Ins 3.40(7)(a)(a) The order of benefit determination rules state whether This Plan is a Primary Plan or Secondary Plan as to another plan covering the person. Ins 3.40(7)(b)(b) There may be more than one Primary Plan. A Plan is a Primary Plan if either subd. 1. or 2. is true: Ins 3.40(7)(b)1.1. The Plan either has no order of benefit determination rules, or it has rules that differ from sub. (11). Ins 3.40(7)(b)2.2. All plans that cover the person are complying plans and, under sub. (11), the Plan determines its benefits first. Ins 3.40(7)(c)(c) When there are more than 2 plans covering the person, This Plan may be a Primary Plan as to one or more other Plans and may be a Secondary Plan as to a different Plan or Plans. Ins 3.40(7)(d)(d) If a person is covered by more than one Secondary Plan, the order of benefit determination rules of this section decide the order in which the benefits are determined in relation to each other. The benefits of each Secondary Plan may take into consideration the benefits of the Primary Plan or Plans and the benefits of any other Plan which, under the rules of this section, has its benefits determined before those of that Secondary Plan. Ins 3.40(8)(a)(a) This coordination of benefits (COB) provision applies to This Plan when an employee or the employee’s covered dependent has health care coverage under more than one Plan. Ins 3.40(8)(b)(b) If this COB provision applies, the order of benefit determination rules shall be looked at first. Those rules determine whether the benefits of This Plan are determined before or after those of another Plan. Ins 3.40(8)(c)(c) The benefits of This Plan shall not be reduced when, under the order of benefit determination rules, This Plan is primary and determines its benefits before another Plan. Ins 3.40(8)(d)(d) The benefits of This Plan may be reduced when, under the order of benefit determination rules, another Plan determines its benefits first. Ins 3.40(9)(9) Flexibility and consistency with this section. Ins 3.40(9)(a)(a) APPENDIX A shall be considered authorized clauses pursuant to s. 631.23, Stats., for use in policy forms subject to this section and shall only be changed as provided in this section. Ins 3.40(9)(b)(b) This section permits but does not require the use of COB or “other insurance” provisions. However, if such provisions are used, they must conform with this section and substantially conform to the clauses contained in APPENDIX A. Liberalization of the prescribed language in APPENDIX A, including rearrangement of the order of the clauses, is permitted provided that the modified language is not less favorable to the insured person. Ins 3.40(9)(c)(c) Policy language which reduces benefits because of other insurance and which is inconsistent with this section violates the criteria of s. 631.20, Stats., and shall not be used. Ins 3.40(9)(d)(d) A Plan that includes a COB provision inconsistent with this section shall not take the benefits of another Plan into account when it determines its benefits. There is one exception: a contract holder’s coverage that is designed to supplement a part of a basic package of benefits may provide that the supplementary coverage shall be excess to any other parts of the Plan provided by the contract holder. Ins 3.40(9)(e)(e) A group contract’s COB provision does not have to use the words and format contained in APPENDIX A. Changes may be made to fit the language and style of the rest of the group contract or to reflect the differences among Plans which provide services, which pay benefits for expenses incurred, and which indemnify. Substantive changes are allowed only as set forth in this section. Ins 3.40(9)(f)(f) A term such as “usual and customary,” “usual and prevailing,” or “reasonable and customary” may be substituted for the term “necessary, reasonable and customary.” Terms such as “medical care” or “dental care” may be substituted for “health care” to describe the coverages to which the COB provisions apply. Ins 3.40(9)(g)(g) A group contract may apply one COB provision to certain of its benefits (such as dental benefits), coordinating only with like benefits, and may apply other separate COB provisions to coordinate other benefits. Ins 3.40(10)(10) Prohibited coordination and benefit design. Ins 3.40(10)(a)(a) A group contract shall not reduce benefits on the basis that: Ins 3.40(10)(a)2.2. Except with respect to Part B of Medicare, that a person is or could have been covered under another Plan; or Ins 3.40(10)(a)3.3. A person has elected an option under another Plan providing a lower level of benefits than another option which could have been elected. Ins 3.40(10)(b)(b) No contract shall contain a provision that its benefits are “excess” or “always secondary” to any Plan defined in sub. (3) (i), except as permitted under this section. Ins 3.40(11)(a)1.1. The Primary Plan shall pay or provide its benefits as if the Secondary Plan or Plans did not exist. Ins 3.40(11)(a)2.2. A Secondary Plan may take the benefits of another Plan into account only when, under the rules in par. (b), it is secondary to that other Plan. Ins 3.40(11)(b)(b) When there is a basis for a claim under This Plan and another Plan, This Plan determines its order of benefits using the first of the following rules which applies: Ins 3.40(11)(b)1.1. ‘No rule in another plan.’ If the other Plan does not have rules coordinating its benefits with those of This Plan, the benefits of the other Plan are determined first. Ins 3.40(11)(b)2.2. ‘Non-dependent or dependent.’ The benefits of the Plan that covers the person as an employee, member or subscriber are determined before those of the Plan that covers the person as a dependent of an employee, member or subscriber. Ins 3.40(11)(b)3.3. ‘Dependent child-parents not separated or divorced.’ Except as stated in subd. 3. c., when This Plan and another Plan cover the same child as a dependent of different persons, called “parents:” Ins 3.40(11)(b)3.a.a. The benefits of the Plan of the parent whose birthday falls earlier in a year are determined before those of the Plan of the parent whose birthday falls later in that year; but Ins 3.40(11)(b)3.b.b. If both parents have the same birthday, the benefits of the Plan which covered the parent longer are determined before those of the Plan which covered the other parent for a shorter period of time. Ins 3.40(11)(b)3.c.c. However, if the other Plan does not have the rule described in subd. 3. a., but instead has a rule based upon the gender of the parent, and if, as a result, the Plans do not agree on the order of benefits, the rule in the other Plan shall determine the order of benefits. Ins 3.40(11)(b)3.d.d. In this subdivision, the word “birthday” refers only to month and day in a calendar year, not the year in which the person was born. Ins 3.40(11)(b)4.4. ‘Dependent child-separated or divorced parents.’ If 2 or more Plans cover a person as a dependent child of divorced or separated parents, benefits for the child are determined in this order: Ins 3.40(11)(b)4.b.b. Then, the plan of the spouse of the parent with custody of the child; and Ins 3.40(11)(b)4.d.d. However, if the specific terms of a court decree state that one of the parents is responsible for the health care expenses of the child and the entity obligated to pay or provide the benefits of the Plan of that parent has actual knowledge of those terms, the benefits of the Plan of the responsible parent are determined first. This subparagraph does not apply with respect to any Claim Determination Period or plan year during which any benefits are actually paid or provided before the entity has that actual knowledge. Ins 3.40(11)(b)4.e.e. If the specific terms of a court decree state that the parents have joint custody of the child and do not specify that one parent has responsibility for the child’s health care expenses or if the court decree states that both parents shall be responsible for the health care needs of the child but gives physical custody of the child to one parent, and the entities obligated to pay or provide the benefits of the respective parents’ Plans have actual knowledge of those terms, benefits for the dependent child shall be determined according to subd. 3. Ins 3.40(11)(b)5.5. ‘Active or inactive employee.’ The benefits of a Plan which covers a person as an employee who is neither laid off or retired, or as that employee’s dependent, are determined before those of a Plan which covers that person as a laid off or retired employee, or as that employee’s dependent. If the other Plan does not have this rule and if, as a result, the Plans do not agree on the order of benefits, this rule is ignored. Ins 3.40(11)(b)5m.5m. ‘Continuation coverage.’ If a person has continuation coverage under federal law or s. 632.897 (3) (a), Stats., and is also covered under another Plan, the following shall determine the order of benefits: Ins 3.40(11)(b)5m.a.a. First, the benefits of a Plan covering the person as an employee, member or subscriber or as a dependent of an employee, member or subscriber. Ins 3.40(11)(b)5s.5s. If the other Plan does not have the rule described in subd. 5m. and if, as a result, the Plans do not agree on the order of benefits, this subdivision is ignored. Ins 3.40(11)(b)6.6. ‘Longer or shorter length of coverage.’ If none of the above rules determines the order of benefits, the benefits of the Plan which covered an employee, member or subscriber longer are determined before those of the Plan which covered that person for the shorter time. Ins 3.40(11)(b)6m.6m. To determine the length of time a person has been covered under a Plan, 2 Plans shall be treated as one if the claimant was eligible under the second within 24 hours after the first ended. Thus, the start of a new Plan does not include: Ins 3.40(11)(b)6m.b.b. A change in the entity which pays, provides or administers the Plan’s benefits; or Ins 3.40(11)(b)6m.c.c. A change from one type of Plan to another, such as, from a single employer plan to that of a multiple employer plan. Ins 3.40(11)(b)6s.6s. The claimant’s length of time covered under a Plan is measured from the claimant’s first date of coverage under that Plan. If that date is not readily available, the date the claimant first became a member of the group shall be used as the date from which to determine the length of time the claimant’s coverage under the present Plan has been in force. Ins 3.40(11)(c)(c) If a dependent is a Medicare beneficiary and if, under the Social Security Act of 1965 as amended, Medicare is secondary to the Plan covering the person as a dependent of an active employee, the federal Medicare regulations shall supersede this subsection. Ins 3.40(12)(a)(a) In accordance with order of benefit determination rules under sub. (11), when This Plan is a secondary Plan as to one or more other Plans, the benefits of This Plan may be reduced as provided in par. (b). The other Plan or Plans are referred to as “the other Plans” in par. (b). Ins 3.40(12)(b)1.1. The benefits of This Plan shall be reduced when the sum of the following exceeds the allowable expenses in a claim determination period: Ins 3.40(12)(b)1.a.a. The benefits that would be payable for the allowable expenses under This Plan in the absence of this COB provision, and Ins 3.40(12)(b)1.b.b. The benefits that would be payable for the allowable expenses under the other Plans, in the absence of provisions with a purpose like that of this COB provision, whether or not claim is made. Ins 3.40(12)(b)2.2. If subd. 1. applies, the benefits of This Plan will be reduced so that they and the benefits payable under the other Plans do not equal more than the total allowable expenses. When the benefits of This Plan are reduced as described, each benefit is reduced in proportion and is then charged against any applicable benefit limit of This Plan. Ins 3.40(12)(c)(c) If the benefits of This Plan are reduced under par. (b), a Secondary Plan may reduce its benefits so that the total benefits paid or provided by all Plans during a claim determination period are not more than the total allowable expenses. The amount by which the Secondary Plan’s benefits are reduced shall be used by the Secondary Plan to pay allowable expenses not otherwise paid, which were incurred during the claim determination period by the person for whom the claim is made. As each claim is submitted, the Secondary Plan determines its obligation to pay for allowable expenses based on all claims which were submitted up to that point in time during the claim determination period. Ins 3.40(14)(14) Right to receive and release needed information. An insurer has the right to decide the facts it needs to apply the COB rules. It may get needed facts from or give them to any other organization or person without the consent of the insured but only as needed to apply the provisions of this section. This subsection does not relieve the insurer of the requirements of s. 146.82, Stats. Each person claiming benefits under This Plan shall give the insurer any facts it needs to pay the claim. Ins 3.40(15)(15) Facility of payment. A payment made under another Plan may include an amount which should have been paid under This Plan. If it does, the insurer responsible for payment may pay that amount to the organization which made that payment. That amount will then be treated as though it were a benefit paid under This Plan. The insurer will not have to pay that amount again. The term “payment made” includes providing benefits in the form of services, in which case “payment made” means reasonable cash value of the benefits provided in the form of services. Ins 3.40(16)(16) Right of recovery. If the amount of the payments made by the insurer responsible for payment, including the reasonable cash value of any benefits provided in the form of services, is more than it should have paid under a COB provision, it may recover the excess from one or more of: Ins 3.40(17)(17) Reasonable cash value of services. A Secondary Plan which provides benefits in the form of services may recover the reasonable cash value of providing the services from the Primary Plan, to the extent that benefits for the services are covered by the Primary Plan and have not already been paid or provided by the Primary Plan. Nothing in this provision shall be interpreted to require a Plan to reimburse a covered person in cash for the value of services provided by a Plan which provides benefits in the form of services. Ins 3.40(18)(18) Coordination with noncomplying plans. Except for expenses covered by worker’s compensation, employer’s liability insurance, Medicare, medical assistance, or traditional automobile “fault” contracts, a Complying Plan may coordinate its benefits with a Noncomplying Plan that may not be subject to insurance regulation on the following basis: Ins 3.40(18)(a)(a) If the Complying Plan is the Primary Plan, it shall pay or provide its benefits on a primary basis. Ins 3.40(18)(b)(b) If the Complying Plan is the Secondary Plan, it shall pay or provide its benefits first, but the amount of the benefits payable shall be determined as if the Complying Plan were the Secondary Plan. In such a situation, the payment shall be the limit of the Complying Plan’s liability. Ins 3.40(18)(c)(c) If the Noncomplying Plan does not provide the information needed by the Complying Plan to determine its benefits within a reasonable time after it is requested to do so, the Complying Plan shall assume that the benefits of the Noncomplying Plan are identical to its own and shall pay its benefits accordingly. However, the Complying Plan shall adjust any payments it makes based on such assumption whenever information becomes available as to the actual benefits of the Noncomplying Plan. Ins 3.40(18)(d)(d) The Complying Plan shall advance to or on behalf of the employee, subscriber, or member an amount equal to the difference if the Noncomplying Plan reduces its benefits so that the employee, subscriber, or member receives less in benefits than he or she would have received had the Complying Plan paid or provided its benefits as the Secondary Plan and the Noncomplying Plan paid or provided its benefits as the Primary Plan. Ins 3.40(18)(e)(e) In no event shall the Complying Plan advance more than the Complying Plan would have paid had it been the Primary Plan less any amount it previously paid. In consideration of such advance, the Complying Plan shall be subrogated to all rights of the employee, subscriber, or member against the Noncomplying Plan. Such advance by the Complying Plan shall also be without prejudice to any claim it may have against the Noncomplying Plan in the absence of such subrogation. Ins 3.40 NoteNote: In sub. (18) if the Noncomplying Plan is unwilling to provide the Complying Plan with the necessary information, the Complying Plan should assume the primary position in order to avoid undue claim delays and hardship to the insured. The Complying Plan may, through its subrogation rights, seek reimbursement for such payments. Undue delay in paying the claim may subject the Complying Plan to a violation of s. Ins 6.11. Ins 3.40(19)(19) Subrogation. The COB concept differs from that of subrogation. Provision for one may be included in health care benefits contracts without compelling the inclusion or exclusion of the other. Ins 3.40 HistoryHistory: Cr. Register, July, 1980, No. 295, eff. 9-1-80; am. (2), Register, January, 1981, No. 301, eff. 2-1-81; r. and recr. (7) (d) and (e), r. (19) under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 16., Stats., renum. (8) to (18) to be (9) to (19), am. (20), Register, July, 1985, No. 355, eff. 8-1-85; r. and recr. Register, December 1986, No. 372, eff. 1-1-87; am. (2), (6) (d) and (f), (18) (b) (intro.) and Appendix A, cr. (11) (b) 4. e., Register, August, 1989, No. 404, eff. 9-1-89; am. (2), (3) (b), (c) and (k), (6) (b) and (c), (7) (b), (11) (b) 2., (12) (a) and (b), (14) and Appendix A, r. (12) (b) (intro.), (c) and (d), (13) (b) to (f), (18) (a) and (20), cr. (11) (b) 5m., and (c), renum. (13) (a) and (18) (b) to be (12) (c) and (18) and am. (12) (c) and (18) (intro.), Register, October, 1991, No. 430, eff. 1-1-92; correction in (11) made under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 1., Stats., Register, April, 1992, No. 436; reprinted to correct error in (3) (c), Register, September, 1992, No. 441; correction in (2) made under s. 13.92 (4) (b) 7., Stats., Register May 2010 No. 653; correction in (2) made under s. 13.92 (4) (b) 7., Stats., Register May 2014 No. 701. Ins 3.40 APPENDIX A
Model COB Provision
This appendix provides model COB provision language. The terms and conditions of all insurance contracts containing a COB provision must comply with Ins 3.40
COORDINATION OF THE GROUP CONTRACT’S BENEFITS WITH OTHER BENEFITS
(I) Applicability.
(A) This Coordination of Benefits (“COB”) provision applies to This Plan when an employee or the employee’s covered dependent has health care coverage under more than one Plan. “Plan” and “This Plan” are defined below.
(B) If this COB provision applies, the order of benefit determination rules shall be looked at first. The rules determine whether the benefits of This Plan are determined before or after those of another Plan. The benefits of This Plan:
(i) shall not be reduced when, under the order of benefit determination rules, This Plan determines its benefits before another Plan; but
(ii) may be reduced when, under the order of benefit determination rules, another Plan determines its benefits first. This reduction is described in Section (IV) Effect on the Benefits of This Plan.
II Definitions.
