SB150: Bill Text

Note: Current law requires an agency to give notice of a public hearing on a proposed rule through the Wisconsin administrative register. Notice is considered to have been given on the first or 15th day of the month following publication of the register. If a notice were published on February 1, 2006, the statute could be interpreted to mean that the notice becomes effective on the following February 15, March 1, or March 15. In order to clarify the statutes and reduce possible delays, this Section provides that the notice generally will be considered to have been given on the effective date of the issue of the Wisconsin administrative register in which the notice first appears. Each issue of the register states its effective date.

SB150, s. 18 Section 18. 227.17 (3) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,11,2 227.17 (3) (d) An analysis of the proposed rule as required under s. 227.14 (2).

Note: Current law requires that an agency notice of a public hearing on a proposed rule must include an analysis of the proposed rule. This Section clarifies that the analysis must include all of the items required under s. 227.14 (2), stats. This analysis is the same analysis that accompanies a proposed rule when it is submitted to the legislative council staff for review under s. 227.15, stats.

SB150, s. 19 Section 19 . 227.19 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,11,17 227.19 (2) Notification of legislature. An agency shall submit a notice to the presiding officer chief clerk of each house of the legislature when a proposed rule is in final draft form. The notice shall be submitted in triplicate and shall be accompanied by a report in the form specified under sub. (3). A notice received under this subsection on or after September 1 of an even-numbered year shall be considered received on the first day of the next regular session of the legislature. Each The presiding officer of each house of the legislature shall, within 7 10 working days following the day on which the notice and report are received, direct the appropriate chief clerk to refer them to one committee, which may be either a standing committee or a joint legislative committee created by law, except the joint committee for review of administrative rules. The agency shall submit to the revisor for publication in the register a statement that a proposed rule has been submitted to the presiding officer chief clerk of each house of the legislature. Each presiding officer chief clerk shall enter a similar statement in the journal of his or her house.

Note: Current law requires an agency to submit a notice to the presiding officer of each house of the legislature when a proposed rule is in final draft form. The presiding officer must, within 7 working days, refer the rule to a committee, which may be either a standing committee or a joint legislative committee created by law, except the joint committee for review of administrative rules. This Section requires that the agency submit the notice to the chief clerk of each house of the legislature for internal processing and that the referral as directed by the presiding officers must be accomplished within 10 working days. Notice to the chief clerks is in accord with the process for notifying the legislature of various actions under s. 13.172, stats. This Section also provides that referral of a proposed rule may be made only to a standing committee.

SB150, s. 20 Section 20. 227.19 (3) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,12,9 227.19 (3) Form of report. (intro.) The report required under sub. (2) shall be in writing and shall include the proposed rule in the form specified in s. 227.14 (1), the material specified in s. 227.14 (2) to (4), a copy of any economic impact report prepared by the agency under s. 227.137, a copy of any report prepared by the department of administration under s. 227.138, a copy of any energy impact report received from the public service commission under s. 227.117 (2), and a copy of any recommendations of the legislative council staff, and an analysis. The analysis report shall also include all of the following:

Note: This Section clarifies that an agency report to the legislature, rather than a rule analysis, must contain specified items.

SB150, s. 21 Section 21. 227.19 (3) (g) of the statutes is created to read:

SB150,12,13 227.19 (3) (g) The report of the department of commerce, as required by s. 227.115, if a proposed rule directly or substantially affects the development, construction, cost, or availability of housing in this state.

Note: Current law requires the department of commerce to prepare a report on a proposed rule if the proposed rule directly or substantially affects the development, construction, cost, or availability of housing in Wisconsin. This Section requires that the report be included in the submission of a proposed rule to the legislature.

SB150, s. 22 Section 22. 227.19 (3) (h) of the statutes is created to read:

SB150,12,16 227.19 (3) (h) A response to any report prepared by the small business regulatory review board under s. 227.14 (2g).

Note: Current law provides that the small business regulatory review board, when reviewing a proposed rule that may have a significant economic impact on small businesses, must notify the agency if it determines that the proposed rule does not include an enforcement provision or that the agency failed to comply with certain statutory requirements. In addition, the small business regulatory review board may submit suggested changes in the proposed rule to the agency. This Section requires that when an agency submits a proposed rule to the legislature for review, it must include its response to a report prepared by the small business regulatory review board.

