Motion carried.
hist57063Representative Steineke asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 876 be given a third reading. Granted.
hist57064The question was: Assembly Bill 876 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Allen, August, Ballweg, Billings, Born, Brandtjen, E. Brooks, R. Brooks, Craig, Czaja, Danou, Doyle, Duchow, Edming, Gannon, Heaton, Horlacher, Hutton, Jacque, Jagler, Jarchow, Katsma, Kerkman, Kitchens, Kleefisch, Knodl, Kremer, Krug, Kuglitsch, Kulp, T. Larson, Loudenbeck, Macco, Murphy, Mursau, Murtha, Nerison, Neylon, Novak, Nygren, J. Ott, Petersen, Petryk, Quinn, Ripp, Rohrkaste, Sanfelippo, Schraa, Skowronski, Steffen, Steineke, Swearingen, Tauchen, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Tranel, Vorpagel, Weatherston and Speaker Vos - 59.
Noes - Representatives Barca, Barnes, Berceau, Bernier, Brostoff, Genrich, Goyke, Hebl, Hesselbein, Hintz, Johnson, Jorgensen, Kahl, Kessler, Kolste, Mason, Meyers, Milroy, Ohnstad, A. Ott, Pope, Rodriguez, Sargent, Shankland, Sinicki, Spiros, Spreitzer, Stuck, Subeck, C. Taylor, VanderMeer, Young, Zamarripa and Zepnick - 34.
Paired for - Representative Knudson - 1.
Paired against - Representative Wachs - 1.
Absent or not voting - Representatives Bowen, Considine, Kooyenga and Riemer - 4.
Motion carried.
hist57065Representative Knodl asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 876 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
_____________
Special Order of
Business at 2:27 P.M.
hist57066Senate Bill 459
Relating to: the regulation of navigable waters and wetlands.
hist57067The question was: Shall Senate Bill 459 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
hist57068Representative Knodl asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 459 be given a third reading. Granted.
hist57069The question was: Senate Bill 459 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Allen, August, Ballweg, Bernier, Born, Brandtjen, E. Brooks, R. Brooks, Craig, Czaja, Duchow, Edming, Gannon, Heaton, Horlacher, Hutton, Jacque, Jagler, Jarchow, Katsma, Kerkman, Kleefisch, Knodl, Kremer, Krug, Kuglitsch, Kulp, T. Larson, Loudenbeck, Murphy, Mursau, Murtha, Nerison, Neylon, J. Ott, Petersen, Petryk, Quinn, Ripp, Rodriguez, Rohrkaste, Sanfelippo, Schraa, Skowronski, Spiros, Steffen, Steineke, Swearingen, Tauchen, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Tranel, VanderMeer, Vorpagel, Weatherston and Speaker Vos - 56.
Noes - Representatives Barca, Barnes, Berceau, Billings, Bowen, Brostoff, Danou, Doyle, Genrich, Goyke, Hebl, Hesselbein, Hintz, Johnson, Jorgensen, Kahl, Kessler, Kitchens, Kolste, Mason, Meyers, Milroy, Novak, Nygren, Ohnstad, A. Ott, Pope, Sargent, Shankland, Sinicki, Spreitzer, Stuck, Subeck, C. Taylor, Young, Zamarripa and Zepnick - 37.
Paired for - Representatives Knudson and Macco - 2.
Paired against - Representatives Riemer and Wachs - 2.
Absent or not voting - Representatives Considine and Kooyenga - 2.
Motion carried.
hist57070Representative Knodl asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 459 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
_____________
Special Order of
Business at 2:30 P.M.
hist57071Senate Bill 492
Relating to: a student safety incident tracking pilot program for school districts and making an appropriation.
hist57072The question was: Shall Senate Bill 492 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
hist57073Representative Knodl asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 492 be given a third reading. Granted.
hist57074The question was: Senate Bill 492 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
hist57075Representative Knodl asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 492 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
hist57076_____________
Special Order of
Business at 2:37 P.M.
