SB21: Bill Text

SB21,2754 Section 2754. 102.11 (1) (am) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1085,19 102.11 (1) (am) 1. The employee is a member of a class of employees that does the same type of work at the same location and, in the case of an employee in the service of the state, is employed in the same office, department, independent agency, authority, institution, association, society, or other body in state government or, if the department office determines appropriate, in the same subunit of an office, department, independent agency, authority, institution, association, society, or other body in state government.

SB21,2755 Section 2755. 102.12 of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1086,15 102.12 Notice of injury, exception, laches. No claim for compensation may be maintained unless, within 30 days after the occurrence of the injury or within 30 days after the employee knew or ought to have known the nature of his or her disability and its relation to the employment, actual notice was received by the employer or by an officer, manager, or designated representative of an employer. If no representative has been designated by posters placed in one or more conspicuous places where notices to employees are customarily posted, then notice received by any superior is sufficient. Absence of notice does not bar recovery if it is found that the employer was not misled thereby by that absence. Regardless of whether notice was received, if no payment of compensation, other than medical treatment or burial expense, is made, and and if no application is filed with the department office within 2 years from after the date of the injury or death, or from or the date the employee or his or her dependent knew or ought to have known the nature of the disability and its relation to the employment, the right to compensation therefor for the injury or death is barred, except that the right to compensation is not barred if the employer knew or should have known, within the 2-year period, that the employee had sustained the injury on which the claim is based. Issuance of notice of a hearing on the department's division's own motion has the same effect for the purposes of this section as the filing of an application. This section does not affect any claim barred under s. 102.17 (4).

SB21,2756 Section 2756. 102.125 of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1087,5 102.125 Fraudulent claims reporting and investigation. If an insurer or self-insured employer has evidence that a claim is false or fraudulent in violation of s. 943.395 and if the insurer or self-insured employer is satisfied that reporting the claim to the department office will not impede its ability to defend the claim, the insurer or self-insured employer shall report the claim to the department office. The department office may require an insurer or self-insured employer to investigate an allegedly false or fraudulent claim and may provide the insurer or self-insured employer with any records of the department office relating to that claim. An insurer or self-insured employer that investigates a claim under this section shall report on the results of that investigation to the department office. If based on the investigation the department office has a reasonable basis to believe that a violation of s. 943.395 has occurred, the department office shall refer the results of the investigation to the district attorney of the county in which the alleged violation occurred for prosecution.

SB21,2757 Section 2757. 102.13 (1) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1087,14 102.13 (1) (c) So long as the employee, after a written request of the employer or insurer which that complies with par. (b), refuses to submit to or in any way obstructs the examination, the employee's right to begin or maintain any proceeding for the collection of compensation is suspended, except as provided in sub. (4). If the employee refuses to submit to the examination after direction by the department division or an examiner, or in any way obstructs the examination, the employee's right to the weekly indemnity which that accrues and becomes payable during the period of that refusal or obstruction, is barred, except as provided in sub. (4).

SB21,2758 Section 2758. 102.13 (1) (d) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1087,20 102.13 (1) (d) 2. Any physician, chiropractor, psychologist, dentist, physician assistant, advanced practice nurse prescriber, or podiatrist who attended a worker's compensation claimant for any condition or complaint reasonably related to the condition for which the claimant claims compensation may be required to testify before the department division when the department division so directs.

SB21,2759 Section 2759. 102.13 (1) (d) 3. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1088,3 102.13 (1) (d) 3. Notwithstanding any statutory provisions except par. (e), any physician, chiropractor, psychologist, dentist, physician assistant, advanced practice nurse prescriber, or podiatrist attending a worker's compensation claimant for any condition or complaint reasonably related to the condition for which the claimant claims compensation may furnish to the employee, employer, worker's compensation insurer, or the department the office, or the division information and reports relative to a compensation claim.

SB21,2760 Section 2760. 102.13 (1) (f) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1088,7 102.13 (1) (f) If an employee claims compensation under s. 102.81 (1), the department office may require the employee to submit to physical or vocational examinations under this subsection.

SB21,2761 Section 2761. 102.13 (2) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1088,19 102.13 (2) (a) An employee who reports an injury alleged to be work-related or who files an application for hearing waives any physician-patient, psychologist-patient or chiropractor-patient privilege with respect to any condition or complaint reasonably related to the condition for which the employee claims compensation. Notwithstanding ss. 51.30 and 146.82 and any other law, any physician, chiropractor, psychologist, dentist, podiatrist, physician assistant, advanced practice nurse prescriber, hospital, or health care provider shall, within a reasonable time after written request by the employee, employer, worker's compensation insurer, or department office, or division, or its representative, provide that person with any information or written material reasonably related to any injury for which the employee claims compensation.

SB21,2762 Section 2762. 102.13 (2) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1089,10 102.13 (2) (c) Except as provided in this paragraph, if an injured employee has a period of temporary disability that exceeds 3 weeks or a permanent disability, if the injured employee has undergone surgery to treat his or her injury, other than surgery to correct a hernia, or if the injured employee sustained an eye injury requiring medical treatment on 3 or more occasions off the employer's premises, the department office may by rule require the insurer or self-insured employer to submit to the department office a final report of the employee's treating practitioner. The department office may not require an insurer or self-insured employer to submit to the department office a final report of an employee's treating practitioner when the insurer or self-insured employer denies the employee's claim for compensation and the employee does not contest that denial. A treating practitioner may charge a reasonable fee for the completion of the final report, but may not require prepayment of that fee. An insurer or self-insured employer that disputes the reasonableness of a fee charged for the completion of a treatment practitioner's final report may submit that dispute to the department office for resolution under s. 102.16 (2).

SB21,2763 Section 2763. 102.13 (3) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1089,24 102.13 (3) If 2 or more physicians, chiropractors, psychologists, dentists or podiatrists disagree as to the extent of an injured employee's temporary disability, the end of an employee's healing period, an employee's ability to return to work at suitable available employment, or the necessity for further treatment or for a particular type of treatment, the department division may appoint another physician, chiropractor, psychologist, dentist or podiatrist to examine the employee and render an opinion as soon as possible. The department division shall promptly notify the parties of this appointment. If the employee has not returned to work, payment for temporary disability shall continue until the department division receives the opinion. The employer or its insurance carrier or both shall pay for the examination and opinion. The employer or insurance carrier or both shall receive appropriate credit for any overpayment to the employee determined by the department division after receipt of the opinion.

SB21,2764 Section 2764. 102.13 (4) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1090,15 102.13 (4) The rights of employees right of an employee to begin or maintain proceedings for the collection of compensation and to receive weekly indemnities which that accrue and become payable shall not be suspended or barred under sub. (1) when an the employee refuses to submit to a physical examination, upon the request of the employer or worker's compensation insurer or at the direction of the department division or an examiner, which that would require the employee to travel a distance of 100 miles or more from his or her place of residence, unless the employee has claimed compensation for treatment from a practitioner whose office is located 100 miles or more from the employee's place of residence or the department division or examiner determines that any other circumstances warrant the examination. If the employee has claimed compensation for treatment from a practitioner whose office is located 100 miles or more from the employee's place of residence, the employer or insurer may request, or the department division or an examiner may direct, the employee to submit to a physical examination in the area where the employee's treatment practitioner is located.

SB21,2765 Section 2765. 102.13 (5) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1090,25 102.13 (5) The department division may refuse to receive testimony as to conditions determined from an autopsy if it appears that the party offering the testimony had procured the autopsy and had failed to make reasonable effort to notify at least one party in adverse interest or the department division at least 12 hours before the autopsy of the time and place it at which the autopsy would be performed, or that the autopsy was performed by or at the direction of the coroner or medical examiner or at the direction of the district attorney for purposes not authorized by under ch. 979. The department division may withhold findings until an autopsy is held in accordance with its directions.

SB21,2766 Section 2766. 102.14 (title) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1091,2 102.14 (title) Jurisdiction of department office; advisory committee.

SB21,2767 Section 2767. 102.14 (1) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1091,5 102.14 (1) This Except as otherwise provided, this chapter shall be administered by the department office.

SB21,2768 Section 2768. 102.14 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1091,15 102.14 (2) The council on worker's compensation shall advise the department office in carrying out the purposes of this chapter . Such council, shall submit its recommendations with respect to amendments to this chapter to each regular session of the legislature, and shall report its views upon any pending bill relating to this chapter to the proper legislative committee. At the request of the chairpersons of the senate and assembly committees on labor, the department office shall schedule a meeting of the council with the members of the senate and assembly committees on labor to review and discuss matters of legislative concern arising under this chapter.

SB21,2769 Section 2769. 102.15 (1) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1091,18 102.15 (1) Subject to this chapter, the department division may adopt its own rules of procedure and may change the same from time to time.

SB21,2770 Section 2770. 102.15 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1091,22 102.15 (2) The department division may provide by rule the conditions under which transcripts or electronic recordings of testimony and proceedings shall be furnished.

SB21,2771 Section 2771. 102.15 (3) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1092,5 102.15 (3) All testimony at any hearing held under this chapter shall be taken down by a stenographic reporter, except that in case of an emergency, as determined by recorded by electronic means. That testimony need not be transcribed, unless the examiner conducting the hearing, testimony may be recorded by a recording machine orders otherwise. The division shall furnish a copy of an electronic recording made under this subsection or a transcript ordered under this subsection to the parties upon payment of any fee required by the division by rule.

SB21,2772 Section 2772. 102.16 (1) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1092,23 102.16 (1) Any controversy concerning compensation or a violation of sub. (3), including controversies a controversy in which the state may be a party, shall be submitted to the department division in the manner and with the effect provided in this chapter. Every compromise of any claim for compensation may be reviewed and set aside, modified or confirmed by the department within Within one year from after the date the on which a compromise of any claim for compensation is filed with the department, or from division or the date on which an award has been entered, based thereon, or the department may take that action based on a compromise, the division, on its own motion or upon application made within one year that period, may review and set aside, modify, or confirm the compromise. Unless the word "compromise" appears in a stipulation of settlement, the settlement shall not be deemed considered a compromise, and further claim is not barred except as provided in s. 102.17 (4) regardless of whether an award is made. The employer, insurer, or dependent under s. 102.51 (5) shall have equal rights with the employee to have review of a compromise or any other stipulation of settlement reviewed under this subsection. Upon petition filed with the department division, the department division may set aside the award or otherwise determine the rights of the parties.

SB21,2773 Section 2773. 102.16 (1m) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1093,16 102.16 (1m) (a) If an insurer or self-insured employer concedes by compromise under sub. (1) or stipulation under s. 102.18 (1) (a) that the insurer or self-insured employer is liable under this chapter for any health services provided to an injured employee by a health service provider, but disputes the reasonableness of the fee charged by the health service provider, the department division may include in its order confirming the compromise or stipulation a determination made by the office under sub. (2) as to the reasonableness of the fee or the department, if such a determination has not yet been made, the division may notify, or direct the insurer or self-insured employer to notify, the health service provider under sub. (2) (b) that the reasonableness of the fee is in dispute. The department shall deny payment of a health service fee that the department determines under this paragraph to be unreasonable. A health service provider and an insurer or self-insured employer that are parties to a fee dispute under this paragraph are bound by the department's determination under this paragraph on the reasonableness of the disputed fee, unless that determination is set aside, reversed, or modified by the department under sub. (2) (f) or is set aside on judicial review as provided in sub. (2) (f).

SB21,2774 Section 2774. 102.16 (1m) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1094,15 102.16 (1m) (b) If an insurer or self-insured employer concedes by compromise under sub. (1) or stipulation under s. 102.18 (1) (a) that the insurer or self-insured employer is liable under this chapter for any treatment provided to an injured employee by a health service provider, but disputes the necessity of the treatment, the department division may include in its order confirming the compromise or stipulation a determination made by the office under sub. (2m) as to the necessity of the treatment or the department, if such a determination has not yet been made, the division may notify, or direct the insurer or self-insured employer to notify, the health service provider under sub. (2m) (b) that the necessity of the treatment is in dispute. Before determining under this paragraph the necessity of treatment provided to an injured employee, the department may, but is not required to, obtain the opinion of an expert selected by the department who is qualified as provided in sub. (2m) (c). The standards promulgated under sub. (2m) (g) shall be applied by an expert and by the department in rendering an opinion as to, and in determining, necessity of treatment under this paragraph. In cases in which no standards promulgated under sub. (2m) (g) apply, the department shall find the facts regarding necessity of treatment. The department shall deny payment for any treatment that the department determines under this paragraph to be unnecessary. A health service provider and an insurer or self-insured employer that are parties to a dispute under this paragraph over the necessity of treatment are bound by the department's determination under this paragraph on the necessity of the disputed treatment, unless that determination is set aside, reversed, or modified by the department under sub. (2m) (e) or is set aside on judicial review as provided in sub. (2m) (e).

SB21,2775 Section 2775. 102.16 (1m) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1095,10 102.16 (1m) (c) If an insurer or self-insured employer concedes by compromise under sub. (1) or stipulation under s. 102.18 (1) (a) that the insurer or self-insured employer is liable under this chapter for the cost of a prescription drug dispensed under s. 102.425 (2) for outpatient use by an injured employee, but disputes the reasonableness of the amount charged for the prescription drug, the department division may include in its order confirming the compromise or stipulation a determination made by the office under s. 102.425 (4m) as to the reasonableness of the prescription drug charge or the department, if such a determination has not yet been made, the division may notify, or direct the insurer or self-insured employer to notify, the pharmacist or practitioner dispensing the prescription drug under s. 102.425 (4m) (b) that the reasonableness of the prescription drug charge is in dispute. The department shall deny payment of a prescription drug charge that the department determines under this paragraph to be unreasonable. A pharmacist or practitioner and an insurer or self-insured employer that are parties to a dispute under this paragraph over the reasonableness of a prescription drug charge are bound by the department's determination under this paragraph on the reasonableness of the disputed prescription drug charge, unless that determination is set aside, reversed, or modified by the department under s. 102.425 (4m) (e) or is set aside on judicial review as provided in s. 102.425 (4m) (e).

SB21,2776 Section 2776. 102.16 (2) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1095,25 102.16 (2) (a) Except as provided in this paragraph, the department office has jurisdiction under this subsection, sub. (1m) (a), and s. 102.17 to resolve a dispute between a health service provider and an insurer or self-insured employer over the reasonableness of a fee charged by the health service provider for health services provided to an injured employee who claims benefits under this chapter. A health service provider may not submit a fee dispute to the department office under this subsection before all treatment by the health service provider of the employee's injury has ended if the amount in controversy, whether based on a single charge or a combination of charges for one or more days of service, is less than $25. After all treatment by a health service provider of an employee's injury has ended, the health service provider may submit any fee dispute to the department office, regardless of the amount in controversy. The department office shall deny payment of a health service fee that the department office determines under this subsection to be unreasonable.

SB21,2777 Section 2777. 102.16 (2) (am) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1096,6 102.16 (2) (am) A health service provider and an insurer or self-insured employer that are parties to a fee dispute under this subsection are bound by the department's office's determination under this subsection on the reasonableness of the disputed fee, unless that determination is set aside on judicial review as provided in par. (f).

