Adopted.
Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 47 offered by Senator Welch.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 47?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 47
Read a third time and passed.
Senate Bill 88
Relating to: increasing forfeitures for motor vehicle speed restriction violations committed in school zones and providing penalties.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 88?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Moen, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 88
Read a third time and passed.
Senate Bill 192
Relating to: the expulsion of pupils from school and creating a council on pupil discipline in the department of public instruction.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 192?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 192?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Moen, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 192
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 15; noes, 17; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
S530
Ayes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plache, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski, Wineke and Wirch - 15.
Noes - Senators Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, George, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Absent or not voting - None.
Passage refused.
Senate Bill 259
Relating to: library lending incentive aid and granting rule-making authority.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 259?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 259?
Adopted.
Senator Potter moved rejection of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 259.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 259?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 16; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plache, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski, Wineke and Wirch - 16.
Noes - Senators Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejection refused.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 259?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 16; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 16.
Noes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plache, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski, Wineke and Wirch - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Adoption refused.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Moen, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 259
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 24; noes, 8; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Darling, Decker, Fitzgerald, George, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Moore, Plache, C. Potter, Risser, Roessler, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Wineke, Wirch and Zien - 24.
Noes - Senators Cowles, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Panzer, Rosenzweig, Weeden and Welch - 8.
Absent or not voting - None.
Passed.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that Assembly Bill 688 be considered for action at this time.
Assembly Bill 688
Relating to: litigation by persons incarcerated, imprisoned, confined or detained in a jail or prison, immunity from civil liability, the time period for the state to respond to an action and limiting access to public records.
Read a second time.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that Assembly Bill 600 be considered for action at this time.
Assembly Bill 600
Relating to: the placement of a child with a relative for adoption and application of the interstate compact on the placement of children; the time by which a juvenile court must hold a hearing on a petition for adoptive placement of a child with a nonrelative and a petition to terminate parental rights that is filed with a petition for adoptive placement; removal of a child from a foster home, treatment foster home or group home for the purpose of placing the child by an agency for adoption; education about adoption and school age parents programs; who may be adopted; the documentation required in a permanency plan for preadoptive placement of a child in foster care or treatment foster care under a voluntary agreement; payments by an adoptive or proposed adoptive parent for the expenses of a birth parent or child; the release of identifying information by an agency that placed a child for adoption or that was appointed guardian of a child who was adopted; advertising related to adoption; the time by which a petition for a rehearing on the ground of new evidence must be filed in a juvenile court proceeding; and providing a penalty.
Read a second time.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Assembly Bill 600
Read a third time and concurred in.
Assembly Bill 688
Relating to: litigation by persons incarcerated, imprisoned, confined or detained in a jail or prison, immunity from civil liability, the time period for the state to respond to an action and limiting access to public records.
Read a second time.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 688 be laid on the table.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 688 be laid on the table.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 3 to Assembly Bill 688 be laid on the table.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 4 to Assembly Bill 688 be laid on the table.
Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 688 offered by Senators Moore, Wirch and Chvala.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 688?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 29; noes, 3; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
