_____________
State of Wisconsin
Office of the Governor
April 15, 2022
The Honorable, the Senate:
hist160179I am vetoing Senate Bill 394 in its entirety. This bill creates a new license for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), administered by the Board of Nursing attached to the Department of Safety and Professional Services.
Nurses are essential to our healthcare system, patient care, and ensuring we have healthy communities in Wisconsin. Indeed, look no further than the last few years, during which nurses across our state have worked tirelessly on the frontlines during this pandemic—acts of selflessness and service for which we can never fully express our gratitude.
I recognize there are many individuals who support this legislation and others who do not, each with important stories, considerations, and concerns. I respect the many people and professions on both sides of this conversation. Unfortunately, the bill ultimately before me today does not address some of the issues raised by parties in the medical profession that went unremedied during the legislative process. I am therefore vetoing this bill in its entirety because I object to altering current licensure standards for APRNs, allowing practices functionally equivalent to those of physicians or potentially omitting physicians from a patient’s care altogether notwithstanding significant differences in required education, training, and experience.
I have appreciated the opportunity to give this thoughtful consideration and I welcome continuing the conversations on this important issue.
Respectfully submitted,
TONY EVERS
Governor
_____________
State of Wisconsin
Office of the Governor
April 15, 2022
The Honorable, the Senate:
hist160180I am vetoing Senate Bill 409 in its entirety. This bill would prohibit providing instruction in any course to students at the University of Wisconsin System and the Wisconsin Technical College System that includes any one of several concepts listed in the bill. Additionally, this bill punishes any institution or technical college found to be in violation of this bill by requiring the University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents and the Technical College System Board to withhold five percent of that institution or college’s state aid allocation. Further, the bill would create a private legal enforcement action, allowing individuals to sue for violations of the bill, and would require a court to award attorney fees among other forms of relief.
I am vetoing this bill in its entirety because I object to creating new censorship rules that restrict educators and higher education institutions from teaching honest, complete facts about important historical topics like the Civil War and civil rights. I continue to trust parents, students, educators, and our higher education institutions to work together to do what is best for our students without political interference and micromanagement from politicians in Madison. I also object to the Legislature’s continued efforts to politicize our higher education institutions, sow division on our campuses, and micromanage the University of Wisconsin and the Wisconsin Technical College Systems. The Legislature must stop using our kids and our students as political pawns. Educators should be able to teach honest, complete facts, and our students deserve to learn in an atmosphere conducive to learning without the Legislature’s unnecessary, politically motivated encroachment and censorship.
Respectfully submitted,
TONY EVERS
Governor
_____________
State of Wisconsin
Office of the Governor
April 15, 2022
The Honorable, the Senate:
hist160181I am vetoing Senate Bill 494 in its entirety. This bill would make numerous changes to the Department of Natural Resources’ aquatic plant management program. The bill would modify the purpose of the aquatic plant management program to require the department to utilize management methods that ensure invasive and nuisance aquatic plants are suppressed or eradicated to the greatest extent possible. The bill would also require that, when reviewing an aquatic plant management plan, the department give equal consideration to plans that utilize chemical treatments. Additionally, the bill would provide an exemption from the permitting process for certain private ponds under 10 acres.
I am vetoing this bill in its entirety because I object to requiring the department to eradicate invasive and nuisance aquatic plants without sufficient safeguards for protecting the plants and waters of the state. The department currently balances the benefits of eliminating invasive and nuisance aquatic plants with other ecological, social, and economic impacts. Setting eradication as the standard could lead to overaggressive policies that harm our environment, our tourism economy, and quality of life for Wisconsin residents.
I also object to requiring the department to give chemical treatments equal consideration to non-chemical treatments. Individual bodies of water and aquatic management plans must be evaluated to determine the best management strategy. Broadly requiring the department to give equal consideration to chemical treatments, even in cases where chemical treatment is not appropriate, may have the effect of favoring chemical treatments over non-chemical treatments.
I further object to providing an exemption from the permitting process for certain private ponds under 10 acres. This provision could have a major impact on Wisconsin’s waters, as the department estimates that it could apply to up to 45,000 bodies of water. Before issuing a permit for chemical treatment, the department reviews the body of water to determine if there are any known endangered, threatened, or special concern species located at the site. By removing the permit requirement, we would lose this valuable check and potentially harm environmentally and culturally important species
Finally, I object to modifying the aquatic plant management program while the department is in the process of updating its administrative rules for the program. The administrative rulemaking process began in April 2020, with the approval of the scope statement and has involved considerable stakeholder input. Stakeholder input is a valuable part of the rulemaking process and gives a voice to the citizens of Wisconsin. This bill would circumvent the department’s rulemaking process and disregard the stakeholder input that was collected as a part of that process.
Respectfully submitted,
TONY EVERS
Governor
_____________
State of Wisconsin
Office of the Governor
April 15, 2022
The Honorable, the Senate:
hist160182I am vetoing Senate Bill 570 in its entirety. This bill would, with certain exceptions, limit the civil liability of firearm, firearm accessory, and ammunition manufacturers, distributors, importers, trade associations, sellers and dealers.
