Noes - None.
Absent or not voting - None.
Concurred in.
Senate Bill 311
Relating to: the prohibition against underage persons entering or being on any premises operating under an alcohol beverage license.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 311?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Farrow, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 311
Read a third time and passed.
Senate Bill 422
Relating to: considering certain statutory factors in deviating from the child support percentage standard, treatment of child care expenses, ordering trusts for the support of children, order of disbursement of wages for Huber law inmates, reducing a payer's child support obligation if the child receives a federal benefit, a study of county child support agency staffing, ordering payment of postmajority support for a child with exceptional educational needs, requiring a report evaluating the adequacy of child support orders and paternity judgments and blood test costs.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 422?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 422?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 422?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 4 to Senate Bill 422 offered by Senator Adelman.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 4 to Senate Bill 422?
Senator Adelman, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 4 to Senate Bill 422 be withdrawn and returned to author.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 422
Read a third time and passed.
Senate Bill 501
S650
Relating to: the grounds for involuntary termination of parental rights over a child, appeals of and motions for relief from orders terminating parental rights and denial of visitation by a parent of a child adjudicated to be in need of protection or services; the statement of legislative purpose in the children's code; abuse and neglect of a child; grounds for jurisdiction over a child alleged to be in need of protection or services; criteria for holding a child in physical custody; payment by a parent for alcohol and other drug abuse services or special treatment or care for a child; duties of a county department of human services or social services with respect to child abuse and neglect investigations; grounds for a child abuse restraining order and injunction; the defense in criminal prosecutions based on the privilege of reasonable discipline of a child; determining whether a child alleged to be in need of protection or services needs protection or services that can be ordered by a juvenile court; extension of an informal disposition for a child when the informal disposition is based on allegations that the child is in need of protection or services; the duties of a guardian ad litem appointed in proceedings involving a child alleged to be in need of protection or services; the right to a jury trial in proceedings involving children alleged to be in need of protection or services; the release of certain information, including the results of tests for the human immunodeficiency virus or viral hepatitis, type B, regarding a child to the child's foster parent or treatment foster parent or the operator of a group home or child caring institution in which the child is placed; a county's authority to use certain community aids funds to employ private attorneys for proceedings under the children's code; disclosure of certain information to certain voluntary reporters of suspected or threatened child abuse or neglect; the time by which a detention hearing must be held and the time by which a petition must be filed under the children's code if a child is held in custody; petitioning a court, at the time a petition is filed for involuntary termination of parental rights to a child, for an order prohibiting visitation or contact with that child; the role of foster parents, treatment foster parents and certain other physical custodians in hearings under the children's code; permitting genetic testing for paternity determinations under the children's code, paternity determination proceedings for a child alleged to be in need of protection or services and disclosure of records Relating to paternity determination proceedings; guardianship for certain children adjudged to be in need of protection or services; requesting the joint legislative council to study the use, effectiveness and funding of systems and programs directed at the prevention of child abuse and neglect; and discovery in proceedings under the children's code.
Read a second time.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that the Senate recess until 2:51 P.M..
2:35 P.M.
__________________
2:51 P.M.
The Senate reconvened.
Senator Rude in the chair.
Senator Chvala moved that Senate Bill 501 be referred to the committee on Judiciary.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 501 be referred to the committee on Judiciary?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 16; noes, 17; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Noes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Absent or not voting - None.
Referal Refused.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 501?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 2 to Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 501 offered by Senator Huelsman.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 501?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 501?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 501?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 501 offered by Senator Adelman.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 501?
Senator Huelsman moved that Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 501 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 3 to Senate
Bill 501 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 19; noes, 14; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, C. Potter, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 19.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Moen, Moore, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 14.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 501
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 22; noes, 11; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Buettner, Burke, Clausing, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, C. Potter, Risser, Rosenzweig, Rude, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 22.
Noes - Senators Andrea, Breske, Chvala, Decker, Fitzgerald, George, Moen, Moore, Schultz, Shibilski and Wineke - 11.
Absent or not voting - None.
Passed.
Senate Bill 554
Relating to: restricted areas above and below hydroelectric dams and granting rule-making authority.
Read a second time.
Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 554 offered by Senators Shibilski, A. Lasee, Decker, Schultz and Rude.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 554?
Senator Cowles moved that Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 554 be laid on the table.
S651
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 1 to
Senate Bill 554 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 10; noes, 22; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Buettner, Burke, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Rosenzweig, Rude and Weeden - 10.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, Farrow, Fitzgerald, George, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Moore, Petak, C. Potter, Risser, Schultz, Shibilski, Welch, Wineke and Zien - 22.
Absent or not voting - Senator Panzer - 1.
Tabling refused.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 554?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Farrow, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 554
