SECTION 2 adds the requirement that prior to performing duties as an intern or receiving credit for hours in an internship in the practice of pharmacy a supervising pharmacist shall be disclosed in the initial application and any change of a supervising pharmacist shall be disclosed to the board prior to further performing duties constituting the practice of pharmacy as an intern.
SECTION 3 repeals a provision allowing 2000 hours of practice as a pharmacy intern prior to receiving certification by the FPGEC.
SECTION 4 reduces the number of hours that may be practiced in a foreign graduate internship.
SECTION 5 repeals a grandfather provision that is no longer applicable.
SECTION 6 removes a typographical error.
Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation: There is no existing or proposed federal regulation for summary and comparison.
Comparison with rules in adjacent states:
Iowa
Requires 1500 hours of internship. Foreign Pharmacy Graduate Examination Committee (FPGEC) certification required prior to internship credit being granted.
Illinois
Requires a minimum of 400 hours of internship. The applicant must obtain prior approval of the Board before enrolling in a course of clinical instruction.
Michigan
Requires a minimum of 1000 hours of internship and Foreign Pharmacy Graduate Examination Committee (FPGEC) certification required prior to internship license being granted, which is valid for a period of two years.
Minnesota
Requires 1600 hours of internship, after FPGEC certification.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies:
There are currently 47 foreign graduate applications in process going back to 2002. None of these applications have been completed for licensure or closed. It is unknown whether these individuals are practicing in Wisconsin as pharmacy interns.
Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business or in preparation of economic impact report: This rule change would not impact a substantial number of small businesses. The requirement for FPGEC passage prior to accumulation of hours may have a slight effect on small businesses employing, or wishing to hire, a foreign graduate intern. According to Department of Regulation and Licensing application files, 6 of the 18 foreign pharmacy graduate interns that have identified their place of employment list a smaller pharmacy. Some are in all likelihood linked with a larger pharmacy. There are 1,222 active, in-state pharmacies in Wisconsin, roughly 350 of which are estimated to be small businesses without a large pharmacy nexus. The FPGEC examination is only offered two times per year, so there may be slightly more of a delay in hiring, or in some cases, an inability to hire because of examination failure. The reduction in the number of total hours that may be worked by an intern from 3,000 to 2,000 may result in earlier termination of employment for interns who have not completed FPGEC. Employing a licensed pharmacist, if available, would increase salary costs. The statewide average wage for a pharmacist is $33.95 per hour, according to the Department of Workforce Development. Two Milwaukee area retail pharmacies offer $17 and $20 to interns, without benefits except for a small amount of vacation offered by one. There are no additional bookkeeping requirements and no new form requirements, although the department will have to revise its existing internship application form.
Section 227.137, Stats., requires an “agency" to prepare an economic impact report before submitting the proposed rule-making order to the Wisconsin Legislative Council. The Department of Regulation and Licensing is not included as an “agency" in this section.
Anticipated costs incurred by private sector: The department finds that this rule has no significant fiscal effect on the private sector.
Fiscal Estimate
The department estimates that this rule will require staff time in the Division of Professional Credentialing. The total staff salary and fringe is estimated at $115.
Effect on small business: These proposed rules will have no significant economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1), Stats. The Department's Regulatory Review Coordinator may be contacted by email at larry.martin@drl.state.wi.us, or by calling (608) 266-8608.
Agency Contact
Pamela Haack, Paralegal, Department of Regulation and Licensing, Office of Legal Counsel, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 152, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708-8935. Telephone: (608) 266-0495. Email: pamela.haack@drl.state.wi.us.
Place where comments are to be submitted and deadline for submission:
Comments may be submitted to Pamela Haack, Paralegal, Department of Regulation and Licensing, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 152, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708-8935, or by email at pamela.haack@drl.state.wi.us. Comments must be received on or before July 3, 2006 to be included in the record of rule-making proceedings.
Notice of Hearing
Transportation
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to ss. 85.16 (1) and 348.07 (4), Stats., interpreting s. 348.07 (4), Stats., the Department of Transportation will hold a public hearing at the following location to consider the amendment of chapter Trans 276, Wisconsin Administrative Code, relating to allowing the operation of double bottoms and certain other vehicles on certain specified highways:
June 20, 2006
Department of Transportation
Hill Farms State Transportation Office
Room 701 (Superior Room)
Madison, WI
10:00 AM
(Parking is available for persons with disabilities)
An interpreter for the hearing impaired will be available on request for this hearing. Please make reservations for a hearing interpreter at least 10 days prior to the hearing.
Analysis Prepared by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Statutory Authority: ss. 85.16 (1) and 348.07 (4), Stats.
Statute Interpreted: s. 348.07 (4), Stats.
