Trans 208.04Concept definition.
(1)The department shall document the perceived need for an improvement project through preparation of a report termed the “concept definition report.” This report presents the initial concepts of the proposed improvement project and sets forth:
(a) Where the proposed improvement project is geographically located;
(b) Why the improvement is needed; and
(c) What concepts are proposed to satisfy the need.
(2)The concept definition report is completed as a part of the project development process under ch. Trans 209 and is submitted to the central office, division of highways and transportation facilities.
History: Cr. Register, February, 1985, No. 350, eff. 3-1-85.
Trans 208.05Investigation.
(1)Upon acceptance of the concept definition report by the chief design engineer, the department shall formally investigate location alternatives. Although the extent of such activities are variable and depend upon the scope and nature of each project, they shall include the following:
(a) Initiation of dialogue with affected public representatives, private individuals and groups; and
(b) Assembly and correlation of relevant highway, land and environmental data in the project area.
(2)Based on information acquired in sub. (1), the department may proceed to develop location project alternatives which are consistent with approved project concepts and highway policies, standards and guides. Engineering experience and judgment are called upon in developing alternatives which may include:
(a) Retention of the existing STH location for the project;
(b) Realignment of one or more segments of the existing STH system within the expected project limits;
(c) Relocation of one or more segments of the STH system; or
(d) Addition of one or more new segments of STH to the system.
(3)The project alternatives are subsequently refined, estimates of their respective production costs are prepared, and the features of each are analyzed and compared.
(4)The region shall then appropriately document the social, economic and environmental impacts of each alternative.
History: Cr. Register, February, 1985, No. 350, eff. 3-1-85; correction in (4) made under s. 13.92 (4) (b) 6., Stats., Register February 2013 No. 686.
Trans 208.06Determination.
(1)Location determination activities include:
(a) Continuation of public involvement;
(b) Final engineering review of the alternatives;
(c) Holding a public hearing if appropriate; and
(d) Recommending a location.
(2)In those instances where only retention or realignment are recommended, the recommendation is submitted to the chief design engineer for approval.
(3)In those instances where STH relocation or addition is recommended, a study report shall be prepared. This report shall include:
(a) Documentation of past location activities;
(b) Description of the alternatives considered; and
(c) The location recommendation.
(5)This report shall be submitted to the chief design engineer for review and recommendation. It shall then be submitted to the administrator of the division of highways and transportation facilities and the secretary for approval of the STH location.
History: Cr. Register, February, 1985, No. 350, eff. 3-1-85.
Loading...
Loading...
Published under s. 35.93, Stats. Updated on the first day of each month. Entire code is always current. The Register date on each page is the date the chapter was last published.