Representative Huebsch asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 99 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
Assembly Bill 38
Relating to: restriction violations by persons holding instruction permits or probationary licenses to operate motor vehicles and providing a penalty.
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 38 offered by Representative Shilling.
__________________
Point of Order
Representative Friske rose to the point of order that Assembly amendment 1 to
Assembly Bill
38 was not germane under Assembly Rule
54.
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese ruled the point of order
well taken.
The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 38 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
Representative Huebsch asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 38 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Assembly Bill 38 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
Motion carried.
Representative Huebsch asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 38 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
Assembly Bill 62
Relating to: sentencing discretion of a court and providing a penalty.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 62 be adopted?
Motion carried.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 62 be adopted?
Motion carried.
Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly Bill 62 offered by Representative Zepnick.
__________________
Point of Order
Representative Gundrum rose to the point of order that Assembly amendment 3 to
Assembly Bill
62 was not germane under Assembly Rule
54.
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese ruled the point of order
well taken.
Representative Richards appealed the ruling of the Chair.
The question was: Shall the ruling of the Chair stand as the ruling of the Assembly?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Ainsworth, Albers, Ballweg, Bies, Davis, J. Fitzgerald, Freese, Friske, Gielow, Gottlieb, Gunderson, Gundrum, Hahn, Honadel, Huebsch, Hundertmark, Jensen, Jeskewitz, Kaufert, Kerkman, Kestell, Kleefisch, Krawczyk, Kreibich, Lamb, F. Lasee, LeMahieu, Loeffelholz, Lothian, McCormick, Meyer, Montgomery, Moulton, Mursau, Musser, Nass, Nerison, Nischke, Ott, Owens, Petrowski, Pettis, Pridemore, Rhoades, Stone, Strachota, Suder, Towns, Townsend, Underheim, Van Roy, Vos, Vrakas, Vukmir, Ward, Wieckert, M. Williams and Speaker Gard - 58.
Noes - Representatives Benedict, Berceau, Black, Boyle, Colon, Cullen, Fields, Grigsby, Gronemus, Hebl, Hubler, Kessler, Kreuser, Krusick, Lehman, Molepske, Nelson, Parisi, Pocan, Pope-Roberts, Richards, Schneider, Seidel, Sheridan, Sherman, Shilling, Sinicki, Staskunas, Steinbrink, Toles, Turner, Van Akkeren, Vruwink, Wasserman, A. Williams, Young, Zepnick and Ziegelbauer - 38.
A115
Absent or not voting - Representatives Hines, Travis and Wood - 3.
Motion carried.
Representative Albers in the chair.
The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 62 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
Representative Huebsch asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 62 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Assembly Bill 62 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
Motion carried.
Representative Huebsch asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 62 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese in the chair.
Assembly Bill 89
Relating to: exclusive municipal court jurisdiction in proceedings against juveniles 12 years of age or over, but under 16 years of age, for municipal traffic ordinance violations.
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 89 offered by Representative Richards.
__________________
Point of Order
Representative Gundrum rose to the point of order that Assembly amendment 1 to
Assembly Bill
89 was not germane under Assembly Rule
54.
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese ruled the point of order
well taken.
Representative Richards appealed the ruling of the Chair.
The question was: Shall the ruling of the Chair stand as the ruling of the Assembly?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Ainsworth, Albers, Ballweg, Bies, Davis, J. Fitzgerald, Freese, Friske, Gielow, Gottlieb, Gunderson, Gundrum, Hahn, Honadel, Huebsch, Hundertmark, Jensen, Jeskewitz, Kaufert, Kerkman, Kestell, Kleefisch, Krawczyk, Kreibich, Lamb, F. Lasee, LeMahieu, Loeffelholz, Lothian, McCormick, Meyer, Montgomery, Moulton, Mursau, Musser, Nass, Nerison, Nischke, Ott, Owens, Petrowski, Pettis, Pridemore, Rhoades, Stone, Strachota, Suder, Towns, Townsend, Underheim, Van Roy, Vos, Vrakas, Vukmir, Ward, Wieckert, M. Williams, Ziegelbauer and Speaker Gard - 59.
Noes - Representatives Benedict, Berceau, Black, Boyle, Colon, Cullen, Fields, Grigsby, Gronemus, Hebl, Hubler, Kessler, Kreuser, Krusick, Lehman, Molepske, Nelson, Parisi, Pocan, Pope-Roberts, Richards, Schneider, Seidel, Sheridan, Sherman, Shilling, Sinicki, Staskunas, Steinbrink, Toles, Turner, Van Akkeren, Vruwink, Wasserman, A. Williams, Young and Zepnick - 37.