SB21,2778 Section 2778. 102.16 (2) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1096,15 102.16 (2) (b) An insurer or self-insured employer that disputes the reasonableness of a fee charged by a health service provider or the department office under sub. (1m) (a) or s. 102.18 (1) (bg) 1. shall provide reasonable written notice to the health service provider that the fee is being disputed. After receiving reasonable written notice under this paragraph or under sub. (1m) (a) or s. 102.18 (1) (bg) 1. that a health service fee is being disputed, a health service provider may not collect the disputed fee from, or bring an action for collection of the disputed fee against, the employee who received the services for which the fee was charged.

SB21,2779 Section 2779. 102.16 (2) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1097,2 102.16 (2) (c) After a fee dispute is submitted to the department office, the insurer or self-insured employer that is a party to the dispute shall provide to the department office information on that fee and information on fees charged by other health service providers for comparable services. The insurer or self-insured employer shall obtain the information on comparable fees from a database that is certified by the department office under par. (h). Except as provided in par. (e) 1., if the insurer or self-insured employer does not provide the information required under this paragraph, the department office shall determine that the disputed fee is reasonable and order that it be paid. If the insurer or self-insured employer provides the information required under this paragraph, the department office shall use that information to determine the reasonableness of the disputed fee.

SB21,2780 Section 2780. 102.16 (2) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1097,19 102.16 (2) (d) The department office shall analyze the information provided to the department office under par. (c) according to the criteria provided in this paragraph to determine the reasonableness of the disputed fee. Except as provided in 2011 Wisconsin Act 183, section 30 (2) (b), the department office shall determine that a disputed fee is reasonable and order that the disputed fee be paid if that fee is at or below the mean fee for the health service procedure for which the disputed fee was charged, plus 1.2 standard deviations from that mean, as shown by data from a database that is certified by the department office under par. (h). Except as provided in 2011 Wisconsin Act 183, section 30 (2) (b), the department office shall determine that a disputed fee is unreasonable and order that a reasonable fee be paid if the disputed fee is above the mean fee for the health service procedure for which the disputed fee was charged, plus 1.2 standard deviations from that mean, as shown by data from a database that is certified by the department office under par. (h), unless the health service provider proves to the satisfaction of the department office that a higher fee is justified because the service provided in the disputed case was more difficult or more complicated to provide than in the usual case.

SB21,2781 Section 2781. 102.16 (2) (e) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1098,3 102.16 (2) (e) 1. Subject to subd. 2., if an insurer or self-insured employer that disputes the reasonableness of a fee charged by a health service provider cannot provide information on fees charged by other health service providers for comparable services because the database to which the insurer or self-insured employer subscribes is not able to provide accurate information for the health service procedure at issue, the department office may use any other information that the department office considers to be reliable and relevant to the disputed fee to determine the reasonableness of the disputed fee.

SB21,2782 Section 2782. 102.16 (2) (e) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1098,7 102.16 (2) (e) 2. Notwithstanding subd. 1., the department office may use only a hospital radiology database that has been certified by the department office under par. (h) to determine the reasonableness of a hospital fee for radiology services.

SB21,2783 Section 2783. 102.16 (2) (f) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1098,16 102.16 (2) (f) Within 30 days after a determination under this subsection, the department office may set aside, reverse, or modify the determination for any reason that the department office considers sufficient. Within 60 days after a determination under this subsection, the department office may set aside, reverse, or modify the determination on grounds of mistake. A health service provider, insurer, or self-insured employer that is aggrieved by a determination of the department office under this subsection may seek judicial review of that determination in the same manner that compensation claims are reviewed under s. 102.23.

SB21,2784 Section 2784. 102.16 (2) (h) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1099,2 102.16 (2) (h) The department office shall promulgate rules establishing procedures and requirements for the fee dispute resolution process under this subsection, including rules specifying the standards that health service fee databases must meet for certification under this paragraph. Using those standards, the department office shall certify databases of the health service fees that various health service providers charge. In certifying databases under this paragraph, the department office shall certify at least one database of hospital fees for radiology services, including diagnostic and interventional radiology, diagnostic ultrasound, and nuclear medicine.

SB21,2785 Section 2785. 102.16 (2m) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1099,16 102.16 (2m) (a) Except as provided in this paragraph, the department office has jurisdiction under this subsection, sub. (1m) (b), and s. 102.17 to resolve a dispute between a health service provider and an insurer or self-insured employer over the necessity of treatment provided for an injured employee who claims benefits under this chapter. A health service provider may not submit a dispute over necessity of treatment to the department office under this subsection before all treatment by the health service provider of the employee's injury has ended if the amount in controversy, whether based on a single charge or a combination of charges for one or more days of service, is less than $25. After all treatment by a health service provider of an employee's injury has ended, the health service provider may submit any dispute over necessity of treatment to the department office, regardless of the amount in controversy. The department office shall deny payment for any treatment that the department office determines under this subsection to be unnecessary.

SB21,2786 Section 2786. 102.16 (2m) (am) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1099,22 102.16 (2m) (am) A health service provider and an insurer or self-insured employer that are parties to a dispute under this subsection over the necessity of treatment are bound by the department's office's determination under this subsection on the necessity of the disputed treatment, unless that determination is set aside on judicial review as provided in par. (e).

SB21,2787 Section 2787. 102.16 (2m) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1100,7 102.16 (2m) (b) An insurer or self-insured employer that disputes the necessity of treatment provided by a health service provider or the department division under sub. (1m) (b) or s. 102.18 (1) (bg) 2. shall provide reasonable written notice to the health service provider that the necessity of that treatment is being disputed. After receiving reasonable written notice under this paragraph or under sub. (1m) (b) or s. 102.18 (1) (bg) 2. that the necessity of treatment is being disputed, a health service provider may not collect a fee for that disputed treatment from, or bring an action for collection of the fee for that disputed treatment against, the employee who received the treatment.

SB21,2788 Section 2788. 102.16 (2m) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1100,25 102.16 (2m) (c) Before determining under this subsection the necessity of treatment provided for an injured employee who claims benefits under this chapter, the department office shall obtain a written opinion on the necessity of the treatment in dispute from an expert selected by the department office. To qualify as an expert, a person must be licensed to practice the same health care profession as the individual health service provider whose treatment is under review and must either be performing services for an impartial health care services review organization or be a member of an independent panel of experts established by the department office under par. (f). The standards promulgated under par. (g) shall be applied by an expert and by the department office in rendering an opinion as to, and in determining, necessity of treatment under this paragraph. In cases in which no standards promulgated under sub. (2m) (g) apply, the department office shall find the facts regarding necessity of treatment. The department office shall adopt the written opinion of the expert as the department's office's determination on the issues covered in the written opinion, unless the health service provider or the insurer or self-insured employer present clear and convincing written evidence that the expert's opinion is in error.

SB21,2789 Section 2789. 102.16 (2m) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1101,12 102.16 (2m) (d) The department office may charge a party to a dispute over the necessity of treatment provided for an injured employee who claims benefits under this chapter for the full cost of obtaining the written opinion of the expert under par. (c). The department office shall charge the insurer or self-insured employer for the full cost of obtaining the written opinion of the expert for the first dispute that a particular individual health service provider is involved in, unless the department office determines that the individual health service provider's position in the dispute is frivolous or based on fraudulent representations. In a subsequent dispute involving the same individual health service provider, the department office shall charge the losing party to the dispute for the full cost of obtaining the written opinion of the expert.

