AB810,77 23Section 77. 343.305 (9) (am) 5. c. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,39,424 343.305 (9) (am) 5. c. Whether the person refused to permit the test. The person
25shall not be considered to have refused the test if it is shown by a preponderance of

1evidence that the refusal was due to a physical inability to submit to the test due to
2a physical disability or disease unrelated to the use of alcohol,
3tetrahydrocannabinols, controlled substances, controlled substance analogs or other
4drugs.
AB810,78 5Section 78. 343.305 (9) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,39,136 343.305 (9) (d) At the close of the hearing, or within 5 days thereafter, the court
7shall determine the issues under par. (a) 5. or (am) 5. If all issues are determined
8adversely to the person, the court shall proceed under sub. (10). If one or more of the
9issues is determined favorably to the person, the court shall order that no action be
10taken on the operating privilege on account of the person's refusal to take the test in
11question. This section does not preclude the prosecution of the person for violation
12of s. 346.63 (1), (2m), (2p), (5) or (7) or a local ordinance in conformity therewith, or
13s. 346.63 (2) or (6), 940.09 (1) or 940.25.
AB810,79 14Section 79. 343.305 (10) (em) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,39,2515 343.305 (10) (em) One penalty for improperly refusing to submit to a test for
16intoxication regarding a person arrested for a violation of s. 346.63 (2m), (2p), or (7)
17or a local ordinance in conformity therewith is revocation of the person's operating
18privilege for 6 months. If there was a minor passenger under 16 years of age in the
19motor vehicle at the time of the incident that gave rise to the improper refusal, the
20revocation period is 12 months. After the first 15 days of the revocation period, the
21person is eligible for an occupational license under s. 343.10. Any such improper
22refusal or revocation for the refusal does not count as a prior refusal or a prior
23revocation under this section or ss. 343.30 (1q), 343.307 and 346.65 (2). The person
24shall not be required to submit to and comply with any assessment or driver safety
25plan under pars. (c) and (d).
AB810,80
1Section 80. 343.307 (1) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,40,92 343.307 (1) (d) Convictions under the law of another jurisdiction that prohibits
3a person from refusing chemical testing or using a motor vehicle while intoxicated
4or under the influence of a controlled substance or controlled substance analog, or
5a combination thereof; with an excess or specified range of alcohol or
6tetrahydrocannabinols
concentration; while under the influence of any drug to a
7degree that renders the person incapable of safely driving; or while having a
8detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood, as those
9or substantially similar terms are used in that jurisdiction's laws.
AB810,81 10Section 81. 343.307 (2) (e) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,40,1811 343.307 (2) (e) Convictions under the law of another jurisdiction that prohibits
12a person from refusing chemical testing or using a motor vehicle while intoxicated
13or under the influence of a controlled substance or controlled substance analog, or
14a combination thereof; with an excess or specified range of alcohol or
15tetrahydrocannabinols
concentration; while under the influence of any drug to a
16degree that renders the person incapable of safely driving; or while having a
17detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood, as those
18or substantially similar terms are used in that jurisdiction's laws.
AB810,82 19Section 82. 343.31 (1) (am) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,41,320 343.31 (1) (am) Injury by the operation of a vehicle while under the influence
21of an intoxicant, tetrahydrocannabinols, a controlled substance or a controlled
22substance analog, or any combination of an intoxicant, tetrahydrocannabinols, a
23controlled substance and a controlled substance analog, under the influence of any
24other drug to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving, or under
25the combined influence of an intoxicant and any other drug to a degree which renders

1him or her incapable of safely driving or while the person has a detectable amount
2of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood or has a prohibited alcohol or
3tetrahydrocannabinols
concentration and which is criminal under s. 346.63 (2).
AB810,83 4Section 83. 343.31 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,41,195 343.31 (2) The department shall revoke the operating privilege of any resident
6upon receiving notice of the conviction of such person in another jurisdiction for an
7offense therein which, if committed in this state, would have been cause for
8revocation under this section or for revocation under s. 343.30 (1q). Such offenses
9shall include violation of any law of another jurisdiction that prohibits a person from
10using a motor vehicle while intoxicated or under the influence of a controlled
11substance or controlled substance analog, or a combination thereof; with an excess
12or specified range of alcohol or tetrahydrocannabinols concentration; while under
13the influence of any drug to a degree that renders the person incapable of safely
14driving; or while having a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in
15his or her blood, as those or substantially similar terms are used in that jurisdiction's
16laws. Upon receiving similar notice with respect to a nonresident, the department
17shall revoke the privilege of the nonresident to operate a motor vehicle in this state.
18Such revocation shall not apply to the operation of a commercial motor vehicle by a
19nonresident who holds a valid commercial driver license issued by another state.
AB810,84 20Section 84. 343.315 (2) (a) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,42,221 343.315 (2) (a) 2. Section 346.63 (1) (b) or (5) (a) or a local ordinance in
22conformity therewith or a law of a federally recognized American Indian tribe or
23band in this state in conformity with s. 346.63 (1) (b) or (5) (a) or the law of another
24jurisdiction prohibiting driving or operating a commercial motor vehicle while the
25person's alcohol concentration is 0.04 or more or with an excess or specified range of

1alcohol or tetrahydrocannabinols concentration, as those or substantially similar
2terms are used in that jurisdiction's laws.
AB810,85 3Section 85. 343.315 (2) (a) 5. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,42,114 343.315 (2) (a) 5. Section 343.305 (7) or (9) or a local ordinance in conformity
5therewith or a law of a federally recognized American Indian tribe or band in this
6state in conformity with s. 343.305 (7) or (9) or the law of another jurisdiction
7prohibiting refusal of a person driving or operating a motor vehicle to submit to
8chemical testing to determine the person's alcohol or tetrahydrocannabinols
9concentration or intoxication or the amount of a restricted controlled substance in
10the person's blood, or prohibiting positive results from such chemical testing, as
11those or substantially similar terms are used in that jurisdiction's laws.
AB810,86 12Section 86. 343.315 (2) (a) 6. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,42,2313 343.315 (2) (a) 6. Section 346.63 (2) or (6), 940.09 (1) or 940.25 or a law of a
14federally recognized American Indian tribe or band in this state in conformity with
15s. 346.63 (2) or (6), 940.09 (1) or 940.25, or the law of another jurisdiction prohibiting
16causing or inflicting injury, great bodily harm or death through use of a motor vehicle
17while intoxicated or under the influence of alcohol, tetrahydrocannabinols, a
18controlled substance, a controlled substance analog or a combination thereof, or with
19an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or more or with an excess or specified range of alcohol
20or tetrahydrocannabinols concentration, while under the influence of any drug to a
21degree that renders the person incapable of safely driving, or while having a
22detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in the person's blood, as those
23or substantially similar terms are used in that jurisdiction's laws.
AB810,87 24Section 87. 343.315 (2) (bm) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,43,3
1343.315 (2) (bm) 2. The offense relates to a vehicle operator's alcohol or
2tetrahydrocannabinols
concentration or intoxication or the amount of a restricted
3controlled substance in the operator's blood.
AB810,88 4Section 88. 343.32 (2) (bj) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,43,95 343.32 (2) (bj) The scale adopted by the secretary shall assess, for each
6conviction, 6 demerit points for a violation of s. 346.63 (6), 4 demerit points for a
7violation of s. 346.63 (2m) or (2p), and 3 demerit points for a violation of s. 346.63 (7)
8(a) 3. The scale adopted by the secretary shall not assess any demerit points for
9conviction of a violation of s. 346.63 (5) or (7) (a) 1. or 2.
AB810,89 10Section 89. 344.576 (2) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,43,1411 344.576 (2) (b) The damage occurs while the renter or authorized driver
12operates the private passenger vehicle in this state while under the influence of an
13intoxicant or other drug, as described under s. 346.63 (1) (a), (am), or (b) or, (2m), or
14(2p)
.
AB810,90 15Section 90. 346.63 (1) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,43,1716 346.63 (1) (b) The person has a prohibited alcohol or tetrahydrocannabinols
17concentration.
AB810,91 18Section 91. 346.63 (1) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,44,219 346.63 (1) (d) In an action under par. (am) that is based on the defendant
20allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine, or
21gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood or
22in an action under par. (b) that is based on the defendant allegedly having a
23prohibited tetrahydrocannabinols concentration
, the defendant has a defense if he
24or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or
25occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its

1metabolic precursors, gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or
2delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.
AB810,92 3Section 92. 346.63 (2) (a) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,44,54 346.63 (2) (a) 2. The person has a prohibited alcohol or tetrahydrocannabinols
5concentration.
AB810,93 6Section 93. 346.63 (2) (b) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,44,167 346.63 (2) (b) 1. In an action under this subsection, the defendant has a defense
8if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the injury would have
9occurred even if he or she had been exercising due care and he or she had not been
10under the influence of an intoxicant, tetrahydrocannabinols, a controlled substance,
11a controlled substance analog or a combination thereof, under the influence of any
12other drug to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving, or under
13the combined influence of an intoxicant and any other drug to a degree which renders
14him or her incapable of safely driving, did not have a prohibited alcohol or
15tetrahydrocannabinols
concentration described under par. (a) 2., or did not have a
16detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood.
AB810,94 17Section 94. 346.63 (2) (b) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,45,218 346.63 (2) (b) 2. In an action under par. (a) 3. that is based on the defendant
19allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine, or
20gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood or
21in an action under par. (a) 2. that is based on the defendant allegedly having a
22prohibited tetrahydrocannabinols concentration
, the defendant has a defense if he
23or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or
24occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its

1metabolic precursors, gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or
2delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.
AB810,95 3Section 95. 346.63 (2p) of the statutes is created to read:
AB810,45,114 346.63 (2p) If a person has not attained the legal age, as defined in s. 961.70
5(1), the person may not drive or operate a motor vehicle while he or she has an
6tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of more than 0.0 but not more than 5.0. One
7penalty for violation of this subsection is suspension of a person's operating privilege
8under s. 343.30 (1p). The person is eligible for an occupational license under s. 343.10
9at any time. If a person arrested for a violation of this subsection refuses to take a
10test under s. 343.305, the refusal is a separate violation and the person is subject to
11revocation of the person's operating privilege under s. 343.305 (10) (em).
AB810,96 12Section 96. 346.65 (2m) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,45,2113 346.65 (2m) (a) In imposing a sentence under sub. (2) for a violation of s. 346.63
14(1) (am) or (b) or (5) or a local ordinance in conformity therewith, the court shall
15review the record and consider the aggravating and mitigating factors in the matter.
16If the amount of alcohol in the person's blood or urine or the amount of a restricted
17controlled substance or tetrahydrocannabinols in the person's blood is known, the
18court shall consider that amount as a factor in sentencing. The chief judge of each
19judicial administrative district shall adopt guidelines, under the chief judge's
20authority to adopt local rules under SCR 70.34, for the consideration of aggravating
21and mitigating factors.
AB810,97 22Section 97. 346.65 (2q) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,46,223 346.65 (2q) Any person violating s. 346.63 (2m) or (2p) shall forfeit $200. If
24there was a minor passenger under 16 years of age in the motor vehicle at the time

1of the violation that gave rise to the conviction under 346.63 (2m) or (2p), the person
2shall be fined $400.
AB810,98 3Section 98. 349.03 (2m) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,46,54 349.03 (2m) Notwithstanding sub. (2), a municipal court may suspend a license
5for a violation of a local ordinance in conformity with s. 346.63 (1) or, (2m), or (2p).
AB810,99 6Section 99. 349.06 (1m) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,46,87 349.06 (1m) Notwithstanding sub. (1), a municipal court may suspend a license
8for a violation of a local ordinance in conformity with s. 346.63 (1) or, (2m), or (2p).
AB810,100 9Section 100. 350.01 (10v) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,46,1110 350.01 (10v) (a) A controlled substance included in schedule I under ch. 961
11other than a tetrahydrocannabinol.
AB810,101 12Section 101. 350.01 (10v) (e) of the statutes is repealed.
AB810,102 13Section 102. 350.01 (21g) of the statutes is created to read:
AB810,46,1514 350.01 (21g) "Tetrahydrocannabinols concentration" has the meaning given in
15s. 23.33 (1) (k).
AB810,103 16Section 103. 350.101 (1) (bg) of the statutes is created to read:
AB810,46,1917 350.101 (1) (bg) Operating with tetrahydrocannabinols concentration at or
18above specified levels.
No person may engage in the operation of a snowmobile while
19the person has a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of 5.0 or more.
AB810,104 20Section 104. 350.101 (1) (cg) of the statutes is created to read:
AB810,46,2421 350.101 (1) (cg) Operating with tetrahydrocannabinols concentration at or
22above specified levels.
If a person has not attained the age of 21, the person may not
23engage in the operation of a snowmobile while he or she has a tetrahydrocannabinols
24concentration of more than 0.0 but not more than 5.0.
AB810,105 25Section 105. 350.101 (1) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,47,9
1350.101 (1) (d) Related charges. A person may be charged with and a prosecutor
2may proceed upon a complaint based upon a violation of any combination of par. (a),
3(b), (bg), or (bm) for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence. If the person
4is charged with violating any combination of par. (a), (b), (bg), or (bm), the offenses
5shall be joined. If the person is found guilty of any combination of par. (a), (b), (bg),
6or (bm) for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence, there shall be a single
7conviction for purposes of sentencing and for purposes of counting convictions under
8s. 350.11 (3) (a) 2. and 3. Paragraphs (a), (b), (bg), and (bm) each require proof of a
9fact for conviction which the others do not require.
AB810,106 10Section 106. 350.101 (1) (e) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,47,1911 350.101 (1) (e) Defenses. In an action under par. (bm) that is based on the
12defendant allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine, or
13gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood or
14in an action under par. (bg) or (cg) that is based on the defendant allegedly having
15a prohibited tetrahydrocannabinols concentration
, the defendant has a defense if he
16or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or
17occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its
18metabolic precursors, gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or
19delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.
AB810,107 20Section 107. 350.101 (2) (bg) of the statutes is created to read:
AB810,47,2321 350.101 (2) (bg) Causing injury with tetrahydrocannabinols concentrations at
22or above specified levels.
No person who has a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration
23of 5.0 or more may cause injury to another person by the operation of a snowmobile.
AB810,108 24Section 108. 350.101 (2) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,48,10
1350.101 (2) (c) Related charges. A person may be charged with and a prosecutor
2may proceed upon a complaint based upon a violation of any combination of par. (a),
3(b), (bg), or (bm) for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence. If the person
4is charged with violating any combination of par. (a), (b), (bg), or (bm) in the
5complaint, the crimes shall be joined under s. 971.12. If the person is found guilty
6of any combination of par. (a), (b), (bg), or (bm) for acts arising out of the same incident
7or occurrence, there shall be a single conviction for purposes of sentencing and for
8purposes of counting convictions under s. 350.11 (3) (a) 2. and 3. Paragraphs (a), (b),
9(bg), and (bm) each require proof of a fact for conviction which the others do not
10require.
AB810,109 11Section 109. 350.101 (2) (d) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,48,1712 350.101 (2) (d) 1. In an action under this subsection, the defendant has a
13defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the injury would
14have occurred even if he or she had been exercising due care and he or she had not
15been under the influence of an intoxicant or did not have an alcohol concentration
16of 0.08 or more or a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of 5.0 or more or a
17detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood.
AB810,110 18Section 110. 350.101 (2) (d) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,49,219 350.101 (2) (d) 2. In an action under par. (bm) that is based on the defendant
20allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine, or
21gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood or
22in an action under par. (bg) that is based on the defendant allegedly having a
23prohibited tetrahydrocannabinols concentration
, the defendant has a defense if he
24or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or
25occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its

1metabolic precursors, gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or
2delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.
AB810,111 3Section 111. 350.104 (4) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,49,134 350.104 (4) Admissibility; effect of test results; other evidence. The results
5of a chemical test required or administered under sub. (1), (2) or (3) are admissible
6in any civil or criminal action or proceeding arising out of the acts committed by a
7person alleged to have violated the intoxicated snowmobiling law on the issue of
8whether the person was under the influence of an intoxicant or the issue of whether
9the person had alcohol or tetrahydrocannabinols concentrations at or above specified
10levels or a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood.
11Results of these chemical tests shall be given the effect required under s. 885.235.
12This section does not limit the right of a law enforcement officer to obtain evidence
13by any other lawful means.
AB810,112 14Section 112. 350.11 (3) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,49,2415 350.11 (3) (d) Alcohol, controlled substances or controlled substance analogs,
16or tetrahydrocannabinols
; assessment. In addition to any other penalty or order, a
17person who violates s. 350.101 (1) or (2) or 350.104 (5) or who violates s. 940.09 or
18940.25 if the violation involves the operation of a snowmobile, shall be ordered by the
19court to submit to and comply with an assessment by an approved public treatment
20facility for an examination of the person's use of alcohol, controlled substances or
21controlled substance analogs, or tetrahydrocannabinols. The assessment order shall
22comply with s. 343.30 (1q) (c) 1. a. to c. Intentional failure to comply with an
23assessment ordered under this paragraph constitutes contempt of court, punishable
24under ch. 785.
AB810,113 25Section 113. 885.235 (1) (d) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,50,2
1885.235 (1) (d) 1. A controlled substance included in schedule I under ch. 961
2other than a tetrahydrocannabinol.
AB810,114 3Section 114. 885.235 (1) (d) 5. of the statutes is repealed.
AB810,115 4Section 115. 885.235 (1) (e) of the statutes is created to read:
AB810,50,65 885.235 (1) (e) "Tetrahydrocannabinols concentration" has the meaning given
6in s. 23.33 (1) (k).
AB810,116 7Section 116. 885.235 (1g) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,50,218 885.235 (1g) (intro.) In any action or proceeding in which it is material to prove
9that a person was under the influence of an intoxicant or had a prohibited alcohol or
10tetrahydrocannabinols
concentration or a specified alcohol concentration while
11operating or driving a motor vehicle or, if the vehicle is a commercial motor vehicle,
12on duty time, while operating a motorboat, except a sailboat operating under sail
13alone, while operating a snowmobile, while operating an all-terrain vehicle or utility
14terrain vehicle or while handling a firearm, evidence of the amount of alcohol or
15tetrahydrocannabinols
in the person's blood at the time in question, as shown by
16chemical analysis of a sample of the person's blood or urine or evidence of the amount
17of alcohol in the person's breath, is admissible on the issue of whether he or she was
18under the influence of an intoxicant or had a prohibited alcohol or
19tetrahydrocannabinols
concentration or a specified alcohol concentration if the
20sample was taken within 3 hours after the event to be proved. The chemical analysis
21shall be given effect as follows without requiring any expert testimony as to its effect:
AB810,117 22Section 117. 885.235 (1g) (ag) of the statutes is created to read:
AB810,51,323 885.235 (1g) (ag) The fact that the analysis shows that the person had an
24tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of more than 0.0 but less than 5.0 is relevant
25evidence on the issue of being under the combined influence of

1tetrahydrocannabinols and alcohol, a controlled substance, a controlled substance
2analog, or any other drug, but, except as provided in sub. (1L), is not to be given any
3prima facie effect.
AB810,118 4Section 118. 885.235 (1g) (cg) of the statutes is created to read:
AB810,51,75 885.235 (1g) (cg) The fact that the analysis shows that the person had an
6tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of 5.0 or more is prima facie evidence that he
7or she had an tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of 5.0 or more.
AB810,119 8Section 119. 885.235 (1L) of the statutes is created to read:
AB810,51,199 885.235 (1L) In any action under s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 3g., 30.681 (1) (bn) 2., 346.63
10(2p), or 350.101 (1) (cg), evidence of the amount of tetrahydrocannabinols in the
11person's blood at the time in question, as shown by chemical analysis of a sample of
12the person's blood or urine, is admissible on the issue of whether he or she had a
13tetrahydrocannabinols concentration in the range specified in s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 3g.,
1430.681 (1) (bn) 2., 346.63 (2p), or 350.101 (1) (cg) if the sample was taken within 3
15hours after the event to be proved. The fact that the analysis shows that the person
16had a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration of more than 0.0 but not more than 5.0
17is prima facie evidence that the person had a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration
18in the range specified in s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 3g., 30.681 (1) (bn) 2., 346.63 (2p), or 350.101
19(1) (cg).
AB810,120 20Section 120. 885.235 (1m) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,52,721 885.235 (1m) In any action under s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 3., 30.681 (1) (bn) 1., 346.63
22(2m) or (7), or 350.101 (1) (c), evidence of the amount of alcohol in the person's blood
23at the time in question, as shown by chemical analysis of a sample of the person's
24blood or urine or evidence of the amount of alcohol in the person's breath, is
25admissible on the issue of whether he or she had an alcohol concentration in the

1range specified in s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 3., 30.681 (1) (bn) 1., 346.63 (2m), or 350.101 (1)
2(c) or an alcohol concentration above 0.0 under s. 346.63 (7) if the sample was taken
3within 3 hours after the event to be proved. The fact that the analysis shows that
4the person had an alcohol concentration of more than 0.0 but not more than 0.08 is
5prima facie evidence that the person had an alcohol concentration in the range
6specified in s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 3., 30.681 (1) (bn) 1., 346.63 (2m), or 350.101 (1) (c) or an
7alcohol concentration above 0.0 under s. 346.63 (7).
AB810,121 8Section 121. 885.235 (4) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB810,52,199 885.235 (4) The provisions of this section relating to the admissibility of
10chemical tests for alcohol or tetrahydrocannabinols concentration or intoxication or
11for determining whether a person had a detectable amount of a restricted controlled
12substance in his or her blood shall not be construed as limiting the introduction of
13any other competent evidence bearing on the question of whether or not a person was
14under the influence of an intoxicant, had a detectable amount of a restricted
15controlled substance in his or her blood, had a specified alcohol or
16tetrahydrocannabinols
concentration, or had an alcohol concentration in the range
17specified in s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 3., 30.681 (1) (bn) 1., 346.63 (2m) or 350.101 (1) (c), or had
18a tetrahydrocannabinols concentration in the range specified in s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 3g.,
1930.681 (1) (bn) 2., 346.63 (2p), or 350.101 (1) (cg)
.
AB810,122 20Section 122. 895.047 (3) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
Loading...
Loading...