LRB-1199/1
MPG&JK:cjs
2023 - 2024 LEGISLATURE
March 8, 2023 - Introduced by Senators Stroebel, Ballweg, Cabral-Guevara,
Cowles, Felzkowski, Nass, Quinn, Roys and Wanggaard, cosponsored by
Representatives Novak, Swearingen, Allen, Armstrong, Baldeh, Behnke,
Bodden, Brooks, Edming, Gundrum, Gustafson, Kitchens, Knodl, Macco,
Murphy, Mursau, Nedweski, Penterman, Rettinger, Rodriguez, Sortwell,
Tittl, Tranel, Tusler and Wittke. Referred to Committee on Government
Operations, Elections and Consumer Protection.
SB117,1,4
1An Act to renumber 19.37 (2) (a); and
to create 19.37 (2) (a) 2. of the statutes;
2relating to: obtaining attorney fees and costs under the state's public records
3law when an authority voluntarily or unilaterally releases a contested record
4after an action has been filed in court.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Currently, if a person requests access to a public record and the agency or officer
in state or local government having custody of the record, known as an “authority”
under the public records law, withholds or delays granting access to the record or a
part of the record, the requester may bring a mandamus action asking a court to
order release of the record or part of the record. Current law requires the court to
award reasonable attorney fees, damages of not less than $100, and other actual
costs to the requester if the requester prevails in whole or in substantial part in any
such action.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court decided in 2022 that a requester prevails in
whole or in substantial part only if the requester obtains a judicially sanctioned
change in the parties' legal relationship, for example, a court order requiring
disclosure of a record. See, Friends of Frame Park, U.A. v. City of Waukesha, 2022 WI
57. Under the supreme court's decision, a requester generally is not entitled to
attorney fees and costs if the authority voluntarily or unilaterally without a court
order provides contested records after the requester files an action in court.
This bill supersedes the supreme court's decision in Friends of Frame Park.
Under the bill, a requester has prevailed in whole or in substantial part if the
requester has obtained relief through any of the following means:
1. A judicial order or an enforceable written agreement or consent decree.
2. The authority's voluntary or unilateral release of a record if the court
determines that the filing of the mandamus action was a substantial factor
contributing to that voluntary or unilateral release.
This standard is substantially the same as the standard that applies for a
requester to obtain attorney fees and costs under the federal Freedom of Information
Act.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
SB117,1
1Section 1
. 19.37 (2) (a) of the statutes is renumbered 19.37 (2) (a) 1.
SB117,2
2Section 2
. 19.37 (2) (a) 2. of the statutes is created to read:
SB117,2,53
19.37
(2) (a) 2. A requester has prevailed in whole or in substantial part under
4this paragraph if the requester has obtained relief through any of the following
5means:
SB117,2,66
a. A judicial order or an enforceable written agreement or consent decree.
SB117,2,97
b. The authority's voluntary or unilateral release of a record if the court
8determines that the filing of the action under sub. (1) was a substantial factor
9contributing to that voluntary or unilateral release.