SB150, s. 23 Section 23 . 227.19 (4) (b) 1. (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,13,7 227.19 (4) (b) 1. (intro.) Except as provided under subd. 5., the committee review period for each committee extends for 30 days after referral under sub. (2). If the chairperson or the cochairpersons of a committee take either of the following actions within the 30-day period, the committee review period for that committee is continued for 30 days from the date on which the first action is taken 30-day review period would have expired:

Note: Current law provides that a committee of the legislature has 30 days within which to review a proposed rule. This period may be extended if, within the 30-day period, the committee requests in writing that the agency meet with the committee or the committee publishes or posts notice that it will hold a meeting or hearing regarding the proposed rule. If the committee takes either of these actions, an additional 30-day review period begins from the date the action is taken. For example, if a notice of hearing is published on the 15th day of the initial 30-day review period, the entire review period will extend to a total of 45 days. If the notice is published on the 30th day of the review period, the full review period will extend to a total of 60 days. This Section provides that if a committee requests a meeting or publishes a notice, the review period for the committee will be 60 days, regardless of when the request or publication took place in the first 30-day review period.

SB150, s. 24 Section 24 . 227.19 (4) (b) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,13,17 227.19 (4) (b) 2. If a committee, by a majority vote of a quorum of the committee, recommends requests modifications in a proposed rule, and the agency, in writing, agrees to make consider making modifications, the review period for both committees is extended either to the 10th working day following receipt by the committees of the modified proposed rule or a written statement to the committee that the agency will not make modifications or to the expiration of the review period under subd. 1., whichever is later. There is no limit either on the number of modification agreements that may be entered into or on the time within which modifications may be made.

Note: Current law provides that a committee reviewing a proposed rule may enter into a modification agreement with an agency if the committee requests modifications in a proposed rule, and the agency, in writing, agrees to make modifications. In practice, a committee often asks an agency to consider modifications that the agency will take under advisement. If the agency agrees to do so, the time period for review of a proposed rule is tolled until the agency responds with drafted amendments or a statement that it will not make modifications. This Section amends the statute in accordance with current practice; a committee may request modifications in a proposed rule and the agency, in writing, may agree to consider making modifications. The review period will be tolled until the agency submits either the modified proposed rule or a written statement that it will not make modifications.

SB150, s. 25 Section 25. 227.19 (4) (b) 3m. of the statutes is created to read:

SB150,14,8 227.19 (4) (b) 3m. An agency may, during the committee review period, reconsider its action by recalling the proposed rule from the chief clerk of each house of the legislature. If the agency decides to continue the rule-making process with regard to the proposed rule, it shall resubmit the proposed rule, either in its recalled form or with one or more germane modifications, to the chief clerk in each house of the legislature as provided in sub. (2) and the committee review period under subd. 1. shall begin again.

Note: Current law requires that if an agency withdraws a proposed rule from the review process, it may not promulgate the proposed rule unless it begins the process again with the filing of a new scope statement. This Section creates a less onerous provision by authorizing an agency, during the committee review period, to reconsider the proposed rule by recalling it from the chief clerk of each house of the legislature. If the agency decides to continue the rule-making process with regard to the proposed rule, it must resubmit the proposed rule, either in its recalled form or with one or more germane modifications, to the chief clerk in each house of the legislature for the commencement of a new committee review period.

SB150, s. 26 Section 26. 227.19 (4) (b) 6. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,15,3 227.19 (4) (b) 6. If a committee has not concluded its jurisdiction over a proposed rule before the day specified under s. 13.02 (1) for the next legislature to convene, that jurisdiction immediately ceases and, within 7 10 working days after that date, the presiding officer of the appropriate house shall refer the proposed rule to the appropriate standing committee or joint legislative committee created by law, except the joint committee for review of administrative rules, as provided under sub. (2). The committee review period that was interrupted by the loss of jurisdiction under this subdivision continues for the committee to which the proposed rule is referred under this subdivision beginning on the date of referral under this subdivision.

Note: Current law provides that when the committee period for review of a proposed rule is interrupted by the convening of a new legislature, the review period ceases and the presiding officer of each house must refer the proposed rule, within 7 working days of the convening of the new legislature, to a standing committee or joint legislative committee, except the joint committee for review of administrative rules. This Section provides, following the amendment in Section 19, that the referral process must be accomplished within 10 working days and that referral of a proposed rule may be made only to a standing committee.

SB150, s. 27 Section 27. 227.19 (4) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,15,11 227.19 (4) (c) Agency not to promulgate rule during committee review. An agency may not promulgate a proposed rule during the committee review period unless both committees waive jurisdiction over the proposed rule prior to the expiration of the review period. A committee may waive its jurisdiction by adopting, by a majority vote of a quorum of the committee, a motion waiving the committee's jurisdiction. The committee shall report its action in writing to the joint committee for review of administrative rules within 2 working days after the waiver action.

Note: Under current law, if a committee reviewing a proposed rule waives its jurisdiction over the rule, it must report this action in writing to the joint committee for review of administrative rules within 2 working days after the waiver action. This Section eliminates the reporting requirement.

SB150, s. 28 Section 28. 227.19 (5) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,15,18 227.19 (5) (a) Referral. If a committee objects to a proposed rule, the committee shall report the proposed rule and the objection to the presiding officer chief clerk of the appropriate house within 2 5 working days after making the objection. The presiding officer chief clerk shall refer the proposed rule and the objection to the joint committee for review of administrative rules within 5 working days after receiving the committee report.

Note: Current law provides that if a committee objects to a proposed rule, the committee must report the proposed rule and the objection to the presiding officer of the appropriate house within 2 working days after making the objection. The presiding officer then refers the proposed rule and the objection to the joint committee for review of administrative rules within 5 working days after receiving the committee report. This Section provides that the report and the objection must be sent to the chief clerk of the appropriate house within 5 working days after making the objection. The chief clerk then will refer the proposed rule and the objection to the joint committee for review of administrative rules within 5 working days after receiving the committee report. This Section reflects methods of internal processing within the legislature and standardizes the reporting and referral periods.

SB150, s. 29 Section 29. 227.19 (5) (b) 1. (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,16,8 227.19 (5) (b) 1. (intro.) The review period for the joint committee for review of administrative rules extends for 30 days after a proposed rule and objection are referred to it. The joint committee for review of administrative rules shall meet and take action in executive session during that period, except that if the cochairpersons take either of the following actions within the 30-day period, the joint committee review period is continued for 30 days from the date on which the first action is taken 30-day review period would have expired:

Note: See the Note to Section 23 for a description of how the joint committee for review of administrative rules may extend its period of review over a proposed rule that has received an objection.

SB150, s. 30 Section 30. 227.19 (5) (b) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,17,2 227.19 (5) (b) 2. If the joint committee for review of administrative rules, by a majority vote of a quorum of the committee, recommends requests modifications in a proposed rule, and the agency, in writing, agrees to make consider making modifications, the review period for the joint committee for review of administrative rules is extended either to the 10th working day following receipt by the joint committee of the modified proposed rule or a written statement to the joint committee that the agency will not make modifications or to the expiration of the review period under subd. 1., whichever is later. There is no limit either on the number of modification agreements that may be entered into or on the time within which modifications may be made.

Note: See the Note to Section 24 for a description of how the joint committee for review of administrative rules may enter into a modification agreement with an agency that has submitted a proposed rule that has received an objection.

SB150, s. 31 Section 31. 227.19 (5) (b) 4. of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,17,12 227.19 (5) (b) 4. If the joint committee for review of administrative rules has not concluded its jurisdiction over a proposed rule before the day specified under s. 13.02 (1) for the next legislature to convene, that jurisdiction immediately ceases and, within 7 10 working days after that date, the presiding officer of the appropriate house shall refer the proposed rule to the joint committee for review of administrative rules. The committee review period that was interrupted by the loss of jurisdiction under this subdivision continues for the joint committee for review of administrative rules to which the proposed rule is referred under this subdivision beginning on the date of referral under this subdivision.

Note: Current law provides that if the joint committee for review of administrative rules has not concluded its jurisdiction over a proposed rule before the day a new legislature convenes, the joint committee's jurisdiction immediately ceases and, within 7 working days after that date, the presiding officer of the appropriate house must refer the proposed rule again to the joint committee for review of administrative rules. This Section amends the statute to provide that the presiding officer must make this referral within 10 working days after the new legislature convenes.

SB150, s. 32 Section 32. 227.19 (5) (e) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,18,3 227.19 (5) (e) Bills to prevent promulgation. When the joint committee for review of administrative rules objects to a proposed rule it shall, within 30 days of the date of the objection, introduce in each house of the legislature, for consideration at any regular session, a bill to support the objection. Within 10 working days after introduction, the presiding officer of each house of the legislature shall refer the bill to the appropriate standing committee meet and take executive action regarding the introduction, in each house of the legislature, of a bill to support the objection. The joint committee shall introduce the bills within 5 working days after taking executive action in favor of introduction of the bills unless the bills cannot be introduced during this time period under the joint rules of the legislature.

