346.57 Annotation
A prima facie presumption of accuracy applies to stationary radar devices. City of Wauwatosa v. Collett,
99 Wis. 2d 522,
299 N.W.2d 620 (Ct. App. 1980).
346.57 Annotation
An actor may claim the defense of legal justification if the conduct of a law enforcement officer causes the actor to reasonably believe that violating the law is the only means of preventing bodily harm to the actor or another and causes the actor to violate the law. State v. Brown,
107 Wis. 2d 44,
318 N.W.2d 370 (1982).
346.57 Annotation
This section does not impose absolute liability upon drivers to avoid accidents. Millonig v. Bakken,
112 Wis. 2d 445,
334 N.W.2d 80 (1983).
346.57 Annotation
The presumption of the accuracy of moving radar is discussed. The elements of the
Hanson/Kramer criteria are explained. Washington County v. Luedtke,
135 Wis. 2d 131,
399 N.W.2d 906 (1987).
346.58
346.58
Special speed restrictions for certain vehicles. 346.58(1)(a)
(a) “Metal tire" means a tire the surface of which in contact with the highway is wholly or partially of metal or other hard, nonresilient material.
346.58(1)(b)
(b) “Solid rubber tire" means a tire made of rubber but not inflated with compressed air.
346.58(2)
(2) In addition to complying with other speed restrictions imposed by law, no person may drive any vehicle equipped with metal tires or solid rubber tires at a speed in excess of 15 miles per hour. This subsection does not apply to operation of a bicycle.
346.59
346.59
Minimum speed regulation. 346.59(1)(1)
No person shall drive a motor vehicle at a speed so slow as to impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic except when reduced speed is necessary for safe operation or is necessary to comply with the law.
346.59(2)
(2) The operator of a vehicle moving at a speed so slow as to impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic shall, if practicable, yield the roadway to an overtaking vehicle and shall move at a reasonably increased speed or yield the roadway to overtaking vehicles when directed to do so by a traffic officer.
346.59 History
History: 1977 c. 100;
2013 a. 365.
346.595
346.595
Motorcycles and mopeds. Whenever a motorcycle or a moped is operated the following rules apply:
346.595(1)
(1) All motor vehicles including motorcycles and mopeds are entitled to the full use of a traffic lane and no vehicle may be driven or operated in such a manner so as to deprive any other vehicle of the full use of a traffic lane. With the consent of both drivers, motorcycles may be operated not more than 2 abreast in a single lane, but mopeds may be so operated only where the speed limit is 25 miles per hour or less.
346.595(2)
(2) No person shall ride any motorcycle or moped while in a side-saddle position.
346.595(3)
(3) No passenger may ride a motorcycle who, when properly seated, cannot rest the feet on assigned foot rests or pegs. No passenger may ride on a moped.
346.595(3m)
(3m) No more than 2 persons may ride on a motorcycle having 2 wheels in tandem during operation unless a sidecar has been attached to the motorcycle and the additional passengers are provided with adequate seating within the sidecar.
346.595(4)
(4) No passenger shall ride in front of the operator on a motorcycle.
346.595(5)
(5) The headlamps on motorcycles shall be lighted whenever the motorcycle is in operation. Motorcycles may be operated to the nearest repair facility for headlamp repair in the event of mechanical or electrical headlamp failure except during hours of darkness. Mopeds shall observe the requirements for lighted headlamps and tail lamps under s.
347.06.
346.595(6)
(6) On any road for which the speed limit is more than 25 miles per hour, mopeds shall be operated only when riding single-file in the extreme right-hand lane. No person may operate a moped on any restricted access highway.
346.595 Annotation
The provision requiring headlamps to be lighted is constitutional. City of Kenosha v. Dosemagen,
54 Wis. 2d 269,
195 N.W.2d 462 (1972).
346.60
346.60
Penalty for violating sections 346.57 to 346.595. 346.60(1)(1)
Except as provided in sub.
(5), any person violating s.
346.59 may be required to forfeit not less than $20 nor more than $40 for the first offense and not less than $50 nor more than $100 for the 2nd or subsequent conviction within a year.
346.60(3)
(3) Except as provided in sub.
(3m) or
(5), any person violating s.
346.57 (2),
(3) or
(4) (a) to
(c) may be required to forfeit not less than $40 nor more than $300 for the first offense and may be required to forfeit not less than $80 nor more than $600 for the 2nd or subsequent conviction within a year.
346.60(3m)(a)(a) If an operator of a vehicle violates s.
346.57 (2),
(3),
(4) (d) to
(h), or
(5) where persons engaged in work in a highway maintenance or construction area or in a utility work area are at risk from traffic or where sanitation workers are at risk from traffic and the operator knows or should know that sanitation workers are present, any applicable minimum and maximum forfeiture specified in sub.
(2) or
(3) for the violation shall be doubled.
346.60(3m)(b)
(b) If an operator of a vehicle violates s.
346.57 (2) to
(5) when children are present in a zone designated by “school" warning signs as provided in s.
118.08 (1), any applicable minimum and maximum forfeiture specified in sub.
(2) or
(3) for the violation shall be doubled.
346.60(4)
(4) Any person violating s.
346.595 may be required to forfeit not less than $30 nor more than $300.
346.60(5)(a)(a) Any operator of a bicycle, electric scooter, or electric personal assistive mobility device who violates s.
346.57 may be required to forfeit not more than $20.
346.60(5)(b)
(b) Any operator of a bicycle, electric scooter, or electric personal assistive mobility device who violates s.
346.59 may be required to forfeit not more than $10.
RECKLESS AND DRUNKEN DRIVING
346.61
346.61
Applicability of sections relating to reckless and drunken driving. In addition to being applicable upon highways, ss.
346.62 to
346.64 are applicable upon all premises held out to the public for use of their motor vehicles, all premises provided by employers to employees for the use of their motor vehicles and all premises provided to tenants of rental housing in buildings of 4 or more units for the use of their motor vehicles, whether such premises are publicly or privately owned and whether or not a fee is charged for the use thereof. Sections
346.62 to
346.64 do not apply to private parking areas at farms or single-family residences.
346.61 History
History: 1995 a. 127.
346.61 Annotation
A privately owned parking lot was not included under this section. City of Kenosha v. Phillips,
142 Wis. 2d 549,
419 N.W.2d 236 (1988).
346.61 Annotation
A parking lot for patrons of a business is held out for the use of the public under this section. City of LaCrosse v. Richling,
178 Wis. 2d 856,
505 N.W.2d 448 (Ct. App. 1993).
346.62
346.62
Reckless driving. 346.62(2)
(2) No person may endanger the safety of any person or property by the negligent operation of a vehicle.
346.62(2m)
(2m) No person may recklessly endanger the safety of any person by driving a vehicle on or across a railroad crossing in violation of s.
346.44 (1) or through, around or under any crossing gate or barrier at a railroad crossing in violation of s.
346.44 (2).
346.62(3)
(3) No person may cause bodily harm to another by the negligent operation of a vehicle.
346.62(4)
(4) No person may cause great bodily harm to another by the negligent operation of a vehicle.
346.62 History
History: 1987 a. 399;
1997 a. 135.
346.62 Note
Judicial Council Note, 1988: The revisions contained in subs. (2) and (3) are intended as editorial, not substantive, as is the substitution of a cross-reference to s. 939.25 (2) for the prior definition of a high degree of negligence. New sub. (4) carries forward the crime created by
1985 Wisconsin Act 293. [Bill 191-S]
346.62 Annotation
That the defendant was an experienced stock car racer was not a defense to a charge of reckless driving. State v. Passarelli,
55 Wis. 2d 78,
197 N.W.2d 740.
346.63
346.63
Operating under influence of intoxicant or other drug. 346.63(1)(1)
No person may drive or operate a motor vehicle while:
346.63(1)(a)
(a) Under the influence of an intoxicant, a controlled substance, a controlled substance analog or any combination of an intoxicant, a controlled substance and a controlled substance analog, under the influence of any other drug to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving, or under the combined influence of an intoxicant and any other drug to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving; or
346.63(1)(am)
(am) The person has a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood.
346.63(1)(b)
(b) The person has a prohibited alcohol concentration.
346.63(1)(c)
(c) A person may be charged with and a prosecutor may proceed upon a complaint based upon a violation of any combination of par.
(a),
(am), or
(b) for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence. If the person is charged with violating any combination of par.
(a),
(am), or
(b), the offenses shall be joined. If the person is found guilty of any combination of par.
(a),
(am), or
(b) for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence, there shall be a single conviction for purposes of sentencing and for purposes of counting convictions under ss.
343.30 (1q) and
343.305. Paragraphs
(a),
(am), and
(b) each require proof of a fact for conviction which the others do not require.
346.63(1)(d)
(d) In an action under par.
(am) that is based on the defendant allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine, gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors, gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.
346.63(2)(a)(a) It is unlawful for any person to cause injury to another person by the operation of a vehicle while:
346.63(2)(a)1.
1. Under the influence of an intoxicant, a controlled substance, a controlled substance analog or any combination of an intoxicant, a controlled substance and a controlled substance analog, under the influence of any other drug to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving, or under the combined influence of an intoxicant and any other drug to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving; or
346.63(2)(a)3.
3. The person has a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood.
346.63(2)(am)
(am) A person may be charged with and a prosecutor may proceed upon a complaint based upon a violation of any combination of par.
(a) 1.,
2., or
3. for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence. If the person is charged with violating any combination of par.
(a) 1.,
2., or
3. in the complaint, the crimes shall be joined under s.
971.12. If the person is found guilty of any combination of par.
(a) 1.,
2., or
3. for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence, there shall be a single conviction for purposes of sentencing and for purposes of counting convictions under ss.
343.30 (1q) and
343.305. Paragraph
(a) 1.,
2., and
3. each require proof of a fact for conviction which the others do not require.
346.63(2)(b)1.1. In an action under this subsection, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the injury would have occurred even if he or she had been exercising due care and he or she had not been under the influence of an intoxicant, a controlled substance, a controlled substance analog or a combination thereof, under the influence of any other drug to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving, or under the combined influence of an intoxicant and any other drug to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving, did not have a prohibited alcohol concentration described under par.
(a) 2., or did not have a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood.
346.63(2)(b)2.
2. In an action under par.
(a) 3. that is based on the defendant allegedly having a detectable amount of methamphetamine, gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood, the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that at the time of the incident or occurrence he or she had a valid prescription for methamphetamine or one of its metabolic precursors, gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.
346.63(2m)
(2m) If a person has not attained the legal drinking age, as defined in s.
125.02 (8m), the person may not drive or operate a motor vehicle while he or she has an alcohol concentration of more than 0.0 but not more than 0.08. One penalty for violation of this subsection is suspension of a person's operating privilege under s.
343.30 (1p). The person is eligible for an occupational license under s.
343.10 at any time. If a person arrested for a violation of this subsection refuses to take a test under s.
343.305, the refusal is a separate violation and the person is subject to revocation of the person's operating privilege under s.
343.305 (10) (em).
346.63(3)(a)
(a) “Drive" means the exercise of physical control over the speed and direction of a motor vehicle while it is in motion.
346.63(3)(b)
(b) “Operate" means the physical manipulation or activation of any of the controls of a motor vehicle necessary to put it in motion.
346.63(4)
(4) If a person is convicted under sub.
(1) or a local ordinance in conformity therewith, or sub.
(2), the court shall proceed under s.
343.30 (1q).
346.63(5)(a)(a) No person may drive or operate a commercial motor vehicle while the person has an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or more but less than 0.08.
346.63(5)(b)
(b) A person may be charged with and a prosecutor may proceed upon a complaint based on a violation of par.
(a) or sub.
(1) (a) or both for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence. If the person is charged with violating both par.
(a) and sub.
(1) (a), the offenses shall be joined. Paragraph
(a) and sub.
(1) (a) each require proof of a fact for conviction which the other does not require. If the person is found guilty of violating both par.
(a) and sub.
(1) (a) for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence, there shall be a single conviction for purposes of sentencing and for purposes of counting convictions. Each conviction shall be reported to the department and counted separately for purposes of suspension or revocation of the operator's license and disqualification.
346.63(6)(a)(a) No person may cause injury to another person by the operation of a commercial motor vehicle while the person has an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or more but less than 0.08.
346.63(6)(b)
(b) A person may be charged with and a prosecutor may proceed upon a complaint based upon a violation of par.
(a) or sub.
(2) (a) 1. or both for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence. If the person is charged with violating both par.
(a) and sub.
(2) (a) 1. in the complaint, the crimes shall be joined under s.
971.12. If the person is found guilty of violating both par.
(a) and sub.
(2) (a) 1. for acts arising out of the same incident or occurrence, there shall be a single conviction for purposes of sentencing and for purposes of counting convictions. Paragraph
(a) and sub.
(2) (a) 1. each require proof of a fact for conviction which the other does not require.
346.63(6)(c)
(c) Under par.
(a), the person charged has a defense if it appears by a preponderance of the evidence that the injury would have occurred even if he or she had not been under the influence of an intoxicant, a controlled substance, a controlled substance analog or a combination thereof, under the influence of any other drug to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving, or under the combined influence of an intoxicant and any other drug to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving or did not have an alcohol concentration described under par.
(a).
