¶ 19. The Department of Commerce may deny, suspend, or revoke the certification of a dwelling contractor qualifier who fails to comply with state continuing education requirements. See Wis. Stat. § 101.654(5)(a); Wis. Admin. Code § Comm 5.10(1)(a). ¶ 20. A municipal ordinance is preempted if: “(1) the legislature has expressly withdrawn the power of municipalities to act; (2) it logically conflicts with state legislation; (3) it defeats the purpose of state legislation; or (4) it violates the spirit of state legislation.” DeRosso Landfill Co. v. City of Oak Creek, 200 Wis. 2d 642, 651-52, 547 N.W.2d 770 (1996) (footnotes omitted). ¶ 21. The Legislature has not expressly withdrawn the authority of municipalities to regulate the local licensure of dwelling contractors. Wisconsin Stat. § 101.65(1) continues to authorize municipalities to “[e]xercise jurisdiction over the construction and inspection of new dwellings by passage of ordinances . . . .” and Wis. Stat. § 101.63(2) also continues to provide that the Department of Commerce “may not adopt any rule which prohibits any city, village, town or county from licensing persons for performing work on a dwelling in which the licensed person has no legal or equitable interest.” ¶ 22. A municipal licensure provision may nevertheless logically conflict with, defeat the purpose of, or violate the spirit of state legislation. The validity of local licensure requirements must therefore be decided by determining whether the individual local licensure requirement can reasonably coexist with the state requirements with which dwelling contractors and dwelling contractor qualifiers must comply.
¶ 23. With respect to any municipal license requirements that impose additional financial responsibility requirements or educational qualifications beyond those required by state law on those seeking a building permit involving construction of dwellings covered by the Dwelling Code, it is my opinion that such municipal ordinances logically conflict with state law and also frustrate its purpose and spirit, and are therefore preempted.
¶ 24. The Dwelling Code is not designed to set minimal requirements that can be exceeded by local ordinance. Instead, the stated purpose of the Dwelling Code is to promote uniformity with respect to the construction and inspection of one- and 2-family dwellings. Wis. Stat. § 101.60. As demonstrated above, the Legislature’s implicit recognition in 1979 that municipalities have licensure authority stems from the Dwelling Code’s grant of authority to the municipalities to exercise jurisdiction “over the construction and inspection of new dwellings[.]” Wis. Stat. § 101.65(1)(a). But that exercise must “meet the requirements of the one- and 2-family dwelling code[.]” Id.
¶ 25. The Dwelling Code expressly creates state requirements relating to the financial responsibility and education of those applying for building permits. Wis. Stat. § 101.654. The Legislature’s education requirements addressed both those who were qualified to obtain building permits when education requirements were enacted—continuing education but not examination—as well as those wishing to be newly qualified to obtain a permit—education and examination. Wis. Stat. § 101.654(c); Wis. Stat. § 101.654(1m)(b)3. Thus, the state education requirements speak to not only continuing education, but also the education requirements for those who wish to enter the field. Id.; compare also Wis. Stat. § 101.625(2) to Wis. Stat. § 101.625(3) (distinguishing dwelling contractor certification council’s duties to recommend to the Department of Commerce those courses appropriate for continuing education and those examination requirements that would be required for new dwelling contractors). In sum, for a municipality’s jurisdiction to “meet the requirements” of the Dwelling Code, it may not impose additional certification or licensure requirements with respect to the financial capability, education, and examination requirements of those seeking to obtain building permits. To do so would logically conflict with the Dwelling Code, defeat its purpose, and violate its spirit.
¶ 26. The fact that Wisconsin law restricts the ability of the Department of Commerce to prohibit local licensure by rule does not undermine my conclusion. Wisconsin Stat. § 101.63(2) limits only the authority of the Department of Commerce to adopt certain rules, it does not (and cannot) prevent subsequently enacted state law from doing so. The acts creating the state’s certification criteria for dwelling contractors with respect to financial responsibility, education, and examination requirements were passed after the Legislature enacted Wis. Stat. § 101.63(2). It is these acts, not an agency rule, that give rise to preemption in the context addressed in this opinion.
CONCLUSION
¶ 27. A particular municipal licensure requirement may be preempted if that requirement logically conflicts with, defeats the purpose of, or violates the spirit of state contractor financial responsibility and continuing education requirements. In my opinion, ordinances requiring local licensure are preempted if they impose on persons seeking a building permit for one- or 2-family dwellings greater financial responsibility, education, or examination requirements than required by state law.
Sincerely,
J.B. VAN HOLLEN
Attorney General
JBVH:KMS:cla