Absent or not voting - None.
Passed.
Senate Bill 410
Relating to: eligibility for a grant under the fire dues program.
Read a second time.
Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 410 offered by Senator Brown.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 410?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Zien, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate
Bill 410
Read a third time and passed.
__________________
Assembly Joint Resolution 52
Relating to: calling for concerted action to support, renew, and expand the agricultural economy in Wisconsin.
Read.
Senator Panzer, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Joint Resolution 52.
Senator Panzer, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Bill 283.
Senator Erpenbach, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Joint Resolution 52.
Senator Stepp, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Joint Resolution 52.
Senator Zien, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Joint Resolution 52.
Senator Zien, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Bill 283.
Senator Wirch, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Joint Resolution 52.
Senator Wirch, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Bill 283.
Senator Kanavas, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Joint Resolution 52.
The question was: Shall Assembly Joint Resolution 52 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
Senator Panzer, with unanimous consent, asked that Assembly Bill 283 beconsidered for action at this time.
Relating to: an income and franchise tax credit for expenses related to operating a dairy farm.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 283?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Leibham, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Bill
283.
Senator Zien, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Assembly Bill 283
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 33; noes, 0; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Brown, Carpenter, Chvala, Coggs, Cowles, Darling, Decker, Ellis, Erpenbach, S. Fitzgerald, Hansen, Harsdorf, Jauch, Kanavas, Kedzie, A. Lasee, Lassa, Lazich, Leibham, M. Meyer, Moore, Panzer, Plale, Reynolds, Risser, Robson, Roessler, Schultz, Stepp, Welch, Wirch and Zien - 33.
Noes - None.
Absent or not voting - None.
Concurred in as amended.
Assembly Bill 67
Relating to: employment discrimination based on creed; exemption from liability and discipline for health care providers and hospital employees who refuse to participate in sterilization, abortion, assisted suicide, and other procedures on moral or religious grounds; and power of attorney for health care instruments and patient declarations regarding the withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining procedures or feeding tubes.
Read a second time.
Senate amendment 3 to Assembly Bill 67 offered by Senator Reynolds.
Senator Reynolds, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 3 to Assembly Bill 67 be withdrawn and returned to author.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 67?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 67?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 4 to Assembly Bill 67 offered by Senators Moore, Risser, Robson, Wirch, Chvala, Coggs, Lassa and Erpenbach.
Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 67 offered by Senators Moore, M. Meyer, Carpenter, Robson, Chvala, Coggs, Risser, Lassa and Erpenbach.
Senator Moore, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 4 to Assembly Bill 67 be placed after Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 67.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a coauthor of Senate Bill 434.
Senator Roessler moved rejection of Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 67.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 67?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 20; noes, 13; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Brown, Cowles, Darling, Ellis, S. Fitzgerald, Harsdorf, Kanavas, Kedzie, A. Lasee, Lazich, Leibham, Panzer, Plale, Reynolds, Roessler, Schultz, Stepp, Welch and Zien - 20.
Noes - Senators Carpenter, Chvala, Coggs, Decker, Erpenbach, Hansen, Jauch, Lassa, M. Meyer, Moore, Risser, Robson and Wirch - 13.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 4 to Assembly Bill 67 offered by Senator Moore.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 4 to Assembly Bill 67?
Adopted.
Senator Roessler moved rejection of Senate amendment 4 to Assembly Bill 67.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 4 to Assembly Bill 67?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 19; noes, 14; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Brown, Cowles, Darling, Ellis, S. Fitzgerald, Harsdorf, Kanavas, Kedzie, A. Lasee, Lazich, Leibham, Panzer, Reynolds, Roessler, Schultz, Stepp, Welch and Zien - 19.
Noes - Senators Carpenter, Chvala, Coggs, Decker, Erpenbach, Hansen, Jauch, Lassa, M. Meyer, Moore, Plale, Risser, Robson and Wirch - 14.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Panzer, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Assembly Bill 67
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 20; noes, 13; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Brown, Cowles, Darling, Ellis, S. Fitzgerald, Harsdorf, Kanavas, Kedzie, A. Lasee, Lazich, Leibham, Panzer, Plale, Reynolds, Roessler, Schultz, Stepp, Welch and Zien - 20.
Noes - Senators Carpenter, Chvala, Coggs, Decker, Erpenbach, Hansen, Jauch, Lassa, M. Meyer, Moore, Risser, Robson and Wirch - 13.
Absent or not voting - None.
Concurred in as amended.
Assembly Bill 279
Relating to: creating a rebuttable presumption against awarding a parent joint or sole legal custody if the court finds that the parent has engaged in a pattern or serious incident of abuse, requiring a guardian ad litem and a mediator to have training related to domestic violence, and requiring a guardian ad litem to investigate and a mediator to inquire whether a party in an action affecting the family engaged in domestic violence.
Read a second time.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Zien, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Assembly Bill 279
