The question was: Shall Assembly Joint Resolution 102 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
Assembly Joint Resolution 108
Relating to: declaring December 12, 2012, Aaron Rodgers Day.
The question was: Shall Assembly Joint Resolution 108 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
Assembly Joint Resolution 112
Relating to: honoring the Port of Milwaukee as Grantee for Foreign-Trade Zone No. 41 and supporting the inclusion of nine additional Wisconsin counties in the zone.
The question was: Shall Assembly Joint Resolution 112 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
Assembly Joint Resolution 113
Relating to: the life and public service of Frank L. Nikolay.
Read.
The question was: Shall Assembly Joint Resolution 113 be concurred in?
Concurred in by unanimous rising vote.
Senator Leibham, with unanimous consent, asked that all members of the Senate be added as cosponsors of Assembly Joint Resolution 113.
Assembly Joint Resolution 117
Relating to: the life and public service of Jim Irwin.
The question was: Shall Assembly Joint Resolution 117 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
Assembly Joint Resolution 119
Relating to: the life and public service of William Kiley.
The question was: Shall Assembly Joint Resolution 119 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
Assembly Joint Resolution 120
Relating to: proclaiming May 18, 19, and 20, 2012, Syttende Mai Weekend.
The question was: Shall Assembly Joint Resolution 120 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
Senator Fitzgerald, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged to the Assembly, with the exception of Senate Bill 526:
Senate Joint Resolution
70
Senate Joint Resolution
71
Assembly Joint Resolution
44
Assembly Joint Resolution
60
Assembly Joint Resolution
74
Assembly Joint Resolution
76
Assembly Joint Resolution
89
Assembly Joint Resolution
91
Assembly Joint Resolution
99
Assembly Joint Resolution
102
Assembly Joint Resolution
108
Assembly Joint Resolution
112
Assembly Joint Resolution
113
Assembly Joint Resolution
117
Assembly Joint Resolution
119
Assembly Joint Resolution
120
Messaged.
__________________
Senate Bill 275
Relating to: membership of technical college district boards.
Read a second time.
Senator Grothman, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 and Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 275 be withdrawn and returned to author.
Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 275 offered by Senator Grothman.
Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 275 offered by Senators Grothman and Harsdorf.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 275?
Adopted.
Senator C. Larson moved that Senate Bill 275 be referred to the committee on Agriculture, Forestry, and Higher Education.
S777
The question was: Shall
Senate Bill 275 be referred to the committee on
Agriculture, Forestry, and Higher Education?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 16; noes, 17; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Carpenter, S. Coggs, T. Cullen, Erpenbach, Hansen, Holperin, Jauch, King, C. Larson, Lassa, Miller, Risser, Shilling, Taylor, Vinehout and Wirch - 16.
Noes - Senators Cowles, Darling, Ellis, S. Fitzgerald, Galloway, Grothman, Harsdorf, Kedzie, Lasee, Lazich, Leibham, Moulton, Olsen, Schultz, Vukmir, Wanggaard and Zipperer - 17.
Absent or not voting - None.
Referal Refused.
The question was: Adoption of Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 275?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Cowles, Darling, Ellis, S. Fitzgerald, Galloway, Grothman, Harsdorf, Kedzie, Lasee, Lazich, Leibham, Moulton, Olsen, Schultz, Vukmir, Wanggaard and Zipperer - 17.
Noes - Senators Carpenter, S. Coggs, T. Cullen, Erpenbach, Hansen, Holperin, Jauch, King, C. Larson, Lassa, Miller, Risser, Shilling, Taylor, Vinehout and Wirch - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator S. Fitzgerald asked unanimous consent that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senator Taylor objected.
Senate Bill 297
Relating to: eliminating ambulatory surgical center assessment.
Read a second time.
Senator S. Fitzgerald, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 297 be referred to committee on Senate Organization.
Referred.
Senate Bill 300
Relating to: the length of time for which a variance applies.
Read a second time.
Senator Lazich, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 300 be placed at the foot of the 11th order order of business on today's calendar.
Placed at the foot of the 11th order of business.
Senate Bill 326
Relating to: the issuance of, and exemptions from, certain individual permits, contracts, and general permits for structures, deposits, and other activities in or near navigable waters; areas of significant scientific value that are areas of special natural resource interest; repair and maintenance of boathouses and fixed houseboats; information required to be published on the Department of Natural Resources Internet Web site; expedited procedures for certain plan approvals; deadlines for action on certain approval applications; and granting rule-making authority.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 326?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 326?
