LRB-4263/1
PJD:kmg:pg
2001 - 2002 LEGISLATURE
February 5, 2002 - Introduced by Joint Legislative Council. Referred to
Committee on Government Operations.
AJR90,1,1 1Relating to: policy of executive branch consultation with tribal governments.
Joint legislative council prefatory note: This joint resolution was prepared for
the joint legislative council's special committee on state-tribal relations.
This joint resolution encourages the governor to develop and implement a
consultation policy under which state executive branch agencies: (1) ensure meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in developing state policies and programs that have
a substantial and direct effect on: (a) one or more American Indian tribes or bands in the
state; (b) American Indians in the state; or (c) the relationship between state government
and the American Indian tribes and bands in the state; and (2) identify key personnel in
the agency who are responsible for coordination with tribal governments and have them
meet on a regular basis with tribal officials regarding issues of mutual interest. The joint
resolution also encourages the governor to promote positive government-to-government
relations between the state and the American Indian tribes and bands in the state.
AJR90,1,32 Whereas, there are 11 federally recognized American Indian tribes and bands
3in this state, each with a unique history and unique concerns; and
AJR90,1,54 Whereas, each of these tribes and bands is a separate and independent political
5community with its own government and is distinct and separate from the state; and
AJR90,1,96 Whereas, tribal governments in this state administer many programs,
7including state programs, that provide benefits to tribal members and nontribal
8members, such as child welfare services, health care services, social services,
9environmental protection, education, and law enforcement; and
AJR90,2,2
1Whereas, there is a need for governments to discuss matters of mutual concern
2in a government-to-government relationship; and
AJR90,2,53 Whereas, the American Indian tribes and bands in this state and the state of
4Wisconsin should have a mutual respect for each other and strive to improve
5communications on issues of mutual concern; and
AJR90,2,86 Whereas, decisions by state agencies that affect tribal governments or
7American Indians would be better informed if they were based on a consideration of
8views of tribal government before the decisions were made; and
AJR90,2,119 Whereas, actions of state government can, and often do, affect the functioning
10of tribal governmental programs, and these effects may be unintended and
11unanticipated by the state; and
AJR90,2,1512 Whereas, these unintended and unanticipated effects may be detrimental to
13tribal government and, thus, to residents of this state inasmuch as a
14well-functioning tribal government is beneficial not only to tribal members but also
15to all residents of this state; and
AJR90,2,1716 Whereas, these unintended and unanticipated effects may be avoided by
17consultation between state and tribal officials; and
AJR90,2,2018 Whereas, several previous U.S. presidents have affirmed the importance of
19government-to-government relations between American Indian tribes and the
20federal government; and
AJR90,2,2221 Whereas, Congress has enacted measures that promote tribal self-government
22and self-determination; and
AJR90,3,223 Whereas, President Clinton issued an executive order to establish regular and
24meaningful consultation and collaboration with tribal officials in the development
25of federal policies that have tribal implications and the federal Department of

1Interior's Bureau of Indian Affairs has developed a government-to-government
2consultation policy; and
AJR90,3,73 Whereas, the states of Oregon and Washington have recognized the importance
4of promoting government-to-government relations between state government and
5tribal governments and have developed consultation processes to seek consultation
6with representatives of tribal governments in developing policies and program
7activities that affect American Indian tribes in those states; and
AJR90,3,118 Whereas, a consultation process can assist in resolving potential conflicts,
9maximize key intergovernmental relations, and enhance an exchange of ideas and
10resources for the greater good of all Wisconsin residents, whether tribal members or
11not; and
AJR90,3,1412 Whereas, the Wisconsin legislature wishes to promote positive
13government-to-government relations between the state of Wisconsin and the
14American Indian tribes and bands in this state; now, therefore, be it
AJR90,3,17 15Resolved by the assembly, the senate concurring, That the Wisconsin
16legislature encourages the governor to develop and implement a consultation policy
17under which state executive branch agencies:
AJR90,3,2018 (1) Ensure meaningful and timely input by representatives of tribal
19government in developing state policies and programs that have a substantial and
20direct effect on:
AJR90,3,2121 (a) One or more American Indian tribes or bands in this state;
AJR90,3,2222 (b) American Indians in this state; or
AJR90,3,2423 (c) The relationship between state government and the American Indian tribes
24and bands in this state; and
AJR90,4,3
1(2) Identify key personnel in the agency who are responsible for coordination
2with tribal governments and have them meet on a regular basis with tribal officials
3regarding issues of mutual interest; and, be it further
AJR90,4,6 4Resolved, That the Wisconsin legislature encourages the governor to promote
5positive government-to-government relations between the state and the American
6Indian tribes and bands in this state; and, be it further
AJR90,4,10 7Resolved, That the assembly chief clerk shall provide copies of this joint
8resolution to the governor, the departments and agencies in the executive branch,
9and the chairs of all of the federally recognized American Indian tribes and bands
10in this state.
AJR90,4,1111 (End)
Loading...
Loading...