Subjects: All matters affecting the availability of hospice care to those in need of it.
Driessen, Anthony H.
S122
Organization's authorization of additional lobbyists:
The following organizations previously registered with the Ethics Board as employers of lobbyists have authorized to act on their behalf these additional licensed lobbyists:
Blood Center of Southeastern Wisconsin, Inc.
Intrater, Michelle R.
Electric Power Co, Wisconsin
Earl, Anthony S.
Fair Liquidation of Waste (FLOW)
Jentz, Robert
Mielke, William
MCI Communications Corp.
Driessen, Anthony
Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club
Grebe, Michael
Paper Council, Wisconsin
Wilusz, Edward J.
PrimeCare Health Plan
Intrater, Michelle R.
Organization's termination of lobbyists:
Each of the following organizations previously registered with the Ethics Board as the employer of a lobbyist has withdrawn, on the date indicated, its authorization for the lobbyist identified to act on the organization's behalf.
Blood Center of Southeastern Wisconsin, Inc.
Klauser, David 2/27/95
Prosecutors, Assn. of State
Klauser, David 3/2/95
Also available from the Wisconsin Ethics Board are reports identifying the amount and value of time state agencies have spent to affect legislative action and reports of expenditures for lobbying activities filed by the organizations that employ lobbyists.
Sincerely,
R. Roth Judd
Executive Director
Senate Joint Resolution 6
Relating to: convening a Conference of the States.
Read.
__________________
Senator Moen asked unanimous consent that the Senate stand recessed for 1 hour and 3minutes.
The senate stood recessed.
10:15 A.M.
__________________
11:18 A.M.
The senate reconvened.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that Senator Joint Resolution 6 be referred to the special committee on State and Federal Relations.
Senate Bill 49
Relating to: the interstate transportation of gambling devices and exempting persons in the business of shipbuilding from laws prohibiting certain gambling activities.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 49?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Farrow, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 49
Read a third time and passed.
Senator Ellis , with unanimous consent, asked that all action be ordered immediately messaged to the Assembly.
Senate Bill 64
Relating to: damage to transmission facilities and providing penalties.
Read a second time.
Senator Leean, with unanimous consent, asked that
Senate Bill 64 be referred to the joint committee on Finance.
Senate Bill 87
Relating to: the labeling of certain gasoline.
Read a second time.
Senator Leean, with unanimous consent, asked that
Senate Bill 87 be referred to the joint committee on Finance.
Senate Bill 89
Relating to: the sale and purchase of reformulated gasoline containing methyl tertiary butyl ether or ethyl tertiary butyl ether and the labeling of certain reformulated gasoline.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 89?
Adopted.
Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 89 offered by Senators Burke, Andrea and Moore.
The question was: Adoption of Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 89?
Senator Cowles moved rejection of Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 89.
The question was: Rejection of Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 89?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 15; absent or not voting, 0 as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Leean, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plewa, C. Potter, Risser and Wineke - 15.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 89 offered by Senator Adelman.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 89?
S123
Senator Cowles moved rejection of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to
Senate Bill 89.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 89?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 15; absent or not voting, 0 as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Leean, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plewa, C. Potter, Risser and Wineke - 15.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 89 offered by Senator Adelman.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 89?
Senator Weeden raised the point of order that Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 is not germane.
The Chair rules the point well taken.
Senator Adelman appealed the ruling of the chair.
The queston was: Shall the decision of the Chair stands as the judgement of the Senate?
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 15; absent or not voting, 0 as follows: