January 7, 2022 - Introduced by Representatives Tusler, Edming, Armstrong,
Callahan, Steffen, Dittrich, Petersen, Brandtjen, Tittl, Gundrum, Novak,
Kurtz, Krug, Knodl, James, Plumer, Skowronski, Kuglitsch, Macco, Born,
Murphy, Kitchens, Swearingen, Sanfelippo and Cabral-Guevara,
cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard and Jacque. Referred to Committee on
Criminal Justice and Public Safety.
AB834,1,2 1An Act to create 164.07 and 968.155 of the statutes; relating to: no-knock
2search warrants and certain expenditures of federal moneys by first class cities.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law as provided in the U.S. Supreme Court case Richards v.
Wisconsin
, a law enforcement officer may execute a search warrant without knocking
and announcing his or her presence if he or she has a reasonable suspicion that
knocking and announcing his or her presence, under the particular circumstances,
would be dangerous or futile or would inhibit the effective investigation of the crime.
This bill creates a statutory provision that provides that right to law enforcement
officers and further provides that:
1. No city, village, town, or county may adopt an ordinance or policy that
restricts a law enforcement officer's ability to execute an unannounced search
warrant.
2. No board of fire and police commissioners may prescribe rules or regulations
that restrict a law enforcement officer's ability to execute an unannounced search
warrant.
3. No sheriff or chief of a law enforcement agency may adopt a policy that
restricts a law enforcement officer's ability to execute an unannounced search
warrant.
4. No mayor or common council may issue an order that restricts a law
enforcement officer's ability to execute an unannounced search warrant.
The bill also requires a first class city (currently, only the city of Milwaukee) to
expend a portion of the moneys it receives under the federal American Rescue Plan

Act of 2021 to fund operations of the city's police department. The portion that must
be expended for these purposes is the total amount of ARPA funds received by the
city multiplied by the result of dividing the amount that the city expended in 2021
for law enforcement purposes by the total amount expended by the city from its
general fund in 2021 for all purposes. The bill also requires that in any year that a
first class city receives ARPA funds, the city must expend at least as much from its
general fund for the city's police department as it did in 2021.
For further information see the local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as
an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
AB834,1 1Section 1. 164.07 of the statutes is created to read:
AB834,2,3 2164.07 Executing a search warrant. A law enforcement officer may execute
3a search warrant as provided under s. 968.155.
AB834,2 4Section 2. 968.155 of the statutes is created to read:
AB834,2,9 5968.155 Search warrants; unannounced entry. (1) A search warrant may
6be executed by a law enforcement officer without knocking and announcing his or her
7presence if the law enforcement officer has a reasonable suspicion that knocking and
8announcing his or her presence, under the particular circumstances, would be
9dangerous or futile or would inhibit the effective investigation of the crime.
AB834,2,12 10(2) (a) No city, village, town, or county may adopt an ordinance or policy that
11restricts a law enforcement officer's ability to execute a search warrant as provided
12under sub. (1).
AB834,2,1513 (b) No board of fire and police commissioners may prescribe rules under s. 62.50
14(3) (a) that restrict a law enforcement officer's ability to execute a search warrant as
15provided under sub. (1).
AB834,3,3
1(c) No board of fire and police commissioners may prescribe rules or regulations
2under s. 62.13 (6) (a) 1. that restrict a law enforcement officer's ability to execute a
3search warrant as provided under sub. (1).
AB834,3,64 (d) No sheriff or chief of a law enforcement agency may adopt a policy that
5restricts a law enforcement officer's ability to execute a search warrant as provided
6under sub. (1).
AB834,3,87 (e) No mayor or common council may issue an order that restricts a law
8enforcement officer's ability to execute a search warrant as provided under sub. (1).
AB834,3 9Section 3. Nonstatutory provisions.
AB834,3,1010 (1) Law enforcement expenditures by a 1st class city.
AB834,3,1511 (a) In this subsection, “policing expenditure rate” means the number calculated
12by dividing the amount expended by a 1st class city from its general fund in 2021 for
13law enforcement purposes, including all expenditures related to the city's police
14department, by the total amount expended by the city from its general fund in 2021
15for all purposes.
AB834,3,2016 (b) In any year, of the moneys a 1st class city receives from the federal
17government pursuant to section 602 of the federal Social Security Act as amended
18by the federal American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, P.L. 117-2, the city shall expend
19not less than the total amount received multiplied by the policing expenditure rate
20to fund operations of the city's police department.
AB834,4,221 (c) In any year that a 1st class city receives moneys from the federal
22government pursuant to section 602 of the federal Social Security Act as amended
23by the federal American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, P.L. 117-2, the city shall expend

1at least as much from its general fund to fund operations of the city's police
2department as it expended from its general fund for these purposes in 2021.
AB834,4,33 (End)
Loading...
Loading...