Recordkeeping
Under current rules, a licensed cheese grader must keep records showing the name of each person for whom cheese is graded, the quantity graded, the grading date, and the grade of each graded lot. This rule also requires the grader to keep fat and moisture records for each lot of cheese if the fat or moisture content is measured.
Fiscal Estimate
Assumptions Used in Arriving at Fiscal Estimate
Rules relating to cheese grading, packaging and labeling are contained in ch. ATCP 81, Wis. Adm. Code. These rules prevent fraud and deception, and assist wholesale and retail purchasers of cheese in making informed value comparisons and purchase decisions. Grade standards contained in the rules set the benchmarks for determining cheese quality.
Under current rules, all bulk cheese manufactured in Wisconsin must be labeled at the dairy plant or cheese factory with the name of the cheese, state identification, dairy plant identification, vat identification, and date of manufacture for the cheese. This rule amends ch. ATCP 81 to permit an electronic code labeling method for these items on the manufacturer's label for bulk cheese if a scanner or other appropriate device is provided where the cheese is located that enables an employe or agent of the Department to decode the information into a readable format. The use of electronic code labeling as the exclusive format for any required label information will be limited to cheese while it remains under the custody and control of the manufacturer. However, DATCP is unable to project how widely this method will be used. DATCP anticipates that some additional time will be needed during inspections or investigations to convert the coded information into a readable format for product identification. Currently, DATCP believes that the increased time and costs will be able to be absorbed by the Department.
Under this rule, Wisconsin grade labeling is prohibited on cheese manufactured in other states or foreign countries. Requirements related to age labeling will apply to any cheese label on which a claim is made. Weight and size requirements for Swiss cheese rindless blocks will be eliminated. These and other minor technical changes are not anticipated to have any long-range fiscal effect on the Department.
A one-time cost of approximately $5700 will be incurred by the Department for permanent rule development.
Long - Range Fiscal Implications
A small decrease in efficiency and increase in costs for Department activities are anticipated with the use of electronic code labeling of bulk cheese. However, DATCP believes the increase in costs will be able to be absorbed by the Department if the use of electronic code labeling is limited in scope to bulk cheese while it remains under the custody and control of the manufacturer.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
This proposed rule modifies current rules under ch. ATCP 81, Wis. Adm. Code, related to cheese grading, packaging and labeling.
Under this rule, cheese manufacturers will be permitted to use electronic code labeling as an alternative method to list any or all of the items of information required on the manufacturer's label for bulk cheese, as long as the cheese remains under the control and custody of the manufacturer. The decision to label bulk cheese in this manner will be fully voluntary. Coding methods will not be standardized under one uniform system from company to company. Therefore, the manufacturer must provide a scanner or other appropriate device where the cheese is located that enables an employe or agent of the Department to decode the information into a readable format. If the cheese is stored in public warehouse facilities, the warehouse may need to make adjustments in its recordkeeping and warehousing operations.
Bulk cheese must be labeled by the manufacturer with a standard, uncoded label format if the cheese will be sold in bulk form at a later date. Bulk cheese is often sold to other cheese packaging plants, manufacturers of processed or cold pack cheese, retail stores, and restaurants that have a need for product label information in a readily understandable format. Standard formats may also be necessary for interstate shipments to comply with labeling laws in other states.
In this rule, Wisconsin grade labeling is prohibited on cheese manufactured in other states or foreign countries. Protection of the “added value" attributable to Wisconsin grade labels for Wisconsin-made cheese will be expected to enhance the marketshare of our state's dairy industry.
Under this rule, licensed cheese graders must maintain and make available to inspection any records of test results for fat and moisture content of any lot of cheese for which fat and moisture was measured. This rule does not require any additional testing, but simply requires that any results of tests conducted be made available for inspection to help ensure that the cheese meets the applicable standard of identity.
At the request of industry, this rule eliminates the weight and size requirements for Swiss cheese rindless blocks to provide greater flexibility for our manufacturers to meet the demand of their customers. Other rule changes are minor and technical in nature and are not expected to require any additional reporting or recordkeeping, knowledge or professional skills, nor increase costs to small businesses.
Notice of Proposed Rule
Elections Board
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to ss. 5.05 (1) (f), 5.93 and 227.11 (2) (a), Stats., and according to the procedure set forth in s. 227.16 (2) (e), Stats., the State of Wisconsin Elections Board will adopt the following rule as proposed in this notice without public hearing unless within 30 days after publication of this notice on November 15, 1999, the Elections Board is petitioned for a public hearing by 25 persons who will be affected by the rule; by a municipality which will be affected by the rule; or by an association which is representative of a farm, labor, business, or professional group which will be affected by the rule.
Analysis Prepared by the State Elections Board
Statutory authority: ss. 5.05 (1) (f), 5.93 and 227.11 (2) (a)
Statutes interpreted: ss. 11.01 (3), (6), (7) and (16), 11.05, 11.25, 11.29, 11.30 and 11.36
This amended rule interprets ss. 11.01 (3), (6), (7) and (16), 11.05, 11.25, 11.29, 11.30 and 11.36, Stats. The amendment attempts to define more specifically those communications that are considered to be express advocacy subject to regulation by ch. 11 of the Wisconsin Statutes. The rule codifies the express advocacy test set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1976, in Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, and reiterated in 1999 by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in WMC IMC, Inc., v. State Elections Board, (Case No. 98-0596), by establishing a nonexclusive list of terms that are considered to expressly advocate. The rule also extends express advocacy to the functional equivalents of those terms.
Text of Rule
Pursuant to the authority vested in the State of Wisconsin Elections Board by ss. 5.05 (1) (f), 5.93, and 227.11 (2) (a), Stats., the Elections Board hereby amends s. ElBd 1.28 (2) (c), interpreting ss. 11.01 (3), (6), (7) and (16), 11.05, 11.25, 11.29, 11.30 and 11.36, Stats., as follows:
SECTION 1. Section ElBd 1.28 (2) (c) is amended to read:
ElBd 1.28 (2) (c) Make expenditures for the purpose a communication containing terms such as the following or their functional equivalents with reference to a clearly identified candidate that expressly advocating advocates the election or defeat of an identified that candidate and that unambiguously relates to the campaign of that candidate:
1. “Vote for;"
2. “Elect;"
3. “Support;"
4. “Cast your ballot for;"
5. “Smith for Assembly;"
6. “Vote against;"
7. “Defeat;"
8. “Reject."
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The amendment of this rule does not affect business.
Fiscal Estimate
The amendment of this rule has no fiscal effect.
Copies of Rule and Contact Information
Copies of this proposed rule are available upon request to:
George A. Dunst, Legal Counsel
State Elections Board
132 East Wilson St.
P.O. Box 2973
Madison, WI 53701-2973
Telephone (608) 266-0136
Notice of Hearings
Health and Family Services
(Community Services, Chs. HFS 30--)
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to s. 51.42 (7) (b), Stats., the Department of Health and Family Services will hold public hearings to consider the repeal of ss. HFS 61.70 to 61.72 and 61.75, Wis. Adm. Code, and subch. V of ch. HFS 61, Wis. Adm. Code, and the creation of chs. HFS 32, 33 and 35, Wis. Adm. Code, relating to standards for community mental health inpatient treatment, adult day treatment and clinic programs.
Hearing Information
The public hearings will be held:
December 6, 1999 Room 120
Monday State Office Bldg.
From 1:00 p.m. 819 North 6th St.
to 5:00 p.m. MILWAUKEE, WI
December 10, 1999 Room 751
Friday State Office Bldg.
From 1:00 p.m. One Wilson St.
to 5:00 p.m. MADISON, WI
December 14, 1999 Room 123
Tuesday State Office Bldg.
From 12:30 p.m. 610 Gibson St.
to 4:30 p.m. EAU CLAIRE, WI
December 16, 1999 Room 152
Thursday State Office Bldg.
From 1:00 p.m. 200 North Jefferson St.
to 4:30 p.m. GREEN BAY, WI
The hearing sites are fully accessible to people with disabilities. Parking for people with disabilities attending the Madison hearing is available in the parking lot behind the building, in the Monona Terrace Convention Center Parking Ramp and in the Doty Street Parking Ramp. People with disabilities may enter the building directly from the parking lot at the west end of the building or from Wilson Street through the side entrance at the east end of the building.
Analyses Prepared by the Dept. of Health and Family Services
The Department under s. 51.42 (7), Stats., certifies community mental health treatment programs. All of the Department's standards for certification of community mental health treatment programs that have been included in subch. IV of ch. HFS 61, Wis. Adm. Code, are now being revised and at the same time renumbered into program-specific separate chapters of the Wisconsin Administrative Code. Separate chapters of the Wisconsin Administrative Code have recently been published for certification of emergency (crisis) service programs (ch. HFS 34) and day treatment programs for children (ch. HFS 40). At these hearings the Department is bringing before the public, for comment, proposed revised standards for inpatient, adult day treatment and mental health clinic programs.
Analysis -- Chapter HFS 32, Community Mental Health Inpatient Programs
This is a general revision, renumbering and considerable expansion of the Department's rules for certification of community mental health inpatient treatment programs. The current rules, ss. HFS 61.70 to 61.72, date from 1974 and have never been updated.
An inpatient mental health treatment program must be certified by the Department in order for the program to receive funds for services provided to a Medical Assistance recipient under s. 49.46 (2) (b) 6. f., Stats., community aids funding from counties under s. 51.423 (2), Stats., or payments provided as mandated insurance coverage under s. 632.89, Stats.
Inpatient mental health treatment programs are operated by hospitals, usually as a service or unit which is a part of a hospital. A hospital's inpatient mental health service is where patients receive inpatient mental health services. The term “service" is used throughout the rules in place of “program," but the meaning is the same.
The revised rules cover:
• Certification of a service (program);