Plain Language Analysis and Summary of, and Preliminary Comparison with, Existing or Federal Regulation. In the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (STAA), the federal government acted under the Commerce clause of the United States Constitution to provide uniform standards on vehicle length applicable in all states. The length provisions of STAA apply to truck tractor-semitrailer combinations and to truck tractor-semitrailer-trailer combinations. (See Jan. 6, 1983, Public Law 97-424, § 411) The uniform standards provide that:
No state shall impose a limit of less than 48 feet on a semitrailer operating in a truck tractor-semitrailer combination.
No state shall impose a length limit of less than 28 feet on any semitrailer or trailer operating in a truck tractor-semitrailer-trailer combination.
No state may limit the length of truck tractors.
No state shall impose an overall length limitation on commercial vehicles operating in truck tractor-semitrailer or truck tractor-semitrailer-trailer combinations.
No state shall prohibit operation of truck tractor-semitrailer-trailer combinations.
The State of Wisconsin complied with the federal requirements outlined above by enacting 1983 Wisconsin Act 78 which amended § 348.07 (2), Stats., and § 348.08 (1), Stats. This act created §§ 348.07 (2) (f), (fm), (gm) and 348.08 (1) (e) to implement the federal length requirements. In 1986 the legislature created § 348.07 (2) (gr), Stats., to add 53 foot semitrailers as part of a two vehicle combination to the types of vehicles that may operate along with STAA authorized vehicles. (See 1985 Wisconsin Act 165)
The vehicles authorized by the STAA may operate on the national system of interstate and defense highways and on those federal aid primary highways designated by regulation of the secretary of the United States Department of Transportation. In 1984 the USDOT adopted 23 CFR Part 658 which in Appendix A lists the highways in each state upon which STAA authorized vehicles may operate. Collectively these highways are known as the National Network. In 1983 Wisconsin Act 78, the legislature enacted § 348.07(4), Stats., which directs the Wisconsin Department of Transportation to adopt a rule designating the highways in Wisconsin on which STAA authorized vehicles may be operated consistent with federal regulations.
The Department of Transportation first adopted ch. Trans 276 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code in December of 1984. The rule is consistent with 23 CFR Part 658 in that the Wisconsin rule designates all of the highways in Wisconsin that are listed in 23 CFR Part 658 as part of the National Network for STAA authorized vehicles. The federal regulation does not prohibit states from allowing operation of STAA authorized vehicles on additional state highways. The rule making authority granted to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation in § 348.07 (4), Stats., allows the DOT to add routes in Wisconsin consistent with public safety. The rule making process also provides a mechanism to review requests from businesses and shipping firms for access to the designated highway system for points of origin and delivery beyond 5 miles from a designated route. A process to review and respond to requests for reasonable access is required by 23 CFR Part 658.
This rule proposes to amend s. Trans 276.07 (28) and (31m), Wisconsin Administrative Code, to add two segments of highway to the designated highway system established under s. 348.07 (4), Stats. The actual highway segments that this rule adds to the designated highway system are:
Hwy.   From   To
CTH T   USH 12   STH 29
CTH F   STH 124   85th Avenue
The long trucks to which this rule applies are those with 53-foot semitrailers, double bottoms and the vehicles which may legally operate on the federal National Network, but which exceed Wisconsin's regular limits on overall length. Generally, no person may operate any of the following vehicles on Wisconsin's highways without a permit: A single vehicle with an overall length in excess of 40 feet, a combination of vehicles with an overall length in excess of 65 feet, a semitrailer longer than 48 feet, an automobile haulaway longer than 66 feet plus allowed overhangs, or a double bottom. Certain exceptions are provided under s. 348.07 (2), Stats., which implements provisions of the federal Surface Transportation Assistance Act in Wisconsin.
The effect of this rule will be to extend the provisions of s. 348.07 (2) (f), (fm), (gm) and (gr), and s. 348.08 (1) (e), Stats., to the highway segments listed above. As a result, vehicles which may legally operate on the federal National Network in Wisconsin will also be allowed to operate on the newly-designated highway. Specifically, this means there will be no overall length limitation for a tractor-semitrailer combination, a double bottom or an automobile haulaway on the affected highway segment. There also will be no length limitation for a truck tractor or road tractor when operated in a tractor-semitrailer combination or as part of a double bottom or an automobile haulaway. Double bottoms will be allowed to operate on the affected highway segment provided neither trailer is longer than 28 feet, 6 inches. Semitrailers up to 53 feet long may also be operated on this highway segment provided the kingpin to rear axle distance does not exceed 43 feet. This distance is measured from the kingpin to the center of the rear axle or, if the semitrailer has a tandem axle, to a point midway between the first and last axles of the tandem. Otherwise, semitrailers, including semitrailers which are part of an automobile haulaway, are limited to 48 feet in length.
These vehicles and combinations are also allowed to operate on undesignated highways for a distance of 5 miles or less from the designated highway in order to reach fuel, food, maintenance, repair, rest, staging, terminal or vehicle assembly or points of loading or unloading.
2005 Wisconsin Act 363. 2005 Wis. Act 363 amends s. 348.07 (4), Stats., effective August 1, 2006. That Act also requires the Department to promulgate emergency and permanent rules governing long trucks. It's effect on this proposed rule change has not been determined.
Comparison with Rules in Adjacent States: None of the states adjacent to Wisconsin (Michigan, Minnesota, Illinois and Iowa) have administrative rules relating to long truck routes in their states.
1 The rule text often achieves these objectives by consolidating individual segments into contiguous segments with new end points. In order to determine the actual highway segment added, it is necessary to compare the combined old designations with the combined new designation.
2 45-foot buses are allowed on the National Network and Interstate system by Federal law. Section 4006(b) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991.
Summary of Factual Data and Analytical Methodologies Used and How the Related Findings Support the Regulatory Approach Chosen: Due to the federal requirement that requests for access to the designated highway system in a state be decided within 90 days of the request, a proposed rule making to add requested routes is initiated without investigation. The public hearing and Department investigation undertaken in preparation for the hearing provide the engineering and economic data needed to make a final decision on whether to withdraw the proposal or proceed to final rule making. In addition, Department review and rule making in response to the enactment of 2005 Wis. Act 363 may affect the Department's final decision on this rule making.
Effect on Small Business and, If Applicable, Any Analysis and Supporting Documentation Used to Determine Effect on Small Businesses: The provisions of this rule adding two highway segments to the designated system have no direct adverse effect on small businesses, and may have a favorable effect on those small businesses which are shippers or carriers using the newly-designated routes. The Department's Regulatory Review Coordinator may be contacted by e-mail at andrew.ruiz@dot.state.wi.us, or by calling (414) 438-4585.
Fiscal Effect and Anticipated Costs Incurred by Private Sector: The Department estimates that there will be no fiscal impact on the liabilities or revenues of any county, city, village, town, school district, vocational, technical and adult education district, sewerage district, or federally-recognized tribes or bands. The Department estimates that there will be no fiscal impact on state or private sector revenues or liabilities.
Contact Person and Place Where Comments are to be Submitted and Deadline for Submission: The public record on this proposed rule making will be held open until close of business the day of the hearing to permit the submission of comments in lieu of public hearing testimony or comments supplementing testimony offered at the hearing. Any such comments should be submitted to Ashwani Sharma, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Highway Operations, Room 501, P. O. Box 7986, Madison, WI 53707-7986. You may also contact Mr. Sharma by phone at (608) 266-1273.
To view the proposed amendments to the rule, view the current rule, and submit written comments via e-mail/internet, you may visit the following website: http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/library/research/law/rulenotices.htm.
Notice of Hearing
Transportation
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to ss. 85.16 (1) and 348.07 (4), Stats., interpreting s. 348.07 (4), Stats., the Department of Transportation will hold a public hearing at the following location to consider the amendment of chapter Trans 276, Wisconsin Administrative Code, relating to allowing the operation of double bottoms and certain other vehicles on certain specified highways:
June 16, 2006
Department of Transportation
Hill Farms State Transportation Office
Room 501 (Eau Claire Room)
Madison, WI
10:00 AM
(Parking is available for persons with disabilities)
An interpreter for the hearing impaired will be available on request for this hearing. Please make reservations for a hearing interpreter at least 10 days prior to the hearing.
Analysis Prepared by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Statutory Authority: ss. 85.16 (1) and 348.07 (4), Stats.
Statute Interpreted: s. 348.07 (4), Stats.
Plain Language Analysis and Summary of, and Preliminary Comparison with, Existing or Federal Regulation. In the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (STAA), the federal government acted under the Commerce clause of the United States Constitution to provide uniform standards on vehicle length applicable in all states. The length provisions of STAA apply to truck tractor-semitrailer combinations and to truck tractor-semitrailer-trailer combinations. (See Jan. 6, 1983, Public Law 97-424, § 411) The uniform standards provide that:
No state shall impose a limit of less than 48 feet on a semitrailer operating in a truck tractor-semitrailer combination.
No state shall impose a length limit of less than 28 feet on any semitrailer or trailer operating in a truck tractor-semitrailer-trailer combination.
No state may limit the length of truck tractors.
No state shall impose an overall length limitation on commercial vehicles operating in truck tractor-semitrailer or truck tractor-semitrailer-trailer combinations.
No state shall prohibit operation of truck tractor-semitrailer-trailer combinations.
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.