Representative Foti asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
442 be taken up at this time. Granted.
Senate Bill 442
Relating to: authorizing the creation of a local cultural arts district; granting a property tax exemption for the district's property; granting a sales tax and use tax exemption for tangible personal property and services purchased by the district; giving a local cultural arts district the authority to issue bonds and granting income tax exemptions for interest income on bonds issued by the district; authorizing certain local cultural arts districts to acquire property by condemnation; and authorizing the Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority to issue bonds to finance certain cultural arts facilities
By
Senator
Risser; cosponsored by Representatives Underheim and Miller.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 442 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative Foti asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 442 be given a third reading.
Representative Hubler objected.
Representative Foti asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
409 be withdrawn from the twelfth order of business on today's calendar and taken up at this time. Granted.
Senate Bill 409
Relating to: the notice of a hearing on the creation of a tax incremental district proposed by the city of Stoughton.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 409 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative Foti asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
409 be given a third reading.
Representative Olsen objected.
Representative Foti asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that the assembly proceed to the twelfth order of business on today's calendar.
Senate Bill 193
Relating to: a state minimum wage, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, providing an exemption from rule-making procedures, granting rule-making authority and providing a penalty.
Representative Bock moved that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 193 be withdrawn from the committee on Labor and Employment and taken up at this time.
__________________
Representative Reynolds asked unanimous consent that the Assembly stand recessed. Granted.
The Assembly stood recessed.
11:20 P.M.
__________________
11:25 P.M.
The Assembly reconvened.
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese in the chair.
The question was: Shall the rules be suspended and Senate Bill 193 be withdrawn from the committee on Labor and Employment and taken up at this time?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
A910
Ayes - Representatives Balow, Berceau, Black, Bock, Boyle, Carpenter, Coggs, Colon, Cullen, Gronemus, Hasenohrl, Hebl, Huber, Hubler, Kreuser, Krug, Krusick, La Fave, Lassa, J. Lehman, Meyer, Meyerhofer, Miller, Morris-Tatum, Plale, Plouff, Pocan, Richards, Riley, Schneider, Schooff, Sherman, Sinicki, Staskunas, Steinbrink, Travis, Turner, Wasserman, Waukau, Williams, Wood and Young - 42.
Noes - Representatives Ainsworth, Albers, Brandemuehl, Duff, Foti, Freese, Gard, Goetsch, Grothman, Gunderson, Gundrum, Hahn, Handrick, Hoven, Huebsch, Hundertmark, Hutchison, Jeskewitz, Johnsrud, Kaufert, Kedzie, Kelso, Kestell, Klusman, Kreibich, Ladwig, F. Lasee, M. Lehman, Leibham, Montgomery, Musser, Nass, Olsen, Ott, Owens, Petrowski, Pettis, Porter, Powers, Reynolds, Rhoades, Seratti, Skindrud, Spillner, Stone, Suder, Sykora, Townsend, Underheim, Urban, Vrakas, Walker, Ward, Wieckert, Ziegelbauer and Speaker Jensen - 56.
Absent or not voting - Representative Ryba - 1.
Motion failed.
Representative Owens moved that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 781 be withdrawn from the committee on Family Law and taken up at this time.
Representative Schneider introduced a privileged resolution.
__________________
Read first time and referred:
Assembly Joint Resolution 125
Relating to: extending the legislative floorperiod commencing on March 7, 2000, solely for the consideration of 1999 Assembly Bill 947, Relating to: lease or purchase of a privately constructed prison in Douglas County.
By
Representatives Boyle, Sherman, Schneider, Krug and Reynolds.
To committee on Rules.
Representative Jensen introduced a privileged resolution.
Assembly Joint Resolution 126
Relating to: extending the legislative floorperiod commencing on March 7, 2000, solely for the consideration of 1999 Assembly Bill 892, the "1999 Professional Football Stadium Bill".
By
Representative
Jensen
.
To committee on Rules.
Representative Schneider asked unanimous consent that the Assembly stand recessed.
Representative Reynolds moved that the Assembly stand adjourned pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1.
The question was: Shall the Assembly stand adjourned pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Balow, Berceau, Black, Bock, Boyle, Carpenter, Coggs, Colon, Cullen, Gronemus, Hasenohrl, Hebl, Huber, Hubler, Krug, Krusick, La Fave, Lassa, J. Lehman, Meyer, Meyerhofer, Miller, Morris-Tatum, Plale, Plouff, Pocan, Reynolds, Richards, Riley, Schneider, Schooff, Sherman, Sinicki, Staskunas, Travis, Turner, Wasserman, Waukau, Williams, Wood, Young and Ziegelbauer - 42.
Noes - Representatives Ainsworth, Albers, Brandemuehl, Duff, Foti, Freese, Gard, Goetsch, Grothman, Gunderson, Gundrum, Hahn, Handrick, Hoven, Huebsch, Hundertmark, Hutchison, Jeskewitz, Johnsrud, Kaufert, Kedzie, Kelso, Kestell, Klusman, Kreibich, Kreuser, Ladwig, F. Lasee, M. Lehman, Leibham, Montgomery, Musser, Nass, Olsen, Ott, Owens, Petrowski, Pettis, Porter, Powers, Rhoades, Seratti, Skindrud, Spillner, Steinbrink, Stone, Suder, Sykora, Townsend, Underheim, Urban, Vrakas, Walker, Ward, Wieckert and Speaker Jensen - 56.
Absent or not voting - Representatives Ryba - 1 .
Motion failed.
__________________
Representative Krug asked unanimous consent that the Assembly stand recessed. Granted.
The Assembly stood recessed.
11:50 P.M., Thursday, March 30
__________________
2:45 A.M., Friday, March 31
The Assembly reconvened.
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese in the chair.
__________________
Motions
Representative Williams asked unanimous consent to be recorded on the following questions from February 3, February 8, February 9, February 10 and March 29. Granted.
The question was: Shall Assembly Joint Resolution 100 be adopted? "Aye"
The question was: Assembly Bill 244 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "Aye"
The question was: Shall the rules be suspended and Assembly Bill 246 be given a third reading? "No"
The question was: Assembly Bill 664 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "Aye"
The question was: Shall Assembly Resolution 24 be adopted? "Aye"
The question was: Assembly Bill 246 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "No"
A911
The question was:
Assembly Bill
582 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "
Aye"
The question was: Assembly Bill 351 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "Aye"
The question was: Assembly Bill 529 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "Aye"
The question was: Assembly Bill 700 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "Aye"
The question was: Assembly Bill 701 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "No"
The question was: Shall the vote by which Assembly Bill 246 was passed be reconsidered? "Aye"
The question was: Shall Assembly substitute amendment 3 to Assembly Bill 941 be laid on the table? "No"
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 941 be laid on the table? "No"
The question was: Shall Assembly substitute amendment 3 to Assembly Bill 941 be taken from the table and taken up at this time? "Aye"
The question was: Shall Assembly Bill
941 be laid on the table? "Aye"
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 941 be laid on the table? "No"
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 941 be laid on the table? "No"
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 941 be laid on the table? "No"
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 941 be laid on the table? "No"
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 6 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 941 be laid on the table? "No"
