Assembly Bill 807
Relating to: the definition of a group health benefit plan and reports by the commissioner of insurance on the effect of changing the definition.
The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 807 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
Representative J. Fitzgerald asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 807 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Assembly Bill 807 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
Motion carried.
Representative J. Fitzgerald asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 807 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
__________________
From: Robert J. Marchant, Senate Chief Clerk.
Mr. Speaker:
I am directed to inform you that the Senate has
Passed and asks concurrence in:
Senate Bill 496
__________________
Representative J. Fitzgerald asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 496 be withdrawn from the Senate message and taken up at this time. Granted.
Senate Bill 496
Relating to: the consequences for failure to act within a time period specified in the Children's Code or the Juvenile Justice Code, extension of certain time periods specified in the Children's Code, and informal dispositions under the Children's Code.
By
Senators
Coggs and Darling; cosponsored by Representatives Jeskewitz and Grigsby.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 496 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative J. Fitzgerald asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 496 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 496 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
Representative J. Fitzgerald asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 496 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
Assembly Bill 809
A655
Relating to: the consequences for failure to act within a time period specified in the Children's Code or the Juvenile Justice Code, extension of certain time periods specified in the Children's Code, and informal dispositions under the Children's Code.
Representative J. Fitzgerald asked unanimous consent that Assembly Bill 809 be laid on the table. Granted.
__________________
Assembly Bill 828
Relating to: the definition of bicycle; lighting of bicycles, motor bicycles, and electric personal assistive mobility devices; and manual turn signals for bicyclists.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 828 be adopted?
Motion carried.
The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 828 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
Representative J. Fitzgerald asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 828 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Assembly Bill 828 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
Motion carried.
Representative J. Fitzgerald asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 828 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
__________________
Assembly Bill 846
Relating to: unlawful use of a global positioning device and providing a penalty.
The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 846 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
Representative J. Fitzgerald asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 846 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Assembly Bill 846 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
Motion carried.
Representative J. Fitzgerald asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 846 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
__________________
From: Robert J. Marchant, Senate Chief Clerk.
Mr. Speaker:
I am directed to inform you that the Senate has
Passed and asks concurrence in:
Senate Bill 511
__________________
Representative J. Fitzgerald asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 511 be withdrawn from the Senate message and taken up at this time. Granted.
Senate Bill 511
Relating to: registration plates for vehicle transporters.
By
Senators
Plale, Lehman, Grothman and Cowles; cosponsored by Representatives Honadel, Krusick, Stone, Murtha, Lothian, Ballweg, Albers, Townsend and Zepnick.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 511 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative J. Fitzgerald asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 511 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 511 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
Representative J. Fitzgerald asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 511 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
Assembly Bill 849
Relating to: registration plates for vehicle transporters.
Representative J. Fitzgerald asked unanimous consent that Assembly Bill 849 be laid on the table. Granted.
Speaker Pro Tempore Gottlieb in the chair.
__________________
Assembly Bill 862
Relating to: providing the public with information on state agency operations expenditures and state agency contracts and grants.
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 862 offered by Representative Schneider.
Representative Vos rose to the point of order that Assembly amendment 1 to
Assembly Bill 862 was not properly before the Assembly because it was dilatory pursuant to Assembly Rule
69.
Speaker Pro Tempore Gottlieb ruled the point of order
well taken.
“Assembly Rule
69 grants the presiding officer the power to declare any motion or procedure that he or she believes is being used for the purpose of delay dilatory and out of order. In this instance, the procedure in question is the offering of an amendment to a proposal that accomplishes a purpose that is already accomplished in the proposal. If amendments are offered to proposals that accomplish the same purposes as the proposals in the same manner as the purposes are accomplished in the proposals, then the offering of such amendments is a dilatory procedure and is out of order."
Representative Travis appealed the ruling of the Chair.
The question was: Shall the ruling of the Chair stand as the ruling of the Assembly?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
