The proposed updates also consolidate references to federal rules and policies to improve readability and reduce future rulemaking efforts to keep specific citations current. In addition, this rulemaking addresses non-substantive errors and provisions that may be perceived as internally inconsistent in the current rule.
Summary of, and Comparison with, Existing or Proposed Federal Statutes and Regulations: WEPA, as implemented through ch. Trans 400, applies to all major Department actions. In order to ensure the availability of federal funds and other federal approvals, Department actions must also follow the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Like WEPA, NEPA imposes a broad mandate to consider environmental impacts of major actions, but does not prescribe many procedural specifics. As such, various federal agencies have promulgated rules and guidance that establish federal NEPA procedural requirements. Most relevant for the department, these agencies include the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). The President’s Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) also promulgates general NEPA regulations, found at 40 CFR pts. 1500 to 1508. The CEQ’s regulations apply to all federal agency actions, such as approving the use of federal funds on state-administered transportation projects.
The most substantive regulations that impact Department highway project development are the regulations found at 23 CFR 771.101 to 771.139 (FHWA’s NEPA regulations). Although promulgated under the FHWA heading, these regulations apply to all U.S. DOT highway and public transportation projects. FHWA’s NEPA regulations are also intended to incorporate the general CEQ regulations.
Chapter Trans 400 was written to closely parallel FHWA’s NEPA regulations to ensure department actions meet both state and federal requirements. Over the years, both FHWA’s NEPA regulations and ch. Trans 400 have been updated to incorporate new policies or new directives from Congress. Recently, Congress approved significant changes to U.S. DOT’s environmental review process as part of the most recent federal surface transportation funding bill, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), P.L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405-986 (2012). These changes are intended to streamline the environmental review process for transportation projects by reducing required processes, accelerating project delivery and encouraging innovative project development approaches.
These changes to the NEPA regulations greatly benefit many projects using federal funds or otherwise requiring federal approval, but are not reflected in Wisconsin’s Trans 400 WEPA regulations. This inconsistency between federal and State regulations results in additional cost and time for many State projects being evaluated under WEPA.
Comparison with Rules in Adjacent States: Neighboring states either follow federal NEPA regulations when seeking federal approval and/or funding, or have adopted potentially more restrictive environmental regulations as a matter of that state’s preferred policy. Illinois, Iowa, and Michigan do not have state-level environmental policy acts like WEPA. Minnesota does have a state-level environmental policy act like WEPA, found at Minn. Stat. ss. 116D.01 to 116D.06. Unlike Wisconsin’s ch. Trans 400, Minnesota’s implementing rules apply generally to all state agencies. Minnesota’s rules are found at Minn. Admin. R. ch. 4410.
The Illinois DOT’s project development guidance applicable to environmental documents is available here (accessed Sep. 15, 2016): http://www.idot.illinois.gov/assets/uploads/files/doing-business/manuals-split/design-and-environment/bde-manual/Chapter%2022%20General%20Environmental%20Procedures.pdf.
  The Iowa DOT’s environmental documentation overview is available here (accessed Sep. 15, 2016): http://www.iowadot.gov/ole/OLESite/OLEStart.html.
  The Michigan DOT’s EIS guidance is available here (accessed Sep. 15, 2016):
  The Minnesota DOT also has policy-level guidance for environmental documentation, available here (accessed Sep. 15, 2016): http://www.dot.state.mn.us/planning/hpdp/.
  The President’s Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) has compiled a list of other states with NEPA-like state environmental policy acts, available at:
Summary of the Factual Data and Analytical Methodologies: By better aligning Trans 400 with newly enacted federal laws, the Department and local transportation authorities will be able to capture the streamlining and efficiencies intended with those federal law changes. The Department expects reduced review time and process, with benefits that will vary by each agency action, depending on the circumstances of that action and the extent to which new streamlined procedures apply.
Analysis Regarding Rule’s Effect on Small Businesses: Because this rule does not add any regulatory requirements for small businesses, the proposed rule updates will not have an economic impact on small businesses under s. 227.24(3m), Stats.
Effect on small business: The Department anticipates no effect on small businesses as a result of this rule. The agency contact person listed below is also the small business regulatory coordinator for this proposed rule. This proposed rule, fiscal estimate, and other related documents may be viewed at https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/code.
Agency Contact Person:
Daniel Scudder
State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Division of Transportation Systems Development
4802 Sheboygan Avenue Room 451
Madison, Wisconsin 53707
Phone Number: 608-267-3615
Email address: dan.scudder@dot.wi.gov
Place Where Comments Should Be Submitted and Deadline: Comments may be submitted to the agency contact person listed above or through the Legislature’s Administrative Rules website http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/code until the deadline given in the forthcoming notice of public hearing.
TEXT OF PERMANENT RULE
SECTION 1. Trans 400.03 (note) is created to read:
Trans 400.03 Applicability. (note) The Wisconsin Environmental Policy Act (WEPA), s. 1.11 of the statutes, requires environmental documentation for major department actions that significantly affect the quality of the human environment. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and its implementing regulations similarly require environmental documentation for major federal actions, such as a federal agency approving the use of federal funds or issuing a permit for department actions. For department actions that require federal approval, the department prepares the required environmental documentation. Where NEPA applies to a department action, WEPA typically also applies. The intent of this chapter is to implement WEPA regulations that are consistent with NEPA and its implementing regulations for all department actions to which these laws apply.
SECTION 2. Trans 400.04 (3) (note) is created to read:
Trans 400.04 (3) (note) The specific versions of federal regulations and federal agency orders as referenced throughout this chapter are adopted in s. Trans 400.05 and are reproduced at appendix 1 to this chapter.
SECTION 3. Trans 400.04 (3) is amended to read:
Trans 400.04 (3) "Categorical exclusion" means an action which meets the definition of the term in the guidelines published by the United States council on environmental quality as a federal rule in 40 CFR 1508.4, July 1, 1990, and the rule published jointly by the federal highway administration and urban mass transit administration of the United States department of transportation and in 23 CFR 771.117, April 1, 1991, or the procedures published by 23 CFR 771.118, or chapter 6 of order 5050.4B of the federal aviation administration of the United States department of transportation as order 5050.4A, chapter 3, paragraph 23, October 8, 1985, or other actions of the department for which neither an EA, EIS nor other environmental documentation is required by this rule.
SECTION 4. Trans 400.04 (4) is amended to read:
Trans 400.04 (4) "Cooperating agency" means any Native American tribe, or any local, state, or federal agency, other than the lead or transportation agency, which has jurisdiction by law over the proposed action or which has special expertise with respect to any relevant environmental effect generated by the proposed action or alternative.
SECTION 5. Trans 400.04 (5) is amended to read:
Trans 400.04 (5) "Department" means the Wisconsin department of transportation or a local agency when acting under the direction of the department.
SECTION 6. Trans 400.04 (10) is amended to read:
Trans 400.04 (10) "ER" or "environmental report" means a brief document used internally by the department to demonstrate a proposed action fits the criteria or conditions for approval as a categorical exclusion in 23 CFR 771.117 (d), April 1,1991, or has met the review criteria of paragraph 23.a. of chapter 3 of federal aviation administration order 5050.4A of October 8, 1985, under s. Trans 400.08 (1) (d) or has been properly coordinated with other agencies having jurisdiction by law over specific activities.
SECTION 7. Trans 400.04 (15) is repealed.
SECTION 8. Trans 400.04 (22m) is created to read:
Trans 400.04 (22m) "Participating agency" means any Native American tribe or any local, state, or federal agency, other than the lead agency, with an interest in the project. "Participating agency" includes cooperating agencies but does not include nongovernmental organizations or other private entities.
SECTION 9. Trans 400.04 (24) is amended to read:
Trans 400.04 (24) "Reevaluation" means the review of a DEIS or FEIS an approved draft or final environmental document to assess whether there have been significant changes in the proposed action, the affected human environment, the anticipated environmental impacts, or the proposed mitigation measures.
SECTION 10. Trans 400.05 of the administrative code is amended to read:
Trans 400.05 Federal regulations adopted. Federal regulations, 23 CFR 21771.115, 771.117, 771.119(a) and 771.123(a), April 1, 1998, adopted jointly by the federal highway administration and urban mass transit administration of the United States department of transportation, and its federal aviation administration order 5050.4A, chapter 3, paragraphs 20, 21, 22, and 23, October 8, 1985, pursuant to 40 CFR 1508.4, July 1, 1998, as approved by the United States council on environmental quality, and 40 CFR 1506.8 and 1508.17 References throughout this chapter to federal regulations and orders are to the following specific versions, which are hereby adopted by the department and are attached hereto in appendix 1: 23 CFR ss. 771.115, 771.117, and 771.118, April 1, 2015; 40 CFR ss. 1500.4, 1500.5, 1506.8, and 1508.4, July l, 2015; 49 CFR 266.19, October 1, 2014; and the United States department of transportation federal aviation administration order 5050.4B, chapters 6, 7, and 9, April 28, 2006.
SECTION 11. Trans 400.05 (note) is repealed.
SECTION 12. Trans 400.06 (5) is amended to read:
Trans 400.06 (5) Measures necessary to avoid, minimize and to mitigate for the mitigation of adverse environmental impacts of proposed actions shall be part of the development and evaluation of alternatives.
SECTION 13. Trans 400.06 (6) is amended to read:
Trans 400.06 (6) The department shall implement procedures to make the WEPA process more useful to decision makers and the public by reducing paperwork and reducing delay utilizing the means for achieving these goals as specified in the rules of the United States council on environmental quality at 40 CFR 1500.4 and 1500.5, July 1, 1990, that which are attached hereto in appendix 1. Environmental documents shall be concise, clear, and to the point and emphasize real environmental issues and alternatives.
SECTION 14. Trans 400.07 (2) (intro.) is amended to read:
Trans 400.07 (2) (intro.) Except for actions designated CE actions which do not require any environmental documentation, actions Actions and procedures designated EIS, EA or ER shall require the following environmental documentation:
SECTION 15. Trans 400.07 (2) (b) 1. is amended to read:
Trans 400.07 (2) (b) 1. An EA shall be prepared for those project actions for which the significance of the environmental impact is not clearly established. If it is concluded from the analysis in the EA that the action is a major action, an EIS shall be prepared. If it is concluded from the analysis in the EA that the action is not a major action, the EA shall be revised to constitute a FONSI, and the FONSI shall serve as the environmental document. The FONSI shall be prepared only after(See PDF for image) availability of the EA for public, and cooperating and participating agency, review and comment and the incorporation of any appropriate revisions resulting from the public involvement process. Where a permit will be required or other agency coordination is specifically required by law, the FONSI may serve as the vehicle for such permit or coordinating agency approval.
SECTION 16. Trans 400.07 (2) (c) (intro.) is amended to read:
Trans 400.07 (2) (c) (intro.) ER. An ER is a procedure followed for an action that is likely to fit the criteria for a conditional categorical exclusion in 23 CFR 771.117 (d), April 1, 1998 23 CFR 771.118 (d), or federal aviation administration order 5050.4A, chapter 3, paragraph 23.a., October 8, 1985, 5050.4B, chapter 6, paragraph 605, or otherwise requires coordination with or concurrence of another agency. An environmental report, or ER, shall be prepared to demonstrate whether the proposed action does fit the criteria or conditions for approval as a categorical exclusion and has been properly coordinated with other agencies having jurisdiction by law over specific activities. The ER shall serve as the department’s record of coordination with other agencies having jurisdiction over specific activities, including the following activities:
SECTION 17. Trans 400.08 (1) (a) (intro.) is amended to read:
Trans 400.08 (1) (a) EIS − Environmental Impact Statement. The federal highway administration regulations at 23 CFR 771.115(a) April 1, 1998, federal aviation administration order 5050.4A, chapter 3, paragraph 21, October 8, 1985, identify types of federally funded actions which require the preparation of an environmental impact statement. The following are examples of department major actions that normally require the preparation of an environmental impact statement:
SECTION 18. Trans 400.08 (1) (a) (note) is repealed.
SECTION 19. Trans 400.08 (1) (a) 1. c. is amended to read:
Trans 400.08 (1) (a) 1. c. New construction Construction or extension of a fixed rail transit facilities including facility, such as rapid rail, light rail, commuter rail, and automated guideway transit or bus rapid transit that will not be located within an existing transportation right−of−way.
SECTION 20. Trans 400.08 (1) (a) 2. a. is amended to read:
Trans 400.08 (1) (a) 2. a. First time Unconditionally approving or funding the first airport layout plan approval or airport location approval for a new commercial service airport located in a standard metropolitan statistical area.
SECTION 21. Trans 400.08 (1) (a) 2. b. is amended to read:
Trans 400.08 (1) (a) 2. b. Federal financial participation in, or airport layout plan approval of, Unconditionally approving or funding a new runway capable of handling to accommodate air carrier aircraft at a commercial service airport located in a standard metropolitan statistical area.
SECTION 22. Trans 400.08 (1) (a) 3. (note) is amended to read:
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.