Note: Current law provides that when the joint committee for review of administrative rules objects to a proposed rule, it must, within 30 days of the date of the objection, introduce in each house of the legislature a bill to support the objection. This Section provides that the joint committee, following an objection, must, within 30 days of the date of the objection, meet and take executive action regarding the introduction of a bill to support the objection. The joint committee must introduce the bills within 5 working days after taking executive action in favor of introduction of the bills.

SB150, s. 33 Section 33. 227.19 (5) (g) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,18,16 227.19 (5) (g) (intro.) If the bills required under par. (e) are introduced on or after February 1 of an even-numbered year and before the next regular session of the legislature commences, as provided under s. 13.02 (2), or if the bills cannot be introduced during this time period under the joint rules of the legislature, the joint committee for review of administrative rules shall reintroduce introduce the bills on the first day of the next regular session of the legislature, unless either house adversely disposes of either bill. If the joint committee for review of administrative rules is required to reintroduce introduce the bills, the agency may not promulgate the proposed rule to which the bills pertain except as provided in par. (f). If either house adversely disposes of either bill, the agency may promulgate the proposed rule that was objected to. In this paragraph, "adversely disposes of" means that one house has voted in one of the following ways:

Note: Current law provides that if the joint committee for review of administrative rules introduces objection-sustaining legislation on or after February 1 of an even-numbered year and before the next regular session of the legislature commences, the joint committee for review of administrative rules must introduce the bills on the next day of the regular session, unless either house adversely disposes of either bill in the current session. This Section clarifies that the introduction requirement also applies if the bills cannot be introduced by the joint committee on or after February 1 of an even-numbered year under the joint rules of the legislature.

SB150, s. 34 Section 34. 227.19 (6) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,19,11 227.19 (6) (b) Upon introduction of the bills under sub. (5), the presiding officer of each house of the legislature shall refer the bill introduced in that house to the appropriate committee, to the calendar scheduling committee or directly to the calendar. If the committee to which a bill is referred makes no report within 30 days after referral, the bill shall be considered reported without recommendation. No later than 40 days after referral, or as soon thereafter as is possible if the legislature is not in a floorperiod 40 days after referral, the bills shall be placed on the calendar of each house of the legislature according to its rule governing the placement of proposals on the calendar. A bill introduced under this section which is received in the 2nd house shall be referred, reported and placed on the calendar in the same manner as an original bill introduced under this section.

Note: Current law provides that when objection-sustaining legislation is introduced, a bill must be placed on the calendar of each house of the legislature no later than 40 days after referral. This Section provides that the bills must be placed on the calendar no later than 40 days after referral or as soon thereafter if the legislature is not in a floorperiod 40 days after referral. This change will accommodate periods of recess in the legislative schedule.

SB150, s. 35 Section 35 . 227.20 (1), (2), and (3) (intro.) of the statutes are amended to read:

SB150,19,18 227.20 (1) An agency shall file a certified copy of each rule it promulgates in the office of the secretary of state and in the office of the revisor. No rule is valid until the certified copies have copy has been filed. A certified copy shall be typed or duplicated on 8 1/2 by 11 inch paper, leaving sufficient room for the secretary of state's revisor's stamp at the top of the first page. Forms that are filed need not comply with the specifications of this subsection.

SB150,19,21 (2) The secretary of state revisor shall endorse the date and the time of filing on each certified copy filed under sub. (1). The secretary of state revisor shall keep a file of all certified copies filed under sub. (1).

SB150,20,2 (3) (intro.) Filing a certified copy of a rule with the secretary of state revisor creates a presumption of all of the following:

Note: Current law requires agencies to file a certified copy of each rule that is promulgated with 2 state officials--the secretary of state and the revisor of statutes. This Section eliminates the need to file a copy with the secretary of state.

SB150, s. 36 Section 36 . 227.21 (2) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,20,10 227.21 (2) (b) The revisor and the attorney general shall consent to incorporation by reference only in a rule of limited public interest and in a case where the incorporated standards are readily available in published form or are available on optical disk or in another electronic format. Each rule containing an incorporation by reference shall state how the material incorporated may be obtained and, except as provided in s. 601.41 (3) (b), that the standards are on file at the offices of the agency, the secretary of state, and the revisor.

Note: Current law provides that if an agency incorporates standards into a rule by reference rather than replicating the entire standard in the text of the rule, it must ensure that the referenced standards are on file at the offices of the agency, the secretary of state, and the revisor of statutes. This Section eliminates the need to ensure that the standards are on file with the secretary of state. In addition, this Section allows the standards to be in a format other than a paper copy.

Current law also requires that the agency receive the consent of the revisor of statutes and the attorney general in order to incorporate the standard by reference. This Section eliminates the requirement for the agency to receive the consent of the revisor.

SB150, s. 37 Section 37. 227.22 (2) (e) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,20,15 227.22 (2) (e) The rule has a significant adverse economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1), in which case the rule applies to small businesses on no earlier than the first day of the 3rd month commencing after the date of publication of the rule.

Note: Current law states that if a proposed rule has a significant economic impact of small businesses, the rule takes effect on the first day of the 3rd month after the date of publication of the rule. This Section specifies that the delay is required only if the impact is adverse. This allows a rule that has a significant economic impact that is beneficial to small businesses to take effect sooner. In addition, this Section specifies that the adverse proposed rule may take effect "no earlier than" the first day of the 3rd month after publication.

SB150, s. 38 Section 38 . 227.24 (2) (am) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,21,14 227.24 (2) (am) Any request by an agency to extend the effective period of the emergency rule or part of the emergency rule must shall be made in writing to the joint committee for review of administrative rules no later than 30 days before the initial expiration date of the emergency rule. At the time that the agency submits the written request to the joint committee for review of administrative rules, the agency shall submit a copy of the written request to the presiding officer of each house of the legislature and to the appropriate committees of each house of the legislature, as determined by the presiding officer of each house of the legislature. The presiding officer of each house of the legislature shall enter a statement in the journal of his or her house that the agency has submitted a request to extend the effective period of the emergency rule or part of the emergency rule. This paragraph shall not apply to any subsequent request by the agency to extend the same emergency rule or part of the emergency rule.

Note: Current law provides that an agency may request the extension of the effective period of an emergency rule. When it does so, the agency must submit a copy of its written request for the extension to the presiding officer of each house of the legislature and to the appropriate committees of each house of the legislature. Similarly, when the joint committee for review of administrative rules extends the effective period of an emergency rule, it must file a statement about the action with various offices, including the presiding officer of each house of the legislature, the appropriate committees of each house of the legislature, and the secretary of state. The submission of these requests and statements will be noted in the journals of the legislature. Sections 38 and 39 eliminate notice to the presiding officers, the standing committees, and the secretary of state and, consequently eliminate the need to record these actions in the journals of the legislature.

SB150, s. 39 Section 39 . 227.24 (2) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,22,5 227.24 (2) (c) Whenever the committee extends an emergency rule or part of an emergency rule under par. (a), it shall file a statement of its action with the agency promulgating the emergency rule, the presiding officer of each house of the legislature, the appropriate committees of each house of the legislature, as determined by the presiding officer of each house of the legislature, the secretary of state and the revisor of statutes. The statement shall identify the specific emergency rule or part of an emergency rule to which it relates. The presiding officer of each house of the legislature shall enter a statement in the journal of his or her house that the emergency rule or part of the emergency rule has been extended.

Note: See the Note to Section 38.

SB150, s. 40 Section 40. 227.24 (3m) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,22,17 227.24 (3m) On the same day that the agency files a rule under sub. (3) that may have a significant economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1), the agency shall submit a copy of the rule to the small business regulatory review board. The board may use cost-benefit analysis to determine the fiscal effect of the emergency rule on small businesses and shall determine whether the agency complied with ss. 227.114 (2) and (3) and s. 227.14 (2) and (2m). If the board determines that the agency failed to comply with s. 227.114 (2) or (3) or 227.14 (2) and (2m), the board shall notify the agency of that determination and ask the agency to comply with any of those provisions. In addition, the board may submit suggested changes in the proposed rule to the agency and may include a request that the agency do any of the following:

Note: Current law provides that when the small business regulatory review board reviews an emergency rule having a significant economic impact on small businesses, it shall determine whether the promulgating agency complied with small business protection requirements under s. 227.114 (2) and (3), stats. However, since s. 227.114, stats., only applies to proposed permanent rules, this Section eliminates any reference as to whether the agency complied with the statute when it has adopted an emergency rule. This Section also clarifies that the board must review the emergency rule to ensure that an appropriate analysis has been included in the rule order.

SB150, s. 41 Section 41. 227.25 (3) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,23,5 227.25 (3) An agency may request an advance commitment as to the title or numbering of a proposed rule by submitting a copy of the proposed rule indicating the requested title and numbering to the revisor prior to filing. As soon as possible after that, the revisor shall either approve the request or inform the agency of any change necessary to preserve uniformity in the code. If the title or numbering of a rule is revised, the revisor shall verify that a certified copy of the revised version has been filed with the secretary of state.

