Relating to: applying to Congress under the provisions of Article V of the Constitution of the United States for a convention to propose an amendment establishing term limits for members of the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate. hist154636Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 to Senate Joint Resolution 102 offered by Representatives Drake, Bowen, Haywood, Stubbs, L. Myers, Baldeh, Moore Omokunde, Neubauer, Spreitzer, Hebl, Subeck, Hesselbein, Vining, Brostoff, Considine, Emerson, B. Meyers, Ohnstad, Anderson, Hong, Conley, Hintz, Riemer, Andraca, McGuire, Shankland, Snodgrass, S. Rodriguez, Shelton, Pope, Vruwink, Goyke, Doyle, Milroy, Ortiz-Velez, Cabrera and Billings. _____________
Point of Order
hist154696Representative Steineke rose to the point of order that Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 to Senate Joint Resolution 102 was not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f). Speaker Pro Tempore August ruled the point of order well taken.
hist154697 Representative Spreitzer appealed the decision of the Chair. hist154698The question was: Shall the ruling of the Chair stand as the ruling of the Assembly? The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Allen, Armstrong, August, Behnke, Born, Brandtjen, Brooks, Cabral-Guevara, Callahan, Dallman, Dittrich, Duchow, Edming, Gundrum, Horlacher, James, Katsma, Kerkman, Kitchens, Knodl, Krug, Kuglitsch, Kurtz, Loudenbeck, Macco, Magnafici, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Neylon, Novak, Oldenburg, Petersen, Petryk, Plumer, Pronschinske, Ramthun, J. Rodriguez, Rozar, Sanfelippo, Schraa, Skowronski, Snyder, Sortwell, Spiros, Steffen, Steineke, Summerfield, Swearingen, Tauchen, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Tranel, Tusler, VanderMeer, Vorpagel, Wichgers, Zimmerman and Speaker Vos - 59.
Noes - Representatives Anderson, Andraca, Baldeh, Billings, Bowen, Brostoff, Cabrera, Conley, Considine, Doyle, Drake, Emerson, Goyke, Haywood, Hebl, Hesselbein, Hintz, Hong, McGuire, B. Meyers, Milroy, Moore Omokunde, L. Myers, Neubauer, Ohnstad, Ortiz-Velez, Pope, Riemer, S. Rodriguez, Shelton, Snodgrass, Spreitzer, Subeck, Vining and Vruwink - 35.
Absent or not voting - Representatives Penterman, Shankland, Sinicki, Stubbs and Wittke - 5.
Motion carried.
hist154699The question was: Shall Senate Joint Resolution 102 be ordered to a third reading? Motion carried.
hist154700Representative Steineke asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Joint Resolution 102 be given a third reading. Granted. hist154701The question was: Shall Senate Joint Resolution 102 be concurred in? Motion carried.
hist154702Representatives Steffen and Skowronski asked unanimous consent to be added as cosponsors of Senate Joint Resolution 102. Granted. Representative Brooks asked unanimous consent to be recorded as voting "No" on the previous question. Granted.
hist154703Representative Steineke asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Joint Resolution 102 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted. _____________
Special Order of Business at
9:41 A.M. on Wednesday, February 23
Assembly Joint Resolution 135
Relating to: applying to Congress under the provisions of Article V of the Constitution of the United States for a convention to propose an amendment establishing term limits for members of the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate. hist154642Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 to Assembly Joint Resolution 135 offered by Representatives Drake, Bowen, Haywood, Stubbs, L. Myers, Baldeh, Moore Omokunde, Neubauer, Spreitzer, Hebl, Subeck, Hesselbein, Vining, Brostoff, Considine, Emerson, B. Meyers, Ohnstad, Anderson, Hong, Conley, Hintz, Riemer, Andraca, McGuire, Shankland, Snodgrass, S. Rodriguez, Shelton, Pope, Vruwink, Goyke, Doyle, Milroy, Ortiz-Velez, Cabrera and Billings. hist154970Representative Skowronski asked unanimous consent to be added as a coauthor of Assembly Joint Resolution 135. Granted. hist154704Representative Steineke asked unanimous consent that Assembly Joint Resolution 135 be laid on the table. Granted. _____________
Special Order of Business at
9:45 A.M. on Wednesday, February 23
Relating to: actions for violations of elections laws.
hist154706The question was: Shall Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 213 be adopted? Motion carried.
hist154707The question was: Shall Senate Bill 213 be ordered to a third reading? Motion carried.
hist154708Representative Steineke asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 213 be given a third reading. Granted. hist154709The question was: Senate Bill 213 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in as amended? Motion carried.
hist154710Representative Steineke asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 213 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted. _____________
Special Order of Business at
9:30 A.M. on Wednesday, February 23
Relating to: allowing persons to charge fees for the use of electric vehicle charging stations and the installation and operation of electric vehicle charging stations by the Department of Transportation or a political subdivision.
hist154686Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 573 offered by Representative Kuglitsch. hist154712The question was: Shall Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 573 be adopted? Motion carried.
hist154713The question was: Shall Senate Bill 573 be ordered to a third reading? Motion carried.
hist154714Representative Steineke asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 573 be given a third reading. Granted. hist154715The question was: Senate Bill 573 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in as amended? Motion carried.
hist154626Representative Armstrong asked unanimous consent to be withdrawn as a co-sponsor of Senate Bill 573. Granted. hist154716Representative Steineke asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 573 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted. Assembly Bill 588
Relating to: allowing persons to charge fees for the use of electric vehicle charging stations and the installation and operation of electric vehicle charging stations by the Department of Transportation or a political subdivision.
hist154687Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 to Assembly Bill 588 offered by Representative Kuglitsch. hist154625Representative Armstrong asked unanimous consent to be withdrawn as a co-sponsor of Assembly Bill 588. Granted. Representative Steineke asked unanimous consent that Assembly Bill 588 be laid on the table. Granted.
_____________
Special Order of
Business at 8:01 A.M.
Assembly Bill 829
Relating to: mandatory minimum sentence for three or more convictions for retail theft and providing a penalty.
hist154718The question was: Shall Senate Amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 829 be concurred in? Motion carried.
hist154719Representative Steineke asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that the Assembly’s action on Assembly Bill 829 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted. _____________
Special Order of
Business at 8:02 A.M.
Relating to: composition of local boards of health.
hist154721The question was: Shall Senate Bill 312 be ordered to a third reading? Motion carried.
hist154722Representative Steineke asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 312 be given a third reading. Granted. hist154723The question was: Senate Bill 312 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in? Motion carried.
hist154724Representative Steineke asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 312 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted. _____________
Special Order of
Business at 8:03 A.M.
Relating to: certification of expanded function dental auxiliaries, extending the time limit for emergency rule procedures, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority.
hist154620Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 392 offered by Representative Plumer. hist154726The question was: Shall Assembly Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 392 be adopted?
