Trans 107.09(4)(a)(a) The department shall conduct a review of an assessment, driver safety plan, or amended driver safety plan upon receipt of a written request for review under s.
343.30 (1q) (d) or
343.305 (10) (d), Stats. The review shall be completed within 10 business days of receipt of the request by the department.
Trans 107.09(4)(am)
(am) The driver assessment and required driver safety plan shall be found to be appropriate if the diagnostic or certainty level of symptoms identified on the assessment report of physiological, behavioral, psychological or attitudinal symptoms, supports the assessment findings made by the assessor on department forms as follows:
Trans 107.09(4)(am)1.
1. `Chemical dependency.' An assessment finding of chemical dependency is appropriate if assessment shows the presence of any of the following:
Trans 107.09(4)(am)1.b.
b. One or more level 1 indicators of dependency from the psychological, attitudinal or behavioral minor or major criteria are present together with 3 or more level 2 indicators of any type.
Trans 107.09(4)(am)2.
2. `Suspected chemical dependency.' An assessment finding of suspected chemical dependency is appropriate if assessment shows 5 or more level 2 indicators of any type from the minor and major criteria.
Trans 107.09(4)(am)3.
3. `Borderline chemical abuse.' An assessment finding of borderline chemical abuse is appropriate if assessment shows any of the following:
Trans 107.09(4)(am)3.a.
a. One level 1 indicator of substance problems from the psychological, attitudinal or behavioral criteria.
Trans 107.09(4)(am)3.b.
b. Three or 4 level 2 indicators of any type are present together with any level 3 indicators of any type.
Trans 107.09(4)(am)4.
4. `Chemical abuse.' An assessment finding of chemical abuse is appropriate if assessment shows any of the following:
Trans 107.09(4)(am)4.a.
a. An absence of level 1 indicators and some level 2 or 3 indicators, but fewer level 2 and 3 indicators than are needed to justify a finding of chemical dependency, suspected chemical dependency or borderline chemical abuse.
Trans 107.09 Note
Note: The Wisconsin Assessment of the Impaired Driver, form MV3649, and the Order For Assessment and Driver Safety Plan Report, form MV3634, refer to “chemical abuse" and “borderline chemical abuse" as “Irresponsible Substance Use" and “Irresponsible Substance Use - Borderline." The form refers to the criteria in s.
Trans 107.09(4)(am)4. as “insufficient evidence for a progressive pattern of substance abuse."
Trans 107.09(4)(b)
(b) The department shall consider the following in determining the appropriateness of a driver safety plan:
Trans 107.09(4)(b)1.
1. A finding of chemical abuse does not support in-patient treatment or extensive out-patient treatment.
Trans 107.09(4)(b)2.
2. A finding of suspected alcohol dependency does not support in-patient treatment.
Trans 107.09(4)(b)3.
3. A finding of chemical abuse does support educational program recommendations.
Trans 107.09(4)(b)4.
4. A finding of suspected chemical dependency does support out-patient treatment or a combination of education and out-patient treatment.
Trans 107.09(4)(b)5.
5. A finding of chemical dependency does support in-patient treatment, extensive outpatient treatment, or combination of treatment.
Trans 107.09(4)(b)6.
6. A finding of borderline chemical abuse does support short term outpatient individual or group counseling, or a combination of education and outpatient counseling.
Trans 107.09(4)(c)
(c) A driver safety plan shall be considered inappropriate if it is a program in another state that does not meet the standards of sub.
(9).
Trans 107.09(5)
(5) When the driver safety plan is found to be appropriate, the suspension shall remain in effect until notification from a county department that the person is complying with the driver safety plan received by the department and the person has paid the reinstatement fee(s) required by s.
343.21 (1) (j), Stats.
Trans 107.09(6)
(6) When the driver safety plan is found to be inappropriate or the person is found to be in compliance with the driver safety plan, the suspension shall be released under the provisions of s.
343.39 (1) (c) and
(2), Stats., and the fee specified in s.
343.21 (1) (j), Stats., shall not be charged for reinstatement of the license, under the provisions of s.
343.30 (1q) (d) or
343.305 (10) (d), Stats., and
Trans 107.09(7)
(7) When the driver safety plan is found to be inappropriate by the department or a court, the person shall be required to furnish the department with another assessment and driver safety plan within 30 days under s.
343.30 (1q) (d) or
343.305 (10) (d), Stats.
Trans 107.09(9)
(9) A driver safety plan recommending treatment in another state is acceptable if approved by the county department or another state's program, it includes an examination of the driver's chemical abuse or dependency level, and it recommends an individualized plan or a program of education or treatment.
Trans 107.09 History
History: Cr.
Register, November, 1982, No. 323, eff. 12-1-82; am. (5),
Register, March, 1984, No. 339, eff. 4-1-84; am. (1), (3) (a), (5), (8) and (9),
Register, September, 1986, No. 369, eff. 10-1-86; am. (1), (4) (intro.), (6) to (8),
Register, May, 1988, No. 389, eff. 6-1-88; am. (4) (a), (b) (intro.), 1. to 4., (7) and (9), cr. (4) (d),
Register, June, 1993, No. 450, eff. 7-1-93; r. and recr. (4) (intro.), (a), (b) (intro.), cr. (4) (b) 6., r. (4) (c), renum. (4) (d) to be (c) and am.,
Register, September, 1996, No. 489, eff. 10-1-96
; reprinted to correct error in (4) (b) 6.,
Register, December, 1996, No. 492.
Trans 107.10(1)(1)
If the decision to deny or cancel operating privileges is based in part on the results of a special examination and a medical report involving chemical abuse or dependency under s.
343.16 (5), Stats., a person may request an appearance before a review board, or a review by a board of the information on file with the department.
Trans 107.10(2)
(2) After receiving the recommendation of a review board, the department shall notify the person of the department's decision within 10 working days after the person's appearance before the review board. The notice shall include the review board's recommendations and department's decision and shall state the reasons for the decision.
Trans 107.10 Note
Note: The department's decision to cancel, deny, suspend or revoke licenses under this chapter is subject to judicial review, in accordance with s.
343.40, Stats.
Trans 107.10 History
History: Cr.
Register, November, 1982, No. 323, eff. 12-1-82; am. (1),
Register, June, 1993, No. 450, eff. 7-1-93.
Trans 107.11
Trans 107.11 Effective dates, transition provisions, and miscellaneous provisions. Trans 107.11(1)(1)
The effective date of all departmental suspensions or revocations under this chapter shall be the date the order was mailed, except if the person is currently under suspension or revocation, the effective date shall be the date the license was surrendered for the previous action, or the date of the conviction causing the new suspensions or revocation, whichever is later.
Trans 107.11(2)
(2) For the purpose of counting the number of refusal revocations, OWI convictions, or arrests, all such convictions, refusal revocations, or arrests prior to, on, or after May 1, 1982 shall be counted by the department using the date of offense or arrest.
Trans 107.11(4)
(4) The reinstatement date for suspensions for noncompliance with assessment or a driver safety plan under ss.
343.30 (1q) (d) and
343.305 (10) (d), Stats., shall be the date the reinstatement fee is paid or the date the department receives the notice of compliance, whichever is later.
Trans 107.11(5)
(5) Implied consent refusals and OWI convictions from the same incident shall be counted as one.
Trans 107.11 History
History: Cr.
Register, November, 1982, No. 323, eff. 12-1-82; am. (3),
Register, March, 1984, No. 339, eff. 4-1-84; am. (3),
Register, September, 1986, No. 369, eff. 10-1-86; am. (2), r. (3), renum. (4) to (8) to be (3) to (7) and am. (3) to (5),
Register, May, 1988, No. 389, eff. 6-1-88; r. (2), renum. (3) to (7) to be (2) to (6),
Register, January, 1991, No. 421, eff. 2-1-91.
