2015 - 2016 LEGISLATURE
February 19, 2015 - Introduced by Senators Tiffany,
LeMahieu, Nass, Vukmir and Lazich, cosponsored by Representatives Craig,
Horlacher, Brandtjen, R. Brooks, Czaja, Hutton, Gannon, Jagler,
Kapenga, Kleefisch, Knodl, Knudson, Kooyenga, Kremer, Kuglitsch, Kulp,
Murphy, Neylon, Sanfelippo, Schraa, Skowronski, Tauchen, Thiesfeldt,
Vorpagel and Born. Referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.
1An Act to renumber
968.26 (1) and 978.045 (1r) (a) to (h); to renumber and
968.20 (1) (intro.), 968.26 (3), 978.045 (1r) (intro.) and 978.045 (1r) (i); 3to amend
173.12 (1m); and to create
968.26 (1b), 968.26 (4), 968.26 (5) and 4
968.26 (6) and (7) of the statutes;
relating to: John Doe proceedings and
5providing a penalty.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law governing John Doe hearings, if a district attorney requests
a judge to convene a proceeding to make a determination of whether a crime has been
committed, the judge must convene a proceeding to make the determination. If a
person who is not a district attorney complains to a judge that he or she has reason
to believe a crime has been committed, the judge must refer the complaint to a district
attorney. The district attorney has 90 days to issue charges; if the district attorney
does not issue charges, the district attorney must forward to the judge with
jurisdiction all law enforcement reports, all records and cases files, and a written
explanation for not issuing charges. If that judge determines a proceeding is
necessary to determine if a crime has been committed, the judge must convene a
Under current law, any conduct that is prohibited by state law and punishable
by fine or imprisonment or both is a crime that may be investigated under a John Doe
proceeding. Under this bill, the crimes that may be investigated under a John Doe
proceeding are certain felonies under the Criminal Code or any conduct punishable
by fine or imprisonment or both that is allegedly committed by an on-duty law
enforcement officer, corrections officer, or state probation, parole, or extended
Under current law, the judge who convenes a John Doe proceeding has
discretion as to whether to keep the proceeding secret and may issue a secrecy order
that extends to every participant in the proceeding. Under this bill, a judge may
enter a secrecy order upon a showing of good cause by the district attorney, but the
order may apply only to the judge, the district attorney or other prosecuting attorney,
law enforcement personnel, interpreters, and reporters who make or transcribe a
record of the proceeding. Any person who violates a secrecy order is subject to a fine
of up to $10,000, imprisonment for up to nine months, or both.
This bill imposes a six-month time limit on a John Doe proceeding. This limit
may be extended for additional six-month periods if a majority of judicial
administrative district chief judges find good cause for each extension. This bill also
provides that the same finding is required to add specified crimes to the original
complaint. The vote of each judge must be available to the public.
Finally, under this bill, records reflecting the costs of John Doe investigations
and proceedings are a matter of public record, temporary or permanent reserve
judges are excluded from presiding over John Doe proceedings, and special
prosecutors may be appointed to assist the district attorney in a John Doe proceeding
only under certain conditions.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime,
the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a
report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to
result if the bill is enacted.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be
printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
173.12 (1m) of the statutes is amended to read:
If an animal has been seized because it is alleged that the animal 3
has been used in or constitutes evidence of any crime specified in s. 951.08, the 4
animal may not be returned to the owner by an officer under s. 968.20 (2). In any 5
hearing under s. 968.20 (1) (1g)
, the court shall determine if the animal is needed as 6
evidence or there is reason to believe that the animal has participated in or been
trained for fighting. If the court makes such a finding, the animal shall be retained 2
968.20 (1) (intro.) of the statutes is renumbered 968.20 (1) and 4
amended to read:
Any person claiming the right to possession of property seized 6
pursuant to a search warrant or seized without a search warrant may apply for its 7
return to the circuit court for the county in which the property was seized or where 8
the search warrant was returned, except that a court may commence a hearing, on
9its own initiative, to return property seized under s. 968.26
The court shall order such notice as it deems adequate to be given the 11
district attorney and, unless notice was provided under s. 968.26 (7), to
all persons 12
who have or may have an interest in the property and. The court
shall hold a hearing 13
to hear all claims to its true ownership. If the right to possession is proved to the 14
court's satisfaction, it shall order the property, other than contraband or property 15
covered under sub. (1m) or (1r) or s. 173.12, 173.21 (4), or 968.205, returned if:
968.26 (1) of the statutes is renumbered 968.26 (1m).
