List with Description of all Entities that may be Affected by the Proposed Rule
These rules will impact migratory game bird hunters, primarily those pursuing ducks and geese.
Summary and Preliminary Comparison with any Existing or Proposed Federal Regulation that Is Intended to Address the Activities to be Regulated by the Proposed Rule
Migratory game bird hunting is regulated by the United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), in
50 CFR part 20. Under international treaty and Federal law, migratory game bird seasons are closed unless opened annually through the USFWS regulations process. As part of the federal rule process, the service annually evaluates migratory game bird populations and breeding habitat in cooperation with state provincial agencies and the Canadian Wildlife Service. After considering recommendations from the flyway councils of states and the guidance of cooperatively developed harvest strategies, the USFWS establishes annual frameworks within flyway or bird populations regions. States can then establish hunting seasons within the sideboards for each species and region. As a result, the hunting seasons of neighboring states are similar to Wisconsin migratory game bird hunting regulations because they are subject to the same federal frameworks.
Locally produced giant Canada geese are now a considerable portion of the harvest in states that also harvest Mississippi Valley Population geese that nest in Northern Ontario. The Mississippi Flyway Council has tested the use of a standard season framework for 5 years, ending in 2011. Season lengths and bag limits for each MVP harvest state remained unchanged. In 2012, the MFC conducted an evaluation of harvest impacts of these stable regulations and established a framework for future seasons. It was agreed within the MFC that states harvesting MVP Canada geese could take small steps toward liberalization while impacts are cooperatively monitored.
Anticipated Economic impact of Implementing the Rule (Note if the Rule is Likely to Have a Significant Economic Impact on Small Businesses)
No economic impacts are anticipated. The hunting season frameworks proposed in this rule will be comparable to those in place during the previous season. These rules are applicable to individual hunters and impose no compliance or reporting requirements for small business, nor are any design or operational standards contained in the rule.
Contact Person
Safety and Professional Services — Examining Board of Architects, Landscape Architects, Professional Engineers, Designers, and Land Surveyors
This statement of scope was approved by the governor on March 6, 2013.
Rule No.
Relating to
Continuing Education (CE).
Rule Type
Permanent.
Finding/Nature of Emergency (Emergency Rule Only)
NA.
Detailed Description of the Objective of the Proposed Rule
The objective of this proposed rule-making is to clarify various provisions of ch.
A-E 13, Wis. Admin. Code, which sets forth minimum standards for continuing education for professional engineers and to resolve inconsistencies between the rules in that chapter. In particular, this proposal is intended to revise the rules so that newly registered comity applicants are treated consistently with newly registered Wisconsin engineers with respect to continuing education. This proposal may include amendments to other A-E Code chapters as necessary based on the changes to ch.
A-E 13.
It is also intended to clarify the rules for a person who has retired from the profession and is seeking a waiver from the continuing education requirements. It will revise the rules to state retirees may not perform or provide professional engineering services nor receive remuneration to be eligible for the waiver.
Description of the Existing Policies Relevant to the Rule, New Policies Proposed to be Included in the Rule, and an Analysis of Policy Alternatives
Policies relevant to ch.
A-E 13, Wis. Admin. Code: All registered professional engineers, like any other professional, should adhere to minimum standards of practice, where such standards have been promulgated by engineer-practitioners knowledgeable in both the practice and its governing law. Minimum professional standards must be easily understood by practitioners. They must also be consistent with each other, the statutes, and other related law; and should reflect current practices of the profession. These policies remain in effect. No new alternative policies are involved, making an analysis of policy alternatives unnecessary.
Detailed Explanation of Statutory Authority for the Rule (Including the Statutory Citation and Language)
Examining Boards are generally empowered by the legislature pursuant to ss.
15.08 (5) (b) and
227.11, Stats., to promulgate rules that govern their profession. The Examining Board of Architects, Landscape Architects, Professional Engineers, Designers and Land Surveyors (Board)are specifically authorized by s.
443.015, Stats., to establish rules governing continuing education requirements. Therefore the Board is authorized generally and specifically to promulgate the proposed rules. See sections
15.08 (5) (b),
227.11 (2) (a), and
443.015 (2), Stats.
Estimate of Amount of Time that State Employees will Spend Developing the Rule and of Other Resources Necessary to Develop the Rule
100 hours
List with Description of all Entities that may be Affected by the Proposed rule
Registered professional engineers and individuals and entities using their services.
Summary and Preliminary Comparison with any Existing or Proposed Federal Regulation that Is Intended to Address the Activities to be Regulated by the Proposed Rule
No federal laws regulate the practice of professional engineering as it relates to the activities regulated by the rules proposed herein.
Anticipated Economic Impact of Implementing the Rule (Note if the Rule is Likely to Have a Significant Economic Impact on Small Businesses)
None.
Contact Person
Shawn Leatherwood, (608) 261-4438,
Shancethea.Leatherwood@Wisconsin.gov.
Safety and Professional Services
Professional Services, Chs.
SPS 1—299
This statement of scope was approved by the governor on March 6, 2013.
Rule No.
Relating to
Hearings, injunctions, and warnings.
Rule Type
Permanent.
Finding/Nature of Emergency (Emergency Rule Only)
NA.
Detailed Description of the Objective of the Proposed Rule
The objective of the proposed rule is to address an outdated process and fix typographical errors.
Description of the Existing Policies Relevant to the Rule, New Policies Proposed to be Included in the Rule, and an Analysis of Policy Alternatives
Sections
SPS 1.08 (2) and
2.10 (1) currently provide for the designation of the presiding officer to be employed by the Department unless the credentialing authority designates otherwise. These sections also indicate the administrative law judge shall be an attorney in the department designated by department general counsel, an employee borrowed from another agency or a person employed as a special project or limited term employee. The Department of Safety and Professional Services no longer has designated administrative law judges within the Department and contracts with Department of Administration, Division of Hearing and Appeals to preside over hearings. The proposed policy is to have the presiding officer of Class 1 and Class 2 hearings be an administrative law judge employed by the Department of Administration.
Detailed Explanation of Statutory Authority for the Rule (Including the Statutory Citation and Language)
Section
440.03(1), Wis. Stats. The department may promulgate rules defining uniform procedures to be used by the department, the real estate appraisers board, and all examining boards and affiliated credentialing boards, attached to the department or an examining board, for receiving, filing and investigating complaints, for commencing disciplinary proceedings and for conducting hearings.
Section
440.205, Wis. Stats. The department shall promulgate rules establishing uniform procedures for the issuance and use of administrative warnings.
Estimate of Amount of Time that State Employees Will Spend Developing the Rule and of Other Resources Necessary to Develop the Rule
20 hours
List with Description of all Entities that may be Affected by the Proposed Rule
Credential holders.
Summary and Preliminary Comparison with any Existing or proposed Federal Regulation that Is Intended to Address the Activities to be Regulated by the Proposed Rule
None.
Anticipated Economic Impact of Implementing the Rule (Note if the Rule is Likely to Have a Significant Economic Impact on Small Businesses)
None.
Contact Person
Sharon Henes, (608) 261-2377.
Safety and Professional Services
Professional Services, Chs.
SPS 1—299
This statement of scope was approved by the governor on February 18, 2013.
Rule No.
Relating to
Mixed martial arts, amateur boxing, and professional boxing.
Rule Type
Permanent.
Finding/Nature of Emergency (Emergency Rule Only)
Not applicable.
Detailed Description of the Objective of the Proposed Rule
The objective of the proposed rule changes is to clarify inconsistencies, delete any unnecessary requirements, add any missing requirements, and improve various administrative elements — primarily for mixed martial arts fighting contests — and to repeal all the rules for amateur boxing. However, some of the improvements that the Department expects to develop for mixed martial arts may be similarly helpful for the Department's requirements for professional boxing. In addition, these rule changes may include combining the current requirements for mixed martial arts fighting contests and for professional boxing contests into fewer and simpler chapters than are currently used. Consequently, the objectives of this rulemaking may be incorporated into more than one rulemaking project.
Description of the Existing Policies Relevant to the Rule, New Policies Proposed to be Included in the Rule, and an Analysis of Policy Alternatives
The existing policies for mixed martial arts fighting contests, and the corresponding rules in chapters SPS 192 to 196, have been in place only since April 2011 – and were developed and implemented very quickly in response to requirements and corresponding deadlines in
2009 Wisconsin Act 111. Although the rules in these chapters established a workable initial framework for this new program, experience in the program since its onset has identified several inconsistencies and unnecessary requirements in these rules, several missing requirements, and several potential improvements for the administrative elements, which should be helpful to the various stakeholders.
The existing rules for amateur boxing, in chapters SPS 100 to 105, have been irrelevant since enactment of
2003 Wisconsin Act 285, which (1) reduced the Department's role in boxing to addressing only professional boxing and (2) required amateur boxing contests to instead be sanctioned by and conducted under the rules of the national governing body for amateur boxing that is recognized by the U.S. Olympic Committee under
36 USC 220521.
Detailed Explanation of Statutory Authority for the Rule (Including the Statutory Citation and Language)
Section
227.11 (2) (a) of the Statutes authorizes the Department to “promulgate rules interpreting the provisions of any statute enforced or administered" by the Department.
Section
440.03 (1) authorizes the Department to “promulgate rules defining uniform rules to be used by the department . . . for receiving, filing and investigating complaints, for commencing disciplinary proceedings and for conducting hearings."
Section
440.03 (7m) authorizes the Department to “promulgate rules that establish procedures for submitting an application for a credential or credential renewal by electronic transmission."
Section
444.02 (2) authorizes the Department to “issue, and for cause limit, suspend, or revoke, a license to conduct professional contests or amateur mixed martial arts fighting contests to any promoter or incorporated club formed as provided in [the] chapter" and to “reprimand a promoter or club for violating this chapter or any rule of the department."
