Assembly Bill 1080
Relating to: eliminating limitations on reimbursement of providers of home health, personal care and private-duty nursing services under the medical assistance program.
Read a second time.
Senator Drzewiecki, Buettner and Darling, with unanimous consent, asked to be made cosponsors of Assembly Bill 1080.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
__________________
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that Senator Andrea be granted a leave of absence for the balance of today's session.
Assembly Bill 1080
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 31; noes, 1; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Breske, Buettner, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Darling, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, George, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Moore, Panzer, Petak, C. Potter, Risser, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Welch, Wineke and Zien - 31.
Noes - Senator Weeden - 1.
Absent or not voting - Senator Andrea - 1.
Concurred in.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged to the Assembly.
__________________
By Charles Sanders, chief clerk.
Mr. President:
I am directed to inform you that the Assembly has amendeded and concurred in as amended:
Senate Bill 624
Assembly amendments 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 adopted.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 624 be withdrawn and taken up at this time.
Senate Bill 624
Relating to: juvenile justice and granting rule-making authority.
Read.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 624 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
S810
Senator George moved nonconcurrence in Assembly amendment 2 to Senate Bill 624.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 2 to Senate Bill 624 be nonconcurred in?
Nonconcurrence refused.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 2 to Senate Bill 624 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 3 to Senate Bill 624 be concurred in?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 26; noes, 6; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Buettner, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Darling, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Panzer, Petak, C. Potter, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Weeden, Welch, Wineke and Zien - 26.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Decker, Drzewiecki, George, Moore and Risser - 6.
Absent or not voting - Senator Andrea - 1.
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 5 to Senate Bill 624 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 6 to Senate Bill 624 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged to the Assembly.
__________________
By Charles Sanders, chief clerk.
Mr. President:
I am directed to inform you that the Assembly has amendeded and concurred in as amended:
Senate Bill 182
Assembly amendments 1, 2 and 3 adopted.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 182 be withdrawn and taken up at this time.
Senate Bill 182
Relating to: sex offender registration requirements, the release to certain persons of information concerning sex offenders required to register, requiring persons who are found to be sexually violent persons to provide biological specimens for deoxyribonucleic acid analysis, granting rule-making authority, making an appropriation and providing a penalty.
Read.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 182 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 2 to Senate Bill 182 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 3 to Senate Bill 182 be concurred in?
Concurred.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged to the Assembly.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that Assembly Bill 1018 be withdrawn from the committee on Senate Organization and taken up at this time.
Assembly Bill 1018
Relating to: the funding of a prison expansion project under the state building program and granting bonding authority.
Read a second time.
Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 1018 offered by Senator Decker.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 1018?
Senator Welch moved rejection of Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 1018.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 1018?
Rejected.
Senate amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 1018 offered by Senators Chvala, Burke, Moore, Decker, Clausing, Grobschmidt, Shibilski, Wineke, George, Jauch, Adelman, Risser, C. Potter and Andrea.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 1018?
Senator Welch moved rejection of Senate amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 1018.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 1018?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 19; noes, 13; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Moen, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 19.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 13.
Absent or not voting - Senator Andrea - 1.
Rejected.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Assembly Bill 1018
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 24; noes, 8; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Breske, Buettner, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Moen, Panzer, Petak, C. Potter, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 24.
Noes - Senators Burke, Decker, George, Jauch, Moore, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 8.
Absent or not voting - Senator Andrea - 1.
Concurred in.
