Rule No.
Relating to
High School Equivalency Diplomas and Certificates of General Educational Development.
Rule Type
Permanent.
1. Finding/Nature of Emergency (Emergency Rule Only)
N/A
2. Detailed Description of the Objective of the Proposed Rule
Chapter
PI 5 governs the issuance of high school completion credentials by the State Superintendent, which includes the General Educational Development (GED) Test and the High School Equivalency Diploma (HSED). This rule change is designed to align the rule with changes in the GED Test. The current rule references the number of subtests and the passing scores for the GED, which will be changing in January 2014, when a new test is implemented by GED Testing Service. Additionally, technical changes are needed to align the rule with statute.
3. Description of the Existing Policies Relevant to the Rule, New Policies Proposed to be Included in the Rule, and an Analysis of Policy Alternatives
This rule change is designed to align the rule with changes in the GED Test and with current statute.
4. Detailed Explanation of Statutory Authority for the Rule (Including the Statutory Citation and Language)
115.29 General powers. The state superintendent may:
(4) High school graduation equivalency. (a) Grant declarations of equivalency of high school graduation to persons, if in the state superintendent's judgment they have presented satisfactory evidence of having completed a recognized high school course of study or its equivalent. The state superintendent may establish the standards by which high school graduation equivalency is determined. Such standards may consist of evidence of high school courses completed in high schools recognized by the proper authorities as accredited, results of examinations given by or at the request of the state superintendent, successful completion of correspondence study courses given by acceptable correspondence study schools, a general educational development certificate of high school equivalency issued by an agency of the U.S. government, course credits received in schools meeting the approval of the state superintendent or other standards established by the state superintendent.
(b) Promulgate rules establishing fees for issuing a declaration of equivalency of high school graduation or a general educational development certificate under par. (a). The rules may provide exemptions from the fees based on financial need.
5. Estimate of Amount of Time that State Employees Will Spend Developing the Rule and of Other Resources Necessary to Develop the Rule
The amount of time needed for rule development by department staff and the amount of other resources necessary are minimal.
6. List with Description of all Entities that may be Affected by the Proposed Rule
Testing and preparation sites authorized by the state superintendent to administer the GED Test may be affected by the proposed rule, including technical colleges, community based organizations, correctional institutions and high schools throughout Wisconsin.
7. Summary and Preliminary Comparison with any Existing or Proposed Federal Regulation that is Intended to Address the Activities to be Regulated by the Proposed Rule
N/A
8. Anticipated Economic Impact of Implementing the Rule (Note if the Rule is Likely to Have a Significant Economic Impact on Small Businesses)
The proposed rules will have no significant economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s.
227.114 (1), Stats.
9. Contact Person
Bureau for Policy and Budget
Attn: Katie Schumacher
Public Instruction
Per the Dane County Circuit Court order issued in Coyne, et al. v. Walker, et al., Case No. 11-CV-4573, the Department of Public Instruction is not required to obtain the Governor's approval for this statement of scope.
Rule No.
Relating to
Children At Risk Plan and Program.
Rule Type
Permanent.
1. Finding/Nature of Emergency (Emergency Rule Only)
N/A
2. Detailed Description of the Objective of the Proposed Rule
The proposed rule change will modify s.
PI 25.05 to align it with the statutory change made in
2011 Wisconsin Act 32, which removed the statutory limitation on the number of children at risk a school district may contract with private agencies to provide services for.
3. Description of the Existing Policies Relevant to the Rule, New Policies Proposed to be Included in the Rule, and an Analysis of Policy Alternatives
4. Detailed Explanation of Statutory Authority for the Rule (Including the Statutory Citation and Language)
118.153 Children at risk of not graduating from high school.
(7) The state superintendent shall promulgate rules to implement and administer this section. The rules shall not be overly restrictive in defining approved programs and shall not serve to exclude programs that have demonstrated success in meeting the needs of children at risk.
5. Estimate of Amount of Time that State Employees Will Spend Developing the Rule and of Other Resources Necessary to Develop the Rule
The amount of time needed for rule development by department staff and the amount of other resources necessary are minimal.
6. List with Description of all Entities that may be Affected by the Proposed Rule
This rule change should not affect any entity since this is only a technical change to align the rule with statutes.
7. Summary and Preliminary Comparison with any Existing or Proposed Federal Regulation that is Intended to Address the Activities to be Regulated by the Proposed Rule
N/A
8. Anticipated Economic Impact of Implementing the Rule (Note if the Rule is Likely to Have a Significant Economic Impact on Small Businesses)
The proposed rules will have no significant economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s.
227.114 (1), Stats.
9. Contact Person
Bureau for Policy and Budget
Attn: Katie Schumacher
Public Instruction
Per the Dane County Circuit Court order issued in Coyne, et al. v. Walker, et al., Case No. 11-CV-4573, the Department of Public Instruction is not required to obtain the Governor's approval for this statement of scope.
Rule No.
Relating to
Grants for STEM Programs.
Rule Type
Permanent.
1. Finding/Nature of Emergency (Emergency Rule Only)
N/A
2. Detailed Description of the Objective of the Proposed Rule
This rule change will eliminate ch.
PI 31, the rule chapter for the Grants for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Programs.
3. Description of the Existing Policies Relevant to the Rule, New Policies Proposed to be Included in the Rule, and an Analysis of Policy Alternatives
2011 Wisconsin Act 32 eliminated the Grants for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Programs under ss.
115.28 (46) and
20.255 (2) (fz), Stats. Since there is no longer any statutory or funding authority for the program, the rules are no longer necessary. Thus, this rule change will eliminate PI 31.
4. Detailed Explanation of Statutory Authority for the Rule (Including the Statutory Citation and Language)
5. Estimate of Amount of Time that State Employees Will Spend Developing the Rule and of Other Resources Necessary to Develop the Rule
The amount of time needed for rule development by department staff and the amount of other resources necessary are minimal.
6. List with Description of all Entities that may be Affected by the Proposed Rule
This rule change should not affect any entity since the statutory authority for this program has already been rescinded.
7. Summary and Preliminary Comparison with any Existing or Proposed Federal Regulation that is Intended to Address the Activities to be Regulated by the Proposed Rule
N/A
8. Anticipated Economic Impact of Implementing the Rule (Note if the Rule is Likely to Have a Significant Economic Impact on Small Businesses)
The proposed rules will have no significant economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s.
227.114 (1), Stats.
9. Contact Person
Bureau for Policy and Budget
Attn: Katie Schumacher
Safety and Professional Services —
Accounting Examining Board
