In 2002, Congress enacted the Help America Vote Act to address problems and issues that surfaced in the 2000 presidential election. Section 303(a)(5)(A)(i) of the Act provided that “an application for voter registration for an election for Federal office may not be accepted or processed by a state unless the application includes – in the case of an applicant who has been issued a current and valid driver's license, the applicant's driver's license number." To comply with federal law, but also to avoid disenfranchising those Wisconsin election day registrants who have been issued a current and valid Wisconsin driver's license but do not provide that number on their registration form, the Board has adopted s. ElBd 3.04, providing for the issuance of a provisional ballot to those registrants, pursuant to s.
6.97, Stats. Under that statute, the provisional ballot will be counted if the registrant provides, by any means feasible, his or her driver's license number to the clerk of the municipality in which the registrant has voted, not later than 4:00 p.m., on the day following the election.
Previously, the Board's policy had been to process the election day registration of those registrants who failed to list their driver's license number on their registration application, if they had provided, on their registration form, a Wisconsin-issued Identification Card Number or the last four digits of their Social Security Number. Whether that policy complied with federal law had been in issue. Assuring that Wisconsin's practice complies with federal law and obtaining that assurance before election day, by the promulgation of this emergency rule, is found to be in the public interest.
Publication Date:
July 31, 2006
Effective Date:
July 31, 2006
Expiration Date:
December 28, 2006
Hearing Date: October 4, 2006
Financial Institutions - Banking
Rules were adopted revising ch. DFI—Bkg 77, relating to pawnbrokers.
Finding of Emergency
The effect of
2005 Wisconsin Act 158 is that pawnbrokers licensed by the department under s.
138.09, Stats., are exempt from s.
138.10, Stats., effective October 1, 2006. Under statutory procedures, however, a permanent rule regulating these pawnbrokers is unlikely to be effective until mid-2007, leaving the public without the safeguards of the permanent rule until that time. Thus the preservation of public safety and welfare necessitates enacting the safeguards of the emergency rule until a permanent rule is in effect.
Publication Date:
September 25, 2006
Effective Date:
October 1, 2006
Expiration Date:
February 28, 2007
Hearing Date: December 13, 2006
Insurance (2)
1.
Rules adopted creating
ss. Ins 9.25 (8) and 9.27 (4), Wis. Adm. Code, relating to preferred provider plan applicability dates and affecting small business plan limited exemption.
Finding of Emergency
The Commissioner of Insurance finds that an emergency exists and that the attached rule is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or welfare. Facts constituting the emergency are as follows:
The rule identifies a limited group of policies issued by licensed insurers offering preferred provider plans that do not comply with newly promulgated ch.
Ins 9, Wis. Adm. Code. In compliance with the request of the Joint Committee for the Review of Administrative Rules (JCRAR), this rule must be issued as an emergency rule and permanent rule. It is not possible to complete the permanent rule process prior to the effective date of the chapter, January 1, 2007, therefore this emergency rule is necessary.
The commissioner has filed a notice of scope for drafting the permanent rule corresponding to this emergency rule and will continue with the permanent rule making process. It is intended that one rule hearing can be held to comply with both the emergency rule and permanent rule requirements.
Publication Date:
August 31, 2006
Effective Date:
September 1, 2006
Expiration Date:
January 29, 2007
Hearing Date: December 12, 2006
2.
Rules adopted revising
s. Ins 6.77, relating to underinsured and uninsured motorist coverage in umbrella and commercial policies.
Finding of Emergency
The Commissioner of Insurance finds that an emergency exists and that the attached rule is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or welfare. Facts constituting the emergency are as follows:
These changes will modify the rule in light of the recent Supreme Court decisions,
Rebernick v American Family Mutual Ins Company, 2006 WI 27 and
Rocker v USAA Casualty Ins Company,
2006 WI 26. In Rebernick, the court held that s.
632.32 (4m), Stats, applies to personal umbrella policies. In Rocker, the court held that s.
632.32 (6) (a), Stats, applies to commercial general liability policies and commercial umbrella policies. These interpretations are inconsistent with current insurer practices and OCI's expectation of what would be covered in these types of policies.
Compliance with this interpretation would create significant, if not impossible compliance problems for insurers. Many insurers who write umbrella coverage do not write and are not even licensed to write automobile coverage. A second, difficult issue is that the limits for umbrella coverages are generally very high, $1,000,000. It is unclear how an umbrella policy would reconcile these limits with the underlying auto policy and underinsured motorist coverage. For this reason, OCI had previously by rule exempted umbrella policies from the similar requirements of the uninsured motorist coverages in s.
632.32, Stats. For similar reasons, the same revision is being made for commercial liability policies.
Publication Date:
September 29, 2006
Effective Date:
September 29, 2006
Expiration Date:
February 26, 2007
Hearing Date: December 11, 2006
Natural Resources
(Environmental Protection - Water Regulation, Chs.
NR 300—)
Rules adopted creating
ss. NR 328.31 to 328.36, relating to shore erosion control on rivers and streams.
Finding of Emergency
The emergency rule procedure, pursuant to s.
227.24, Stats., is necessary and justified in establishing rules to protect the public health, safety and welfare. The Wisconsin Legislature enacted
2003 Wisconsin Act 118 to streamline the regulatory process for activities in public trust waters. The state has an affirmative duty to administer the law in a manner consistent with the public trust responsibilities of the State of Wisconsin under Article IX, Section I of the Wisconsin Constitution.
Act 118 identifies certain activities that may be undertaken as exempt from a permit, or under a general permit. There are no statutory exemptions for shore protection on rivers and streams. Without emergency rules to create general permits, all shore protection projects on rivers and streams require an individual permit with an automatic 30-day public notice. The required 30-day comment period will unnecessarily delay projects that otherwise could go ahead with prescribed conditions established in a general permit. To carry out the intention of Act 118 to speed decision-making but not diminish the public trust in state waters, these emergency rules are required to establish general permits to be in effect for the 2006 construction season, with specific standards for shore erosion control structures on rivers and streams.
Publication Date:
May 5, 2006
Effective Date:
May 8, 2006
Expiration Date:
October 4, 2006
Hearing Date: June 13, 2006
Extension Through:
December 2, 2006
Natural Resources
(Environmental Protection - Hazardous Waste, Chs.
NR 600—)
Rules adopted revising
chs. NR 660 to 665, relating to hazardous waste management.
Exemption from Finding of emergency
The Department of Natural Resources finds that an emergency exists and the foregoing rules are necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety or welfare. A statement of facts constituting the emergency is:
In 2001, EPA proposed regulations to change the hazardous waste manifest requirements under the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) to eliminate all state-specific manifest requirements and to require electronic submittal of the manifests. The EPA's final rule was published March 4, 2005, with correcting amendments published on June 16, 2005, and the effective date is September 5, 2006. The new regulations require the use of standardized manifest forms in all states and require certification from EPA in order to print the manifest forms. (Final action on the e-manifest was postponed.) Unlike most RCRA rules, this federal regulation will take effect, nation-wide, on the effective date. The new federal requirements will apply in all states, including Wisconsin, but will not override or supersede Wisconsin's state-specific hazardous waste manifest requirements. Accordingly, the potential exists for conflicting or additional state manifest requirements to exist beginning on that date, and the advantages of a single, uniform nationwide rule will be lost.
The normal administrative rulemaking process cannot be completed in time to conform Wisconsin's hazardous waste manifest requirements to the new EPA manifest regulations by their September 5, 2006 effective date. However, failure to adopt the new federal requirements as state rules by this date may cause legal uncertainty and potential confusion among hazardous waste generators, transporters and treatment, storage and disposal facility operators, as well as state regulatory program staff. This could interfere with interstate commerce and the orderly functioning of government, imposing unnecessary regulatory costs on Wisconsin individuals and businesses and out-of-state companies doing business in Wisconsin, to the detriment of the public welfare. More importantly, the potential confusion caused by different state and federal manifest requirements could lead to improper transportation and management of hazardous wastes, resulting in a threat to public health or safety and the environment.
Publication Date:
September 2, 2006
Effective Date:
September 5, 2006
Expiration Date:
February 2, 2007
Hearing Date: September 26, 2006
Optometry Examining Board
A rule Was adopted creating
ch. Opt 8, relating to continuing education.
Exemption from finding of emergency
“(3) Continuing education rules. (b)
…Notwithstanding section
227.24 (1) (a),
(2) (b), and
(3) of the statutes, the optometry examining board is not required to provide evidence that promulgating a rule under this paragraph as an emergency rule is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or welfare and is not required to provide a finding of emergency for a rule promulgated under this paragraph."
Plain language analysis
Chapter
Opt 8 is being created to incorporate the continuing education requirements that optometrists must complete in order to renew their registrations. As a result of the changes made to ch.
449, Stats., by
2005 Wisconsin Act 297, all optometrist will now be required to complete 30 hours of continuing education. Previously, only optometrists who were certified to use diagnostic pharmaceutical agents (DPA) and therapeutic pharmaceutical agents (TPA) were required to complete continuing education course work.
Publication Date:
November 8, 2006
Effective Date:
November 8, 2006
Expiration Date:
April 7, 2007
Hearing Date: December 7, 2006
Regulation and Licensing
Rules adopted creating
chs. RL 160 to 168, relating to substance abuse professionals.
Exemption from finding of emergency
Section
9140 (1q) of
2005 Wisconsin Act 25 states in part: “Notwithstanding section
227.24 (1) (a),
(2) (b), and
(3) of the statutes, the department is not required to provide evidence that promulgating a rule under this subsection as an emergency rule is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or welfare and is not required to provide a finding of emergency for a rule promulgated under this subsection."
Plain language analysis
2005 Wisconsin Act 25 created Subchapter VII of chapter 440, Stats., Substance Abuse Counselors, Clinical Supervisors, and Prevention Specialists. This Act transferred the certification and regulation of Alcohol and other Drug Abuse (AODA) counselors from the Department of Health and Family Services to the Department of Regulation and Licensing, effective 2006. This proposed rule-making order creates rules relating to definitions, requirements for certification, supervised practice, scope of practice, education approval and professional liability insurance for substance abuse professionals.
Publication Date:
November 27, 2006
Effective Date:
December 1, 2006
Expiration Date:
April 30, 2007
Transportation (2)
1.
Rules adopted creating
ch. Trans 515, relating to contractual service procurement.
Exemption from finding of emergency
The Legislature, by Section
8 of
2005 Wis. Act 89, provides an exemption from a finding of emergency for the adoption of the rule.
Analysis Prepared by the Department of Transportation
The proposed rule requires a cost benefit analysis before procuring engineering or other specialized services under s.
84.01 (13), Stats., in excess of $25,000 when those services are normally performed by state employees. The required analysis includes a comparison between the costs of contracting out and performing the services with state employees. The analysis also considers other subjective factors such as timeliness, quality and technical expertise.
Publication Date:
July 1, 2006
Effective Date:
July 1, 2006
Hearing Date: August 8, 2006
2.
Rules adopted revising
ch. Trans 276, relating to allowing the operation of certain 2-vehicle combinations on certain highways without a permit.
Exemption from finding of emergency
The Legislature, by Section
7 of
2005 Wis. Act 363, provides an exemption from a finding of emergency for the adoption of the rule.
Plain language analysis
Section
348.07 (1), Stats., historically has limited vehicle lengths on Wisconsin highways to 65 feet. Section
348.07(2), Stats., allowed vehicles meeting the specifications of that subsection to operate without permits despite exceeding the 65-foot limit of subsection (1).
2005 Wis. Act 363 amended s.
348.07, Stats., and essentially made 75 feet the default permitted length on the state trunk highway system. Wisconsin's old default 65-foot overall length limit still applies on all local roads but only applies to state trunk highways that are designated as 65-foot restricted routes by the Department. This emergency rule making establishes a preliminary list of such “65-foot restricted routes."
