Where the parent works and the hours of employment. If there is evidence that the other parent engaged in interspousal battery, as described under s. 940.19
or 940.20 (1m)
, or domestic abuse, as defined in s. 813.12 (1) (a)
, with respect to the parent providing the parenting plan, the parent providing the parenting plan is not required to disclose the specific address but only a general description of where he or she works.
Who will provide any necessary child care when the parent cannot and who will pay for the child care.
What doctor or health care facility will provide medical care for the child.
What the child's religious commitment will be, if any.
Who will make decisions about the child's education, medical care, choice of child care providers and extracurricular activities.
Whether and how the child will be able to contact the other parent when the child has physical placement with the parent providing the parenting plan.
How the parent proposes to resolve disagreements related to matters over which the court orders joint decision making.
What child support, family support, maintenance or other income transfer there will be.
If there is evidence that either party engaged in interspousal battery, as described under s. 940.19
or 940.20 (1m)
, or domestic abuse, as defined in s. 813.12 (1) (a)
, with respect to the other party, how the child will be transferred between the parties for the exercise of physical placement to ensure the safety of the child and the parties.
(2) Custody to party; joint or sole. 767.24(2)(a)(a)
Subject to pars. (am)
, based on the best interest of the child and after considering the factors under sub. (5)
, the court may give joint legal custody or sole legal custody of a minor child.
The court shall presume that joint legal custody is in the best interest of the child.
The court may give sole legal custody only if it finds that doing so is in the child's best interest and that either of the following applies:
Both parties agree to sole legal custody with the same party.
The parties do not agree to sole legal custody with the same party, but at least one party requests sole legal custody and the court specifically finds any of the following:
One party is not capable of performing parental duties and responsibilities or does not wish to have an active role in raising the child.
One or more conditions exist at that time that would substantially interfere with the exercise of joint legal custody.
The parties will not be able to cooperate in the future decision making required under an award of joint legal custody. In making this finding the court shall consider, along with any other pertinent items, any reasons offered by a party objecting to joint legal custody. Evidence that either party engaged in abuse, as defined in s. 813.122 (1) (a)
, of the child, as defined in s. 48.02 (2)
, or evidence of interspousal battery, as described under s. 940.19
or 940.20 (1m)
, or domestic abuse, as defined in s. 813.12 (1) (a)
, creates a rebuttable presumption that the parties will not be able to cooperate in the future decision making required.
The court may not give sole legal custody to a parent who refuses to cooperate with the other parent if the court finds that the refusal to cooperate is unreasonable.
If the interest of any child demands it, and if the court finds that neither parent is able to care for the child adequately or that neither parent is fit and proper to have the care and custody of the child, the court may declare the child to be in need of protection or services and transfer legal custody of the child to a relative of the child, as defined in s. 48.02 (15)
, to a county department, as defined under s. 48.02 (2g)
, or to a licensed child welfare agency. If the court transfers legal custody of a child under this subsection, in its order the court shall notify the parents of any applicable grounds for termination of parental rights under s. 48.415
If the legal custodian appointed under par. (a)
is an agency, the agency shall report to the court on the status of the child at least once each year until the child reaches 18 years of age, is returned to the custody of a parent or is placed under the guardianship of an agency. The agency shall file an annual report no less than 30 days before the anniversary of the date of the order. An agency may file an additional report at any time if it determines that more frequent reporting is appropriate. A report shall summarize the child's permanency plan and the recommendations of the review panel under s. 48.38 (5)
, if any.
The court shall hold a hearing to review the permanency plan within 30 days after receiving a report under par. (b)
. At least 10 days before the date of the hearing, the court shall provide notice of the time, date and purpose of the hearing to the agency that prepared the report, the child's parents, the child, if he or she is 12 years of age or over, and the child's foster parent, treatment foster parent or the operator of the facility in which the child is living.
Following the hearing, the court shall make all of the determinations specified under s. 48.38 (5) (c)
and, if it determines that an alternative placement is in the child's best interest, may amend the order to transfer legal custody of the child to another relative, other than a parent, or to another agency specified under par. (a)
The charges for care furnished to a child whose custody is transferred under this subsection shall be pursuant to the procedure under s. 48.36 (1)
or 938.36 (1)
except as provided in s. 767.29 (3)
(4) Allocation of physical placement. 767.24(4)(a)1.1.
Except as provided under par. (b)
, if the court orders sole or joint legal custody under sub. (2)
, the court shall allocate periods of physical placement between the parties in accordance with this subsection.
In determining the allocation of periods of physical placement, the court shall consider each case on the basis of the factors in sub. (5)
. The court shall set a placement schedule that allows the child to have regularly occurring, meaningful periods of physical placement with each parent and that maximizes the amount of time the child may spend with each parent, taking into account geographic separation and accommodations for different households.
A child is entitled to periods of physical placement with both parents unless, after a hearing, the court finds that physical placement with a parent would endanger the child's physical, mental or emotional health.
No court may deny periods of physical placement for failure to meet, or grant periods of physical placement for meeting, any financial obligation to the child or, if the parties were married, to the former spouse.
If a court denies periods of physical placement under this section, the court shall give the parent that was denied periods of physical placement the warning provided under s. 48.356
If the court grants periods of physical placement to more than one parent, it shall order a parent with legal custody and physical placement rights to provide the notice required under s. 767.327 (1)
(5) Factors in custody and physical placement determinations.
In determining legal custody and periods of physical placement, the court shall consider all facts relevant to the best interest of the child. The court may not prefer one parent or potential custodian over the other on the basis of the sex or race of the parent or potential custodian. The court shall consider the following factors in making its determination:
The wishes of the child's parent or parents, as shown by any stipulation between the parties, any proposed parenting plan or any legal custody or physical placement proposal submitted to the court at trial.
The wishes of the child, which may be communicated by the child or through the child's guardian ad litem or other appropriate professional.
The interaction and interrelationship of the child with his or her parent or parents, siblings, and any other person who may significantly affect the child's best interest.
The amount and quality of time that each parent has spent with the child in the past, any necessary changes to the parents' custodial roles and any reasonable life-style changes that a parent proposes to make to be able to spend time with the child in the future.
The child's adjustment to the home, school, religion and community.
The age of the child and the child's developmental and educational needs at different ages.
The mental and physical health of the parties, the minor children and other persons living in a proposed custodial household.
The need for regularly occurring and meaningful periods of physical placement to provide predictability and stability for the child.
The availability of public or private child care services.
The cooperation and communication between the parties and whether either party unreasonably refuses to cooperate or communicate with the other party.
Whether each party can support the other party's relationship with the child, including encouraging and facilitating frequent and continuing contact with the child, or whether one party is likely to unreasonably interfere with the child's continuing relationship with the other party.
Whether either party has or had a significant problem with alcohol or drug abuse.
The reports of appropriate professionals if admitted into evidence.
Such other factors as the court may in each individual case determine to be relevant.
If legal custody or physical placement is contested, the court shall state in writing why its findings relating to legal custody or physical placement are in the best interest of the child.
In making an order of joint legal custody, upon the request of one parent the court shall specify major decisions in addition to those specified under s. 767.001 (2m)
Notwithstanding s. 767.001 (1s)
, in making an order of joint legal custody, the court may give one party sole power to make specified decisions, while both parties retain equal rights and responsibilities for other decisions.
In making an order of joint legal custody and periods of physical placement, the court may specify one parent as the primary caretaker of the child and one home as the primary home of the child, for the purpose of determining eligibility for aid under s. 49.19
or benefits under ss. 49.141
or for any other purpose the court considers appropriate.
No party awarded joint legal custody may take any action inconsistent with any applicable physical placement order, unless the court expressly authorizes that action.
In an order of physical placement, the court shall specify the right of each party to the physical control of the child in sufficient detail to enable a party deprived of that control to implement any law providing relief for interference with custody or parental rights.
Except under par. (b)
or unless otherwise ordered by the court, access to a child's medical, dental and school records is available to a parent regardless of whether the parent has legal custody of the child.
A parent who has been denied periods of physical placement with a child under this section is subject to s. 118.125 (2) (m)
with respect to that child's school records, s. 51.30 (5) (bm)
with respect to the child's court or treatment records, s. 55.07
with respect to the child's records relating to protective services and s. 146.835
with respect to the child's patient health care records.
(7m) Medical and medical history information. 767.24(7m)(a)(a)
In making an order of legal custody, the court shall order a parent who is not granted legal custody of a child to provide to the court medical and medical history information that is known to the parent. The court shall send the information to the physician or other health care provider with primary responsibility for the treatment and care of the child, as designated by the parent who is granted legal custody of the child, and advise the physician or other health care provider of the identity of the child to whom the information relates. The information provided shall include all of the following:
The known medical history of the parent providing the information, including specific information about stillbirths or congenital anomalies in the parent's family, and the medical histories, if known, of the parents and siblings of the parent and any sibling of the child who is a child of the parent, except that medical history information need not be provided for a sibling of the child if the parent or other person who is granted legal custody of the child also has legal custody, including joint legal custody, of that sibling.
A report of any medical examination that the parent providing the information had within one year before the date of the order.
The physician or other health care provider designated under par. (a)
shall keep the information separate from other records kept by the physician or other health care provider. The information shall be assigned an identification number and maintained under the name of the parent who provided the information to the court. The patient health care records of the child that are kept by the physician or other health care provider shall include a reference to that name and identification number. If the child's patient health care records are transferred to another physician or other health care provider or another health care facility, the records containing the information provided under par. (a)
shall be transferred along with the child's patient health care records. Notwithstanding s. 146.819
, the information provided under par. (a)
need not be maintained by a physician or other health care provider after the child reaches age 18.
The physician or other health care provider with custody of the information, or any other record custodian at the request of the physician or other health care provider, shall have access to the information if, in the professional judgment of the physician or other health care provider, the information may be relevant to the child's medical condition.
The physician or other health care provider may release only that portion of the information, and only to a person, that the physician or other health care provider determines is relevant to the child's medical condition.
(8) Notice in judgment.
A judgment which determines the legal custody or physical placement rights of any person to a minor child shall include notification of the contents of s. 948.31
Notwithstanding 1987 Wisconsin Act 355, section 73
, as affected by 1987 Wisconsin Act 364
, the parties may agree to the adjudication of a custody or physical placement order under this section in an action affecting the family that is pending on May 3, 1988.
History: 1971 c. 149
; 1975 c. 39
; 1977 c. 105
; 1979 c. 32
, 92 (4)
; 1979 c. 196
; Stats. 1979 s. 767.24; 1981 c. 391
; 1985 a. 70
; 1987 a. 332
; 1987 a. 355
; 1989 a. 56
; 1989 a. 359
; 1991 a. 32
; 1993 a. 213
; 1995 a. 77
; 1997 a. 35
; 1999 a. 9
NOTE: 1987 Wis. Act 355
, which made many changes in this section, contains a "legislative declaration" in section 1 and explanatory notes.
Impropriety of the award of custody of a child to the mother cannot be predicated on the guardian ad litem's contrary recommendation. Heiting v. Heiting, 64 Wis. 2d 110
, 218 N.W.2d 334
The award of custody to the father was reversible error where the trial court should have recognized the rule of comity and declined to exercise its jurisdiction. Sheridan v. Sheridan, 65 Wis. 2d 504
, 223 N.W.2d 557
In a child custody dispute between the children's father, who was divorced by his wife, and the wife's parents, subsequent to her death, the trial court erred in concluding that it had no choice but to award custody to the surviving natural parent unless it found him unfit or unable to care for the children. LaChapell v. Mawhinney, 66 Wis. 2d 679
, 225 N.W.2d 501
Res judicata is not to be applied to custody matters with the same strictness as to other matters. Kuesel v. Kuesel, 74 Wis. 2d 636
, 247 N.W.2d 72
Consideration of evidence concerning a mother's attempts to frustrate the father's visitation privileges was proper in awarding custody. Marotz v. Marotz, 80 Wis. 2d 477
, 259 N.W.2d 524
In a post-divorce child custody dispute where the original award was by stipulation, a full-scale hearing was necessary. Haugen v. Haugen, 82 Wis. 2d 411
, 262 N.W.2d 769
The trial court may not order a custodial parent to live in designated part of the state or else lose custody. Groh v. Groh, 110 Wis. 2d 117
, 327 N.W.2d 655
In a custody dispute between a parent and a third party, unless the court finds that the parent is unfit or unable to care for the child or that there are compelling reasons for denying custody to the parent, the court must grant custody to the parent. Barstad v. Frazier, 118 Wis. 2d 549
, 348 N.W.2d 479
Custody and visitation are controlled by statute and case law and cannot be contracted away. A co-parenting contract between a parent and a non-parent is unenforceable. In re Interest of Z.J.H. 162 Wis. 2d 1002
, 471 N.W.2d 202
Revision of s. 767.24to allow joint custody in cases where both parties did not agree was not a "substantial change in circumstances" justifying a change to joint custody. Licary v. Licary, 168 Wis. 2d 686
, 484 N.W.2d 371
(Ct. App. 1992).
Section 767.001 (2m) confers the right to choose a child's religion on the custodial parent. Reasonable restrictions on visitation to prevent subversion of this right do not violate the constitution. Lange v. Lange, 175 Wis. 2d 373
, N.W.2d (Ct. App. 1993).
There is no authority to order a change of custody at an unknown time in the future upon the occurrence of some stated contingency. Koeller v. Koeller, 195 Wis. 2d 660
, 536 N.W.2d 216
(Ct. App. 1995).
A custodial parent's right to make major decisions for the children does not give that parent the right to decide whether the actions of the noncustodial parent are consistent with those decisions. Wood v. DeHahn, 214 Wis. 2d 221
, 571 N.W.2d 186
(Ct. App. 1997).