SB21,2790 Section 2790. 102.16 (2m) (e) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1101,21 102.16 (2m) (e) Within 30 days after a determination under this subsection, the department office may set aside, reverse, or modify the determination for any reason that the department office considers sufficient. Within 60 days after a determination under this subsection, the department office may set aside, reverse, or modify the determination on grounds of mistake. A health service provider, insurer, or self-insured employer that is aggrieved by a determination of the department office under this subsection may seek judicial review of that determination in the same manner that compensation claims are reviewed under s. 102.23.

SB21,2791 Section 2791. 102.16 (2m) (f) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1102,3 102.16 (2m) (f) The department office may contract with an impartial health care services review organization to provide the expert opinions required under par. (c), or establish a panel of experts to provide those opinions, or both. If the department office establishes a panel of experts to provide the expert opinions required under par. (c), the department office may pay the members of that panel a reasonable fee, plus actual and necessary expenses, for their services.

SB21,2792 Section 2792. 102.16 (2m) (g) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1102,13 102.16 (2m) (g) The department office shall promulgate rules establishing procedures and requirements for the necessity of treatment dispute resolution process under this subsection, including rules setting the fees under par. (f) and rules establishing standards for determining the necessity of treatment provided to an injured employee. Before the department office may amend the rules establishing those standards, the department office shall establish an advisory committee under s. 227.13 composed of health care providers providing treatment under s. 102.42 to advise the department office and the council on worker's compensation on amending those rules.

SB21,2793 Section 2793. 102.16 (4) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1102,22 102.16 (4) The department division has jurisdiction to pass on any question arising out of sub. (3) and has jurisdiction to order the employer to reimburse an employee or other person for any sum deducted from wages or paid by him or her in violation of that subsection. In addition to the penalty provided in s. 102.85 (1), any employer violating sub. (3) shall be liable to an injured employee for the reasonable value of the necessary services rendered to that employee pursuant to under any arrangement made in violation of sub. (3) without regard to that employee's actual disbursements for the same those services.

SB21,2794 Section 2794. 102.17 (1) (a) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1103,4 102.17 (1) (a) 1. Upon the filing with the department division by any party in interest of any application in writing stating the general nature of any claim as to which any dispute or controversy may have arisen, the department division shall electronically deliver or mail a copy of the application to all other parties in interest, and the insurance carrier shall be considered a party in interest. The department division may bring in additional parties by service of a copy of the application.

SB21,2795 Section 2795. 102.17 (1) (a) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1103,16 102.17 (1) (a) 2. Subject to subd. 3., the department division shall cause notice of hearing on the application to be given to each interested party , by service of that notice on the interested party personally, by electronically delivering a copy of that notice to the interested party, or by mailing a copy of that notice to the interested party's last-known address at least 10 days before the hearing. If a party in interest is located without this state, and has no post-office address within this state, the copy of the application and copies of all notices shall be filed with the department of financial institutions and professional standards and shall also be sent by registered or certified mail to the last-known post-office address of the party. Such filing and mailing shall constitute sufficient service, with the same effect as if served upon a party located within this state.

SB21,2796 Section 2796. 102.17 (1) (a) 3. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1103,22 102.17 (1) (a) 3. If a party in interest claims that the employer or insurer has acted with malice or bad faith, as described in s. 102.18 (1) (b) or (bp), that party shall provide written notice stating with reasonable specificity the basis for the claim to the employer, the insurer, the office, and the department division before the department division schedules a hearing on the claim of malice or bad faith.

SB21,2797 Section 2797. 102.17 (1) (a) 4. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB21,1104,7 102.17 (1) (a) 4. The hearing may be adjourned in the discretion of the department division, and hearings may be held at such places as the department division designates, within or without the state. The department division may also arrange to have hearings held by the commission, officer, or tribunal having authority to hear cases arising under the worker's compensation law of any other state, of the District of Columbia, or of any territory of the United States, with the testimony and proceedings at any such hearing to be reported to the department division and to be made part of the record in the case. Any evidence so taken shall be subject to rebuttal upon final hearing before the department division.