LRB-3516/1
TJD:wlj
2021 - 2022 LEGISLATURE
June 14, 2021 - Introduced by Representatives Rozar,
Armstrong, Brandtjen,
Cabral-Guevara, Edming, Gundrum, Murphy, Sinicki, Skowronski, Spiros,
Subeck and Wichgers, cosponsored by Senators Jacque,
Ballweg and L.
Taylor. Referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety.
AB400,1,3
1An Act to amend 46.90 (5) (b) (intro.), 55.043 (1r) (a) 1g. and 55.043 (1r) (b)
2(intro.) of the statutes;
relating to: responses to reports relating to elder adults
3at risk and adults at risk.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law requires employees of entities that are credentialed by the
Department of Health Services to report to the county department, the
elder-adult-at-risk agency, DHS, the Board on Aging and Long-term Care, or law
enforcement a request by an elder adult at risk to make a report; a reasonable belief
that an elder adult at risk is at imminent risk of serious bodily harm, death, sexual
assault, or significant property loss but is unable to make an informed judgment
whether to make a report; or a reasonable belief that any elder adult at risk is at risk
of any of those harms by a suspected perpetrator. An “elder adult at risk” is defined
under current law as a person age 60 or older who has experienced, is experiencing,
or is at risk of experiencing abuse, financial exploitation, neglect, or self-neglect.
Upon receiving a report, the elder-adult-at-risk agency must respond to the report
or refer the report to another agency for investigation or, if the alleged victim is a
client of a credentialed entity and if the suspected perpetrator of the harm is a
caregiver or nonclient resident of the entity, must refer the report to DHS. Current
law specifies that the agency's response or investigation may include any of the
following actions: a visit to the elder adult at risk's residence; observation of or
interview with the elder adult at risk; interview with a guardian, agent under an
activated power of attorney for health care, or caregiver of the elder adult at risk; or
review of treatment and patient health care records or financial records. This bill
requires that at least one of these specified actions be included in the response or
investigation.
Current law contains a similar reporting requirement for similar types of
harms to adults at risk, who are adults who have a physical or mental condition that
substantially impairs their ability to care for their needs and who have experienced,
are experiencing, or are at risk of experiencing abuse, financial exploitation, neglect,
or self-neglect. Current law requires the recipient of a report, if the alleged victim
is a client of a credentialed entity and if the suspected perpetrator is a caregiver or
nonresident client of the entity, to refer the report to DHS, but under other
circumstances, the adult-at-risk agency is allowed but not required to respond to a
reasonable belief that an adult at risk is the subject of abuse, financial exploitation,
neglect, or self-neglect. The bill requires an adult-at-risk agency that receives a
report of alleged abuse or an adult-at-risk agency that has reason to believe an
adult-at-risk is the subject of the harms specified under current law to respond by
conducting an investigation or by referring the report to another agency for
investigation. The bill also requires the investigating agency to include at least one
of the actions specified in current law, which are the same actions described for
investigations related to elder adults at risk.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
AB400,1
1Section
1. 46.90 (5) (b) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB400,2,42
46.90
(5) (b) (intro.) The elder-adult-at-risk agency's response or another
3investigative agency's investigation
may shall include
at least one
or more of the
4following:
AB400,2
5Section
2. 55.043 (1r) (a) 1g. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB400,3,116
55.043
(1r) (a) 1g. Except as otherwise provided, if an adult-at-risk agency has
7reason to believe that an adult at risk has been the subject of abuse, financial
8exploitation, neglect, or self-neglect
or upon receiving a report of alleged abuse, the
9adult-at-risk agency
may shall respond
, including by conducting an investigation
,
10to or by referring the report to another agency for investigation. The investigation
11may be used to determine whether the adult at risk is in need of protective services.
12If an adult-at-risk agency has reason to believe that there is abuse, financial
1exploitation, neglect, or self-neglect of an adult at risk who is a client, as defined in
2s. 50.065 (1) (b), of an entity, as defined in s. 50.065 (1) (c), and if the person suspected
3of perpetrating the alleged abuse, financial exploitation, or neglect is a caregiver or
4nonclient resident of the entity, the adult-at-risk agency shall refer the report
5within 24 hours after the report is received to the department for investigation. The
6department shall coordinate its investigatory efforts with other investigative
7agencies or authorities as appropriate. An adult-at-risk agency's response to or
8another investigative agency's investigation of a report of abuse, financial
9exploitation, neglect, or self-neglect that is not referred to the department shall be
10commenced within 24 hours after a report is received, excluding Saturdays,
11Sundays, and legal holidays.
AB400,3
12Section
3. 55.043 (1r) (b) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB400,3,1513
55.043
(1r) (b) (intro.) The adult-at-risk agency's
response or another
14investigative agency's investigation
may shall include
at least one
or more of the
15following: