Milwaukee
Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, reasonable accommodations, including the provision of informational material in an alternative format, will be provided for qualified individuals with disabilities upon request. Please call Robert Eckdale at (608) 266-2856 with specific information on your request at least 10 days before the date of the scheduled hearing.
The hearing will be held in conjunction with the hearing for Natural Resources Board Order No. AM-19-08,
CR 08-102, relating to the application of reasonably available control technology emission limitations to sources of volatile organic compounds in ozone non-attainment counties and Natural Resources Board Order No. AM-24-08,
CR 08-104, relating to VOC emission controls for industrial wastewater collection and treatment operations. The order in which the proposals will be considered will be decided at the time of hearing.
Copies of Proposed Rules and Submission of Written Comments
The proposed rule and supporting documents, including the fiscal estimate may be viewed and downloaded and comments electronically submitted at the following Internet site:
http://adminrules.wisconsin.gov. (Search this Web site using the Natural Resources Board Order No. AM-19-08. Written comments on the proposed rule may be submitted via U.S. mail to Mr. Tom Karman, Bureau of Air Management, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707 or by e-mail to
Thomas.Karman@wisconsin.gov. Comments may be submitted until December 10, 2008. Written comments whether submitted electronically or by U.S. mail will have the same weight and effect as oral statements presented at the public hearings. If you do not have Internet access, a personal copy of the proposed rule and supporting documents, including the fiscal estimate may be obtained from Robert Eckdale, Bureau of Air Management, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707 or by calling (608) 266-2856.
Analysis Prepared by Department of Natural Resources
Statutes interpreted
Statutory authority
Related statute or rule
The current provisions of ch.
NR 428 established nitrogen oxide emission limits for new and existing facilities which are located in ozone nonattainment counties. The primary intent of these provisions is to fulfill Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for demonstrating rate-of-progress towards attaining the 1-hour ozone standard and establishment of a Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) program for major sources of nitrogen oxide emissions (NO
x) in counties designated as nonattainment under the 8-hour ozone standard. Modifications are proposed to existing portions of ch.
NR 428.
Plain language analysis
The proposed revisions relate to issues for State Implementation Plan approvability and miscellaneous implementation issues. The State Implementation Plan developed under s.
285.11 (6), Stats., is revised.
The proposed revisions address two areas: 1) required modifications to the NOx RACT program to meet minimum criteria for conditional Federal approval of the program into the State Implementation Plan (SIP); and 2) revisions identified by the department and stakeholders during implementation which clarify and facilitate implementation of requirements within ch.
NR 428.
Revisions for SIP approval
As stated in s.
NR 428.20, NO
x RACT requirements are applicable to facilities which have potential NO
x emissions equal to or greater than 100 tons per year. These facilities under the Clean Air Act are known as major sources. In proposing federal approval, the US EPA requires that the term "potential emissions", used in identifying major sources, be defined as the amount of NO
x which can be theoretically emitted from emissions units at the facility on an uncontrolled basis over the year. These total potential emissions may consider a restriction on operational capacity or hours, if those restrictions are federally enforceable.
To address EPA's concerns, the proposed rules incorporate a definition of "maximum theoretical emissions" in identifying which sources are subject to NO
x RACT requirements. This approach is consistent with the use of this term in s.
NR 419.02 (11) for identifying the applicability of the state's VOC RACT requirements.
Revisions for Clarifications and Implementation
There are a number of miscellaneous revisions proposed in the rule package consistent with the intent of the existing rules. These revisions do not change the emission limitations or the sources subject to the emission limitations. The revisions are focused to implementation issues and clarification of requirements. These revisions include:
•
The existing NOx RACT rule identifies electric utility owned units as those subject to the federal CAIR rule. The proposed rule revision amends these provisions to account for the vacatur of the CAIR rule.
•
The existing NOx RACT rule allows sources to apply for an alternative emission limit or compliance schedule. However, the applications were due by May 1, 2008 even though in some cases requirements are not effective until 2013. The rule revision allows additional time for sources to submit an application for an alternative requirement.
•
The existing NOx RACT rule prohibits a source with an approved alternative emission limit or compliance schedule from participating in emissions averaging at any time. The rule revision only prohibits participation in the emissions averaging program for purposes of demonstrating compliance with an alternative emission limit of compliance schedule.
•
The new source NO
x limits in s.
NR 428.04 are applicable to units that undergo modification. The proposed revision modifies the existing rule to avoid triggering
new source NO
x limits when the modification is made solely to comply with existing NO
x control requirements.
•
Several revisions allow sources subject to monitoring and reporting requirements under different provisions in ch.
NR 428 to satisfy all requirements by meeting one set of monitoring and reporting requirements. These revisions also allow certain sources to demonstrate compliance through periodic stack testing instead of more costly continuous emissions monitoring.
•
A number of miscellaneous revisions are proposed to clarify monitoring requirements and deadlines.
•
The NO
x limits in s.
NR 428.05, established prior to the RACT program, are intended to apply to sources existing prior to February 1, 2001 with no lapse in applicability unless the source becomes subject to the new source limits in s.
NR 428.04 due to a major modification. The applicability statement in s.
NR 428.05 (1) is being revised to remove the reference to "modified" sources to clarify this intent.
Comparison with federal regulations
The NOx emission requirements of NR 428 are in place to fulfill federal ozone requirements in non-attainment areas for demonstrating rate-of-progress towards meeting 1 hour ozone attainment and for implementing a Reasonably Available Control Technology program for major sources of NOx emissions (NOx RACT). Since there are no direct federal emission limitations, states must meet these requirements through development of control requirements and adoption of them into the State Implementation Plan. Many states have NOx emission control programs in place or are in the process of evaluating and developing necessary rules to meet federal ozone non-attainment requirements.
EPA does regulate NO
x emissions for similar sources and to similar control levels as those contained in ch.
NR 428. These EPA regulations include new source performance standards, new source review and prevention of significant deterioration requirements, federal engine standards, the Acid Rain program, the NO
x State SIP Call and various source specific consent decrees.
Comparison with similar rules in adjacent states
The need to implement NO
x emission control requirements in adjacent states differ based on ozone non-attainment designations and the resulting applicable federal requirements. Illinois is in the process of developing NO
x RACT rules. Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan are evaluating their applicable federal requirements based on attainment status. And Iowa and Minnesota currently do not have to respond to federal requirements for reduction in NO
x emissions. As in the case of ch.
NR 428, all rules developed by these states for ozone related purposes must undergo federal approval for inclusion into their State Implementation Plan.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
Several proposed revisions are needed to address EPA's concern for approving the RACT rules into the State Implementation Plan Other proposed revisions address implementation issues and the need for clarifications by the Department staff and stakeholders.
Small Business Impact
Analysis and supporting documents used to determine the effect on small business
The existing rule requirements are applicable to large industrial or electric generation sources. Based on the limited nature of the proposed changes to the existing rule there is no impact anticipated to small businesses.
Small business regulatory coordinator
Environmental Impact
The Department has made a preliminary determination that this action does not involve significant adverse environmental effects and does not need an environmental analysis under ch.
NR 150, Wis. Adm. Code. However, based on the comments received, the Department may prepare an environmental analysis before proceeding with the proposal. This environmental review document would summarize the Department's consideration of the impacts of the proposal and reasonable alternatives.
Fiscal Estimate
Assumptions
The proposed revisions to ch.
NR 428 address criteria for federal approval of the Reasonably Available Control (RACT) Program. Specifically, EPA requires incorporating into rule the basis for identifying major sources subject to the RACT program as those sources with maximum theoretical emissions equal to or greater than 100 tons per year of NOx. Incorporating this concept is not anticipated to change the emissions units subject to NOx emission limitations as the currently adopted RACT program and applicability of emission limitations therein were originally developed on the basis of maximum theoretical emissions.
In general other revisions proposed to ch.
NR 428 affect corrections and address implementation issues which also do not change the affected units and intended emission reductions. One proposed revision, however, does address whether an emissions unit is subject to an existing or new source emission limitation under ch.
NR 428. Currently, an emissions unit through installation of control equipment to meet a NOx emission limitation may trigger major modification levels and applicability of a more stringent new source NOx emission limitation. The ch.
NR 428 rules established emission limitations by source category with no intent of triggering a more stringent emission limit in meeting the original applicable limit. Therefore, this specific modification is consistent with the original intent and emission reductions and cost evaluated in developing the currently adopted rules.
Estimate
There is no anticipated fiscal impact from these rule revisions. Since the rule revisions proposed in Board Order AM-20-08 do not change the overall NOx emission requirements or the emissions units anticipated to be subject to emission limitations there is no change anticipated due to these rule revisions versus the original fiscal estimates supporting adoption of current ch.
NR 428 requirements.
State government fiscal effect
None
Local government fiscal effect
None
Agency Contact Person
Thomas Karman
Phone: (608) 264-8856
Fax: (608) 267-0560
Notice of Hearing
Regulation and Licensing
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to authority vested in the Department of Regulation and Licensing in ss.
227.11 (2) and
460.04 (2), Stats.,
2007 Wisconsin Act 104, the Department of Regulation and Licensing will hold a public hearing on an order adopting emergency rules to create s.
RL 91.01 (3) (k), relating to training and proficiency in the use of automated external defibrillators for certification as a massage therapist or bodyworker.
Hearing Information
Date: November 26, 2008
Time: 9:00 A.M.
Location: 1400 East Washington Avenue
(Enter at 55 North Dickinson Street)
Room 121A
Madison, Wisconsin
Submission of Written Comments
Interested persons are invited to present information at the hearing. Persons appearing may make an oral presentation but are urged to submit facts, opinions and argument in writing as well. Facts, opinions and argument may also be submitted in writing without a personal appearance by mail addressed to Pamela Haack, Department of Regulation and Licensing, Office of Legal Counsel, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 152, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708-8935, or by email to
pamela.haack@drl.state.wi.us. Written comments must be received by December 1, 2008, to be included in the record of rule-making proceedings.
Analysis Prepared by the Department of Regulation and Licensing
Statutes interpreted
Statutory authority
Explanation of agency authority
2007 Wisconsin Act 104 amends ch.
460, Stats., which regulates the profession of massage therapy and bodywork. The effect of the Act requires the Department of Regulation and Licensing to amend administrative rules for application for certification as a massage therapist or bodyworker. As required by
2007 Wisconsin Act 104, the rule creates the requirement for applicants to be proficient in the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) through the completion of an approved instruction program prior to initial certification.
Related statutes or rules
Plain language analysis
The massage therapy and bodywork statutes and administrative rules regarding application for certification, reciprocal certification and renewal do not have a requirement for training and proficiency in the use of an AED. This rule implements a provision of
2007 Wisconsin Act 104, requiring applicants for a credential to be proficient in the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) through the completion of an approved instruction program prior to initial certification.
SECTION 1 creates a requirement for applicants for a credential to be proficient in the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) through the completion of an approved instruction program prior to initial certification.
Comparison with federal regulations
There is no existing or proposed federal regulation that is intended to address the activities to be regulated by the rule.
Comparison with rules in adjacent states
Minnesota:
Minnesota does not have regulations or state requirements for massage therapy.
Michigan:
Michigan does not have regulations or state requirements for massage therapy.
Iowa:
