Adm 10.037
Adm 10.037 Continued appropriateness of contracting. The department or its designated agents shall review periodically, and before any renewal, the continued appropriateness of contracting under each contractual service agreement involving an estimated annual expenditure of more than $25,000.
Adm 10.037 History
History: Emerg. cr. eff. 7-1-06;
CR 06-090: cr.
Register December 2006 No. 612, eff. 1-1-07.
Adm 10.038
Adm 10.038 Submittal of cost-benefit analysis. The department or its designated agents shall submit the original cost-benefit analysis in
s. Adm 10.035 and continued appropriateness of contracting periodic reviews in
s. Adm 10.037 to the department of administration, bureau of procurement.
Adm 10.038 History
History: Emerg. cr. eff. 7-1-06;
CR 06-090: cr.
Register December 2006 No. 612, eff. 1-1-07.
Adm 10.039
Adm 10.039 Effective date. The requirements of this rule apply to all contracts for which solicitation of interest date is after June 30, 2006.
Adm 10.039 History
History: CR 06-090: cr.
Register December 2006 No. 612, eff. 1-1-07.
Adm 10.04(1)
(1)
Application. Prior to taking any contractual services procurement action, an agency shall file an RPA with the department, that includes the information specified in
s. Adm 10.05 (1), the proposed method of procurement, the proposed evaluation procedure and the method of selecting the membership of any evaluation committee.
Adm 10.04(2)
(2) Consolidation of transactions. An agency may consolidate repetitive and similar transactions into a general request for prior approval. Such general prior approval may be issued by the department for a specific period of time, not to exceed one calendar year.
Adm 10.04(3)
(3) Procurement commodity bulletin. The department shall issue a procurement commodity bulletin if it approves the RPA.
Adm 10.04(4)
(4) Prohibition. No contract for contractual services shall be entered into and no payment to any contractor shall be made unless the department has issued a procurement commodity bulletin for that contract.
Adm 10.04 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1983, No. 325, eff. 2-1-83.
Adm 10.05(1)
(1)
Contents of justification. Each RPA shall include the following:
Adm 10.05(1)(a)
(a) A reference to the federal law or regulation or state law which requires or authorizes the procurement of the contractual services;
Adm 10.05(1)(b)
(b) A description of the services to be performed, a list of any items to be delivered, complete schedules and timetables, and any other specific conditions to be required of the contractor;
Adm 10.05(1)(c)
(c) A statement showing why the services can be performed more economically or efficiently by contract rather than by current state employees or by hiring permanent, project, or limited term employees. The consideration of costs shall include, but not be limited to, the costs of salaries, fringe benefits, training and unemployment compensation payments;
Adm 10.05(1)(d)
(d) A statement showing why the proposed procurement is in compliance with the applicable state collective bargaining agreements and that the labor organization or organizations representing the appropriate certified collective bargaining unit or units have been notified of the proposed procurement;
Adm 10.05(1)(e)
(e) A statement showing why it is not possible to have the services performed by another state agency; and
Adm 10.05(1)(f)
(f) A statement indicating that competitive bidding will be used or why competitive bidding cannot be used and the justification for using the proposed alternative.
Adm 10.05(2)
(2) Office of state employment relations. If the department is not satisfied with the justification required by
sub. (1) (c),
(d) and
(e), the department shall submit the RPA to the director of the office of state employment relations for review and shall notify the labor organization or organizations representing the appropriate certified collective bargaining unit or units. The RPA may not be approved unless the director of the office of state employment relations or his or her designee determines that the RPA complies with the provisions of s.
16.705 (3), Stats.
Adm 10.05 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1983, No. 325, eff. 2-1-83; corrections made under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 6., Stats.,
Register January 2004 No. 577.
Adm 10.06
Adm 10.06 Competitive bidding. Competitive bidding is the preferred method for procuring contractual services, and shall be used in every case that permits the preparation of specifications or standards, or both, that can be used as the basis for award.
Adm 10.06 Note
Note: For information on competitive bidding, see State Procurement Manual, section PRO-C, “The Bidding Process".
Adm 10.06 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1983, No. 325, eff. 2-1-83.
Adm 10.07(1)
(1)
Waiver requirement. Any procurement of contractual services that is not made by competitive bidding requires a waiver of bidding. The request for a waiver shall contain a complete explanation of why competitive bidding cannot be used and the proposed alternative procedure. Procurements estimated to exceed $10,000 require waivers by the governor. Procurements estimated to total $10,000 or less may be waived by the secretary or his or her designee.
Adm 10.07(2)
(2) General waiver. Agencies may consolidate repetitive and similar transactions into a general waiver request. General waivers are issued for a specific period of time not to exceed one calendar year.
Adm 10.07 Note
Note: For information on waivers, see State Procurement Manual, sections PRO-C-9, “Waiver of Bidding Process", PRO-C-10, “Bid Waiver Transmittal Letter", and PRO-C-11, “General Waiver".
Adm 10.07 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1983, No. 325, eff. 2-1-83.
Adm 10.08(1)
(1)
Request for proposals (RFP). The preparation of an RFP is mandatory. The RFP shall be written in clear, concise and measurable terms. The RFP shall:
Adm 10.08(1)(a)
(a) State the name and address of the contracting agency or the procuring agency, or both, and the names, addresses, titles and telephone numbers of persons to whom questions concerning the proposals should be directed;
Adm 10.08(1)(b)
(b) State how sealed proposals are to be delivered, the date and time by which they must be received and the name and address of the person who is to receive them;
Adm 10.08(1)(c)
(c) Contain the date and time of the pre-proposal conference, if any, and the period of the contract or contracts;
Adm 10.08(1)(d)
(d) Clearly describe the scope of the services requested and shall provide prospective contractors with performance criteria, including quantity of each service required and delivery schedules for those services;
Adm 10.08(1)(e)
(e) State the factors to be considered in evaluating proposals and the relative importance of each factor. Factors that may be considered when evaluating proposals include;
Adm 10.08(1)(e)1.
1. Responsiveness of the proposals. The proposal should clearly state the proposer's understanding of the work to be performed.
Adm 10.08(1)(e)2.
2. Technical experience and resources of the firm or individual submitting the proposal.
Adm 10.08(1)(e)3.
3. Experience and professional activities of the firm or individual submitting the proposal.
Adm 10.08(1)(e)4.
4. Size and structure of the firm or individual practice of the proposer.
Adm 10.08(1)(f)
(f) State that the procuring agency reserves the right to reject for cause any and all proposals submitted and to request additional information for purposes of clarification only from proposers; and
Adm 10.08(1)(g)
(g) State that any award made shall be made to the firm which, based on the evaluation by the procuring agency, is best qualified.
Adm 10.08(2)
(2) Legal notice. When the estimated cost exceeds $10,000, a Class 2 notice under
ch. 985, Stats., inviting competitive sealed proposals shall be published. The advertisement shall describe the services to be purchased, the intent to solicit proposals rather than bids, any requirement for surety and date the proposals will be opened.
Adm 10.08(3)
(3) Proposal evaluation. Proposals shall be evaluated using a predetermined method to determine which proposer best meets the needs of the procuring agency. A description of the process of evaluation should be included with the RFP. The RFP should state, whenever possible, whether oral presentations by proposers will be part of the evaluation process.
Adm 10.08(4)
(4) Evaluation committee. Before an RFP is distributed to prospective contractors, the procuring agency shall establish an evaluation committee. Each committee shall consist of 3 or a larger number of members, depending on the complexity and scope of services being procured. At least one member or a person advising the committee, shall be trained in procuring contractual services. An evaluation committee shall:
Adm 10.08(4)(a)
(a) Review all proposals submitted in response to an RFP, using as a basis the evaluation criteria included in the RFP;
Adm 10.08(4)(b)
(b) Conduct all formal, scheduled oral conferences and presentations with proposers that affect the evaluation process;
Adm 10.08(4)(c)
(c) Keep accurate records of all meetings, conferences, oral presentations, evaluations and decisions;
Adm 10.08(4)(d)
(d) Not disclose to any proposer any information obtained from any other proposer;
Adm 10.08(4)(e)
(e) Give all proposers an equal opportunity to make a presentation, if presentations are permitted; and
Adm 10.08(5)
(5) Discussions with proposers. Fair and equal discussions may be conducted with all proposers for the purpose of clarification, and with proposers whose proposals are reasonably apt to be awarded the contract for the purpose of negotiating the best offer.
Adm 10.08(6)
(6) Notice of intent. When the competitive negotiation process is used to procure services over $10,000, a letter of intent to contract shall be sent by the contracting agency to the selected proposer. Copies of the letter of intent shall be sent to all other proposers in the evaluation process. All letters of intent shall be sent at least 5 days before the intended date of award.
Adm 10.08(7)
(7) Contract award. Award shall be based on the evaluation committee recommendation unless, after review by the department of the award or of a protest by a bidder or proposer, a change in an award is approved because:
Adm 10.08(7)(b)
(b) The award was recommended to a proposer who should have been disqualified as not responsive to all mandatory requirements of the RFP;
Adm 10.08(7)(c)
(c) Evidence of collusion or fraud involving either the proposer or an evaluation committee member is found;
Adm 10.08(7)(d)
(d) The evaluation committee failed to follow the evaluation criteria as set forth in the RFP; or
Adm 10.08(7)(e)
(e) Violations of this chapter or the statutes have occurred.
Adm 10.08(8)
(8) Conflict of interest. No person shall serve on an evaluation committee where the action of that committee might benefit that person, or a member of that person's immediate family as defined in s.
19.42 (7), Stats., or any organization or business with which that person is associated as defined in s.
19.42 (2), Stats.
Adm 10.08 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1983, No. 325, eff. 2-1-83; am. (3) and (4) (intro.),
Register, December, 1985, No. 360, eff. 1-1-86.
Adm 10.09
Adm 10.09 Noncompetitive negotiation. In cases where the contractual service can only be obtained from one source, the agency shall provide information in the RPA to show that only one source exists, that the price is reasonable either on a fair market value or on a cost basis, and that the procurement is in the best interests of the state.
Adm 10.09 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1983, No. 325, eff. 2-1-83.
Adm 10.10(1)
(1) Any bidder or proposer other than a political subdivision of the state shall include with a bid or proposal a written statement that discloses and provides relevant information on any of the following conditions that exist:
Adm 10.10(1)(a)
(a) An officer or an employee of the contracting or procuring agency, or his or her immediate family, as defined in s.
19.42 (7), Stats., owns or controls, directly or indirectly, any equity, or is associated, as defined in s.
19.42 (2), Stats., with the bidder or proposer;
Adm 10.10(1)(b)
(b) The bidder or proposer currently employs, or has offered or agreed to employ, any person who is or has been an officer or employee of the contracting or procuring agency within the 12 month period preceding the bid or proposal; or
Adm 10.10(1)(c)
(c) The bidder or proposer has a contract for contractual services with the contracting or procuring agency or provides services to, or anticipates providing services during the term of the contract to, a person or organization that is regulated by, or receives state funds from, the contracting or procuring agency.
Adm 10.10(2)
(2) If none of the above conditions exist, the bidder or proposer shall include, with any bid or proposal, a written statement to that effect.
Adm 10.10(3)
(3) The contracting or procuring agency shall review the statement and prepare a written determination on whether or not the information disclosed under
sub. (1) interferes with fair competition and whether or not, in spite of the information disclosed, the awarding of the contract to the bidder or proposer will be in the best interests of the state.
Adm 10.10(4)
(4) The department shall review the determination by the contracting or procuring agency. If the department does not concur in that determination, the department shall not approve the contract.
Adm 10.10(5)
(5) All contracts shall provide that if the bidder or proposer has failed to disclose any conditions described in
sub. (1), the contract may be declared to be void by the department and any amounts paid under the contract may be recovered as provided in s.
16.77 (2), Stats.
Adm 10.10(6)
(6) No disclosure under
sub. (1) (c) is required if a) state or federal law prohibits the disclosure, or b) the relationship does not create a conflict of interest and loss of independence, or the disclosure is improper under standards of professional conduct adopted by, or administrative rules of, the state agency or agency of the judicial branch that is responsible for regulating or licensing the occupational group of which the bidder or proposer is a member.
Adm 10.10 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1983, No. 325, eff. 2-1-83.
Adm 10.11
Adm 10.11 Purchase orders. An official state purchase order shall be issued by the contracting agency for each contractual services procurement. All standard terms and conditions of the official state purchase order shall apply to all contracts except as deleted or amended in the text of an attached contract.
Adm 10.11 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1983, No. 325, eff. 2-1-83.
Adm 10.12
Adm 10.12 Contract administration. Every contract for services shall have a specific person designated as the contract administrator. Responsibilities of the contract administrator are as follows:
Adm 10.12(1)
(1) Compliance. To determine whether the contractor is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract before any scheduled payment is made;
Adm 10.12(2)
(2) Action. To take action in the event of any nondelivery or other breach of contract; and
Adm 10.12(3)
(3) Evaluation. To file with the department, within 60 days of fulfillment of the contract, an evaluation of the contractor's performance.
Adm 10.12 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1983, No. 325, eff. 2-1-83.
Adm 10.13(1)
(1)
Degree of delegation. The degree of authority delegated to designated agents pursuant to s.
16.71, Stats., shall be at the discretion of the department. The delegation shall be in writing.
Adm 10.13(2)
(2) Delegation review. Delegation of its purchasing power under s.
16.71, Stats., does not absolve the department from its responsibilities under subch.
IV of ch. 16, Stats. The department shall periodically review the exercise of delegated authority by agencies and may withdraw delegation at any time for cause.
Adm 10.13 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1983, No. 325, eff. 2-1-83.
Adm 10.14
Adm 10.14 Performance of contractors. The department shall review evaluations of contractor performance submitted by agencies pursuant to s.
16.705 (6), Stats. The department shall investigate each negative report and develop a list of contractors determined to have performed in an unsatisfactory manner. A contractor placed on this list shall be excluded from participating in state contracts for a period specified by the department not to exceed 2 years. A contractor who is placed on this list may request a hearing under s.
227.42, Stats.
