Ayes: 7 - Representatives Petrowski, Bies, Van Roy, Musser, Young, Staskunas and Shilling.
Noes: 0.
To committee on Rules.
Jerry Petrowski
Chairperson
Committee on Highway Safety
__________________
The committee on Natural Resources reports and recommends:
Relating to the regulation of baiting and feeding to control and manage chronic wasting disease.
Objection:
Ayes: 7 - Representatives Gunderson, Pettis, Bies, Krawczyk, M. Williams, Gronemus and Steinbrink.
Noes: 4 - Representatives Johnsrud, Ott, Black and Miller.
To joint committee for review of Administrative Rules
.
DuWayne Johnsrud
Chairperson
Committee on Natural Resources
__________________
Speaker's Communications
July 14, 2003
Mr. Patrick Fuller
Chief Clerk
Wisconsin State Assembly
Room 208, Risser Justice Center
17 West Main Street
Madison, Wisconsin 53708
Dear Patrick:
Pursuant to Assembly Rule
42 (3)(c), I am withdrawing
Assembly Bill 432 from the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources and re-referring it to the Assembly Committee on Tourism. I have the consent of Representative DuWayne Johnsrud, chairman of the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources, to take this action.
Please call Ellen Nowak of my office if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
John G. Gard
Speaker
__________________
Chief Clerk Reports
The Chief Clerk records:
Assembly Bill 378
Presented to the Governor on Monday, July 14.
Patrick E. Fuller
Assembly Chief Clerk
__________________
Executive Communications
State of Wisconsin
Office of the Governor
Madison
July 15, 2003
To the Honorable Members of the Assembly:
The following bill, originating in the Assembly, has been approved, signed and deposited in the office of the Secretary of State:
Bill Number Act Number Date Approved
AB 378
(In part)31July 15, 2003
Respectfully submitted,
James Doyle
Governor
__________________
Governor's Veto Message
July 15, 2003
To the Honorable Members of the Assembly:
I have approved
Assembly Bill 378 as
2003 Wisconsin Act 31 and have deposited it in the Office of the Secretary of State. I have exercised the partial veto in Sections 22 and 23.
Assembly Bill 378 makes a significant down payment on future economic growth by helping Wisconsin meet its future energy needs. It will compensate communities that agree to site baseload power plants for the increased demand on its local infrastructure. These additional costs -- in road construction, improved safety and environmental mitigation - often follow after a community agrees to host the new generation facility.
Assembly Bill 378 marks a significant improvement in the state's effort to provide the energy necessary to enhance Wisconsin's economic growth.
I am however making several technical changes that create either inappropriate limitations or inequitable treatment of localities. With my partial veto of these sections, a more comprehensive, flexible and balanced energy strategy is established.
A306
Section 22 [as it relates to municipalities contiguous to baseload plants] provides a payment to a municipality that is contiguous to the location of a baseload electric generating facility. I am partially vetoing this provision because it creates inequities and may ultimately lead to unnecessary and substantially higher state costs. Before the state begins making incentive payments to localities that do not host a plant, but are instead near a plant, it needs to both consider both the fiscal consequences and develop an evenhanded payment methodology. This provision was crafted to specifically benefit one municipality. A number of other municipalities, however, could likewise be considered to have impacts from nearby power plants yet these local governments would not receive payments. This construct is unfair. As a result of this partial veto, the bill's incentive payments will be limited to localities that host power plants. If payments to neighboring localities are to be considered, this concern should be addressed more broadly and equitably.
Section 22 [as it relates to incentive payments for the location of cogeneration plants] provides an incentive payment to a municipality and county in which a cogeneration plant is located if the plant is completed after December 31, 2003 and before December 31, 2006. I am partially vetoing this provision to eliminate the requirement that a cogeneration plant be completed before December 31, 2006 to receive this payment because this provision is unnecessarily restrictive and may hinder the development of other cogeneration facilities. Since cogeneration makes effective use of what otherwise would be waste heat to increase the benefits provided from the fuels used in producing power, it is prudent to provide this incentive payment to plants completed after December 31, 2006. Under my partial veto of this provision, all localities in which eligible cogeneration plants are completed after December 31, 2003 will receive these incentive payments.
Section 23 prohibits an electric public utility from recovering through its rates the cost of mitigation payments to a locality hosting a power plant except if the mitigation payment agreement is received by the Public Service Commission by June l0, 2003 and the commission finds the agreement to be reasonable. I am vetoing this section because circumstances may still exist in which mitigation payments would be both prudent and constructive. While the incentive payments provided by the bill greatly diminish the need for mitigation payments, extraordinary or unique circumstances may still occur that cannot be anticipated by legislation. Consequently, an avenue for these payments must be available. I am also vetoing this section because it creates an unnecessarily broad restriction on the Public Service Commission's authority that may have unintended consequences. As a result of my veto, the Public Service Commission will be able to employ its current discretion in determining when mitigation payments are appropriate. These payments are expected, however, to be increasingly rare once the incentive payments provided by this bill become effective.
Respectfully submitted,
James Doyle
Governor
__________________
Reference Bureau Corrections
Assembly Bill 162
1. Page 2, line 2: delete "th is" and substitute "this".
__________________
Referral of Agency Reports
State of Wisconsin
Department of Health and Family Services
Madison
July 7, 2003
To the Honorable, the Assembly:
As required by s.
252.04 (11), Wis. Stats., enclosed is the Annual Statewide Immunization Program Report. Please distribute this report to the appropriate standing committees.
Sincerely,
Helene Nelson
Secretary
Referred to committee on Public Health.
__________________
Agency Reports
State of Wisconsin
Legislative Audit Bureau
Madison
July 9, 2003
To the Honorable, the Legislature:
The Department of Employee Trust Funds (ETF) and the Investment Board are partners in administering the Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS). As part of this relationship, ETF relies on investment information the Investment Board provides to properly report WRS investments and returns. During our audit of ETF's 2001 financial statements, we found that an error in information the Investment Board provided ETF resulted in a significant error in the crediting and reporting of the investment account balances for the Milwaukee Retirement Systems, which invest in the WRS investment trust funds. The balances in the Milwaukee Retirement Systems were overstated by a total of $3.87 million for the period February 2001 through January 2003. The investment balance for the Milwaukee Schools Retirement System was adjusted for its overage, while ETF is attempting to recover funds from the City of Milwaukee Retirement System, which had discontinued its investment in the WRS funds as of June 2002.
The error occurred as the result of human error by Investment Board staff in transcribing information from its custodial bank. However, ETF may have been able to detect the error earlier if it had been more diligent in reviewing information in its financial reports. Further, the error demonstrates a need for additional care and collaboration by both agencies in ensuring that information is correctly calculated and communicated. Both the Investment Board and ETF have responded quickly to correct the error and to take steps to prevent similar errors from occurring in the future.
A307
A more detailed description of the error and the responses from the Investment Board and ETF on their plans to implement recommendations are attached.
Respectfully submitted,
Janice Mueller
State Auditor