Note: Current law provides that if the numbering of a rule is revised, the revisor must verify that a certified copy of the revised version has been filed with the secretary of state. This Section eliminates this requirement, since, in accordance with the amendments in Section 35 , certified copies of rules no longer will be deposited with the secretary of state.

SB150, s. 42 Section 42. 227.26 (2) (f) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,23,14 227.26 (2) (f) Introduction of bills. If any rule is suspended, the committee shall, within 30 days after the suspension, introduce in each house of the legislature, for consideration at any regular session, a bill to repeal the suspended rule meet and take executive action regarding the introduction, in each house of the legislature, of a bill to support the suspension. The committee shall introduce the bills within 5 working days after taking executive action in favor of introduction of the bills unless the bills cannot be introduced during this time period under the joint rules of the legislature.

Note: Current law provides that when the joint committee for review of administrative rules suspends an existing rule, it must, within 30 days of the date of the suspension, introduce in each house of the legislature a bill to support the suspension. This Section provides that the joint committee, following a suspension, must, within 30 days of the date of the suspension, meet and take executive action regarding the introduction of a bill to support the suspension. The joint committee must introduce the bills within 5 working days after taking executive action in favor of introduction of the bills.

SB150, s. 43 Section 43. 227.26 (2) (h) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,24,9 227.26 (2) (h) Legislative procedure. Upon the introduction of bills by the committee under this subsection, the presiding officer of each house of the legislature shall refer the bill introduced in that house to the appropriate committee, to the calendar scheduling committee or directly to the calendar. If the committee to which a bill is referred makes no report within 30 days after referral, the bill shall be considered reported without recommendation. No later than 40 days after referral, or as soon thereafter as is possible if the legislature is not in a floorperiod 40 days after referral, the bills shall be placed on the calendar of each house of the legislature according to its rule governing the placement of proposals on the calendar. A bill introduced under this subsection which is received in the 2nd house shall be referred, reported and placed on the calendar in the same manner as an original bill introduced under this subsection.

Note: Current law provides that when suspension-sustaining legislation is introduced, a bill must be placed on the calendar of each house of the legislature no later than 40 days after referral. This Section provides that the bills must be placed on the calendars no later than 40 days after referral or as soon thereafter if the legislature is not in a floorperiod 40 days after referral. This change will accommodate periods of recess in the legislative schedule.

SB150, s. 44 Section 44. 227.26 (2) (j) of the statutes is amended to read:

SB150,24,21 227.26 (2) (j) Late introduction of bills; effect. If the bills required under par. (f) are introduced on or after February 1 of an even-numbered year and before the next regular session of the legislature commences, as provided under s. 13.02 (2), or if the bills cannot be introduced during this time period under the joint rules of the legislature, unless either house adversely disposes of either bill, the committee shall reintroduce introduce the bills on the first day of the next regular session of the legislature. If the committee is required to reintroduce introduce the bills on the first day of the next regular session, the rule to which the bills pertain remains suspended except as provided in par. (i). If either house adversely disposes of either bill, the rule remains in effect and the committee may not suspend it again. In this paragraph, "adversely disposes of" has the meaning given under s. 227.19 (5) (g).

Note: Current law provides that if the joint committee for review of administrative rules introduces suspension-sustaining legislation on or after February 1 of an even-numbered year and before the next regular session of the legislature commences, the joint committee must introduce the bills on the next day of the regular session, unless either house adversely disposes of either bill in the current session. This Section clarifies that the introduction requirement also applies if the bills cannot be introduced by the joint committee on or after February 1 of an even-numbered year under the joint rules of the legislature.

SB150, s. 45 Section 45. 227.26 (2) (L) of the statutes is created to read:

SB150,25,5 227.26 (2) (L) Emergency rules. If the committee suspends an emergency rule under this section, the agency may not submit to the legislature under s. 227.19 (2) the substance of the emergency rule as a proposed permanent rule during the time the emergency rule is suspended.

Note: Current law permits the joint committee for review of administrative rules to suspend a rule, including an emergency rule. This Section codifies current practice by stating that if the committee suspends an emergency rule, the agency may not promulgate the substance of the emergency rule as a proposed permanent rule during the time the emergency rule is suspended.

SB150, s. 46 Section 46. 227.27 (2) of the statutes is amended to read: