Statement of Scope
Radiography Examining Board
Rule No.:
Chapter RAD 1
Relating to:
Definition of licensed independent practitioner
Rule Type:
Permanent
1. Finding/nature of emergency (Emergency Rule only):
N/A
2. Detailed description of the objective of the proposed rule:
The objective of the proposed rule is to reflect the provisions of 2015 Wisconsin Act 375, which grants qualified physical therapists the authority to order X-rays.
3. Description of the existing policies relevant to the rule, new policies proposed to be included in the rule, and an analysis of policy alternatives:
Current rules provide the scope of practice for radiographers involves the production of images for the interpretation by, or at the request of, a licensed independent practitioner. “Licensed independent practitioner” as defined in current rules does not include a physical therapist. The proposed rule would amend the definition of “licensed independent practitioner” to include a physical therapist who is licensed under s. 448.53, Stats., and satisfies one of the qualifications under s. 448.56 (7) (a), Stats.
If the rules are not updated, they will not reflect the provisions of 2015 Wisconsin Act 375.
4. Detailed explanation of statutory authority for the rule (including the statutory citation and language):
Section 15.08 (5) (b), Stats., provides examining boards, “shall promulgate rules for its own guidance and for the guidance of the trade or profession to which it pertains. . .”
Section 227.11 (2) (a), Stats., sets forth the parameters of an agency’s rule-making authority, stating an agency, “may promulgate rules interpreting provisions of any statute enforced or administered by the agency. . .but a rule is not valid if the rule exceeds the bounds of correct interpretation.”
5. Estimate of amount of time that state employees will spend developing the rule and of other resources necessary to develop the rule:
30 hours
6. List with description of all entities that may be affected by the proposed rule:
Licensed radiographers and limited X-ray machine operator permit holders.
7. Summary and preliminary comparison with any existing or proposed federal regulation that is intended to address the activities to be regulated by the proposed rule:
None.
8. Anticipated economic impact of implementing the rule (note if the rule is likely to have a significant economic impact on small businesses):
The proposed rule will have minimal to no economic impact on small businesses and the state’s economy as a whole.
Contact Person: Dale Kleven, (608) 261-4472, Dale2.Kleven@wisconsin.gov
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.