SB275: Bill Text

LRB-2614/1

SWB:all

2023 - 2024 LEGISLATURE

2023 Senate BILL 275

May 15, 2023 - Introduced by Senators Jacque, Wimberger and Felzkowski, cosponsored by Representatives Tusler, Rettinger, Brandtjen, Murphy, Mursau, Snyder and Wichgers. Referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.

SB275,1,2 An Act to create chapter 798 of the statutes; relating to: statutory recognition of specialized treatment court and commercial court dockets.

Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill statutorily recognizes specialized dockets for treatment courts and for commercial cases. The bill recognizes in statute treatment courts, which are defined in the bill to include adult drug treatment court, juvenile drug treatment court, operating while intoxicated treatment court, mental health treatment court, family dependency treatment court, veterans treatment court, hybrid treatment court, and tribal healing to wellness court.

The bill also statutorily recognizes a specialized docket for commercial cases. Under the bill, the chief justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, taking into consideration recommendations from the relevant chief judges of the judicial administrative districts, must select circuit court judges who will be assigned to the commercial court docket upon each judge's agreement to serve. The bill provides that a judge who presides over cases on the commercial court docket is not prohibited from working on any other assigned docket.

Under the bill, certain commercial case types must be assigned to the commercial court docket, including cases involving any of the following: 1) the governance or internal affairs of business organizations; 2) tortious or statutorily prohibited business activity, unfair competition, or antitrust claims; 3) the sale, consolidation, or merger of a business organization or the conversion, share exchange, or sale of substantially all of the assets of a business organization; 4) the issuance, sale, or transfer of securities; 5) intellectual property rights; 6) the relationship between a franchisor and franchisee or similar distribution relationship; 7) certain claims or disputes involving the Uniform Commercial Code, when the amount in controversy exceeds $100,000; (8) receiverships in excess of $250,000; (9) confirmation of arbitration awards and compelling or enforcing arbitration awards when the amount in controversy exceeds $100,000; and (10) real estate construction disputes when the amount in controversy exceeds $250,000. The bill provides that certain types of cases are ineligible for assignment to the commercial court docket, including small claims cases, cases involving a governmental entity or political subdivision seeking to enforce a statutory or regulatory restriction or prohibition, or disputes between landlords and tenants.

The commercial court docket created under the bill is a commercial case docket that generally involves disputes between commercial entities rather than individuals and does not include actions typically involving individuals such as personal injury suits, products liability, malpractice, or other tort claims, or landlord and tenant disputes or similar claims. Under the bill, parties may jointly move for discretionary assignment of a case to the commercial court docket if the case is one that is not identified under the mandatory criteria, but is not otherwise ineligible for assignment. The bill provides that a decision granting or denying a motion for a discretionary assignment of a case to the commercial court docket is final and nonappealable.

The bill also allows that parties to a case that is filed in a judicial administrative district that does not have a dedicated commercial court docket may, in certain circumstances, jointly petition for transfer of the case to a commercial court docket. Under the bill, no party may withdraw a request for transfer to the commercial court docket after a judicial assignment of the case has been made.

The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:

SB275,1 Section 1 . Chapter 798 of the statutes is created to read:

SB275,2,3 Chapter 798 specialty courts

SB275,2,4 798.01 Legislative findings. The legislature finds all of the following:

SB275,3,4 (1) Specialized dockets for treatment courts and for commercial cases have existed in this state and across the country for a number of years in recognition of the fact that the interests of justice in general, and of litigants in particular, are substantially enhanced when judges and other court personnel commit to take specific training in the subject matter areas of a particular specialized docket and then apply that training and expertise to the unique issues before the court. The use of specialized dockets increases efficiencies and improve outcomes in the handling of these cases.

SB275,3,8 (2) The commercial court docket has existed in this state for 5 years as a pilot project in a number of counties and judicial districts and has been shown to reduce substantially the time it takes to obtain a decision and increase the level of satisfaction of the parties with the results in commercial disputes.

SB275,3,16 798.05 Treatment court dockets. (1) Purpose; authority. The purpose of this section is to statutorily recognize specialized dockets for treatment courts. Treatment courts are designed to operate within the framework of the existing state court system and specifically address underlying issues relating to criminal behavior. Treatment courts provide treatment while working with a multidisciplinary team to deploy a range of graduated rewards and sanctions with the goal of engaging participants in treatment long enough to successfully address any addiction or mental health issues and end the cycle of recidivism.

SB275,3,17 (2) Definition. In this section, “treatment court” includes any of the following:

SB275,3,18 (a) Adult drug treatment court.

SB275,3,19 (b) Juvenile drug treatment court.

SB275,3,20 (c) Operating while intoxicated treatment court.

SB275,3,21 (d) Mental health treatment court.

SB275,3,22 (e) Family dependency treatment court.

SB275,3,23 (f) Veterans treatment court.

SB275,3,24 (g) Hybrid treatment court.

SB275,3,25 (h) Tribal healing to wellness court.

SB275,4,7 798.15 Commercial court docket. (1) Purpose; authority. The purpose of this section is to statutorily recognize a specialized docket for commercial cases in state circuit courts. The commercial court docket is designed to operate within the framework of the existing state court system with minimal impact on the balance of court operations. It is intended to leverage judicial expertise in commercial law and disputes with commercial litigants' desire to tailor case management practices best suited for resolving substantial business disputes fairly and expeditiously.

SB275,4,8 (2) Definitions. In this section:

SB275,4,14 (a) “Business organization” includes a sole proprietorship, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, limited partnership, professional association, benefits corporation, service corporation, joint venture, bank, savings bank, savings and loan association, or business trust. A “business organization” excludes an individual, a family trust, or a political subdivision or governmental entity.

SB275,4,16 (b) “Consumer contract or transaction” means a consumer contract or transaction that is primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.

SB275,4,22 (3) Scope. (a) The commercial court procedures outlined in this section apply to judicial administrative districts that have established specialized dockets for commercial cases on the effective date of this paragraph .... [LRB inserts date], and to any commercial court docket established after the effective date of this paragraph .... [LRB inserts date], beginning on the date that docket is established. Courts with specialized dockets for commercial cases shall be referred to as the commercial court.

SB275,5,3 (b) 1. The chief justice of the supreme court, after considering the recommendation of the chief judge of the encompassing judicial administrative district, shall select the circuit court judges in the judicial administrative districts who will be assigned to the commercial court docket upon each judge's agreement to so serve. The chief justice of the supreme court shall select at least all of the following to participate in the commercial court under this section:

SB275,5,5 a. No fewer than 4 circuit court judges within the 2nd judicial administrative district.

SB275,5,7 b. No fewer than 4 circuit court judges within the 3rd judicial administrative district.

SB275,5,9 c. No fewer than 4 circuit court judges within the 5th judicial administrative district.

SB275,5,11 d. No fewer than 4 circuit court judges within the 8th judicial administrative district.

SB275,5,13 e. No fewer than 4 circuit court judges within the 10th judicial administrative district.

SB275,5,15 f. No fewer than 4 circuit court judges within any judicial administrative district that adds a commercial court docket.

SB275,5,17 2. A judge who presides in a commercial court docket is not prohibited from working on any other assigned docket.

SB275,5,20 3. The chief justice of the supreme court may add additional judicial administrative districts to the commercial court docket upon the recommendation of the director of state courts.

SB275,5,24 (4) Mandatory assignment of cases to the commercial court docket. (a) Any case of a type described under par. (b) that is filed in a circuit court in which a commercial court docket has been established shall be assigned to the commercial court docket as provided under sub. (7).

SB275,6,2 (b) The commercial court shall have jurisdiction over any of the following types of cases:

SB275,6,4 1. Cases involving the governance or internal affairs of business organizations, including any of the following:

SB275,6,5 a. Claims between or among owners or constituents of a business organization.

SB275,6,6 b. Claims against officers, directors, or managers of a business organization.

SB275,6,8 c. Claims involving the indemnity of owners, officers, directors, or managers of a business organization.

SB275,6,11 d. Claims involving the interpretation of the rights and obligations under the law governing business organizations, such as chs. 178 to 181, 183, 185, 204, 214, 215, and 221 to 223, or any similar statute or law from another jurisdiction.

SB275,6,15 e. Claims involving the interpretation of the rights and obligations under any agreement governing a business organization, such as the articles of incorporation, bylaws, operating agreements, membership agreements, or partnership agreement of the business organization.

SB275,6,17 2. Cases involving tortious or statutorily prohibited business activity, unfair competition, or antitrust, including any of the following:

SB275,6,18 a. Claims under ch. 133.

SB275,6,19 b. Claims under s. 100.30 (5m) or (5r).

SB275,6,20 c. Claims under s. 134.01.

SB275,6,21 d. Claims of tortious interference with a business organization.

SB275,6,23 e. Claims involving restrictive covenants and agreements not to compete or solicit.

SB275,6,24 f. Claims involving confidentiality agreements.

SB275,7,3 3. Cases involving the sale, consolidation, or merger of a business organization or the conversion, share exchange, or sale of substantially all of the assets of a business organization.

SB275,7,6 4. Cases involving the issuance, sale, or transfer of securities, including claims for securities fraud under ch. 551, or any similar statute or law from another jurisdiction.

SB275,7,7 5. Cases involving intellectual property rights, including any of the following:

SB275,7,9 a. Claims to determine the use, ownership, or status of trademarks, trade secrets, or copyrights.

SB275,7,10 b. Claims under s. 134.90.

SB275,7,12 c. Claims involving any agreement relating to the licensing of any intellectual property right, including patent rights.

SB275,7,14 6. Cases involving the relationship between a franchisor and franchisee or similar distribution relationship, including any of the following:

SB275,7,16 a. Claims arising from ch. 135 or any similar statute or law from another jurisdiction.

SB275,7,18 b. Claims arising from s. 134.93 or any similar statute or law from another jurisdiction.

SB275,7,20 c. Claims arising from ch. 553 or any similar statute or law from another jurisdiction.

SB275,7,23 7. Cases involving claims or disputes under ch. 402, 403, 404, 405, or 409, or any similar statute or law from another jurisdiction, when the amount in controversy exceeds $100,000, exclusive of interest, costs, and attorney fees.

SB275,7,24 8. Cases involving receiverships in excess of $250,000.

SB275,8,2 9. Cases involving confirmation of arbitration awards and compelling or enforcing arbitration awards when the amount in controversy exceeds $100,000.

SB275,8,4 10. Cases involving commercial real estate construction disputes when the amount in controversy exceeds $250,000.

SB275,8,11 (5) Discretionary assignment of cases to the commercial court docket. (a) In addition to the cases identified under sub. (4) and that are not otherwise excluded under sub. (6), parties to a case in a judicial administrative district in which there is a commercial court docket may jointly move the chief judge of that judicial administrative district for discretionary assignment of the case to that commercial court docket. If the motion for discretionary assignment is granted, the case may be assigned to a commercial court docket.

SB275,8,19 (b) In deciding a motion for discretionary assignment of a case to a commercial court docket, the chief judge of the encompassing judicial administrative district shall consider the parties to the dispute, the nature of the dispute, the complexity of the issues presented, and whether the commercial court's resolution of the case will provide needed guidance to influence future commercial behavior or assist in resolving future disputes. The decision granting or denying a motion for a discretionary assignment of a case to a commercial court docket is final and nonappealable.

SB275,8,21 (6) Ineligible case types. The following cases may not be assigned to the commercial court docket: