Senator Rude move reconsideration of the vote by which Senate Bill 360 passed.
Assembly Bill 773
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Moen, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Assembly Bill 773
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 32; noes, 0; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Darling, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, George, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Moore, Panzer, Plache, C. Potter, Risser, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Weeden, Welch, Wineke, Wirch and Zien - 32.
Noes - None.
Absent or not voting - None.
Concurred in.
Senate Bill 360
Relating to: allowing brewers and alcohol beverage wholesalers to contribute money or things of value to or for the benefit of certain festivals held in 2nd class cities.
Read.
The question was: Shall the vote by which Senate Bill 360 passed be reconsidered?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 16; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 16.
Noes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plache, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski, Wineke and Wirch - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Reconsideration refused.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged to the Assembly.
Senate Bill 494
Relating to: suspension of licenses, permits and other credentials for failure to pay child support or to comply with a subpoena or warrant related to paternity or child support proceedings and requiring social security numbers on license, permit and other credential applications and on certain documents concerning marriage and children; creating a record matching program to match information about delinquent child support obligors with financial account information of financial institutions; creating a statutory lien for delinquent child support obligations; creating a mechanism for enforcing child support liens; fees for the child and spousal support, establishment of paternity and medical liability support program and cooperation with child support efforts under Wisconsin works; income withholding for support or maintenance, adjudicating paternity when the mother fails to appear and other technical changes related to child support enforcement; access to certain agency records, nonliability for providing information from records, issuing subpoenas, ordering genetic tests; providing notice to new employers of a parent's obligation to provide health care coverage for a child; hospital-based voluntary establishment of paternity; administratively changing interstate income-withholding orders to sum certain amounts; presumption of paternity; access by county child support employes to tax information; acknowledgment of paternity; procedure, temporary orders and probable cause in paternity actions; payment for genetic tests in paternity actions; changes in departmental responsibility for support enforcement; intercepting delinquent support and certain other payments from pension plan disbursements; intercepting delinquent support from court judgments and settlements; granting rulemaking authority; making appropriations; and providing a penalty.
Read a second time.
Senator Wineke moved that the Senate adjourn.
The question was: Shall the Senate adjourn?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 8; noes, 24; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Darling, Farrow, George, Rosenzweig, Weeden, Welch, Wineke and Zien - 8.
Noes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Fitzgerald, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Moore, Panzer, Plache, C. Potter, Risser, Roessler, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski and Wirch - 24.
S540
Absent or not voting - None.
Adjournment refused.
Senator George moved that Senate Bill 494 be referred to the committee on Senate Organization.
__________________
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that the Senate recess until 6:38 P.M..
6:01 P.M.
__________________
6:38 P.M.
The Senate reconvened.
Senator Risser in the chair.
__________________
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 494 be referred to the committee on Senate Organization?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 2; noes, 29; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
Ayes - Senators George and Wineke - 2.
Noes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Darling, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Moore, Panzer, Plache, C. Potter, Risser, Roessler, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Weeden, Welch, Wirch and Zien - 29.
Absent or not voting - Senator Rosenzweig - 1.
Referal Refused.
The question was: Adoption of Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 494?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 494
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 25; noes, 6; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Darling, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Moore, Panzer, Plache, C. Potter, Roessler, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Wirch and Zien - 25.
Noes - Senators Fitzgerald, George, Risser, Weeden, Welch and Wineke - 6.
Absent or not voting - Senator Rosenzweig - 1.
Passed.
Senator Moen, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 315 be withdrawn and taken up at this time.
Senate Bill 315
Relating to: eliminating the office of health care information and transferring functions related to collection, analysis and dissemination of health care information to the department of health and family services, confidentiality of patient health care records, granting rule-making authority, providing a penalty and making appropriations.
Read.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 315 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 2 to Senate Bill 315 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 3 to Senate Bill 315 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 4 to Senate Bill 315 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 5 to Senate Bill 315 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 21 to Senate Bill 315 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
Senator Moen moved nonconcurrence in Assembly amendment 23 to Senate Bill 315.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 23 to Senate Bill 315 be nonconcurred in?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 20; noes, 11; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Decker, Ellis, Farrow, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Panzer, Plache, Risser, Roessler, Rude, Weeden and Zien - 20.
Noes - Senators Darling, Drzewiecki, Fitzgerald, George, A. Lasee, C. Potter, Schultz, Shibilski, Welch, Wineke and Wirch - 11.
Absent or not voting - Senator Rosenzweig - 1.
Nonconcurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 25 to Senate Bill 315 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 28 to Senate Bill 315 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 29 to Senate Bill 315 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged to the Assembly.
__________________
