The Board concludes the claim should be paid in the reduced amount of $108.44, the purchase price of the television minus the amount already reimbursed by DOC, based on equitable principles. The Board further concludes, under authority of § 16.007(6m), Stats., payment should be made from the Department of Corrections appropriation § 20.410(1)(a), Stats.
6. Vance Hernandez-Smith of Stanley, Wisconsin claims $247.00 for damage to a typewriter allegedly caused by the actions of Department of Corrections staff. Claimant is an inmate at Stanley Correctional Institution. In October 2016, he gave his typewriter to the property sergeant to pack and ship to Will’s Repair Service to fix a broken key. He states that Will’s notified him by phone that the typewriter arrived broken into several pieces and therefore could not be repaired under warranty. Claimant alleges that Will’s also told him the typewriter was not shipped in its original box, but in a standard institution box without adequate padding. Claimant’s social worker spoke to the shipping service, UPS, which allegedly told her that they would not pay for the damage because their investigation concluded the typewriter was improperly packed. Claimant filed a complaint with the Inmate Complaint Review System. He provided contact information for both UPS and Will’s Repair Service, so the Institution Complaint Examiner could contact them as part of the investigation. Claimant states that the ICE did not contact either party, but simply relied on the property sergeant’s statement that she packed the typewriter in the original box with the original padding. Claimant believes the ICE’s investigation was inadequate because contacting Will’s or UPS would have proven the sergeant’s statement was untrue. Claimant believes the ICE’s inadequate investigation was a violation of DOC 310, Wis. Admin. Code and requests reimbursement for his damaged typewriter.
DOC recommends denial of this claim. The Inmate Complaint Examiner’s investigation determined that DOC staff properly packed claimant’s typewriter in the original box with the original padding as is standard practice and that DOC was therefore not responsible for any damage. This conclusion was upheld by the institution warden and the Corrections Complaint Examiner. DOC notes that claimant has submitted no evidence of any negligent handling of his typewriter by DOC staff. Despite claimant’s statements regarding UPS’s investigation, he has submitted no evidence that UPS concluded the typewriter was improperly packed. Finally, as of this date, the typewriter is still in the possession of Will’s Repair Service and DOC is therefore unable to confirm the damage alleged by claimant.
The Board concludes claimant has failed to provide evidence of the value of the typewriter, there has been an insufficient showing of negligence on the part of the DOC employees in packing the typewriter, and this claim is neither one for which the state is legally liable nor one which the state should assume and pay based on equitable principles.
7. Cory Frederiksen of Portage, Wisconsin claims $99.85 for value of property allegedly lost by Department of Corrections staff. Claimant is an inmate at Columbia Correctional Institution. On December 9, 2016, he was transferred to Temporary Lock Up (TLU) and his personal property was packed up by DOC staff. On December 12, 2016, his property was returned, and he notified DOC that several items were missing. He filed an inmate complaint about the missing property, but his complaint was denied. Claimant states that the additional missing items he added to this claim were not included in his original inmate complaint because he received additional property back after the inmate complaint was filed and discovered more missing items. Claimant points to Division of Adult Institutions Policy 309.20.03, which provides that when property is packed up due to an inmate’s transfer to TLU, the inmate is supposed to be allowed to review and sign the property inventory form. Claimant states that he was not given his property inventory form to review and sign, in violation of that policy. He also states that state and federal law have found that once an inmate is placed in TLU, his property becomes the responsibility of the staff assigned to the unit. Claimant alleges that DOC staff was negligent in handling his property and requests reimbursement.
DOC recommends denial of this claim. DOC investigated this incident in response to claimant’s inmate complaint. The complaint investigator reviewed his property inventory and receipts and determined that the allegedly missing items were not in claimant’s property at the time he was transferred to TLU. DOC notes that these items could have been given away, lost, or stolen at any time prior to claimant’s transfer. DOC also notes that claimant is now alleging that more items were missing than he did in his original inmate complaint. DOC believes he has not exhausted his administrative remedies regarding those additional items. DOC has found no evidence that claimant had those additional items in his cell when he was transferred to TLU. DOC believes there is no evidence that staff mishandled claimant’s property and that his claim should be denied.
The Board concludes the claim should be paid in the reduced amount of $38.44 based on equitable principles. The Board further concludes, under authority of § 16.007(6m), Stats., payment should be made from the Department of Corrections appropriation § 20.410(1)(a), Stats.
8. Wade A. Strassburg of Oregon, Wisconsin claims $1,320.00 for rent and transportation expenses allegedly related to an accident at Stanley Correctional Institution (SCI) in July 2015. At the time of the accident, claimant was an inmate employee working in the SCI kitchen. He states that he slipped and twisted his knee because the floors were wet. He points to the fact that there were no “wet floor” signs posted in the area, despite the fact that SCI staff had told inmates to empty the water from the steam tables onto the floor. Claimant states that his injury required knee surgery after his release from SCI. He alleges that he has been unable to work because of the injury and therefore cannot keep up with his rent payments. In addition, he is claiming transportation expenses for travel to and from various medical appointments related to his injury.
The Department of Corrections recommends denial of this claim. DOC believes claimant has not demonstrated that his expenses are the result of DOC negligence. DOC notes that claimant has provided no receipts or proof that he would not have incurred these expenses but for the negligence of DOC. Claimant filed an inmate complaint related to this accident. The investigation into that complaint revealed that floors in the food service area are often wet, especially during the summer months, a condition of which claimant should have been aware. In addition, food service employees’ duties include cleaning all equipment, which results in varying amounts of water on the floor. DOC believes that as a food service employee, claimant should have been aware that the kitchen floors were often wet and exercised reasonable caution while performing his duties. His inmate complaint was denied. DOC believes it responded appropriately to the accident by providing medical attention to claimant and that there is no evidence of negligence by DOC or its employees.
The Board concludes there has been an insufficient showing of negligence on the part of the state, its officers, agents or employees and this claim is neither one for which the state is legally liable nor one which the state should assume and pay based on equitable principles.
9. Terrance J. Shaw of Sturtevant, Wisconsin claims $400.15 for court filing fees, cost of service, supplies, and photocopies allegedly incurred due to the actions of Department of Corrections staff. Claimant received a conduct report charging him and his roommate with covering their cell door window. He filed a complaint with the Inmate Complaint Review System, which was denied. He filed a Writ of Certiorari in Dane County Circuit Court challenging the conduct report. The court found no evidence supporting claimant’s guilt. The court reversed DOC and vacated the conduct report. In its decision, the court stated that the conduct report was “arbitrary and capricious,” that DOC “did not follow its own rules,” and that claimant’s “right to due process was violated by the DOC’s staff.” Claimant takes issue with DOC’s assertion that he has not exhausted his administrative remedies. He notes that these costs were incurred in January-February 2017. DOC rules require that ICRS complaints be filed within 14-days, therefore, any complaint he filed now would be considered untimely. Because no remedy exists for him under the ICRS system, he is not legally obligated to use it. DOC also seems to suggest that § 814.25, Stats., shows legislative intent to completely bar prisoners from ever receiving costs for actions related to prison conditions. Claimant believes this is a misinterpretation of the statute, which clearly allows costs under certain circumstances. Claimant notes that § 814.25, Stats., only bars the court from awarding costs in a certiorari action related to prison conditions, it is not a total ban against prisoners receiving costs. Claimant states that such a ban would violate prisoners’ rights under Article 1, Section 9 of the Wisconsin Constitution. He requests reimbursement for his costs, which would not have been incurred but for the arbitrary and capricious actions of DOC.
DOC recommends denial of this claim. While claimant did file an ICRS complaint related to the conduct report he received, he did not file a subsequent complaint requesting reimbursement for his costs. Because he did not do so, he has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by Chapter DOC 300, Wis. Admin. Code. DOC also believes that § 814.25, Stats., makes it clear that the Wisconsin Legislature did not want prisoners to be awarded costs for actions related to prison conditions. Section 814.25(2)(b), Stats., specifically states such costs are not allowed for certiorari actions related to prison conditions. DOC believes that if the court is not allowed to award such costs, it stands to reason that claimant should not be allowed to circumvent the statute by claiming such costs before the Claims Board.
The Board concludes there has been an insufficient showing of negligence on the part of the state, its officers, agents or employees and this claim is neither one for which the state is legally liable nor one which the state should assume and pay based on equitable principles.
10.   Donovan Crowe of Portage, Wisconsin claims $257.60 for monies allegedly illegally deducted from claimant’s inmate account at Columbia Correctional Institution. In December 2016, the Department of Corrections switched computer software from the Wisconsin Inmate Trust System (WITS) to the Wisconsin Integrated Corrections System (WICS). After the switch, WICS deducted $80 court costs and $170 supervision fees from claimant’s inmate account. He alleges that these debts had already been paid under the WITS system. He filed an institution complaint and both the Inmate Complaint Examiner, and the Corrections Complaint Examiner affirmed his complaint. Despite this decision, DOC’s business office has refused to refund the money to claimant. Claimant points to two January 2017 DOC memos as evidence that DOC admits it erred in deducting the money. He requests reimbursement for the $250 deducted from his account and $7.60 for the cost of filing this claim.
DOC recommends denial of this claim. DOC states that the initial decision to affirm claimant’s institution complaint was erroneous. After the decision, it was discovered that the court costs and supervision fees had never been added to claimant’s debts and obligations under the WITS system and had therefore never been deducted from his account. This oversight was discovered when the switch was made to the WICS system and those debts were added to claimant’s accounts and properly deducted under the new system. DOC notes that the January 2017 memos do not support his argument and are not admissions of error by DOC in this matter. DOC believes claimant has submitted no proof that he has previously paid these debts and that his claim should be denied.
The Board concludes there has been an insufficient showing of negligence on the part of the state, its officers, agents or employees and this claim is neither one for which the state is legally liable nor one which the state should assume and pay based on equitable principles.
The Board concludes:
That the following identified claimants are denied:
Jay Callahan
Penny Schofield
Vance Hernandez-Smith
Wade A. Strassburg
Terrance J. Shaw
Donovan Crowe
That payment of the amounts below to the identified claimants from the following statutory appropriations is justified under § 16.007 (6)(b), Stats:  
Kurt & Barb Zipp $245.00 § 20.566(1)(a), Stats.
Randy Alexander   $108.44 § 20.410(1)(a), Stats.
Corey J. Frederiksen $38.44 § 20.410(1)(a), Stats.
That decision of the following claims is deferred until a later date:
Shanquil Bey
Dated at Madison, Wisconsin this 27th day of February, 2018.
COREY FINKELMEYER
Chair, Representative of the Attorney General
CHRISTOPHER N. GREEN
Secretary, Representative of the Secretary of Administration
KATIE E. IGNATOWSKI
Representative of the Governor
LUTHER OLSEN
Senate Finance Committee
MARY FELZKOWSKI
Assembly Finance Committee
_____________
Motions Under Senate Rule 98 and Joint Rule 7
for the Month of February 2018
A certificate of commendations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Stroebel, for Hunter Babcock, on the occasion of earning and attaining the rank of the Eagle Scout Award.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Erpenbach, for Alyssa Beery, on the occasion of the completion of the Senate Scholar Program.
A certificate of commendations by the Wisconsin Senate, for Joshua G. Bixler, on the occasion of earning and attaining the rank of the Eagle Scout Award.
A certificate of condolences by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Taylor, for the family and friends of Monica Joyce Campbell, on the occasion of extending our deepest sympathies to her family and friends.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Ringhand, for Brady Deegan, on the occasion of the completion of the Senate Scholar Program.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Nass, for Megan Degner, on the occasion of the completion of the Senate Scholar Program.
A certificate of commendations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Darling, for Kent Eliason, on the occasion of receiving the 2017 President’s Award from Chamber President Leanne Buttke and the Menomonee Falls Chamber of Commerce and wish him success in future endeavors.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Vukmir, for Amanda Eve, on the occasion of the completion of the Senate Scholar Program.
A certificate of commendations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Darling, for Benjamin Ferree, on the occasion of earning and attaining the rank of the Eagle Scout Award.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Risser, for William Franken, on the occasion of the completion of the Senate Scholar Program.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Vukmir, for Elizabeth Gardner, on the occasion of the completion of the Senate Scholar Program.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Moulton, for Joshua Gienapp, on the occasion of the completion of the Senate Scholar Program.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Shilling, for Tayler Jones, on the occasion of the completion of the Senate Scholar Program.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Olsen, for Ryan Krieser, on the occasion of the completion of the Senate Scholar Program.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Hansen, for Coleman North LaBlanc, on the occasion of earning and attaining the rank of the Eagle Scout Award.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Risser, for Awonder Liang, on the occasion of achieving the Grandmaster title from the Federation International des Eches, and we wish him all the best at the 2018 United States Closed Championship in St. Louis, Missouri.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Erpenbach, for Nicholas Maxfield, on the occasion of earning and attaining the rank of the Eagle Scout Award.
A certificate of commendations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Taylor, for First Lady Prentiss McClelland, on the occasion of her 65th Birthday and acknowledges her contributions, advocacy and compassion that continue to inspire the people of our community.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Cowles, for the Nicolet Mill, on the occasion of 125 years of operation and wishes safety and success for the Nicolet Mill and its current employees for years to come.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Kapenga, for Benjamin Mayo, on the occasion of the completion of the Senate Scholar Program.
A certificate of commendations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Miller, for the Monona Grove boys swim team, on the occasion of an outstanding season and wish them well in their future endeavors.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Hansen, for John Olsen, on the occasion of earning and attaining the rank of the Eagle Scout Award.
A certificate of commendations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Stroebel, for Noah R. Pecor, on the occasion of earning and attaining the rank of the Eagle Scout Award.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Lasee, for Emily Pinkert, on the occasion of earning and attaining the rank of the Eagle Scout Award.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Cowles, for Tom Seidler, on the occasion of the completion of the Senate Scholar Program.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Vinehout, for Tiffani Skroch, on the occasion of the completion of the Senate Scholar Program.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Petrowski, for Anna Taylor, on the occasion of the completion of the Senate Scholar Program.
A certificate of commendations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Darling, for Gordon Thompson, on the occasion of earning and attaining the rank of the Eagle Scout Award.
A certificate of commendations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Stroebel, for Nicholas Thorison, on the occasion of earning and attaining the rank of the Eagle Scout Award.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Vinehout, for Benjamin Walz, on the occasion of earning and attaining the rank of the Eagle Scout Award.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Craig, for Katherine Watson, on the occasion of the completion of the Senate Scholar Program.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Kapenga, for Mitch Whitmore, on the occasion of his performance on the U.S. Olympic Long Track Speedskating Team, and for his service to his country in the 2018 Olympic Winter Games in PyeongChang.
A certificate of congratulations by the Wisconsin Senate on the motion of Senator Shilling, for Yining Zhou, on the occasion of the completion of the Senate Scholar Program.
Loading...
Loading...