Senator Bradley, with unanimous consent, asked to be recorded as voting “Aye” on the question of adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 564.
hist148081The question was: Adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 564? Adopted.
Senator Bradley, with unanimous consent, asked to be recorded as voting “No” on the question of adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 564.
hist148083Senator LeMahieu, with unanimous consent, asked that the rules be suspended and the bill be given its third reading. Read a third time and passed.
Senators Bradley, Nass and Stafsholt with unanimous consent, asked to be recorded as voting “No” on the question of passage of Senate Bill 564.
Senate Bill 574
Relating to: qualified bidders on state projects.
hist148087Senator LeMahieu, with unanimous consent, asked that the rules be suspended and the bill be given its third reading. Read a third time.
The question was: Passage of Senate Bill 574?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 21; noes, 12; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Ballweg, Bernier, Bradley, Cowles, Darling, Felzkowski, Feyen, Jacque, Jagler, Kapenga, Kooyenga, LeMahieu, Marklein, Nass, Petrowski, Roth, Stafsholt, Stroebel, Testin, Wanggaard and Wimberger - 21.
Noes - Senators Agard, Bewley, Carpenter, Erpenbach, Johnson, Larson, Pfaff, Ringhand, Roys, Smith, L. Taylor and Wirch - 12.
Absent or not voting – None - 0.
Passed.
Senate Bill 596
Relating to: P.O.D. accounts and loan obligations to financial institutions; payments for public deposit losses in failed financial institutions; automated teller machines; prohibiting requiring access boxes on buildings owned by financial institutions; promissory notes of certain public bodies; and repealing rules promulgated by the Department of Financial Institutions.
hist148090The question was: Adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 596? Adopted.
hist148092Senator LeMahieu, with unanimous consent, asked that the rules be suspended and the bill be given its third reading. Read a third time and passed.
Senate Bill 597
Relating to: early admission to kindergarten and first grade at a private school participating in a parental choice program.
hist148096Senator LeMahieu, with unanimous consent, asked that the rules be suspended and the bill be given its third reading. Read a third time.
The question was: Passage of Senate Bill 597?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 21; noes, 12; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Ballweg, Bernier, Bradley, Cowles, Darling, Felzkowski, Feyen, Jacque, Jagler, Kapenga, Kooyenga, LeMahieu, Marklein, Nass, Petrowski, Roth, Stafsholt, Stroebel, Testin, Wanggaard and Wimberger - 21.
Noes - Senators Agard, Bewley, Carpenter, Erpenbach, Johnson, Larson, Pfaff, Ringhand, Roys, Smith, L. Taylor and Wirch - 12.
Absent or not voting – None - 0.
Passed.
Senate Bill 600
Relating to: decriminalizing fentanyl testing strips.
hist148100Senator LeMahieu, with unanimous consent, asked that the rules be suspended and the bill be given its third reading. Read a third time and passed.
Senator LeMahieu, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged to the Assembly:
Messaged.
Senate Bill 603
Relating to: allowing a court commissioner to address stipulated final legal separation hearings.
hist148131Senator LeMahieu, with unanimous consent, asked that the rules be suspended and the bill be given its third reading. Read a third time and passed.
Senate Bill 604
Relating to: the required annual exchange of financial information in an order for family support, child support, or maintenance.
hist148135Senator LeMahieu, with unanimous consent, asked that the rules be suspended and the bill be given its third reading. Read a third time and passed.
Senate Bill 605
Relating to: resident tuition at University of Wisconsin System institutions and technical colleges as applied to relocated service members and their children and spouses.
hist148138The question was: Adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 605?