The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 912 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
Representative Jensen asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill
912 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Assembly Bill 912 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
Motion carried.
Representative Jensen asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill
912 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
Assembly Bill 919
Relating to: the duration of the requirement to maintain proof of financial responsibility for long-term care of a mining waste facility.
Representative Jensen asked unanimous consent that Assembly Bill 919 be placed after Assembly Bill 996 on the calendar of Monday, March 25. Granted.
Assembly Bill 927
Relating to: interdepartmental coordination of certain environmental protection measures applicable to transportation projects.
The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 927 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
Representative Jensen asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill
927 be given a third reading.
Representative Black objected.
Assembly Bill 966
Relating to: facilities for the production, transmission or distribution of gas.
The question was: Shall Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 966 be adopted?
The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 966 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
Representative Jensen asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill
966 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Assembly Bill 966 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed?
Motion carried.
Representative Jensen asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill
966 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
Assembly Bill 919
Relating to: the duration of the requirement to maintain proof of financial responsibility for long-term care of a mining waste facility.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 919 be adopted?
Motion carried.
Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 919 offered by Representative Black.
__________________
Representative Ourada rose to the point of order that Assembly amendment 2 to
Assembly Bill 919 was not germane under Assembly Rule
54(3)(f).
Representative Jensen asked unanimous consent that Assembly Bill 919 be placed at the foot of calendar of Monday, March 25. Granted.
Senate Bill 184
Relating to: the requirements for licensure as a certified public accountant and granting rule-making authority.
Representative Hanson moved that Senate Bill 184 be referred to the joint committee on Finance
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 184 be referred to the joint committee on Finance?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Baldus, Baldwin, Baumgart, Black, Bock, Dueholm, Gronemus, Grothman, Hanson, Huber, Hubler, Krug, Linton, Murat, Notestein, Reynolds, Schneider, Travis, Wood, L. Young and R. Young - 21.
Noes - Representatives Ainsworth, Albers, Bell, Boyle, Brancel, Brandemuehl, Carpenter, Coggs, Coleman, Cullen, Dobyns, Duff, Foti, Freese, Gard, Goetsch, Green, Gunderson, Hahn, Handrick, Harsdorf, Hasenohrl, Hoven, Huebsch, Hutchison, Jensen, Johnsrud, Kaufert, Kelso, Klusman, Kreibich, Kreuser, Krusick, Kunicki, La Fave, Ladwig, F. Lasee, Lazich, Lehman, Lorge, Meyer, Morris-Tatum, Musser, Nass, Olsen, Ott, Otte, Ourada, Owens, Plache, Plombon, Porter, R. Potter, Powers, Riley, Robson, Rutkowski, Ryba, Schneiders, Seratti, Silbaugh, Skindrud, Springer, Turner, Underheim, Urban, Vander Loop, Vrakas, Walker, Ward, Wasserman, Wilder, Wirch, Ziegelbauer, Zukowski and Speaker Prosser - 76.
Absent or not voting - Representative Williams - 1.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 184 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative Klusman asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 184 be given a third reading.
Representative Krug objected.
Representative Klusman moved that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill 184 be given a third reading.
The question was: Shall the rules be suspended and Senate Bill 184 be given a third reading?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Ainsworth, Albers, Bell, Bock, Brancel, Brandemuehl, Coggs, Coleman, Dobyns, Duff, Foti, Freese, Gard, Goetsch, Green, Grothman, Gunderson, Hahn, Handrick, Hanson, Hasenohrl, Hoven, Huebsch, Hutchison, Jensen, Johnsrud, Kaufert, Kelso, Klusman, Kreibich, Krug, Krusick, La Fave, Ladwig, F. Lasee, Lazich, Lehman, Lorge, Murat, Musser, Nass, Olsen, Ott, Otte, Ourada, Owens, Plache, Plombon, Porter, R. Potter, Powers, Reynolds, Riley, Robson, Rutkowski, Schneider, Schneiders, Seratti, Silbaugh, Skindrud, Turner, Underheim, Urban, Vander Loop, Vrakas, Walker, Ward, Wasserman, Wilder, Williams, Wirch, Ziegelbauer, Zukowski and Speaker Prosser - 74.
Noes - Representatives Baldus, Baldwin, Baumgart, Black, Boyle, Carpenter, Cullen, Dueholm, Gronemus, Harsdorf, Huber, Hubler, Kreuser, Kunicki, Linton, Meyer, Morris-Tatum, Notestein, Ryba, Springer, Travis, Wood, L. Young and R. Young - 24.
Absent or not voting - None.
Motion carried.
Representative Morris-Tatum asked unanimous consent to be recorded as voting "Aye" on the previous question. Granted.
Representative Potter asked unanimous consent to be recorded as voting "No" on the previous question. Granted.
Representative Williams asked unanimous consent to be recorded as voting "No" on the previous question. Granted.
Representative Bock asked unanimous consent to be recorded as voting "No" on the previous question. Granted.
Representative Wirch asked unanimous consent to be recorded as voting "No" on the previous question. Granted.
A1028
The question was: Senate Bill 184 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
Representative Jensen asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
184 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
Senate Bill 436
Relating to: repealing, consolidating, renumbering, amending and revising various provisions of the statutes for the purpose of correcting errors, supplying omissions, correcting and clarifying references, eliminating defects, anachronisms, conflicts, ambiguities and obsolete provisions, deleting, replacing or otherwise modifying language which discriminates on the basis of sex, reconciling conflicts and repelling unintended repeals (Revisor's Correction Bill).
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 436 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative Jensen asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
436 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 436 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
Representative Jensen asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
436 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
Senate Bill 441
Relating to: inspection of certain snowmobile trails by the department of natural resources.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 441 be ordered to a third reading?
Motion carried.
Representative Jensen asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
441 be given a third reading. Granted.
The question was: Senate Bill 441 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in?
Motion carried.
Representative Jensen asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Senate Bill
441 be immediately messaged to the Senate. Granted.
Senate Bill 478
Relating to: limitation of civil liability related to equine activities.
Representative Rutkowski withdrew his motion to revive Assembly amendment 3 to Senate Bill 478.
Assembly amendment 4 to Senate Bill 478 offered by Representatives Skindrud, Green and Jensen.
Representative Skindrud asked unanimous consent that Assembly amendment 4 to Senate Bill 478 be withdrawn and returned to the author. Granted.
Assembly amendment 5 to Senate Bill 478 offered by Representatives Skindrud, Green and Jensen.
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 5 to Senate Bill 478 offered by Representatives Rutkowski, Skindrud and Green.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 5 to Senate Bill 478 be adopted?
Motion carried.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 5 to Senate Bill 478 be adopted?
Motion carried.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 478 be ordered to a third reading?
