LRB-1125/2
RNK:kg:ijs
1999 - 2000 LEGISLATURE
January 21, 1999 - Introduced by Representatives Johnsrud, Jensen, Musser,
Hasenohrl, J. Lehman, Sykora, Porter, Spillner, Albers, Goetsch, Vrakas,
Ward
and Montgomery, cosponsored by Senators Clausing, Schultz, Burke,
Breske, Cowles
and Decker. Referred to Committee on Rules.
AJR12,1,4 1Relating to: urging the members of the Wisconsin delegation to the U. S. Congress
2to support proposed federal legislation that would provide revenues to
3Wisconsin from the development of oil and natural gas resources on the outer
4continental shelf.
AJR12,1,75 Whereas, each year the federal government receives billions of dollars in
6revenues from the development of oil and natural gas resources on the outer
7continental shelf (OCS), a capital asset of this nation; and
AJR12,1,108 Whereas, on October 7, 1998, companion bills were introduced in the U.S. house
9of representatives (H.R. 4717, the Conservation and Reinvestment Act of 1998) and
10the U.S. senate (S. 2566, the Reinvestment and Environmental Act of 1998); and
AJR12,1,1211 Whereas, Wisconsin is a coastal state within the meaning of that term, as
12defined in the bills, because it borders Lake Superior and Lake Michigan; and
AJR12,2,213 Whereas, in their Title I Coastal Impact Assistance sections both bills dedicate
1427% or $1.24 billion of annual OCS revenues toward impact assistance that benefits

1fish and wildlife, and this would amount to $6.8 million for Wisconsin from either bill;
2and
AJR12,2,63 Whereas, in their Title II Land-based Recreation sections both bills dedicate
4additional percentages of OCS revenues that would benefit land-based recreation
5as well as the state and federal sides of the Land and Water Conservation Fund for
6Wisconsin in the amount of $6.2 million (S. 2566) and $6.9 million (H.R. 4717); and
AJR12,2,107 Whereas, in their Title III Wildlife Conservation and Restoration sections both
8bills dedicate amounts ($6.3 million or 10% of OCS revenues in H.R. 4717 and $9
9million or 7% of OCS revenues in S. 2566) that would be used to fund wildlife
10conservation and related recreation and education in Wisconsin; and
AJR12,2,1611 Whereas, since the early 1970's the department of natural resources has,
12working through the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies
13(IAFWA), and more recently through the IAFWA-led Teaming With Wildlife
14Coalition, supported a permanent budget authority mechanism for nongame wildlife
15modeled after the proven Federal Aid in Wildlife (Pittman-Roberts) and Sport Fish
16Restoration Program (Dingell-Johnson); and
AJR12,2,2217 Whereas, with year 2000 oil and gas revenue estimates of $4.59 billion, the
18department of natural resources could get additional federal revenues equal to or
19greater than the current combined Pittman-Roberts and Dingell-Johnson income
20for a comprehensive wildlife program, and especially for nongame fish and wildlife,
21allowing for the development of proactive, fully responsive conservation education
22programs such as Watchable Wildlife; and
AJR12,2,2523 Whereas, both bills were introduced with bipartisan sponsorship and with the
24support of more than 3,000 conservation organizations and related businesses; now,
25therefore, be it
AJR12,3,5
1Resolved by the assembly, the senate concurring, That the members of the
2Wisconsin legislature respectfully urge the members of the Wisconsin congressional
3delegation to support and work to ensure passage of successor legislation to H.R.
44717 and S. 2566, or similar legislation, in the next Congress that secures similar
5resources for Wisconsin; and, be it further
AJR12,3,7 6Resolved, That the assembly chief clerk shall provide a copy of this joint
7resolution to each member of this state's congressional delegation.
AJR12,3,88 (End)
Loading...
Loading...