectuate the policy of the state that the benefits of this chapter shall extend and be granted to employees in the service of the state, or of any municipality therein local governmental unit in this state, on the same basis, in the same manner, under the same conditions, and with like right of recovery as in the case of employees of persons, firms, or private corporations, any question whether any person is an employee under this chapter shall be governed by and determined under the same standards, considerations, and rules of decision in all cases under subs. (1) to (9). Any statutes, ordinances, or administrative regulations which statute, ordinance, or rule that may be otherwise applicable to the classes of employees enumerated in sub. (1) shall not be controlling in deciding whether any person is an employee for the purposes of this chapter.

SB550,12 Section 12. 102.07 (12m) of the statutes is renumbered 102.07 (12m) (b) and amended to read:

SB550,16,5 102.07 (12m) (b) A student of a public school, as described in s. 115.01 (1), or a private school, as defined in s. 115.001 (3r), or an institution of higher education, while he or she is engaged in performing services as part of a school work training, work experience, or work study program, and who is not on the payroll of an employer that is providing the work training or work experience or who is not otherwise receiving compensation on which a worker's compensation carrier could assess premiums on that employer, is an employee of a school district or, private school, or institution of higher education that elects under s. 102.077 to name the student as its employee.

SB550,13 Section 13. 102.07 (12m) (a) of the statutes is created to read:

SB550,16,7 102.07 (12m) (a) In this subsection:

SB550,16,12 1. "Institution of higher education" means an institution within the University of Wisconsin System, a technical college, a tribally controlled college controlled by an Indian tribe that has elected under s. 102.05 (2) to become subject to this chapter, a school approved under s. 38.50, or a private, nonprofit institution of higher education located in this state.

SB550,16,13 2. "Private school" has the meaning given in s. 115.001 (3r).

SB550,16,14 3. "Public school" means a school described in s. 115.01 (1).

SB550,14 Section 14. 102.077 (1) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB550,17,2 102.077 (1) A school district or a , private school, as defined in s. 115.001 (3r), or institution of higher education may elect to name as its employee for purposes of this chapter a student described in s. 102.07 (12m) (b) by an endorsement on its policy of worker's compensation insurance or, if the school district or, private school, or institution of higher education is exempt from the duty to insure under s. 102.28 (2) (a), by filing a declaration with the department in the manner provided in s. 102.31 (2) (a) naming the student as an employee of the school district or, private school, or institution of higher education for purposes of this chapter. A declaration under this subsection shall list the name of the student to be covered under this chapter, the name and address of the employer that is providing the work training or work experience for that student, and the title, if any, of the work training, work experience, or work study program in which the student is participating.

SB550,15 Section 15. 102.077 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB550,17,9 102.077 (2) A school district or, private school, or institution of higher education may revoke a declaration under sub. (1) by providing written notice to the department in the manner provided in s. 102.31 (2) (a), the student , and the employer who is providing the work training or work experience for that student. A revocation under this subsection is effective 30 days after the department receives notice of that revocation.

SB550,16 Section 16. 102.11 (1) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB550,18,2 102.11 (1) (intro.) The average weekly earnings for temporary disability, permanent total disability, or death benefits for injury in each calendar year on or after January 1, 1982, shall be not less than $30 nor more than the wage rate that results in a maximum compensation rate of 110 percent of the state's average weekly earnings as determined under s. 108.05 as of June 30 of the previous year. The average weekly earnings for permanent partial disability shall be not less than $30 and, for permanent partial disability for injuries occurring on or after April 17, 2012, and before January 1, 2013, not more than $468, resulting in a maximum compensation rate of $312, and, for permanent partial disability for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2013, not more than $483, resulting in a maximum compensation rate of $322, except as provided in 2011 Wisconsin Act 183, section 30 (2) (a) 1 the effective date of this subsection .... [LRB inserts date], and before January 1, 2015, not more than $506, resulting in a maximum compensation rate of $337, and, for permanent partial disability for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2015, not more than $528, resulting in a maximum compensation rate of $352. Between such limits the average weekly earnings shall be determined as follows:

SB550,17 Section 17. 102.125 (title) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB550,18,5 102.125 (title) Fraudulent claims Fraud reporting and, investigation, and prosecution.

SB550,18 Section 18. 102.125 of the statutes is renumbered 102.125 (1) and amended to read:

SB550,18,17 102.125 (1) Fraudulent claims reporting and investigation. If an insurer or self-insured employer has evidence that a claim is false or fraudulent in violation of s. 943.395 and if the insurer or self-insured employer is satisfied that reporting the claim to the department will not impede its ability to defend the claim, the insurer or self-insured employer shall report the claim to the department. The department may require an insurer or self-insured employer to investigate an allegedly false or fraudulent claim and may provide the insurer or self-insured employer with any records of the department relating to that claim. An insurer or self-insured employer that investigates a claim under this section subsection shall report on the results of that investigation to the department.

SB550,18,23 (3) Prosecution. If based on the an investigation under sub. (1) or (2) the department has a reasonable basis to believe that a violation of s. 943.20, 943.38, 943.39, 943.392, 943.395, 943.40, or any other criminal law has occurred, the department shall refer the results of the investigation to the department of justice or to the district attorney of the county in which the alleged violation occurred for prosecution.

SB550,19 Section 19. 102.125 (2) of the statutes is created to read:

SB550,19,5 102.125 (2) Assistance by department of justice. The department of workforce development may request the department of justice to assist the department of workforce development in an investigation under sub. (1) or in the investigation of any other suspected fraudulent activity on the part of an employer, employee, insurer, health care provider, or other person related to worker's compensation.

SB550,20 Section 20. 102.13 (2) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB550,19,17 102.13 (2) (b) A physician, chiropractor, podiatrist, psychologist, dentist, physician assistant, advanced practice nurse prescriber, hospital, or health service provider shall furnish a legible, certified duplicate of the written material requested under par. (a) in paper format upon payment of the actual costs of preparing the certified duplicate, not to exceed the greater of 45 cents per page or $7.50 per request, plus the actual costs of postage, or shall furnish a legible, certified duplicate of that material in electronic format upon payment of $26 per request. Any person who refuses to provide certified duplicates of written material in the person's custody that is requested under par. (a) shall be liable for reasonable and necessary costs and, notwithstanding s. 814.04 (1), reasonable attorney fees incurred in enforcing the requester's right to the duplicates under par. (a).

SB550,21 Section 21. 102.13 (2) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB550,20,9 102.13 (2) (c) Except as provided in this paragraph, if an injured employee has a period of temporary disability that exceeds 3 weeks or a permanent disability, if the injured employee has undergone surgery to treat his or her injury, other than surgery to correct a hernia, or if the injured employee sustained an eye injury requiring medical treatment on 3 or more occasions off the employer's premises, the department may by rule require the insurer or self-insured employer to submit to the department a final report of the employee's treating practitioner. The department may not require an insurer or self-insured employer to submit to the department a final report of an employee's treating practitioner when the insurer or self-insured employer denies the employee's claim for compensation in its entirety and the employee does not contest that denial. A treating practitioner may charge a reasonable fee for the completion of the final report, but may not require prepayment of that fee. An Subject to s. 102.16 (2) (i), an insurer or self-insured employer that disputes the reasonableness of a fee charged for the completion of a treatment practitioner's final report may submit that dispute to the department for resolution under s. 102.16 (2).

SB550,22 Section 22. 102.16 (1m) (a) of the statutes is amended to read: