948.12(3)(a)(a) Except as provided in
par. (b), a person who violates
sub. (1m) or
(2m) is guilty of a Class D felony.
948.12(3)(b)
(b) A person who violates
sub. (1m) or
(2m) is guilty of a Class I felony if the person is under 18 years of age when the offense occurs.
948.12 Annotation
A violation of this section must be based on the content of the photograph and how it was produced. Evidence of the location and manner of storing the photo are not properly considered. State v. A. H.
211 Wis. 2d 561,
566 N.W.2d 858 (Ct. App. 1997),
96-2311.
948.12 Annotation
For purposes of multiplicity analysis, each image possessed can be prosecuted separately. Prosecution is not based upon the medium of reproduction. Multiple punishment is appropriate for a defendant who compiled and stored multiple images over time. State v. Multaler,
2002 WI 35,
252 Wis. 2d 54,
643 N.W.2d 437,
00-1846.
948.12 Annotation
Criminalizing child pornography presents the risk of self-censorship of constitutionally protected material. Criminal responsibility may not be imposed without some element of scienter, the degree of knowledge that makes a person legally responsible for the consequences of his or her act or omission. In this section, “reasonably should know" is less than actual knowledge but still requires more than the standard used in civil negligence actions, which is constitutionally sufficient. State v. Schaefer,
2003 WI App 164,
266 Wis. 2d 719,
668 N.W.2d 760,
01-2691.
948.12 Annotation
There was sufficient evidence in the record to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly possessed the child pornography images on his computer because he repeatedly visited child pornography Web sites, clicked on thumbnail images to create larger pictures for viewing, accessed five images twice, and saved at least one image to his personal folder. State v. Lindgren,
2004 WI App 159,
275 Wis. 2d 851,
687 N.W.2d 60,
03-1868.
948.12 Annotation
Sub. (1m) forbids only depictions of real children engaged in sexually explicit activity. Sub. (1m) (c) specifies that to be convicted under the statute, the person possessing the pornography must know or have reason to know that the child engaged in sexually explicit conduct has not attained the age of 18 years. This element does not speak of depictions at all, but rather of a child who has not attained the age of 18 years. State v. Van Buren,
2008 WI App 26,
307 Wis. 2d 447,
746 N.W.2d 545,
06-3025.
948.12 Annotation
Sub. (1m) criminalizes the knowing possession of any photograph of a child engaging in sexually explicit conduct. Expert testimony or other evidence to establish the reality of apparently real photographs is not required. When there has been no evidence adduced that the photographs are anything other than what they appear to be, the photographs themselves are sufficient evidence of the reality of what they depict. State v. Van Buren,
2008 WI App 26,
307 Wis. 2d 447,
746 N.W.2d 545,
06-3025.
948.12 Annotation
Individuals who purposely view digital images of child pornography on the Internet, even though the images are not found in the person's computer hard drive, nonetheless knowingly possess those images in violation of sub. (1m). An individual knowingly possesses child pornography when he or she affirmatively pulls up images of child pornography on the Internet and views those images knowing that they contain child pornography. Whether the proof is hard drive evidence or something else should not matter. State v. Mercer,
2010 WI App 47,
324 Wis. 2d 506,
782 N.W.2d 125,
08-1763.
948.13
948.13
Child sex offender working with children. 948.13(1)(1) In this section, “serious child sex offense" means any of the following:
948.13(1)(a)
(a) A crime under
s. 940.22 (2) or
940.225 (2) (c) or
(cm), if the victim is under 18 years of age at the time of the offense, a crime under
s. 940.302 (2) if
s. 940.302 (2) (a) 1. b. applies, or a crime under
s. 948.02 (1) or
(2),
948.025 (1),
948.05 (1) or
(1m),
948.051,
948.06,
948.07 (1),
(2),
(3), or
(4),
948.075, or
948.085.
948.13(1)(b)
(b) A crime under federal law or the law of any other state or, prior to May 7, 1996, under the law of this state that is comparable to a crime specified in
par. (a).
948.13(2)(a)(a) Except as provided in
pars. (b) and
(c), whoever has been convicted of a serious child sex offense and subsequently engages in an occupation or participates in a volunteer position that requires him or her to work or interact primarily and directly with children under 16 years of age is guilty of a Class F felony.
948.13(2)(b)
(b) If all of the following apply, the prohibition under
par. (a) does not apply to a person who has been convicted of a serious child sex offense until 90 days after the date on which the person receives actual written notice from a law enforcement agency, as defined in
s. 165.77 (1) (b), of the prohibition under
par. (a):
948.13(2)(b)1.
1. The only serious child sex offense for which the person has been convicted is a crime under
s. 948.02 (2).
948.13(2)(b)2.
2. The person was convicted of the serious child sex offense before May 7, 2002.
948.13(2)(b)3.
3. The person is eligible to petition for an exemption from the prohibition under
sub. (2m) because he or she meets the criteria specified in
sub. (2m) (a) 1. and
1m.
948.13(2)(c)
(c) The prohibition under
par. (a) does not apply to a person who is exempt under a court order issued under
sub. (2m).
948.13(2m)(a)(a) A person who has been convicted of a crime under
s. 948.02 (2),
948.025 (1), or
948.085 may petition the court in which he or she was convicted to order that the person be exempt from
sub. (2) (a) and permitted to engage in an occupation or participate in a volunteer position that requires the person to work or interact primarily and directly with children under 16 years of age. The court may grant a petition filed under this paragraph if the court finds that all of the following apply:
948.13(2m)(a)1.
1. At the time of the commission of the crime under
s. 948.02 (2),
948.025 (1), or
948.085 the person had not attained the age of 19 years and was not more than 4 years older or not more than 4 years younger than the child with whom the person had sexual contact or sexual intercourse.
948.13(2m)(a)1m.
1m. The child with whom the person had sexual contact or sexual intercourse had attained the age of 13 but had not attained the age of 16.
948.13(2m)(a)2.
2. It is not necessary, in the interest of public protection, to require the person to comply with
sub. (2) (a).
948.13(2m)(b)
(b) A person filing a petition under
par. (a) shall send a copy of the petition to the district attorney who prosecuted the person. The district attorney shall make a reasonable attempt to contact the victim of the crime that is the subject of the person's petition to inform the victim of his or her right to make or provide a statement under
par. (d).
948.13(2m)(c)
(c) A court may hold a hearing on a petition filed under
par. (a) and the district attorney who prosecuted the person may appear at the hearing. Any hearing that a court decides to hold under this paragraph shall be held no later than 30 days after the petition is filed if the petition specifies that the person filing the petition is covered under
sub. (2) (b), that he or she has received actual written notice from a law enforcement agency of the prohibition under
sub. (2) (a), and that he or she is seeking an exemption under this subsection before the expiration of the 90-day period under
sub. (2) (b).
948.13(2m)(d)
(d) Before deciding a petition filed under
par. (a), the court shall allow the victim of the crime that is the subject of the petition to make a statement in court at any hearing held on the petition or to submit a written statement to the court. A statement under this paragraph must be relevant to the issues specified in
par. (a) 1.,
1m. and
2.
948.13(2m)(e)1.1. Before deciding a petition filed under
par. (a), the court may request the person filing the petition to be examined by a physician, psychologist or other expert approved by the court. If the person refuses to undergo an examination requested by the court under this subdivision, the court shall deny the person's petition without prejudice.
948.13(2m)(e)2.
2. If a person is examined by a physician, psychologist or other expert under
subd. 1., the physician, psychologist or other expert shall file a report of his or her examination with the court, and the court shall provide copies of the report to the person and, if he or she requests a copy, to the district attorney. The contents of the report shall be confidential until the physician, psychologist or other expert has testified at a hearing held under
par. (c). The report shall contain an opinion regarding whether it would be in the interest of public protection to require the person to comply with
sub. (2) (a) and the basis for that opinion.
948.13(2m)(e)3.
3. A person who is examined by a physician, psychologist or other expert under
subd. 1. is responsible for paying the cost of the services provided by the physician, psychologist or other expert, except that if the person is indigent the cost of the services provided by the physician, psychologist or other expert shall be paid by the county. If the person claims or appears to be indigent, the court shall refer the person to the authority for indigency determinations under
s. 977.07 (1), except that the person shall be considered indigent without another determination under
s. 977.07 (1) if the person is represented by the state public defender or by a private attorney appointed under
s. 977.08.
948.13(2m)(em)
(em) A court shall decide a petition no later than 45 days after the petition is filed if the petition specifies that the person filing the petition is covered under
sub. (2) (b), that he or she has received actual written notice from a law enforcement agency of the prohibition under
sub. (2) (a), and that he or she is seeking an exemption under this subsection before the expiration of the 90-day period under
sub. (2) (b).
948.13(2m)(f)
(f) The person who filed the petition under
par. (a) has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that he or she satisfies the criteria specified in
par. (a) 1.,
1m. and
2. In deciding whether the person has satisfied the criterion specified in
par. (a) 2., the court may consider any of the following:
948.13(2m)(f)1.
1. The ages, at the time of the violation, of the person who filed the petition and the victim of the crime that is the subject of the petition.
948.13(2m)(f)2.
2. The relationship between the person who filed the petition and the victim of the crime that is the subject of the petition.
948.13(2m)(f)3.
3. Whether the crime that is the subject of the petition resulted in bodily harm to the victim.
948.13(2m)(f)4.
4. Whether the victim of the crime that is the subject of the petition suffered from a mental illness or mental deficiency that rendered him or her temporarily or permanently incapable of understanding or evaluating the consequences of his or her actions.
948.13(2m)(f)5.
5. The probability that the person who filed the petition will commit other serious child sex offenses in the future.
948.13(2m)(f)7.
7. Any other factor that the court determines may be relevant to the particular case.
948.13(3)
(3) Evidence that a person engages in an occupation or participates in a volunteer position relating to any of the following is prima facie evidence that the occupation or position requires him or her to work or interact primarily and directly with children under 16 years of age:
948.14
948.14
Registered sex offender and photographing minors. 948.14(1)(b)
(b) “Minor" means an individual who is under 17 years of age.
948.14(1)(d)
(d) “Sex offender" means a person who is required to register under
s. 301.45.
948.14(2)(a)(a) A sex offender may not intentionally capture a representation of any minor without the written consent of the minor's parent, legal custodian, or guardian. The written consent required under this paragraph shall state that the person seeking the consent is required to register as a sex offender with the department of corrections.
948.14(2)(b)
(b) Paragraph (a) does not apply to a sex offender who is capturing a representation of a minor if the sex offender is the minor's parent, legal custodian, or guardian.
948.14(3)
(3) Penalty. Whoever violates
sub. (2) is guilty of a Class I felony.
948.14 Note
NOTE: The Court of Appeals in State v. Oatman,
2015 WI App 76, concluded that s. 948.14 is overbroad on its face and invalid in its entirety.
948.14 History
History: 2005 a. 432.
948.14 Annotation
The structure of s. 942.09, with its separate subdivisions for capturing and possessing a representation, and the legislature's decision to import the definition of “captures a representation" from s. 942.09, along with legislative history indicating that the purpose of this section is to prohibit sex offenders from photographing, filming, or videotaping minors without parental consent, leads to the conclusion that “stores in any medium data that represents a visual image" as used in the definition of “captures a representation" in s. 942.09 does not include the mere possession of visual images. State v. Chagnon,
2015 WI App 66,
364 Wis. 2d 719,
870 N.W.2d 27,
14-2770.
948.20
948.20
Abandonment of a child. Whoever, with intent to abandon the child, leaves any child in a place where the child may suffer because of neglect is guilty of a Class G felony.
948.20 History
History: 1977 c. 173;
1987 a. 332 s.
35; Stats. 1987 s. 948.20;
2001 a. 109.
948.21
948.21
Neglecting a child. 948.21(1)
(1) Any person who is responsible for a child's welfare who, through his or her actions or failure to take action, intentionally contributes to the neglect of the child is guilty of one of the following:
948.21(1)(b)
(b) A Class H felony if bodily harm is a consequence.
948.21(1)(c)
(c) A Class F felony if great bodily harm is a consequence.
948.21(1)(d)
(d) A Class D felony if death is a consequence.
948.21(2)
(2) Under
sub. (1), a person responsible for the child's welfare contributes to the neglect of the child although the child does not actually become neglected if the natural and probable consequences of the person's actions or failure to take action would be to cause the child to become neglected.
948.22
948.22
Failure to support. 948.22(1)(a)
(a) “Child support" means an amount which a person is ordered to provide for support of a child by a court of competent jurisdiction in this state or in another state, territory or possession of the United States, or, if not ordered, an amount that a person is legally obligated to provide under
s. 49.90.
948.22(1)(c)
(c) “Spousal support" means an amount which a person is ordered to provide for support of a spouse or former spouse by a court of competent jurisdiction in this state or in another state, territory or possession of the United States, or, if not ordered, an amount that a person is legally obligated to provide under
s. 49.90.
948.22(2)
(2) Any person who intentionally fails for 120 or more consecutive days to provide spousal, grandchild or child support which the person knows or reasonably should know the person is legally obligated to provide is guilty of a Class I felony. A prosecutor may charge a person with multiple counts for a violation under this subsection if each count covers a period of at least 120 consecutive days and there is no overlap between periods.
948.22(3)
(3) Any person who intentionally fails for less than 120 consecutive days to provide spousal, grandchild or child support which the person knows or reasonably should know the person is legally obligated to provide is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
948.22(4)
(4) Under this section, the following is prima facie evidence of intentional failure to provide child, grandchild or spousal support:
948.22(4)(a)
(a) For a person subject to a court order requiring child, grandchild or spousal support payments, when the person knows or reasonably should have known that he or she is required to pay support under an order, failure to pay the child, grandchild or spousal support payment required under the order.
948.22(4)(b)
(b) For a person not subject to a court order requiring child, grandchild or spousal support payments, when the person knows or reasonably should have known that he or she has a dependent, failure to provide support equal to at least the amount established by rule by the department of children and families under
s. 49.22 (9) or causing a spouse, grandchild or child to become a dependent person, or continue to be a dependent person, as defined in
s. 49.01 (2).
948.22(5)
(5) Under this section, it is not a defense that child, grandchild or spousal support is provided wholly or partially by any other person or entity.
948.22(6)
(6) Under this section, affirmative defenses include but are not limited to inability to provide child, grandchild or spousal support. A person may not demonstrate inability to provide child, grandchild or spousal support if the person is employable but, without reasonable excuse, either fails to diligently seek employment, terminates employment or reduces his or her earnings or assets. A person who raises an affirmative defense has the burden of proving the defense by a preponderance of the evidence.
948.22(7)(a)(a) Before trial, upon petition by the complainant and notice to the defendant, the court may enter a temporary order requiring payment of child, grandchild or spousal support.
948.22(7)(b)
(b) In addition to or instead of imposing a penalty authorized for a Class I felony or a Class A misdemeanor, whichever is appropriate, the court shall:
