State of Wisconsin
Office of the Secretary of State
Madison
To Whom It May Concern:
Acts, Joint Resolutions and Resolutions deposited in this office have been numbered and published as follows:
Assembly Bill No. Act Number
Publication Date
583 (partial veto)116January 3, 1996
607117January 3, 1996
Sincerely,
Douglas La Follette
Secretary of State
__________________
State of Wisconsin
Joint Legislative Council
Madison
December 29, 1995
Mr. Charles Sanders
Assembly Chief Clerk
1 East Main Street, Suite 402
Madison, WI 53702
Dear Charlie:
I am pleased to transmit to you the following report to the 1995 Legislature on legislation introduced by the Joint Legislative Council:
RL 95-9 Legislation on School Health Services
(1995 Senate Bill 469)
I would appreciate your including this letter in the Journal for the information of the membership. Additional copies of this report are available, on request, in the Legislative Council Staff offices, One East Main, Suite 401.
Sincerely,
David J. Stute
Director
__________________
Referral of agency reports
State of Wisconsin
Department of Public Instruction
Madison
December 18, 1995
To the Honorable, the Legislature:
The department is pleased to submit the 1995 Annual Report on the Status of Bilingual-Bicultural Education programs, as required under s.
115.996, Wisconsin Statutes.
The report provides a review of the state's administration and funding of bilingual education in Wisconsin and factors contributing to program expansion and the resulting continuously lower annual reimbursement rates for school districts. The number of pupils served from minority languages, the locations of the state-funded programs during the 1995 fiscal year (July 1, 1994, through June 30, 1995), and staff-related data are included in the report to inform those with responsibilities for ensuring the continued success of bilingual education programs in Wisconsin. I am confident that you will find the report informational, useful and of concern given the rising numbers of pupils to be served absent a corresponding increase in fiscal support by the state.
A713
If you have questions on any aspect of this report, please contact Dr. William J. Erpenbach, director, divisionwide planning and process, 267-1072. He will be happy to discuss these with you at your convenience.
Sincerely,
John T. Benson
State Superintendent
Referred to committee on Education.
__________________
Agency Reports
State of Wisconsin
Legislative Audit Bureau
Madison
December 19, 1995
To the Honorable, the Legislature:
We have completed an evaluation of methods for allocating district attorney positions, as requested be the Joint Legislative Audit Committee. District attorney positions were transferred from county to state employment in 1990.
Currently, there are 360.5 authorized full-time equivalent state prosecutor positions. State expenditures for prosecutorial responsibilities totaled $28.4 million in fiscal year 1994-95. The current distribution of district attorney positions is largely a result of county staffing decisions made before the transfer to state employment. Although there has been an 8.6 percent increase in positions since 1990, the majority of requests have been denied, in part because of insufficient information about district attorney workload and questions concerning the accuracy of available information in portraying actual workload.
We include a number of recommendations to make the existing caseload measures more accurate by including more types of cases in the measure, recognizing the effect of homicides on case weights, and improving reporting to make data more comparable among counties. Once the caseload measure is made more accurate, it could be used to compare actual workload against a standard in order to evaluate position increase requests. To do so, a workload goal or standard would need to be established, similar to workload standards established for circuit court judges.
We also note that under current statutes, legislative control over the authorization of additional prosecutor positions can be bypassed by appointment and local funding of certain special prosecutor positions. If the Legislature wishes to restrict such activity in order to maintain property tax relief efforts by ensuring that only state funds are used for prosecutors, statutes governing the appointment and funding of public service special prosecutors need to be modified.
We appreciate the courtesy and cooperation extended to us by State Prosecutors Office staff, district attorneys, and court staff throughout the state. The response of the State Prosecutors Office is Appendix V.
Respectfully submitted,
Dale Cattanach
State Auditor
__________________
State of Wisconsin
Legislative Audit Bureau
Madison
December 21, 1995
To the Honorable, the Legislature:
We have completed an audit of the Office of the State Treasurer, covering the period July 1, 1994 to June 30, 1995, as part of our audit of the State's comprehensive financial statements for fiscal year 1994-95 and to fulfill our audit responsibilities under s.
13.94, Wis. Stats.
A principal responsibility of the Office is to collect the State's portion of various fees, fines, forfeitures, assessments, taxes, and other remittances due from counties and other municipalities, including cities, villages, and towns. We found that while the Office has taken reasonable steps to ensure it receives monthly and quarterly collections reports from the counties, effective procedures are not in place to ensure the receipt of all payments due. For example, Milwaukee County has not remitted the State's share of required marriage licenses fees for at least five years; its unremitted marriage license fees estimated to total $1 million in general purpose revenue. Milwaukee County has, however, recently remitted $24,000 in general program revenue for past-due dog license fees as a result of our audit work.
We also found that Racine and Lafayette counties have not remitted either marriage or dog license fees that are at least one year past due and may include an additional $80,000 in general purpose and program revenues, and that Marathon County's remittance of $21,900 in marriage license fees, which the Office should have recorded as general purpose revenue, was instead mistakenly recorded as program revenue from dog license fees. The recording error has since been corrected. Our report recommends steps by which the Office can ensure receipt of appropriate payments from counties and municipalities.
The Office of the State Treasurer also administers the Unclaimed Property program, through which it attempts to return cash, investment securities, and other property left with banks and insurance companies to the rightful owners. In prior audit reports, we discussed the needs for improving security over unclaimed property by limiting access to computer records and establishing additional verification procedures. The Office has since addressed most of our concerns, although it still needs to reconcile its unclaimed property records to those maintained on the State's central accounting system.
We appreciate the courtesy and cooperation extended to us by the Office's staff during the audit. The State Treasurer's response is the appendix.
Respectfully submitted,
Dale Cattanach
State Auditor