Senate Bill 546
Relating to: administrative subpoena for investigating Internet crimes against children, creating an Internet crimes against children surcharge, and making an appropriation.
hist56756Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 546 offered by Representative Kessler.
hist57077Representative Knodl moved that Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 546 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 546 be laid on the table?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Allen, August, Ballweg, Barca, Berceau, Bernier, Billings, Born, Brandtjen, E. Brooks, R. Brooks, Craig, Czaja, Doyle, Duchow, Edming, Gannon, Genrich, Heaton, Hintz, Horlacher, Hutton, Jacque, Jagler, Jarchow, Jorgensen, Katsma, Kerkman, Kitchens, Kleefisch, Knodl, Kremer, Krug, Kuglitsch, Kulp, T. Larson, Loudenbeck, Macco, Mason, Meyers, Murphy, Mursau, Murtha, Nerison, Neylon, Novak, Nygren, A. Ott, J. Ott, Petersen, Petryk, Quinn, Ripp, Rodriguez, Rohrkaste, Sanfelippo, Schraa, Shankland, Skowronski, Spiros, Steffen, Steineke, Subeck, Swearingen, Tauchen, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Tranel, VanderMeer, Vorpagel, Weatherston, Zamarripa, Zepnick and Speaker Vos - 74.
Noes - Representatives Barnes, Bowen, Brostoff, Danou, Goyke, Hebl, Hesselbein, Johnson, Kahl, Kessler, Kolste, Milroy, Ohnstad, Pope, Sargent, Sinicki, Spreitzer, Stuck, C. Taylor and Young - 20.
Absent or not voting - Representatives Considine, Knudson, Kooyenga, Riemer and Wachs - 5.
Motion carried.
hist56838Assembly Amendment 2 to Senate Bill 546 offered by Representatives Jarchow and Goyke.
hist57078The question was: Shall Assembly Amendment 2 to Senate Bill 546 be adopted?
Motion carried.
hist57079The question was: Shall Senate Bill 546 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
hist57080Representative Knodl asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 546 be given a third reading. Granted.
Representative Schraa in the chair.
hist57131The question was: Senate Bill 546 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in as amended?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Allen, August, Ballweg, Barca, Barnes, Berceau, Bernier, Billings, Born, Bowen, Brandtjen, E. Brooks, Brostoff, Czaja, Danou, Doyle, Duchow, Edming, Gannon, Genrich, Goyke, Heaton, Hebl, Hesselbein, Hintz, Horlacher, Jacque, Jagler, Jarchow, Johnson, Jorgensen, Kahl, Katsma, Kerkman, Kitchens, Kleefisch, Knodl, Kolste, Kremer, Krug, Kuglitsch, Kulp, T. Larson, Loudenbeck, Macco, Mason, Meyers, Milroy, Murphy, Mursau, Murtha, Nerison, Neylon, Novak, Nygren, Ohnstad, A. Ott, J. Ott, Petersen, Petryk, Pope, Quinn, Ripp, Rodriguez, Rohrkaste, Sargent, Shankland, Sinicki, Skowronski, Spiros, Spreitzer, Steffen, Steineke, Stuck, Subeck, Swearingen, Tauchen, C. Taylor, Tittl, Tranel, VanderMeer, Vorpagel, Weatherston, Young, Zamarripa, Zepnick and Speaker Vos - 87.
Noes - Representatives R. Brooks, Craig, Hutton, Kessler, Sanfelippo, Schraa and Thiesfeldt - 7.
Paired for - Representative Wachs - 1.
Paired against - Representative Knudson - 1.
Absent or not voting - Representatives Considine, Kooyenga and Riemer - 3.
Motion carried.
Representatives Barca, Shankland, Wachs, Zepnick, Sargent, Ohnstad and Hesselbein asked unanimous consent to be added as cosponsors of Senate Bill 546. Granted.
Representative Steineke asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 546 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
Speaker Pro Tempore August in the chair.
_____________
Special Order of
Business at 2:43 P.M.
hist57085Senate Bill 615
Relating to: special needs scholarship program.
hist56401Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 615 offered by Representatives Vos, Thiesfeldt, Loudenbeck, Murphy, Kitchens and Jagler.
_____________
Point of Order
hist57091Representative Hebl rose to the point of order that Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 615 was not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f).
_____________
Ruling on the Point of Order
Speaker Pro Tempore August ruled the point of order not well taken.
Representative Hebl appealed the decision of the Chair.
hist57092The question was: Shall the ruling of the chair stand as the ruling of the Assembly?
The roll was taken.
Loading...
Loading...