I am vetoing this bill in its entirety because I object to creating more immunities for the gun industry. Under the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, Pub. L. 109-92, the gun industry already enjoys the benefit of broad immunity that virtually no other industry receives in federal and state courts. This bill would double down on those privileges and create an unprecedented, punitive fee-shifting mechanism in Wisconsin. I believe the presumption should be an open courthouse door to anyone seeking justice and an honest debate of the law of the land. Any immunity or deviation from that presumption should be tailored and finite. Creating more far-reaching immunities to protect the gun industry is unnecessary and the wrong approach.
As I have previously said, Wisconsinites desperately want their elected leaders to act on gun safety and support having a meaningful, thoughtful dialogue about common-sense solutions that will both respect and uphold rights while keeping our communities safe. These goals are not mutually exclusive, and I continue to welcome constructive conversations to that end.
Respectfully submitted,
TONY EVERS
Governor
_____________
State of Wisconsin
Office of the Governor
April 15, 2022
The Honorable, the Senate:
hist160183I am vetoing Senate Bill 585 in its entirety. This bill would require public school district high schools, independent charter high schools, and private high schools participating in a parental choice program, to collect and submit to the Department of Public Instruction statistics on violations of municipal disorderly conduct ordinances and certain other crimes. This bill would also require the department to include the statistics on school and school district accountability reports, but the statistics would not be considered in the calculation of school or school district performance for purposes of the accountability reports.
As a former educator, principal, and state superintendent, I know what’s best for our kids is what’s best for our state, and that includes ensuring our kids are safe, healthy, and in the classroom. Student safety and security, especially at school, is critically important. This is among the reasons that, for years, public schools in Wisconsin have already been reporting on student behavior resulting in that student’s suspensions and expulsion. However, I must veto this bill in its entirety for several reasons. First, I object to mandating additional reporting without the necessary funding for implementation. School districts, independent charter schools, and private schools participating in a parental choice program have differing levels of staffing, training, and resources at each high school related to incident and crime reporting. This disparate level of resources may lead to inconsistent reporting and may compromise the value of the data by not providing like comparisons. This problem could be further complicated by the fact that the definition of disorderly conduct is defined at the municipal level, which may lead to inconsistent reporting for school districts spanning multiple municipalities or counties.
I also object to this bill excluding local law enforcement agencies from the reporting process. High schools do not have the same access to the Summary-Based Reporting and Incident-Based Reporting systems, and subsequently the Wisconsin Incident-Based Reporting System, as local law enforcement agencies.
Respectfully submitted,
TONY EVERS
Governor
_____________
State of Wisconsin
Office of the Governor
April 15, 2022
The Honorable, the Senate:
hist160184I am vetoing Senate Bill 608 in its entirety. This bill allows students that participated in the Special Needs Scholarship program in the previous year to meet the prior year's attendance requirement to participate in the Wisconsin Parental Choice program or the Racine Parental Choice program. The bill additionally extends the window of time when students may transfer applications across choice programs and allows applications for the Milwaukee Parental Choice program or Racine Parental Choice program to transfer to the Wisconsin Parental Choice program if certain conditions are met. Finally, as drafted last year, the bill opened a window in November 2021 to allow applications submitted prior to April 2021 to transfer between choice programs.
I am vetoing this bill in its entirety because I object to complicating the movement of students among the state’s private choice programs while these programs continue to be funded in a disparate manner and have different requirements. Funding for parental choice programs remains convoluted and inconsistent across programs. Currently, new students enrolling in private schools in the Wisconsin Parental Choice program and Racine Parental Choice program are effectively entirely funded by their resident school district’s property taxes through a revenue limit adjustment, but students enrolling in private schools in the Milwaukee Parental Choice program are funded almost entirely by the state. Additionally, the bill continues untimely and obsolete provisions.
Respectfully submitted,
TONY EVERS
Governor
_____________
State of Wisconsin
Office of the Governor
April 15, 2022
The Honorable, the Senate:
hist160185I am vetoing Senate Bill 629 in its entirety. This bill would require the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation to implement a program to certify active or prospective residential real estate development sites as shovel-ready if such sites meet several criteria. The bill would further require local governments and state agencies to expedite permitting for these shovel-ready projects.
I am vetoing this bill in its entirety because I object to implementing a program that may detract from existing economic development efforts. While the bill is aimed at improving the availability of workforce housing in the state, it does not ensure that a shovel-ready site would address a particular or even generalized workforce housing need anywhere in the state. The proposed requirements for a minimum number of housing units and a maximum acreage per single-family housing unit, are insufficient to fill gaps in our workforce housing. In fact, the bill provides no means to require that a qualifying site be useful when considered on price or location.
Moreover, I object to requiring the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation to create a program without additional funding, which may force the corporation to shift resources and staffing away from established and tested economic development programs.
Respectfully submitted,
TONY EVERS
Governor
_____________
State of Wisconsin
Office of the Governor
April 15, 2022