968.26 (1b) of the statutes is created to read:
In this section:
(a) "Crime" means any of the following:
1. Any Class A, B, C, or D felony under chs. 940 to 948 or 961.
2. A violation of any of the following if it is a Class E, F, G, H, or I felony:
a. Section 940.04, 940.11, 940.19 (2), (4), (5), or (6), 940.195 (2), (4), (5), or (6), 23
940.20, 940.201, 940.203, 940.205, 940.207, 940.208, 940.22 (2), 940.225 (3), 940.29, 24
940.302 (2) (c), 940.32, 941.32, 941.38 (2), 942.09 (2), 943.10, 943.205, 943.32 (1), 25
946.43, 946.44, 946.47, 946.48, 948.02 (3), 948.03 (2) (b) or (c), (3), or (4), 948.04,
948.055, 948.095, 948.10 (1) (a), 948.11, 948.13 (2) (a), 948.14, 948.20, 948.23 (1), (2), 2
or (3) (c) 2. or 3., or 948.30 (1).
b. Section 940.285 (2) if s. 940.285 (2) (b) 1m., 1r., or 2. applies; s. 940.295 (3) 4
(a) if s. 940.295 (3) (b) 1m., 1r., 2., or 3. applies; s. 948.05 (1), (1m), or (2) if s. 948.05 5
(2p) (b) applies; s. 948.12 (1m) or (2m) if s. 948.12 (3) (b) applies; or s. 948.21 if s. 6
948.21 (1) (b) or (c) applies.
3. A violation of s. 940.03.
4. A violation of s. 946.83 or 946.85, if the racketeering activity is listed in s. 9
946.82 (4) and in subd. 1., 2., or 3.
5. Any conduct that is prohibited by state law and punishable by fine or 11
imprisonment or both if the individual who allegedly participated in the conduct was 12
a law enforcement officer; a correctional officer; or a state probation, parole, or 13
extended supervision officer and the individual was engaged in his or her official 14
duties at the time of the alleged conduct.
(b) "Judge" does not include a permanent reserve judge, as defined in s. 753.075 16
(1) (a), or a temporary reserve judge, as defined in s. 753.075 (1) (b).
968.26 (3) of the statutes is renumbered 968.26 (3) (a) and amended 18
(a) The Except as provided in sub. (5), the
extent to which the judge 20
may proceed in an examination under sub. (1) (1m)
or (2) is within the judge's 21
The examination may be adjourned and may be secret
Any witness examined under this section may have counsel present at the 24
examination but the counsel shall not be allowed to examine his or her client, 25
cross-examine other witnesses, or argue before the judge. Subject to s. 971.23, if the
1proceeding is secret, the record of the proceeding and the testimony taken shall not
2be open to inspection by anyone except the district attorney unless it is used by the
3prosecution at the preliminary hearing or the trial of the accused and then only to
4the extent that it is so used.
A court, on the motion of a district attorney, may compel a person to testify 6
or produce evidence under s. 972.08 (1). The person is immune from prosecution as 7
provided in s. 972.08 (1), subject to the restrictions under s. 972.085.
968.26 (4) of the statutes is created to read:
(a) The judge may enter a secrecy order upon a showing of good cause 10
by the district attorney. A secrecy order under this paragraph may apply to only the 11
judge, a district attorney or other prosecuting attorney who participates in a 12
proceeding under this section, law enforcement personnel admitted to a proceeding 13
under this section, an interpreter who participates in a proceeding under this 14
section, or a reporter who makes or transcribes a record of a proceeding under this 15
section. No secrecy order under this section may apply to any other person.
(b) If a judge enters a secrecy order under par. (a), the judge shall terminate 17
that secrecy order if any person applies to the judge for the termination and 18
establishes that the good cause shown under par. (a) no longer exists. If a judge 19
terminates a secrecy order entered under par. (a), the identity of the subject of the 20
proceeding under this section may not be disclosed without the subject's consent, 21
except as provided in par. (c).
(c) If a criminal complaint is filed following a proceeding in which the judge 23
entered a secrecy order, the order is terminated at the initial appearance and s. 24
971.23 governs disclosure of information from a proceeding under this section.
(d) Any person who violates a secrecy order entered under par. (a) is subject to 2
a fine not to exceed $10,000 or imprisonment not to exceed 9 months, or both.
968.26 (5) of the statutes is created to read:
(a) 1. Except as provided in subd. 2., no proceeding may last longer 5
than the following:
a. If the proceeding begins under sub. (1m), 6 months beginning on the day the 7
district attorney requests the judge to convene the proceeding.
b. If the proceeding begins under sub. (2), 6 months beginning on the day the 9
district attorney forwards under sub. (2) (b) to a judge all reports, records and case 10
files, and an explanation of his or her refusal.
2. The period under subd. 1. may be extended only if a majority of judicial 12
administrative district chief judges find good cause for the extension and 13
identification of the vote of each judge is available to the public. The period under 14
subd. 1. may be extended an unlimited number of times, but each extension may be 15
for no more than 6 months and, for each extension, a majority of judicial 16
administrative district chief judges must find good cause and the identification of the 17
vote of each judge must be available to the public.
(b) A proceeding may not investigate a crime that was not part of the original 19
request under sub. (1m) or complaint under sub. (2) (a), whichever is appropriate, 20
unless a majority of judicial administrative district chief judges find good cause to 21
add specified crimes and the identification of the vote of each judge is available to the 22
public. An unlimited number of specified crimes may be added but, for each addition 23
of a specified crime, a majority of judicial administrative district chief judges must 24
find good cause and the identification of the vote of each judge must be available to 25
968.26 (6) and (7) of the statutes are created to read: