UWS 5.10(3)
(3) Acceptance of either of these options will terminate the faculty members association with the University of Wisconsin System at the end of the leave period.
UWS 5.11
UWS 5.11 Faculty hearing committee. The faculty of each institution shall, promptly after February 1, 1975, establish a committee or designate an existing committee to serve as a hearing committee for the purposes of this chapter. The committee shall consist of faculty members of the institution chosen by the faculty in a manner to be determined by the faculty. This standing faculty committee shall operate as the hearing agent for the board pursuant to s.
227.46 (4), Stats., and conduct the hearing, make a verbatim record of the hearing, prepare a summary of the evidence and transmit such record and summary along with its recommended findings of law and decision to the board according to
s. UWS 5.14
UWS 5.11 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1975, No. 229, eff. 2-1-75; correction made under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 7., Stats.,
Register, June, 1995, No. 474; correction made under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 7., Stats.,
Register May 2007 No. 617.
UWS 5.12(1)
(1) A faculty member whose position is recommended for elimination is entitled to a hearing before the faculty hearing committee as to the appropriateness of the decision to lay off that particular individual. The existence of a state of financial emergency and the designation of the colleges, schools, departments or programs in which faculty positions are to be eliminated are not subject to review in the hearing.
UWS 5.12(2)
(2) A hearing must be requested within 20 days of the receipt by the faculty member of notification of recommended layoff. The request shall state with particularity the grounds to be relied upon in establishing the impropriety of the decision. Relevant information supplementary to that contained in the notification statement may be requested. The question to be considered in the review is whether one or more of the following improper factors entered into the decision to lay off:
UWS 5.12(2)(a)
(a) Conduct, expressions, or beliefs on the faculty member's part which are constitutionally protected, or protected by the principles of academic freedom; or
UWS 5.12(2)(b)
(b) Factors proscribed by applicable state or federal law regarding fair employment practices; or
UWS 5.12(2)(c)
(c) Improper selection of the individual to be laid off. For the purposes of this section, “improper selection" occurs if material prejudice resulted from any of the following:
UWS 5.12(2)(c)1.
1. The procedures required by rules of the faculty or board were not followed; or
UWS 5.12(2)(c)2.
2. Available data bearing materially on the role of the faculty member in the institution were not considered; or
UWS 5.12(2)(c)4.
4. Immaterial or improper factors other than those specified above entered into the decision.
UWS 5.12(3)
(3) The faculty member shall present evidence on whether one or more of the improper factors specified above entered into the decision to lay off. The committee shall then consider whether the evidence presented establishes a prima facie case that such factor or factors did enter significantly into the layoff decision. If the committee finds that a prima facie case has not been established, the layoff decision shall be found to have been proper and the hearing shall be ended. The committee shall report this finding to the chancellor and faculty member.
UWS 5.12(4)
(4) If the committee finds that a prima facie case has been established, the chancellor or designee shall be entitled to present evidence to support the layoff decision, and, thereafter, the faculty member may present evidence in rebuttal. On the basis of all the evidence presented, the committee shall make its determination as follows:
UWS 5.12(4)(a)
(a) The committee shall first consider whether one or more of the above specified improper factors entered significantly into the decision to lay off. Unless the committee is convinced that such factors did significantly enter into that decision, the committee shall find the decision to have been proper.
UWS 5.12(4)(b)
(b) If the committee believes that improper factors may have entered into the decision, but is convinced that the same decision would have been reached had the error(s) not occurred, it shall find the decision to have been proper.
UWS 5.12(4)(c)
(c) If the committee is convinced that improper factors entered significantly into and affected the decision, it shall be found to be improper.
UWS 5.12(5)
(5) The committee shall report its findings and recommendations to the chancellor and the faculty member.
UWS 5.12 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1975, No. 229, eff. 2-1-75.
UWS 5.13(1)
(1) If the faculty hearing committee requests, the chancellor shall provide legal counsel to the committee. The hearing shall be closed unless the faculty member whose position has been recommended for elimination requests an open hearing, in which case it shall be open (see subch.
V of ch. 19, Stats., Open Meeting Law).
UWS 5.13(2)
(2) The faculty hearing committee may, on motion of either party, disqualify any one of its members for cause by a majority vote. If one or more of the faculty hearing committee members disqualify themselves or are disqualified, the remaining members may select a number of other members of the faculty equal to the number who have been disqualified to serve, except that alternative methods of replacement may be specified in the rules and procedures adopted by the faculty establishing the standing committee under
s. UWS 5.11. No faculty member who participated in the decision to lay off or who is a material witness may sit in on the hearing committee.
UWS 5.13(3)
(3) The faculty member shall be given at least 10 days notice of the hearing; such hearing shall be held not later than 20 days after the request except that this time limit may be extended by mutual consent of the parties or by order of the hearing committee.
UWS 5.13(4)
(4) The faculty member shall have access to the evidence on which the administration intends to rely to support the decision to lay off, and shall be guaranteed the following minimal procedural safeguards at the hearing:
UWS 5.13(4)(b)
(b) A right to counsel and/or other representatives, and to offer witnesses;
UWS 5.13(4)(c)
(c) A right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses;
UWS 5.13(4)(d)
(d) A verbatim record of the hearing, which might be a sound recording, provided at no cost;
UWS 5.13(4)(e)
(e) Written findings of fact and decision based on the hearing record; and
UWS 5.13(5)
(5) Adjournments shall be granted to enable either party to investigate evidence as to which a valid claim of surprise is made.
UWS 5.13 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1975, No. 229, eff. 2-1-75, correction in (4) (f) made under s. 19.93 (2m) (b) 7., Stats.,
Register, June, 1995, No. 474; correction in (1) made under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 7., Stats.,
Register, April, 2001, No. 544; correction in (4) (f) made under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 7., Stats.,
Register May 2007 No. 617.
UWS 5.14
UWS 5.14 Recommendations and review by the board. The recommendations of the chancellor and the recommendations, if any, of the faculty hearing committee, shall be transmitted to the president of the University of Wisconsin System and to the board and acted upon as follows:
UWS 5.14(1)
(1) If the faculty member has not requested a hearing before the faculty hearing committee, the recommendation shall be deemed proper and shall be reported for information to the system president and the board.
UWS 5.14(2)
(2) If the faculty member has requested a hearing and the faculty hearing committee has found the decision to be proper, the report of the faculty hearing committee shall be forwarded to the system president and board by the chancellor with a recommendation. The faculty member may request a review by the board, and the board review panel may at its option grant a review. Unless the board review panel grants the request for review, the recommended findings of fact and decision of the standing faculty committee shall be the final decision of the Board of Regents.
UWS 5.14(3)
(3) If after a hearing, the faculty hearing committee's recommended findings of fact and decision are that the initial decision was improper, the chancellor shall review the matter and give careful consideration to the committee's finding. If the chancellor accepts the committee's findings the chancellor's decision shall be final. If the chancellor contests the recommended findings that the decision was improper, the verbatim record, a summary of the evidence and the recommended findings of law and decision shall be forwarded to the board review panel (see
s. UWS 5.15). The chancellor and the faculty member shall be furnished with copies of this material and shall have a reasonable opportunity to file written exceptions to such summary and proposed findings and decision and to argue with respect to them orally and in writing before the board review panel. The board review panel shall hear and decide the case in accordance with s.
227.46 (4), Stats. The decision of the board review panel shall be final.
UWS 5.14 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1975, No. 229, eff. 2-1-75, correction in (3) made under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 7., Stats.,
Register, June, 1995, No. 474; correction in (3) made under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 7., Stats.,
Register May 2007 No. 617;
2015 Wis. Act 330 s. 20: am. (intro.), (2) Register April 2016 No. 724, eff. 5-1-16.
UWS 5.15
UWS 5.15 Board review. A review panel shall be appointed by the president of the Board of Regents, and shall include 3 members of the board, and 2 nonvoting staff members from the academic affairs office of the university system. The panel shall review the criteria and reasoning of the chancellor and the findings and recommendations of the faculty hearing committee in each case forwarded for its review, and shall reach a decision on the recommendation to be approved. The decision shall be final and binding upon the chancellor and the faculty member affected unless one or more of the regent members of the review panel request that the decision be reviewed by the full Board of Regents, in which case the record shall be reviewed and a decision reached by the full board.
UWS 5.16(1)
(1) A faculty member whose position has been eliminated or reduced in accordance with the provisions of this chapter shall, at the end of the appropriate notice period, be placed on layoff status, unless the layoff notice has been rescinded prior to that time.
UWS 5.16(2)
(2) The faculty member whose notice period has expired, and who is placed on layoff status shall remain on layoff status until:
UWS 5.16(2)(a)
(a) For probationary faculty, the probationary appointment would have expired under its own terms;
UWS 5.16(2)(b)1.
1. Reappointment to the position from which laid off. Failure to accept such reappointment would terminate the faculty member's association with the University of Wisconsin System.
UWS 5.16(2)(b)2.
2. Acceptance of an alternative continuing position in the University of Wisconsin System. Failure to accept an alternate appointment would not terminate the faculty member's association with the University of Wisconsin System.
UWS 5.16(2)(b)4.
4. Failure by the affected faculty member to notify the chancellor not later than December 1, of each year while on layoff status as to his/her location, employment status, and desire to remain on layoff status. Failure to provide such notice of desire to remain on layoff status shall terminate the faculty member's association with the University of Wisconsin System.
UWS 5.16 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1975, No. 229, eff. 2-1-75;
2015 Wis. Act 330 s. 20: am. (2) (b) 1., 2., 4. Register April 2016 No. 724, eff. 5-1-16.
UWS 5.17
UWS 5.17 Alternative employment. Each institution shall devote its best efforts to securing alternative appointments within the institution in positions for which faculty laid off under this chapter are qualified under existing criteria. In addition, the University of Wisconsin System shall provide financial assistance for one year for faculty who are designated for layoff to readapt within the department or within another department of the institution, where such readaptation is feasible. Further, the University of Wisconsin System shall devote its best efforts to insure that faculty members laid off or terminated in any institution shall be made aware of openings within the system.
UWS 5.18
UWS 5.18 Reappointment rights. Each institution shall establish administrative procedures and policies to insure that where layoff or terminations occur for reasons of financial emergency, no person may be employed at that institution within 3 years to perform reasonably comparable duties to those of the faculty member laid off or terminated without first offering the laid off or terminated faculty member reappointment without loss of tenure, seniority and other rights. The 3 year period shall be computed from the effective date of layoff as specified in the original notice.
UWS 5.18 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1975, No. 229, eff. 2-1-75.
UWS 5.19
UWS 5.19 Retention of rank and salary. Any faculty member reappointed within 3 years after layoff or termination shall be reappointed with a rank and salary at least equivalent to the rank and salary when laid off or terminated, together with such other rights and privileges which may have accrued at that time; any faculty member relocated within an institution or within the University of Wisconsin System shall not have either rank or salary adversely affected except by consent at the time of relocation.
UWS 5.20
UWS 5.20 Rights of faculty members on layoff. A faculty member on layoff status in accord with the provisions of this chapter has the reemployment rights guaranteed by
ss. UWS 5.18 and
5.19, and has the following minimal rights:
UWS 5.20(1)
(1) Such participation in fringe benefit programs as is allowed by state regulations governing rights of laid off state employees;
UWS 5.20(2)
(2) Such continued use of campus facilities as is allowed by policies and procedures established by the department and institution; and
UWS 5.20(3)
(3) Such participation in departmental and institutional activities as is allowed by guidelines established by the department and institution.
UWS 5.20 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1975, No. 229, eff. 2-1-75.
UWS 5.21
UWS 5.21 Systemwide tenure. The commitment to systemwide tenure within the former chapter 37 institutions shall be honored by those institutions for those eligible under s.
36.13 (4), 1973 Stats., in the event of layoff or termination under the provisions of this chapter.
UWS 5.21 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1975, No. 229, eff. 2-1-75.
UWS 5.22
UWS 5.22 Lack of faculty action. If the faculty of an institution is given due notice of its rights and responsibilities under this chapter, and does not act, the chancellor may act as follows in lieu of the faculty action:
UWS 5.22(1)
(1) If a faculty committee provided for in
s. UWS 5.04 is not established, the chancellor may consult those members or representatives of the faculty he or she considers appropriate to satisfy the intent of
s. UWS 5.05. All departments potentially involved shall be consulted and representatives of the faculty may dispute the chancellor's recommendation for a state of financial emergency before the board.
UWS 5.22(2)
(2) If the faculty does not act to determine the form of seniority to be followed, the chancellor may designate the form. Such designation shall be effective campuswide and shall be made prior to the declaration by the board of a state of financial emergency.
UWS 5.22(3)
(3) If an affected department or program does not recommend individuals for layoff or termination following declaration of a state of financial emergency, the chancellor shall determine the individuals to be affected, using such advice as is deemed of value.
UWS 5.22(4)
(4) If a faculty hearing committee provided for in
s. UWS 5.11 is not established by the faculty, the chancellor may appoint a committee of faculty members to provide this function.
UWS 5.22 History
History: Cr.
Register, January, 1975, No. 229, eff. 2-1-75; correction in (1) made under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 5., Stats.,
Register, June, 1995, No. 474.