Absent or not voting - Representatives Hines, Travis and Wood - 3.
Motion carried.
The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 89 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
Representative Huebsch asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 89 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Assembly Bill 89 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
Motion carried.
Representative Huebsch asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 89 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
Assembly Bill 91
Relating to: noncompliance with a municipal court order.
Representative Huebsch asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 91 be withdrawn from today's calendar and taken up at this time. Granted.
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 91 offered by Representative Sheridan.
__________________
Point of Order
Representative Gundrum rose to the point of order that Assembly amendment 1 to
Assembly Bill
91 was not germane under Assembly Rule
54.
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese ruled the point of order
well taken.
Representative Richards appealed the ruling of the Chair.
The question was: Shall the ruling of the Chair stand as the ruling of the Assembly?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
A116
Ayes - Representatives Ainsworth, Albers, Ballweg, Bies, Davis, J. Fitzgerald, Freese, Friske, Gielow, Gottlieb, Gunderson, Gundrum, Hahn, Honadel, Huebsch, Hundertmark, Jensen, Jeskewitz, Kaufert, Kerkman, Kestell, Kleefisch, Krawczyk, Kreibich, Lamb, F. Lasee, LeMahieu, Loeffelholz, Lothian, McCormick, Meyer, Montgomery, Moulton, Mursau, Musser, Nass, Nerison, Nischke, Ott, Owens, Petrowski, Pettis, Pridemore, Rhoades, Stone, Strachota, Suder, Towns, Townsend, Underheim, Van Roy, Vos, Vrakas, Vukmir, Ward, Wieckert, M. Williams and Speaker Gard - 58.
Noes - Representatives Benedict, Berceau, Black, Boyle, Colon, Cullen, Fields, Grigsby, Gronemus, Hebl, Hubler, Kessler, Kreuser, Krusick, Lehman, Molepske, Nelson, Parisi, Pocan, Pope-Roberts, Richards, Schneider, Seidel, Sheridan, Sherman, Shilling, Sinicki, Staskunas, Steinbrink, Toles, Turner, Van Akkeren, Vruwink, Wasserman, A. Williams, Young, Zepnick and Ziegelbauer - 38.
Absent or not voting - Representatives Hines, Travis and Wood - 3.
Motion carried.
The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 91 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
Representative Huebsch asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 91 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Assembly Bill 91 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
Motion carried.
Representative Huebsch asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 91 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
Assembly Joint Resolution 8
Relating to: the limited-business floorperiod for considering bills introduced by the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules.
Representative Schneider moved that
Assembly Joint Resolution 8 be withdrawn from the committee on
Rules pursuant to Assembly Rule
15 (5).
Representative Gard moved that the motion to withdraw
Assembly Joint Resolution 8 from the committee on
Rules pursuant to Assembly Rule
15 (5) be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall the motion to withdraw
Assembly Joint Resolution 8 from the committee on
Rules pursuant to Assembly Rule
15 (5) be laid on the table?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Ainsworth, Albers, Ballweg, Bies, Davis, J. Fitzgerald, Freese, Friske, Gielow, Gottlieb, Gunderson, Gundrum, Hahn, Honadel, Huebsch, Hundertmark, Jensen, Jeskewitz, Kaufert, Kerkman, Kestell, Kleefisch, Krawczyk, Kreibich, Lamb, F. Lasee, LeMahieu, Loeffelholz, Lothian, McCormick, Meyer, Montgomery, Moulton, Mursau, Musser, Nass, Nerison, Nischke, Ott, Owens, Petrowski, Pettis, Pridemore, Rhoades, Stone, Strachota, Suder, Towns, Townsend, Underheim, Van Roy, Vos, Vrakas, Vukmir, Ward, Wieckert, M. Williams, Ziegelbauer and Speaker Gard - 59.
Noes - Representatives Benedict, Berceau, Black, Boyle, Colon, Cullen, Fields, Grigsby, Gronemus, Hebl, Hubler, Kessler, Kreuser, Krusick, Lehman, Molepske, Nelson, Parisi, Pocan, Pope-Roberts, Richards, Schneider, Seidel, Sheridan, Sherman, Shilling, Sinicki, Staskunas, Steinbrink, Toles, Turner, Van Akkeren, Vruwink, Wasserman, A. Williams, Young and Zepnick - 37.
