165.76 Annotation
165.76 Annotation STATE OF WISCONSIN File No. ......
165.76 Annotation vs. ORDER
165.76 Annotation A.B.
165.76 Annotation Address
165.76 Annotation City, State, Zip Code
165.76 Annotation , Respondent
165.76 Annotation
165.76 Annotation THE STATE OF WISCONSIN, To the Respondent named above:
165.76 Annotation Unless you choose to contest this Order, by appearing at the time, date, and place set forth below, you are ordered to present yourself to the .... county sheriff, [ADDRESS], no later than ...., between the hours of .... and ...., for the collection of a biological specimen, obtained by buccal swab, for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis and inclusion of the results of that analysis in the state crime laboratory's DNA database. YOU MUST BRING A COPY OF THIS ORDER WITH YOU. YOU MUST ALSO BRING TWO FORMS OF IDENTIFICATION, INCLUDING ONE FORM OF GOVERNMENT-ISSUED, PHOTOGRAPHIC IDENTIFICATION. A copy of the petition submitted to obtain this order is attached.
165.76 Annotation If you wish to contest this order, you may do so by appearing in person at the time, date, and place set forth below, at which time you will have the opportunity to show cause to the court why you should not be required to provide a biological specimen for DNA analysis:
165.76 Annotation [Court information]
165.76 Annotation If you do not appear in person to contest this order at the time, date, and place set forth above, and you do not present yourself for collection of a biological specimen as directed, all of the following apply:
165.76 Annotation 1. You may be held in contempt of court and be subject to sanctions as provided in chapter 785 of the Wisconsin Statutes.
165.76 Annotation 2. The court will issue an order to facilitate collection of a biological specimen which, in the court's discretion, may authorize arrest or detention or use of reasonable force against you to collect the biological specimen.
165.76 Annotation Dated: ...., .... (year)
165.76 Annotation By the Court signed: .... ....
165.76 Annotation This Order is entered under section 165.76 (6) of the Wisconsin Statutes. A copy of that section is attached.
Effective date text (c) At a hearing on a petition under par. (a), the person has the burden of rebutting the matters established in the petition by demonstrating that he or she is not required to submit a biological specimen under sub. (1).
Effective date text (d) If the court determines after the hearing under par. (c) that the person is required to submit a biological specimen under sub. (1) and that the person's specimen is not included in the data bank under s. 165.77 (3), the court shall issue an order to facilitate collection of a biological specimen from the person, which may authorize arrest or detention of the person or use of reasonable force against the person to collect the biological specimen.
165.76 History History: 1993 a. 16, 98, 227; 1995 a. 27 s. 9126 (19); 1995 a. 77, 440; 1997 a. 35, 283; 1999 a. 9; 2001 a. 96; 2005 a. 277, 344; 2007 a. 20 s. 9121 (6) (a); 2007 a. 97; 2009 a. 261; 2011 a. 257; 2011 a. 260 s. 81; 2013 a. 20, 166, 214, 362; s. 13.92 (2) (i).
165.76 Annotation When officers make an arrest supported by probable cause for a serious offense and bring the suspect to the station to be detained in custody, taking and analyzing a cheek swab of the arrestee's DNA is, like fingerprinting and photographing, a legitimate police booking procedure that is reasonable under the 4th amendment. In the context of a valid arrest supported by probable cause, the arrestee's expectations of privacy were not offended by the minor intrusion of a brief swab of his cheeks for DNA. That same context of arrest gives rise to significant state interests in identifying respondent not only so that the proper name can be attached to his charges but also so that the criminal justice system can make informed decisions concerning pretrial custody. Upon these considerations, DNA identification of arrestees is a reasonable search that can be considered part of a routine booking procedure. Maryland v. King, 569 U.S. ___ , 133 S. Ct. 1236 185 L. Ed. 2d 171, (2013).
165.76 AnnotationDNA sampling under this section is constitutional. Shelton v. Grudman, 934 F. Supp. 1048 (1996).
165.76 Annotation DNA Extraction on Arrest: Maryland v. King and Wisconsin's New Extraction Law. Dupuis. Wis. Law. Sept. 2013.
165.765 165.765 Biological specimen; force and immunity.
165.765(1g)(1g) In this section:
165.765(1g)(a) (a) "Correctional officer" has the meaning given in s. 301.28 (1).
165.765(1g)(b) (b) "Jail officer" has the meaning given in s. 165.85 (2) (bn).
165.765(1g)(c) (c) "Law enforcement officer" has the meaning given in s. 165.85 (2) (c).